Abstract
Recent advances in our understanding of the pathophysiology of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) have led to the US FDA’s approval of eight drugs for its treatment. Although guidelines for the use of PAH therapies are available and regularly updated, there is a lack of information on how these agents differ and what characteristics may enable one agent to be of greater relative clinical utility than another. Oral agents may be compared across a variety of measures, including clinical efficacy, safety and tolerability, dosing and pharmacology, potential for drug interactions, treatment adherence and suitability for use in combination regimens. Although no large, prospective, head-to-head trial has been conducted with oral agents for PAH, data from placebo-controlled studies indicate that the enrolled patient populations were remarkably homogeneous with respect to demographic and disease severity parameters. In general, data suggest that these agents improve functional capacity, delay disease progression and improve haemodynamics. Additionally, long-term sustainability of response has been demonstrated. However, there was no consistently superior agent across the primary and secondary endpoints assessed in these trials, and the magnitudes of improvements were in a fairly defined range across agents. Consequently, treatment choice may shift to other aspects such as drug safety and tolerability, potential for drug interactions, dosing convenience, treatment adherence, effect on quality of life and access to medication. In this review, the four targeted oral agents approved for the treatment of PAH in the US are reviewed, and clinical results are placed into context.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Humbert M, Sitbon O, Simonneau G. Treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension. N Engl J Med 2004; 351(14): 1425–36
D’Alonzo GE, Barst RJ, Ayres SM, et al. Survival in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension: results from a national prospective registry. Ann Intern Med 1991; 115(5): 343–9
Humbert M, Sitbon O, Chaouat A, et al. Pulmonary arterial hypertension in France: results from a national registry. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006; 173(9): 1023–30
Thenappan T, Shah SJ, Rich S, et al. Survival in pulmonary arterial hypertension: a reappraisal of the NIH risk stratification equation. Eur Respir J 2010; 35: 1079–87
Barst RJ, Rubin LJ, Long WA, et al. A comparison of continuous intravenous epoprostenol (prostacyclin) with conventional therapy for primary pulmonary hypertension. N Engl J Med 1996; 334(5): 296–301
McLaughlin VV, Gaine SP, Barst RJ, et al. Efficacy and safety of treprostinil: an epoprostenol analog for primary pulmonary hypertension. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 2003; 41(2): 293–9
Olschewski H, Simonneau G, Galie N, et al. Inhaled iloprost for severe pulmonary hypertension. N Engl J Med 2002; 347(5): 322–9
Steiner MK, Preston IR. Optimizing endothelin receptor antagonist use in the management of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Vasc Health Risk Manag 2008; 4(5): 943–52
Driscoll JA, Chakinala MM. Medical therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2008; 9(1): 65–81
Badesch DB, Abman SH, Ahearn GS, et al. Medical therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 2004; 126(1 Suppl.): 35S–62S
Badesch DB, Abman SH, Simonneau G, et al. Medical therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension: updated ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 2007; 131(6): 1917–28
Barst RJ, Gibbs JS, Ghofrani HA, et al. Updated evidence-based treatment algorithm in pulmonary arterial hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 54(1 Suppl.): S78–84
Marasciulo FL, Montagnani M, Potenza MA. Endothelin-1: the yin and yang on vascular function. Curr Med Chem 2006; 13(14): 1655–65
Opitz CF, Ewert R, Kirch W, et al. Inhibition of endothelin receptors in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension: does selectivity matter? Eur Heart J 2008; 29(16): 1936–48
Valerio CJ, Kabunga P, Coghlan JG. Safety and efficacy of ambrisentan in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Clin Med Ther 2009; 1: 541–56
Letairis® (ambrisentan) tablets [package insert]. Foster City (CA): Gilead Sciences, Inc., 2009
Greene S, Nunley K, Weber S, et al. ETA vs ETB receptor selectivity of endothelin-1 receptor antagonists in human myocardial membranes [abstract]. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 47 Suppl.: 307A
Giaid A, Saleh D. Reduced expression of endothelial nitric oxide synthase in the lungs of patients with pulmonary hypertension. N Engl J Med 1995; 333(4): 214–21
Kass DA, Champion HC, Beavo JA. Phosphodiesterase type 5: expanding roles in cardiovascular regulation. Circ Res 2007; 101(11): 1084–95
Rosen RC, Kostis JB. Overview of phosphodiesterase 5 inhibition in erectile dysfunction. Am J Cardiol 2003; 92(9A): 9M–18M
Wright PJ. Comparison of phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors. Int J Clin Pract 2006; 60(8): 967–75
Sharma R. Novel phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors: current indications and future directions. Indian J Med Sci 2007; 61(12): 667–79
Gupta M, Kovar A, Meibohm B. The clinical pharmaco-kinetics of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors for erectile dysfunction. J Clin Pharmacol 2005; 45(9): 987–1003
Forgue ST, Patterson BE, Bedding AW, et al. Tadalafil pharmacokinetics in healthy subjects. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2006; 61(3): 280–8
Adcirca® (tadalafil) tablets [package insert]. Indianapolis (IN): Eli Lilly and Company, 2009
Revatio® (sildenafil citrate) tablets [package insert]. New York: Pfizer Inc., 2007
Tracleer® (bosentan) tablets [package insert]. South San Francisco (CA): Actelion Pharmaceuticals US, 2009
Weber C, Banken L, Birnboeck H, et al. Effect of the endothelin-receptor antagonist bosentan on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin. J Clin Pharmacol 1999; 39(8): 847–54
Richards DB, Walker GA, Mandagere A, et al. Effect of ketoconazole on the pharmacokinetic profile of ambrisentan. J Clin Pharmacol 2009; 49(6): 719–24
