ReviewBirth Weight and Subsequent Risk of Asthma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Introduction
Asthma is a major cause of morbidity and mortality among children, and the prevalence of asthma has been steadily rising over the past two decades. [1] Around the world, over 300 million people suffer from this disease. [2] Although many treatments for asthma are available, there is no current cure and the morbidity of asthma remains high. [3] The lack of curative options seems to be largely due to the unknown aetiology of asthma. [4] In epidemiological studies it is has been suggested that factors such as air pollution, environmental tobacco smoke, smaller family size, and decreased exposure to infectious agents may be attributed to asthma, but it has not yet been fully explained. [5], [6], [7] One possible hypothesis is that asthma is related to intrauterine and postnatal environments. [7] Intrauterine development may ‘programme’ foetal anatomy, physiology, and metabolism and thus may affect the risk of diseases including asthma in later life. [8], [9], [10], [11], [12]
In recent years, evidence supporting the effect of intrauterine development on the risk of disease later in life has been accumulated. [13] Birth weight (BW) is frequently used as an indicator of the conditions experienced in utero. [14], [15] At present, studies on the effect of birth weight on asthma have no entirely consistent results. Many authors have found, on either side of the ‘J’ and ‘U’, shaped relationships between birth weight and the prevalence of asthma which are seen for the low (<2,500 g) and high (>4,000 g) birth weights. [8], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [25] However, some researchers claimed that BW had little effect on asthma. [10], [24], [26], [27], [28] Therefore, we present here a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the direction and magnitude of the association between birth weight and asthma among children and adults.
Section snippets
Methods
We carried out a systematic review and meta-analyses according to the Cochrane methodology and the recommendations for reporting proposed by the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology group. [29]
Overview of studies included in the systematic review
Overall, 540 non-duplicated titles and abstracts were identified, 523 of which were excluded based on the reasons listed in Fig. 1. The score of one study [21] was smaller than six studies which were considered low in methodological quality (Appendix 1). Sixteen articles reporting 17 original studies [8], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [10], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29] (one article [22] described two studies) were included in the systematic review, including 15 cohort [8]
Discussion
The present comprehensive systematic review and meta-analyses found that consistently reported low BW (<2500 g) was associated with increased risk of asthma when BW>2,500 g and BW = 2500–4000 g were used as the reference for both children and adults. By contrast, there is no association between high BW (>4000 g) and asthma when compared with BW>2,500 g and BW = 2500–4000 g for both children and adults. Analysis based on growth and developmental stage also revealed that low BW increased the risk of asthma
Acknowledgements
All authors declared no conflicts of interest. The authors’ contributions were as follows. M.M. contributed to development of the study hypothesis, reviewed the literature, collected the data, conducted the statistical analysis, provided interpretation of results, drafted and edited the manuscripts. The main investigator: S.Y., G.L.L, S.F.W., J.S., B.M.J. All authors contributed to the discussion and interpretation of the data and to the writing of the manuscript. We are sincerely grateful to
References (41)
- et al.
Surveillance for asthma—United States, 1980–1999
MMWR Surveill Summ
(2002) - et al.
American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society Task Force on Asthma Control and Exacerbations. An official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society statement: asthma control and exacerbations: standardizing endpoints for clinical asthma trials and clinical practice
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
(2009) - et al.
Real-world evaluation of asthma control and treatment (REACT): findings from a national web-based survey
J Allergy Clin Immunol
(2007) Current trends in aetiological asthma research
Eur J Epidemiol
(2009)- et al.
Siblings, day-care attendance, and the risk of asthma and wheezing during childhood
N Engl J Med
(2000) - et al.
The relevance of allergen exposure to the development of asthma in childhood
J Allergy Clin Immunol
(2000) Is allergic disease programmed in early life?
Clin Exp Allergy
(1994)- et al.
Birth characteristics and asthma symptoms in young adults: results from a population-based cohort study in Norway
Eur Respir J
(1998) - et al.
Birth weight, body mass index and asthma in young adults
Thorax
(1999) - et al.
The relation of markers of fetal growth with asthma, allergies and serum immunoglobulin E levels in children at age 5–7 years
Clin Exp Allergy
(2004)
The relationship between birth weight and childhood asthma: a population-based cohort study
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med
Respiratory symptoms in the first 7 years of life and birth weight at term: the PIAMA Birth Cohort
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
Fetal origins of perinatal morbidity and/or adult disease
Semin Reprod Med
Birth weight: genetic and intrauterine environment in normal pregnancy
Diabetes Care
Birth-related exposures and asthma and allergy in adulthood: a population-based cross-sectional study of young adults in North Staffordshire
J Asthma
High birth weight, asthma and atopy at the age of 16 yr
Pediatr Allergy Immunol
The effects of birthweight and breastfeeding on asthma among children aged 1–5 years
J Paediatr Child Health
Is the association between low birth weight and asthma independent of genetic and shared environmental factors?
Am J Epidemiol
Familial factors do not confound the association between birth weight and childhood asthma
Pediatrics
Is large birth weight associated with asthma risk in early childhood?
Arch Dis Child
Cited by (79)
Early-Life Weight Status and Risk of Childhood Asthma or Recurrent Wheeze in Preterm and Term Offspring
2023, Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In PracticeSmall vulnerable newborns—big potential for impact
2023, The LancetEarly origins of metabolic and overall health in young adults: An outcome-wide analysis in a general cohort population
2023, Diabetes and MetabolismCitation Excerpt :When BW was studied as a continuous variable, interaction with sex remained significant only for HBP and asthma. Indeed, we found an association between LBW and asthma in women only though an association is well known in both sexes [22]. Moreover, we found a protective effect of HBW in women.
Asthma and allergies in a cohort of adolescents conceived with ART
2022, Reproductive BioMedicine OnlineBirth weight and long-term risk of mortality among US men and women: Results from three prospective cohort studies
2022, The Lancet Regional Health - AmericasCitation Excerpt :Interestingly, there was no evidence of a modifying effect of these lifestyle factors, although accumulating evidence consistently suggests that they are important determinants of mortality.7 Multiple studies have associated low birth weight with a greater risk of asthma,29 respiratory diseases,4 and impaired lung function in adulthood.30,31 To date, however, very few studies have assessed the association of birth weight with the risk of respiratory disease mortality.
Impact of prenatal and early life environmental exposures on normal human development
2021, Paediatric Respiratory ReviewsCitation Excerpt :In addition, it is now evident that many NCDs, in particular cardiovascular, respiratory, neurodegenerative diseases and cancer, originate during foetal development and/or early childhood. Birth weight is a major determinant of ’whole of life’ health, presumably reflecting the importance of the intrauterine environment [19–22]. Normal human development progresses through defined stages of foetal development.