Effects of gender and posture on thoraco-abdominal kinematics during quiet breathing in healthy adults
Introduction
It is well known that posture influences thoraco-abdominal kinematics during spontaneous quiet breathing. Previous studies (Wade, 1954, Fugl-Meyer, 1974, Sharp et al., 1975, Verschakelen and Demedts, 1995, Lee et al., 2010) have investigated both erect (sitting or standing) and supine positions in healthy subjects, and have shown that quiet breathing is predominantly abdominal in the former and thoracic in the latter position.
On the other hand, the effect of gender on chest wall kinematics is still controversial. While some authors (Fugl-Meyer, 1974, Gilbert et al., 1981) reported a relatively greater rib cage motion in women, others (Sharp et al., 1975, Verschakelen and Demedts, 1995) did not. There is evidence in the literature, however, that the differences in pulmonary function (namely, lung volumes, maximal expiratory flow rates, diffusion surfaces and maximal pulmonary ventilation) between females and males are mostly due to the smaller height and trunk size in women (McClaran et al., 1998). These controversies remain when considering possible interactions between posture and gender on thoraco-abdominal motion during quiet breathing.
In the previous studies, different measurement techniques such as mercury-in-rubber strain gauges (Wade, 1954), linear differential transducers (Konno and Mead, 1967), magnetometers (Fugl-Meyer, 1974, Sharp et al., 1975, Gilbert et al., 1981), and respiratory inductive plethysmography (Verschakelen and Demedts, 1995) were used. The differences in experimental methods, particularly in the kind of measurement they provide (changes of diameters, perimeters, transversal sections), could contribute to the different findings regarding the effects of gender and possible interactions between posture and gender on chest wall kinematics.
Opto-Electronic Plethysmography (OEP, Cala et al., 1996) has been proposed as a new method that, starting from the three-dimensional coordinates of markers positioned on a subject's trunk and acquired by an opto-electronic system for motion analysis, allows the accurate measurement of the kinematics and the volume variations of the chest wall and its compartments (rib cage and abdomen) in different positions: standing, seated, supine (Aliverti et al., 2000), and prone (Aliverti et al., 2001).
The present study was conducted in order to prove the hypothesis that posture, gender and their interaction all have significant effects on rib cage and abdominal kinematics during quiet breathing and to clarify which are the limits of validity of chest wall kinematics measurements when considering different geometrical parameters. For these purposes, we used the novel OEP technique to study a group of healthy female and male subjects in different postures, i.e., different inclinations of the trunk from seated (with and without back support) to supine position. By using the same set of three-dimensional coordinates measured by the same opto-electronic system for motion analysis, we calculated simultaneous variations in diameters, perimeters, transversal sections and volumes at the levels of the rib cage and the abdomen as different descriptors of chest wall kinematics. In this way we aimed to exclude all the possible differences between these parameters due to measurement errors introduced by the different sensors and/or devices, which in part may explain the controversial results reported in the literature.
Section snippets
Subjects
34 healthy adults (17 females, 17 males) were recruited for the present study. The inclusion criteria were: absence of cardiac and pulmonary disease, no smokers, no endurance-trained athletes, and age higher than 18 years. Subjects’ characteristics are shown in Table 1.
The study was approved by the local Ethical committee of IRCCS “E. Medea” Institute where all the data acquisitions were performed and all subjects gave informed consent.
Protocol
For each subject, the data acquisition protocol consisted
Results
The anthropometric characteristics of the entire group and of the two subgroups were divided according to their gender (Table 1). The two gender subgroups were homogeneous in age but not in weight and height (p < 0.01).
Discussion
The main result of the present study is that chest wall kinematics and breathing pattern are significantly influenced by the position of the trunk and by gender. A progressively increased inclination of the trunk determines a progressive reduction of rib cage displacement, tidal volume, and minute ventilation and a progressive increase of abdominal contribution to tidal volume.
Female subjects are characterized by smaller dimensions confined in the rib cage compartment and during quiet breathing
Acknowledgement
The authors gratefully acknowledge M.H. Schwartz for the language revision.
References (22)
- et al.
Relationship of rib cage and abdomen motion to diaphragm function during quiet breathing
Chest
(1981) - et al.
Changes in sitting posture induce multiplanar changes in chest wall shape and motion with breathing
Respir. Physiol. Neurobiol.
(2010) - et al.
Abdominal and thoracic pressures at different lung volumes
J. Appl. Physiol.
(1960) - et al.
Optoelectronic plethysmography in intensive care patients
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.
(2000) - et al.
Compartmental analysis of breathing in the supine and prone positions by optoelectronic plethysmography
Ann. Biomed. Eng.
(2001) - et al.
Effect of posture on lung and regional chest wall mechanics
Anesthesiology
(1993) - et al.
Breathing pattern and kinematics in normal subjects during speech, singing and loud whispering
Acta Physiol.
(2006) - et al.
Sex differences in thoracic dimensions and configuration
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.
(2003) - et al.
Chest wall and lung volume estimation by optical reflectance motion analysis
J. Appl. Physiol.
(1996) Relative respiratory contribution of the rib cage and the abdomen in males and females with special regard to posture
Respiration
(1974)
Respiratory muscle action inferred from rib cage and abdominal V–P partitioning
J. Appl. Physiol.
Cited by (131)
Thoracic and abdominal breathing volumes in various body positions
2023, IFAC-PapersOnLineRespiratory pattern complexity in newly-diagnosed asthmatic patients
2022, Respiratory Physiology and NeurobiologyCitation Excerpt :Short-term and long-term variability (SD1 and SD2) were also good indicators of respiratory dynamics in asthma, and the higher value in asthmatic patients supports the increased irregularity in asthma. Our different outcome may result from the methodological differences in our study, especially postural variability that affects breathing patterns (Romei et al., 2010). Unlike our previous study (Raoufy et al., 2016), we took a simpler approach in visualizing IBI and LV indices that has not been previously explained.
Breathing patterns recognition: A functional data analysis approach
2022, Computer Methods and Programs in BiomedicineRespiratory function assessment at the time of a new respiratory virus pandemic
2021, Respiratory MedicineInfluence of the breathing pattern on the pulmonary function of endurance-trained athletes
2024, Scientific Reports