Skip to main content
Log in

Excess costs associated with patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension in a US privately insured population

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a rare but fatal disease. Little is known about the economic burden associated with PAH patients in the US.

Objectives

The objective of this study was to estimate excess direct costs associated with privately insured PAH patients in the US.

Methods

From a privately insured claims database (>8 million beneficiaries, 2002–7), 471 patients with PAH were identified using the criteria: two or more claims for primary pulmonary hypertension (PH), International Classification of Diseases, ninth edition, clinical modification (ICD-9-CM) code 416.0; no left heart disease, lung diseases, chronic thromboembolic PH or miscellaneous PH diagnoses within 12 months prior or 1 month after the initial PH claim (index date); one or more claim for right heart catheterization (RHC) within 6 months prior to any PH claim or one or more claim for echocardiogram within 6 months prior to a specialist-diagnosed PH claim; aged 18–64 years. Patients with PAH were matched demographically to controls without PH. Patients were followed as long as continuously eligible; mean follow-up of PAH patients was 24.8 months. Chi-squared tests were used to compare baseline co-morbidities. Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to compare direct (medical and pharmaceutical) patient-month costs to insurers.

Results

The average age for PAH patients was 52.2 years, and 55.8% were women. Compared with controls, PAH patients had significantly higher baseline rates of co-morbidities (e.g. essential hypertension, diabetes mellitus and congestive heart failure) and a higher mean Charlson Co-morbidity Index score. Mean direct patient-month costs (year 2007 values) were $US2023 for PAH patients and $US498 for controls (p< 0.0001), yielding excess costs of $US1525. Sensitivity analysis restricting the sample to patients diagnosed following RHC yielded a 64% increase in excess costs relative to the original sample. Regarding cost drivers, inpatient services accounted for 45%, outpatient and other services for 38% and prescription drugs for 15% of total direct healthcare costs per patient-month in PAH patients. Circulatory/respiratory system-related patient-month costs were $US724 among PAH patients and $US114 among controls (p< 0.0001).

Conclusions

Patients with PAH had substantially higher costs and co-morbidity than controls, with circulatory/respiratory system-related costs accounting for 40% of excess costs. The high burden of illness suggests opportunities for savings from improved management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Table I
Table II
Table III
Table IV
Table V

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McLaughlin VV, Archer SL, Badesch DB, et al. AC-CF/AHA 2009 expert consensus document on pulmonary arterial hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 53(17): 1573–619

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Thenappan T, Shah SJ, Rich S, et al. A USA-based registry for pulmonary arterial hypertension: 1982–2006. Eur Respir J 2007; 30: 1103–10

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Peacock AJ. Treatment of pulmonary hypertension. BMJ 2003; 326: 835–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Galie N, Manes A, Branzi A. Emerging medical therapies for pulmonary arterial hypertension. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2002; 45(3): 213–24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Benedict N, Seybert A, Mathier M. Evidence-based pharmacologic management of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Clin Ther 2007; 29(10): 2134–53

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Murali S. Pulmonary arterial hypertension. Curr Opin Crit Care 2006; 12: 228–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Simonneau G, Galie N, Rubin LJ, et al. Clinical classification of pulmonary hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 43: 5–12S

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Simonneau G, Robbins IM, Beghetti M, et al. Updated clinical classification of pulmonary hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009 Jun 30; 54(1 Suppl.): S43–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Clinical and cost effectiveness of treatments for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) within their licensed indications. London: NICE, 2007 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/PAHassessmentreport.pdf [Accessed 2009 Nov 20]

    Google Scholar 

  10. Michelakis ED, Tymchak W, Noga M, et al. Long-term treatment with oral sildenafil is safe and improved functional capacity and hemodynamics in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Circulation 2003; 108(17): 2066–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hoeper MM, Faulenbach C, Golpon H, et al. Combination therapy with bosentan and sildenafil in idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur Respir J 2004; 24(6): 1007–10

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Angalakuditi M, Edgell E, Beardsworth A, et al. Treatment patterns and resource utilization and costs among patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension in the United States. J Med Econ 2010; 13(3): 393–402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Peacock AJ, Murphy NF, McMurray JJV, et al. An epidemiological study of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur Respir J 2007; 30: 104–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Chin KM, Rubin LJ. Pulmonary arterial hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 51: 1527–38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Champion HC, Michelakis ED, Hassoun PM. Comprehensive invasive and noninvasive approach to the right ventricle pulmonary circulation unit: state of the art and clinical and research implications. Circulation 2009; 120: 992–1007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, et al. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987; 40(5): 373–83

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Romano PS, Roos LL, Jollis J. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data. J Clin Epidemiol 1993; 46(10): 1075–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Consumer price index for medical care services, 2009 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.bls.gov/cpi/ [Accessed 2009 Nov 23]

    Google Scholar 

  19. Einarson TR, Granton JT, Vicente C, et al. Cost-effectiveness of treprostinil versus epoprostenol in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension: a Canadian analysis. Can Respir J 2005 Nov-Dec; 12(8): 419–25

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wilkens H, Grimminger F, Hoeper M, et al. Burden of pulmonary arterial hypertension in Germany. Respir Med 2010 Jun; 104(6): 902–10

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Macchia A, Marchioli R, Marfisi R, et al. A meta-analysis of trials of pulmonary hypertension: a clinical condition looking for drugs and research methodology. Am Heart J 2007; 153: 1037–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ghofrani HA, Wilkins MW, Rich S. Uncertainties in the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Circulation 2008; 118: 1195–201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Galiè N, Palazzini M, Manes A. Pulmonary arterial hypertension: from the kingdom of the near-dead to multiple clinical trial meta-analyses. Eur Heart J 2010 Sep; 31(17): 2080–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Chen YF, Jowett S, Barton P, et al. Clinical and cost-effectiveness of epoprostenol, iloprost, bosentan, sitaxentan and sildenafil for pulmonary arterial hypertension within their licensed indications: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 2009 Oct; 13(49): 1–320

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Research and writing support was provided to Analysis Group, Inc. by Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals.

Dr Kirson, Dr Birnbaum, Ms Ivanova and Ms Waldman are employees of Analysis Group, Inc. Drs Joish and Williamson are employees of Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals. The authors wish to thank Dr David Muccino for his assistance in reviewing the final manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Noam Y. Kirson PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kirson, N.Y., Birnbaum, H.G., Ivanova, J.I. et al. Excess costs associated with patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension in a US privately insured population. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 9, 293–303 (2011). https://doi.org/10.2165/11592430-000000000-00000

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/11592430-000000000-00000

Keywords

Navigation