Kloner RA. Pharmacology and drug interaction effects of the phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors: focus on alpha-blocker interactions. Am J Cardiol 2005; 96(12B): 42M–6M
Burgess G, Hoogkamer H, Collings L, et al. Mutual pharmacokinetic interactions between steady-state bosentan and sildenafil. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2008; 64(1): 43–50
Wrishko RE, Dingemanse J, Yu A, et al. Pharmacokinetic interaction between tadalafil and bosentan in healthy male subjects. J Clin Pharmacol 2008; 48(5): 610–8
Spence R, Mandagere A, Dufton C, et al. Pharmacokinetics and safety of ambrisentan in combination with sildenafil in healthy volunteers. J Clin Pharmacol 2008; 48(12): 1451–9
Spence R, Harrison B, Mandagere A, et al. No clinically relevant pharmacokinetic interactions between ambrisentan and tadalafil [abstract]. Chest 2008; 134(4): p161002
Galiè N, Brundage BH, Ghofrani HA, et al. Tadalafil therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension. Circulation 2009; 119(22): 2894–903
Galiè N, Ghofrani HA, Torbicki A, et al. Sildenafil citrate therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension. N Engl J Med 2005; 353(20): 2148–57
Galiè N, Olschewski H, Oudiz RJ, et al. Ambrisentan for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension: results of the Ambrisentan in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, efficacy (ARIES) study 1 and 2. Circulation 2008; 117(23): 3010–9
Rubin LJ, Badesch DB, Barst RJ, et al. Bosentan therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension. N Engl J Med 2002; 346(12): 896–903
Data on file, United Therapeutics Corporation, Research Triangle Park (NC): 2008
Frost AE, Langleben D, Oudiz R, et al. The 6-min walk test (6MW) as an efficacy endpoint in pulmonary arterial hypertension clinical trials: demonstration of a ceiling effect. Vascul Pharmacol 2005; 43(1): 36–9
McLaughlin VV, Oudiz RJ, Frost A, et al. Randomized study of adding inhaled iloprost to existing bosentan in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006; 174(11): 1257–63
Simonneau G, Rubin LJ, Galie N, et al. Addition of sildenafil to long-term intravenous epoprostenol therapy in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2008; 149(8): 521–30
Galie N, Rubin L, Hoeper M, et al. Treatment of patients with mildly symptomatic pulmonary arterial hypertension with bosentan (EARLY study): a double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2008; 371(9630): 2093–100
Channick RN, Simonneau G, Sitbon O, et al. Effects of the dual endothelin-receptor antagonist bosentan in patients with pulmonary hypertension: a randomised placebo-controlled study. Lancet 2001; 358(9288): 1119–23
McLaughlin VV, Sitbon O, Badesch DB, et al. Survival with first-line bosentan in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension. Eur Respir J 2005; 25(2): 244–9
Provencher S, Sitbon O, Humbert M, et al. Long-term outcome with first-line bosentan therapy in idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur Heart J 2006; 27(5): 589–95
McLaughlin V. Long-term ambrisentan therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension in patients who previously received placebo in ARIES-1 or ARIES-2 [abstract]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2008; 177: A697
Rubin LJ, Badesch D, Fleming T, et al. Long-term treatment with sildenafil citrate in pulmonary arterial hypertension [abstract]. Chest 2008; 134: s40003
Oudiz R, Beardsworth A, Chan MLS, et al. Blinded, longterm safety and efficacy of tadalafil in treatment for pulmonary arterial hypertension [abstract]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2009; 179: A1042
Wilkins MR, Paul GA, Strange JW, et al. Sildenafil versus Endothelin Receptor Antagonist for Pulmonary Hypertension (SERAPH) study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005; 171(11): 1292–7
Humbert M, Segal ES, Kiely DG, et al. Results of European post-marketing surveillance of bosentan in pulmonary hypertension. Eur Respir J 2007; 30(2): 338–44
Galie N, Badesch D, Oudiz R, et al. Ambrisentan therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46(3): 529–35
Spence S, Anderson C, Cukierski M, et al. Teratogenic effects of the endothelin receptor antagonist L-753,037 in the rat. Reprod Toxicol 1999; 13(1): 15–29
Gruenig E, Michelakis ED, Vachiery JL, et al. Acute administration of sildenafil in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) treated with bosentan produced a significant hemodynamic response: results of the COMPASS-1 study [abstract]. Eur Heart J 2007; 28 Suppl.: 140
Actelion. Effects of the combination of bosentan and sildenafil versus sildenafil monotherapy on pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) (COMPASS 2) [online]. Available from URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00303459 [Accessed 2009 Oct 7]
Humbert M, Barst RJ, Robbins IM, et al. Combination of bosentan with epoprostenol in pulmonary arterial hypertension: BREATHE-2. Eur Respir J 2004; 24(3): 353–9
Hoeper MM, Leuchte H, Halank M, et al. Combining inhaled iloprost with bosentan in patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur Respir J 2006; 28(4): 691–4
Acknowledgements
Editorial assistance was provided under the direction of the author by MedThink Communications, Inc., with support from United Therapeutics Corporation. Dr Safdar has received consultancy fees and honoraria from United Therapeutics, Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd, and Gilead Sciences, Inc., and has stock ownership options of less than $US5000.00 for Gilead Sciences, Encysive Pharmaceuticals Inc., and United Therapeutics. Dr Safdar did not receive any funding for the preparation of this review article. The decision to submit this manuscript to Clinical Drug Investigation was made by Dr Safdar.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Safdar, Z. Targeted Oral Therapies in the Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Clin. Drug Investig. 30, 811–826 (2010). https://doi.org/10.2165/11538870-000000000-00000
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/11538870-000000000-00000