Chest
Volume 120, Issue 3, September 2001, Pages 757-764
Journal home page for Chest

Clinical Investigations
Muscle Strength
Inspiratory Muscle Strength in Acute Asthma

https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.120.3.757Get rights and content

Abstract

Study objectives

The aim of this study was to measure inspiratory pressure-generating capacity in patients presenting with acute asthma, as it has been suggested that inspiratory muscle fatigue may contribute to breathlessness and acute respiratory failure.

Design

Descriptive study.

Setting

Emergency departments of two inner-city hospitals.

Patients

Fifty-one patients with acute asthma, and 45 patients without respiratory disease who served as control subjects.

Measurements and results

Maximum inspiratory pressure-generating capacity was measured soon after presentation by the sniff nasal inspiratory pressure (SNIP) method. The mean (SD) SNIP was 110 cm H2O (23 cm H2O) in men with asthma (mean for control subjects, 126 cm H2O [25 cm H2O]; p < 0.05) and 80 cm H2O [24 cm H2O] in women with asthma (mean for control subjects, 105 cm H2O (26 cm H2O); p < 0.01). In a second study of simultaneous SNIP and intrathoracic pressure measurements in a group of patients with acute asthma (n = 10) and control subjects (n = 11), the effect of airways obstruction on SNIP was assessed. The measurement of sniff esophageal pressure was more negative than SNIP by approximately 16% in asthmatic patients and by 4% in control subjects. Taking account of the likely effect of airways obstruction on SNIP, the reduction in inspiratory pressure-generating capacity that was observed in these patients with moderately severe acute asthma was minor and was consistent with the modest hyperinflation observed.

Conclusions

This study did not find evidence of inspiratory muscle weakness or fatigue in patients with moderately severe acute asthma presenting to the emergency department.

Section snippets

Materials and Methods

The study protocol was approved by the research ethics committees of the two hospitals concerned, and all patients gave informed consent

First Study

Measurements were made on 57 patients and 47 control subjects. The data on six patients with asthma and two control subjects were subsequently excluded from the analysis. The reasons for the exclusions from the asthma group were poor reversibility of airway obstruction (two patients), history of smoking (two patients), consolidation on chest radiograph (one patient), and uncertainty over the cause of breathlessness (one patient). In the control group, two patients had evidence of airways

Discussion

Our data show that the SNIP was around 20% lower in patients with acute moderately severe asthma than in a comparable group of control subjects. However, the difference in intrathoracic pressure generation between the asthmatic patients and the control subjects would have been considerably less than this when the loss of pressure transmission to the nostril in the asthmatic patients, as demonstrated in the second study, is taken into consideration. This showed that SNIP underestimated

Summary

The SNIP maneuver could be performed by all patients, and the reproducibility of this measurement was as good when the patients were ill as when they were well. A total of 15 measurements can be managed by acutely ill patients and provides a more accurate measurement of inspiratory muscle strength than does 10. Inspiratory muscle strength is close to normal in patients with moderately severe acute asthma who are presenting to emergency departments.

References (21)

  • MH Lavietes et al.

    Inspiratory muscle strength in asthma

    Chest

    (1988)
  • D Stefanutti et al.

    Sniff nasal inspiratory pressure: reference values in caucasian children

    Am J Respir Crit Care Med

    (1999)
  • S Chinn

    Repeatability and method comparison

    Thorax

    (1991)
  • P Armitage et al.

    Further experimental designs

  • T Wanke et al.

    Dependence of maximal sniff generated mouth and transdiaphragmatic pressure on lung volume

    Thorax

    (1990)
  • JG Martin et al.

    Mechanical load and inspiratory muscle action during induced asthma

    Am Rev Respir Dis

    (1983)
  • DK McKenzie et al.

    Strength and endurance of inspiratory, expiratory, and limb muscles in asthma

    Am Rev Respir Dis

    (1986)
  • AJ Woolcock et al.

    Lung volume changes in asthma measured concurrently by two methods

    Am Rev Respir Dis

    (1971)
  • CS Roussos et al.

    Diaphragmatic fatigue in man

    J Appl Physiol

    (1977)
  • G Tzelepis et al.

    Increased lung volume limits endurance of inspiratory muscles

    J Appl Physiol

    (1988)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (29)

  • Activity limitation and exertional dyspnea in adult asthmatic patients: What do we know?

    2016, Respiratory Medicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    de Bruin et al. have observed significantly lower MIP values in asthmatic subjects than in healthy subjects (−52 ± 18 vs −73 ± 21 cm H2O respectively) [18] By studying steroid-dependent and non-dependent asthma patients, Perez et al. found, comparing to a control group, significant lower values in the first group but not in the second one [19]. Conversely, Stell et al., using another technique (Sniff Nasal Inspiratory Pressure, SNIP) showed that in patients with asthma of moderate severity values were comparable to those of non-asthmatic subjects [20]. Concerning the relationship between respiratory muscle strength and lung volume measurements, data are also contradictory.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text