Elsevier

Toxicology Letters

Volume 149, Issues 1–3, 1 April 2004, Pages 295-300
Toxicology Letters

Risk factors of jet fuel combustion products

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2003.12.040Get rights and content

Abstract

Air travel is increasing and airports are being newly built or enlarged. Concern is rising about the exposure to toxic combustion products in the population living in the vicinity of large airports.

Jet fuels are well characterized regarding their physical and chemical properties. Health effects of fuel vapors and liquid fuel are described after occupational exposure and in animal studies. Rather less is known about combustion products of jet fuels and exposure to those.

Aircraft emissions vary with the engine type, the engine load and the fuel. Among jet aircrafts there are differences between civil and military jet engines and their fuels. Combustion of jet fuel results in CO2, H2O, CO, C, NOx, particles and a great number of organic compounds. Among the emitted hydrocarbons (HCs), no compound (indicator) characteristic for jet engines could be detected so far. Jet engines do not seem to be a source of halogenated compounds or heavy metals. They contain, however, various toxicologically relevant compounds including carcinogenic substances. A comparison between organic compounds in the emissions of jet engines and diesel vehicle engines revealed no major differences in the composition. Risk factors of jet engine fuel exhaust can only be named in context of exposure data. Using available monitoring data, the possibilities and limitations for a risk assessment approach for the population living around large airports are presented. The analysis of such data shows that there is an impact on the air quality of the adjacent communities, but this impact does not result in levels higher than those in a typical urban environment.

Introduction

The increasing air travel worldwide leads to building of new airports and enlargement of existing airports. Concern is rising about the exposure to toxic combustion products of jet fuel in the population living in the vicinity of large airports.

Jet fuels are well characterized regarding their physical and chemical properties. Health effects of fuel vapors and of liquid fuel via skin contact are described after occupational exposure and in animal studies. Rather less is known about combustion products of jet fuels and exposure to those.

The present knowledge about possible health risk factor deriving from exposure to jet engine exhaust is described. Using available monitoring data, a risk assessment approach is demonstrated for the population living around large airports.

Section snippets

Aviation fuels

Jet engines are fuelled with kerosene, which is a complex mixture of hydrocarbons (HCs) with a boiling point range between 145 and 300 °C. Jet fuels are a similar petroleum fraction (middle distillation range) as heating oil and diesel fuel. The major aviation fuels are jet propulsion fuel 8 (JP-8) for military engines and Jet A1 for civil aviation engines. The properties of Jet A1 turbine fuel including specification of additive are defined in the Defence Standard DEF STAN 91-91/1 (1994). Some

Jet engine emissions

Aircraft emissions vary with the engine type, the engine load and the fuel. Among jet aircrafts, there are differences between civil and military jet engines and their fuels. The ICAO (1981) gives emission limits for turbine engines with a performance >26.7 kN. The regulated components are: hydrocarbons, nitrogen oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO) and smoke number (SN). The engine emissions are measured according to a defined test cycle, the landing and take off (LTO) cycle. This test cycle

Toxicology of jet engine emissions

Although the toxicology and carcinogenicity of some jet fuels as such has been evaluated (IARC, 1989a), comparable studies on jet engine emissions as they exist for Diesel and gasoline engine emissions (IARC, 1989b) are not yet available. Health effect after occupational exposure to jet engine emissions—like eye and respiratory irritations due to aldehydes—have been described (Miyamato, 1986, Kobayashi and Kikukawa, 2000, Tunnicliffe et al., 1999). A study on cancer incidence in occupationally

Exposure to jet fuel combustion products around airports

Since no indicator or characteristic compound for jet engine emissions has been found, monitoring ambient air concentrations is the only approach to measure at least for non occupationally human exposure. Monitoring data of air pollutants are available for many airports, but they are mostly restricted to classical pollutants like sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide and particles and a few others in special monitoring programs. Table 6 summarizes such data for the German airports of

