Elsevier

Lung Cancer

Volume 76, Issue 1, April 2012, Pages 1-18
Lung Cancer

Review
The challenge of NSCLC diagnosis and predictive analysis on small samples. Practical approach of a working group

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2011.10.017Get rights and content

Abstract

Until recently, the division of pulmonary carcinomas into small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was adequate for therapy selection. Due to the emergence of new treatment options subtyping of NSCLC and predictive testing have become mandatory. A practical approach to the new requirements involving interaction between pulmonologist, oncologist and molecular pathology to optimize patient care is described. The diagnosis of lung cancer involves (i) the identification and complete classification of malignancy, (ii) immunohistochemistry is used to predict the likely NSCLC subtype (squamous cell vs. adenocarcinoma), as in small diagnostic samples specific subtyping is frequently on morphological grounds alone not feasible (NSCLC-NOS), (iii) molecular testing. To allow the extended diagnostic and predictive examination (i) tissue sampling should be maximized whenever feasible and deemed clinically safe, reducing the need for re-biopsy for additional studies and (ii) tissue handling, processing and sectioning should be optimized.

Complex diagnostic algorithms are emerging, which will require close dialogue and understanding between pulmonologists and others who are closely involved in tissue acquisition, pathologists and oncologists who will ultimately, with the patient, make treatment decisions. Personalized medicine not only means the choice of treatment tailored to the individual patient, but also reflects the need to consider how investigative and diagnostic strategies must also be planned according to individual tumour characteristics.

Highlights

► The diagnosis of lung cancer involves the identification and complete classification of malignancy. ► New therapeutic options require specific subtyping of NSCLCs and, increasingly, the identification of therapeutically predictive molecular markers, to determine the safest and most effective choice of drugs. ► Small diagnostic sample size and tumour complexity often prevent specific subtyping on morphological grounds alone (NSCLC-NOS). ► Immunohistochemistry can predict the likely NSCLC subtype (squamous cell vs. adenocarcinoma) in most NSCLC-NOS cases. ► Tissue sampling should be maximized whenever feasible and deemed clinically safe, reducing the need for re-biopsy for additional studies. ► Tissue handling, processing and sectioning should minimize wastage and optimize use of tissue for diagnosis.

Section snippets

Background

For decades the simple division of pulmonary carcinomas into small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was adequate for the selection of patients for appropriate therapy. However, the emergence of new treatment options for subtypes of NSCLC has made definite histological subtyping mandatory. This is especially true for the distinction between squamous cell carcinomas (SqCC) from non-squamous cell carcinomas, the latter comprising mostly adenocarcinomas and large cell

General comments

Success in the cyto-histological diagnosis of lung cancer depends upon, among other things, the correct sampling and processing of tissue. For many patients this involves an invasive attempt to access intra-thoracic tumour at either the primary or a metastatic site. It is important to apply the correct methodology for obtaining and preserving these samples to be sent to the pathology laboratory. Although this is an important step in the diagnostic process, there are no guidelines to facilitate

General procedure and comments

The best strategy for the handling of small samples in suspected lung cancer is always based on accurate and relevant clinical information. The required clinical information is shown in Table 1. This information will be used by the pathologist to (i) determine priorities of the diagnostic approach (see below), (ii) determine how specific a diagnosis is required, (iii) plan the necessary investigations and anticipate the use of IHC and molecular biological tests, and (iv) prevent unnecessary

Mucin stain

The classical Alcian blue/periodic acid Schiff (AB/PAS) histochemical stain for mucin, when combined with p63 and TTF-1, represented the best panel for NSCLC subtyping with an accuracy of 86% and a reduction to 7% of the “NSCLC” diagnosis rate [64]. For resection specimens 5 vacuoles of mucin in two high power fields has been used as a criterion for solid adenocarcinoma with mucin [53], but for small biopsy samples even 1 or 2 unequivocal intracytoplasmic vacuoles may be diagnostic for

General comments

Biomarker analysis helpful in NSCLC therapy can be based on immunohistochemistry, FISH and DNA mutation analysis. As each successive handling and cutting of the paraffin block results in additional tissue loss ideally a standard preparation regimen for the handling of the biopsy should be implemented. Therefore procedures for EGFR testing cannot be addressed without covering other potential analyses to be performed on the same tissue.

