Chest
Original ResearchCOPDA Call for High-Quality Advance Care Planning in Outpatients With Severe COPD or Chronic Heart Failure
Section snippets
Design
This prospective cross-sectional study is part of a longitudinal study concerning self-perceived symptoms and care needs in patients with severe COPD or CHF and the consequences for their closest relatives.19 The methodology of this study was described previously,19 and details are provided in e-Appendix 1. The Medical Ethical Commission of the Maastricht University Medical Centre + (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands, approved this study (MEC 07-3-054).
Study Population
The study population consisted of a
General Patient Characteristics
One hundred five patients with COPD and 80 patients with CHF were included. The proportion of eligible patients who participated in the study was 62.9% for patients with COPD and 46.0% for patients with CHF (P < .05). Chest physicians referred a median of five (one to 10) patients, and cardiologists referred two (one to three) participating patients. Most patients with COPD had very severe COPD (GOLD stage IV, 73.3%). Patients with CHF were classified mainly as NYHA class III (92.5%). On
Discussion
The present study shows that the majority of Dutch outpatients with clinically stable severe COPD or CHF are able to indicate their preferences regarding life-sustaining treatments, depending on burden of treatment, outcome of treatment, and likelihood of outcome. Despite the fact that patients can indicate preferences regarding life-sustaining treatments and end-of-life care, these preferences are rarely discussed with their physician specialist. Indeed, patients rate quality of
Conclusions
To conclude, the current findings emphasize the lack of advance care planning in Dutch clinically stable outpatients with severe COPD or CHF. Increased awareness among chest physicians and cardiologists that advance care planning is an essential component of care for patients with severe COPD or CHF is necessary. Finally, the quality of patient-physician end-of-life care communication needs to improve.
Acknowledgments
Author contributions: Dr Janssen had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Dr Janssen: contributed to the study concept and design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting of the article, critical revision of the article for important intellectual content, and final approval of the version to be published.
Dr Spruit: contributed to the study concept and design, acquisition
References (35)
- et al.
Association of depression and life-sustaining treatment preferences in patients with COPD
Chest
(2005) - et al.
Patients' perspectives on physician skill in end-of-life care: differences between patients with COPD, cancer, and AIDS
Chest
(2002) - et al.
A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation
J Chronic Dis
(1987) - et al.
Ventilation in a Birmingham intensive care unit 1993-1995: outcome for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Respir Med
(1998) - et al.
Barriers and facilitators to end-of-life care communication for patients with COPD
Chest
(2005) - et al.
Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments. Perceptions by family members of the dying experience of older and seriously ill patients
Ann Intern Med
(1997) - et al.
An official American Thoracic Society clinical policy statement: palliative care for patients with respiratory diseases and critical illnesses
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
(2008) - et al.
Palliative care in heart failure: a position statement from the palliative care workshop of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology
Eur J Heart Fail
(2009) - et al.
End-of-life preferences in elderly patients admitted for heart failure
QJM
(2004) - et al.
Resuscitation preferences among patients with severe congestive heart failure: results from the SUPPORT project
Circulation
(1998)
Life-sustaining treatments in patients who died of chronic congestive heart failure compared with metastatic cancer
Crit Care Med
Attitudes of 100 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease to artificial ventilation and cardiopulmonary resuscitation
Palliat Med
Attitudes regarding advance directives among patients in pulmonary rehabilitation
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
Understanding the treatment preferences of seriously ill patients
N Engl J Med
Assessment of patient preferences: integrating treatments and outcomes
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci
Advance directives and outcomes of surrogate decision making before death
N Engl J Med
The impact of advance care planning on end of life care in elderly patients: randomised controlled trial
BMJ
Cited by (119)
Unmet needs in end-of-life care for heart failure patients
2024, International Journal of CardiologyDevelopment and preliminary validation of a scale to assess physicians' emotional distress intolerance in end-of-life care communication
2022, Palliative and Supportive CareAmerican Muslim Engagement With Advance Care Planning: Insights From a Community Survey
2024, American Journal of Hospice and Palliative MedicinePracticing Serious Illness Conversations in a Pulmonary Medicine Teaching Clinic
2024, American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine
Funding/Support: This project was supported by Proteion Thuis and CIRO+, Centre of Expertise for Chronic Organ Failure, Horn, The Netherlands; The Netherlands Asthma Foundation, Leusden, The Netherlands [Grant 3.4.06.082]; and Stichting Wetenschapsbevordering Verpleeghuiszorg (SWBV), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Reproduction of this article is prohibited without written permission from the American College of Chest Physicians (http://www.chestpubs.org/site/misc/reprints.xhtml).