Conclusions

Available data on jet engine fuels and their combustion products reveal no specific toxic compound that can be used as a marker or indicator for exposure. Higher alkanes may be an indicator for occupationally exposed persons. For a population living in the vicinity of a large airport, risk assessment can only be achieved by relying on air monitoring data. Such data show that there is an impact on the air quality of the adjacent communities, but that impact does not result in levels higher than

References (18)

  • Dannecker, W., 1983. Untersuchungen der Emissionen von Flugtriebwerken zur Bestimmung der darin enthaltenen...
  • DEF STAN 91-91/1, 1994. DERD (Directorate of Engine Research and Development) 2494: Turbine Fuel, Aviation, Kerosene...
  • Eickhoff, W., 1998. Emissionen organisch-chemischer Verbindungen aus zivilen Flugzeugtriebwerken. HLfU (Hessische...
  • Health Council of the Netherlands. Committee on the Health Impact of Large Airports, 1999. Public Health Impact of...
  • ICAO (International Civil Aviation Organisation), 1981. International Standards and Recommended Practices,...
  • IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer), 1989a. Occupational Exposures in Petroleum Refining: Crude Oil and...
  • IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer), 1989b. Diesel and Gasoline Exhausts and Some Nitroarenes, vol. 46....
  • Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, 2002. Chicago O’Hare Airport. Air Toxic Monitoring Program June–December...
  • A. Kobayashi et al.

    Increased formaldehyde jet engine exhaust with changes to JP-8, lower temperature, and lower humidity irritates eyes and respiratory tract

    Aviation Space Environ. Med.

    (2000)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (49)

  • Effects of short-term exposures to ultrafine particles near an airport in healthy subjects

    2020, Environment International
    Citation Excerpt :

    Moreover, little is known about aviation-related UFP exposure, as most studies focus on road-traffic-related UFP (Ohlwein et al., 2019). UFP levels have been shown to be elevated around large airports (Hudda et al., 2018, 2014; Keuken et al., 2015), reaching similar levels as urbanised areas (Tesseraux, 2004), with different sources influencing UFP composition and size. Aviation-related UFP tend to be smaller (mainly 10–20 nm (Keuken et al., 2015; Mazaheri et al., 2013; Stacey, 2019)) than those from road traffic (mainly > 50 nm (Harrison et al., 2011; Liu et al., 2015; Ntziachristos et al., 2007)), although an overlap in size range exists, especially in the 20–30 nm range (Voogt et al., 2019).

  • VOC tracers from aircraft activities at Beirut Rafic Hariri International Airport

    2019, Atmospheric Pollution Research
    Citation Excerpt :

    The above studies provide a significant insight into VOC (mainly non-methane hydrocarbon (NMHC)) speciation from aircraft exhaust. However, no special jet exhaust VOC was identified as tracer (Schürmann et al., 2007; Tesseraux, 2004). The identification of aircraft tracers is essential for the assessment of the impact of the airport activities on air quality.

  • Aircraft engine exhaust emissions and other airport-related contributions to ambient air pollution: A review

    2014, Atmospheric Environment
    Citation Excerpt :

    Air quality degradation in the locality of airports is considered by some to pose a real public health hazard (Barrett et al., 2013) and some recent estimates of the aviation contribution to premature mortality have been reported (e.g., Ratliff et al., 2009; Levy et al., 2012; Ashok et al., 2013; Yim et al., 2013). Although at the current time, no specific target toxic compound has been identified to be used as a marker or indicator for human exposure to jet engine fuels and their combustion products (Tesseraux, 2004), it has been estimated that over 2 million civilian and military personnel per year are occupationally exposed to jet fuels and exhaust gases (Pleil et al., 2000; Ritchie, 2003; Cavallo et al., 2006). Kerosene-based fuels have the potential to cause acute or persistent neurotoxic effects from acute, sub-chronic, or chronic exposure of humans or animals (Ritchie et al., 2001), although evidence is lacking that current levels of exposure are harmful.

View all citing articles on Scopus

Parts of this presentation have been published before: Tesseraux et al., 1998.

View full text