As requirements regarding specific markers may vary

Conclusion

To provide meaningful information for treatment and making the best use of the available and often scarce material in the diagnostic work up of NSCLC applying quality approved and clinically relevant molecular testing only is mandatory. By additionally observing a simple procedure of specimen handling the need for rebiopsies and the rate of inconclusive molecular tests can be kept as low as possible. The pathologists in the hospital should take a major position in handling the specimens. Those

Conflict of interest statement

Thunnissen received consultant honoraria from Lilly, unrestricted grant from Lilly. Kerr, Herth, Lantuejoul, Weynand, Grünberg, Ninane, Olszewski, Rintoul, Jaume, Thiberville received consultant honoraria from Lilly. Papotti received consultant honoraria from Lilly, Novartis Pharma, unrestricted grant from Novartis. Rossi received grant/honoraria as consultant from Eli-Lilly, Hoffmann-La Roche, Novartis and Pfizer. Skov, López-Ríos, Schnabel, Laenger received consultant honoraria from Lilly and

References (233)

  • T. Nakajima et al.

    How I do it – optimal methodology for multidirectional analysis of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration samples

    J Thorac Oncol

    (2011)
  • C.G. Micames et al.

    Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for non-small cell lung cancer staging: a systematic review and metaanalysis

    Chest

    (2007)
  • F.J.F. Herth et al.

    Combined endoscopic-endobronchial ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of mediastinal lymph nodes through a single bronchoscope in 150 patients with suspected lung cancer

    Chest

    (2010)
  • N. Ikeda et al.

    Comprehensive diagnostic bronchoscopy of central type early stage lung cancer

    Lung Cancer

    (2007)
  • C.L. Coghlin et al.

    Quantitative analysis of tumor in bronchial biopsy specimens

    J Thorac Oncol

    (2010)
  • W.A. Baaklini et al.

    Diagnostic yield of fiberoptic bronchoscopy in evaluating solitary pulmonary nodules

    Chest

    (2000)
  • R. Eberhardt et al.

    Electromagnetic navigation diagnostic bronchoscopy in peripheral lung lesions

    Chest

    (2007)
  • M.S. Levine et al.

    Transthoracic needle aspiration biopsy following negative fiberoptic bronchoscopy in solitary pulmonary nodules

    Chest

    (1988)
  • Y.C. Cheung et al.

    Adequacy and complications of computed tomography-guided core needle biopsy on non-small cell lung cancers for epidermal growth factor receptor mutations demonstration: 18-gauge or 20-gauge biopsy needle

    Lung Cancer

    (2010)
  • J.A. Govert et al.

    Cost-effectiveness of collecting routine cytologic specimens during fiberoptic bronchoscopy for endoscopically visible lung tumor

    Chest

    (1996)
  • H.S. Lee et al.

    Real-time endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in mediastinal staging of non-small cell lung cancer: how many aspirations per target lymph node station?

    Chest

    (2008)
  • D. Nonaka

    Immunohistochemical differentiation of metastatic tumours

    Diagn Histopathol

    (2010)
  • W.D. Travis et al.

    Bronchioloalveolar carcinoma and lung adenocarcinoma: the clinical importance and research relevance of the 2004 World Health Organization pathologic criteria

    J Thorac Oncol

    (2006)
  • A. Babic et al.

    The impact of pre-analytical processing on staining quality for H&E, dual hapten, dual color in situ hybridization and fluorescent in situ hybridization assays

    Methods

    (2010)
  • M.D. McKinney et al.

    Detection of viral RNA from paraffin-embedded tissues after prolonged formalin fixation

    J Clin Virol

    (2009)
  • P.S. Loo et al.

    Subtyping of undifferentiated non-small cell carcinomas in bronchial biopsy specimens

    J Thorac Oncol

    (2010)
  • N. Kalhor et al.

    TTF-1 and p63 for distinguishing pulmonary small-cell carcinoma from poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma in previously pap-stained cytologic material

    Mod Pathol

    (2006)
  • H. Zhang et al.

    Distinction of pulmonary small cell carcinoma from poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma: an immunohistochemical approach

    Mod Pathol

    (2005)
  • R. Camilo et al.

    Expression of p63, keratin 5/6, keratin 7, and surfactant-A in non-small cell lung carcinomas

    Hum Pathol

    (2006)
  • A.G. Nicholson et al.

    Refining the diagnosis and EGFR status of non-small cell lung carcinoma in biopsy and cytologic material, using a panel of mucin staining, TTF-1, cytokeratin 5/6, and P63, and EGFR mutation analysis

    J Thorac Oncol

    (2010)
  • G. Pelosi et al.

    Immunohistochemistry by means of widely agreed-upon markers (cytokeratins 5/6 and 7, p63, thyroid transcription factor-1, and vimentin) on small biopsies of non-small cell lung cancer effectively parallels the corresponding profiling and eventual diagnoses on surgical specimens

    J Thorac Oncol

    (2011)
  • N. Nakamura et al.

    Expression of thyroid transcription factor-1 in normal and neoplastic lung tissues

    Mod Pathol

    (2002)
  • L. Johansson

    Histopathologic classification of lung cancer: relevance of cytokeratin and TTF-1 immunophenotyping

    Ann Diagn Pathol

    (2004)
  • J.A. Bishop et al.

    Napsin A and thyroid transcription factor-1 expression in carcinomas of the lung, breast, pancreas, colon, kidney, thyroid, and malignant mesothelioma

    Hum Pathol

    (2010)
  • N. Rekhtman et al.

    Immunohistochemical algorithm for differentiation of lung adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma based on large series of whole-tissue sections with validation in small specimens

    Mod Pathol

    (2011)
  • B.Y. Wang et al.

    P63 in pulmonary epithelium, pulmonary squamous neoplasms, and other pulmonary tumors

    Hum Pathol

    (2002)
  • R. Pirker et al.

    Cetuximab plus chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (FLEX): an open-label randomised phase III trial

    Lancet

    (2009)
  • R. Pirker et al.

    Monoclonal antibodies against EGFR in non-small cell lung cancer

    Crit Rev Oncol Hematol

    (2011)
  • N. Rekhtman et al.

    Suitability of thoracic cytology for new therapeutic paradigms in non-small cell lung carcinoma: high accuracy of tumor subtyping and feasibility of EGFR and KRAS molecular testing

    J Thorac Oncol

    (2011)
  • G.V. Scagliotti et al.

    Phase III study comparing cisplatin plus gemcitabine with cisplatin plus pemetrexed in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer

    J Clin Oncol

    (2008)
  • D.H. Johnson et al.

    Randomized phase II trial comparing bevacizumab plus carboplatin and paclitaxel with carboplatin and paclitaxel alone in previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer

    J Clin Oncol

    (2004)
  • A. Sandler et al.

    Paclitaxel-carboplatin alone or with bevacizumab for non-small-cell lung cancer

    N Engl J Med

    (2006)
  • T.J. Lynch et al.

    Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor underlying responsiveness of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib

    N Engl J Med

    (2004)
  • W. Pao et al.

    Acquired resistance of lung adenocarcinomas to gefitinib or erlotinib is associated with a second mutation in the EGFR kinase domain

    PLoS Med

    (2005)
  • E.L. Kwak et al.

    Anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibition in non-small-cell lung cancer

    N Engl J Med

    (2010)
  • T.S. Mok et al.

    Gefitinib or carboplatin-paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma

    N Engl J Med

    (2009)
  • W.D. Travis et al.
  • J.S. Thomas et al.

    How reliable is the diagnosis of lung cancer using small biopsy specimens? Report of a UKCCCR Lung Cancer Working Party

    Thorax

    (1993)
  • S.L. Edwards et al.

    Preoperative histological classification of primary lung cancer: accuracy of diagnosis and use of the non-small cell category

    J Clin Pathol

    (2000)
  • V.H. Mak et al.

    Value of washings and brushings at fibreoptic bronchoscopy in the diagnosis of lung cancer

    Thorax

    (1990)
  • Cited by (196)

    • An Unusual Presentation of Aggressive Primary Invasive Adenocarcinoma of Lung

      2021, American Journal of the Medical Sciences
      Citation Excerpt :

      Most invasive subtypes of adenocarcinoma present as a solid or subsolid nodules and rarely as ground-glass nodules. 8,22 An exception would be invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma (previously mucinous BAC) with a variable appearance, including consolidation, air bronchograms, or multifocal subsolid nodules or masses. 8, 22 Bilateral infiltrates are uncommon with invasive adenocarcinoma and currently, there appears to be no consensus on the percentage of adenocarcinoma presenting as bilateral diffuse infiltrates, as seen in our case.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    The considerations in this manuscript are authored by a working group which was formed as a result of initial discussions held by some of the authors in independent meetings convened by Eli Lilly and Roche Pharmaceuticals. Neither company has had any input, influence or any other connection with the subsequent project of formulating and writing this manuscript.

    View full text