The Many Manifestations of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Presentation, Evaluation, and Treatment

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gtc.2007.07.014Get rights and content

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common problem that is expensive to diagnose and treat. The disease is increasing in prevalence in the Western world, with important risk factors being obesity and the eradication of Helicobacter pylori. Heartburn and acid regurgitation are classic symptoms of GERD, but their sensitivity is poor. Ambulatory esophageal pH testing is the most sensitive test for GERD, whereas endoscopy is the most specific test. Medical treatment with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) has revolutionized the treatment of GERD and its complications, but long-term side effects do exist. Laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery and PPIs have similar efficacy in the few available long-term trials. This article reviews the presentation, evaluation, and treatment of GERD.

Section snippets

Definition

Unfortunately there is no gold standard test for GERD. Because the reflux of acid, particularly after meals, is a physiologic process, the simple presence of gastroesophageal reflux (GER) or occasional symptoms of heartburn or acid regurgitation cannot be defined as a disease. Recently a group of 44 experts from 18 countries used a modified Delphi process to develop a globally acceptable definition and classification of GERD that can be applied in clinical practice and in research (Fig. 1) [2].

Prevalence and Incidence

The prevalence and incidence of GERD was recently estimated in two systematic reviews that defined GERD as at least weekly heartburn and/or acid regurgitation and met criteria concerning sample size, response rate, and recall period [3], [4]. The prevalence in the Western world generally ranges between 15% and 25%, whereas in Asia the prevalence is reported to be less than 5% (Fig. 2). Time trends confirm a significant increase in the prevalence of reflux symptoms averaging 5% annually in North

Clinical Presentations

Heartburn and acid regurgitation are the classic symptoms of GERD. Heartburn describes a burning feeling, rising from the stomach or lower chest and radiating toward the neck, throat, and occasionally, the back [18]. It occurs postprandially, particularly after large meals or after eating spicy foods, citrus products, fats, chocolates, or drinking alcohol. The supine position or bending over may exacerbate heartburn. Nighttime heartburn may cause sleeping difficulties and impair next-day

Diagnostic Tests

A large number of tests are available for evaluating patients who have suspected GERD. Many times these tests are unnecessary, because the presence of frequent heartburn and acid regurgitation are sufficiently accurate to identify the disease and begin medical treatment. This is not always the case, however, and clinicians must decide which tests to choose so as to make the diagnosis in a reliable, timely, and cost-effective manner, depending on the information desired (Table 1) [23].

Complications

There are few data on the long-term outcome of patients who have varying severities of GERD. Severity and duration of symptoms seem to have a poor correlation with the presence or severity of esophagitis [7]. Furthermore, there is some controversy whether GERD exists as a spectrum of disease severity or as a categoric disease in three distinct groups: nonerosive and erosive reflux disease and Barrett esophagus [24], [47]. The recent European ProGERD study involving nearly 4000 patients sheds

Lifestyle and Over-the-Counter Medications

Numerous dietary and lifestyle modifications are advocated for the treatment of GERD. They are frequently first-line therapy for patients who have mild disease and often adjunct therapy even for patients on PPIs.What is the evidence, however? In a recent evidence-based review, studies of smoking, alcohol, chocolate, fatty foods, and citrus products showed physiologic evidence that their intake can adversely affect symptoms or esophageal pH. There was little evidence, however, that cessation of

Endoscopic Treatment

Various endoscopic techniques for the treatment of GERD have been developed as alternatives to antisecretory therapy or antireflux surgery [87]. These techniques include the delivery of radiofrequency energy to the gastroesophageal junction (Stretta), injection of bulking agents (Eneryx), or implantation of a bioprosthesis (Gatekeeper) into the LES, and suture plication of the proximal gastric folds (Endocinch, Endoscopic Plication System). Studies to date have primarily enrolled PPI-dependent

Surgical Management

Only surgical fundoplication can correct the physiologic factors contributing to GERD and prevent the need for long-term medication. Successful antireflux surgery involves (1) reducing the hiatal hernia back into the abdomen, (2) closing the opening in the diaphragmatic hiatus, (3) lengthening the intra-abdominal portion of the LES, and (4) strengthening the repair with a fundoplication. The most popular fundoplication is the 360° Nissen fundoplication. The partial posterior Toupet

Summary

Gastroesophageal reflux disease is a common problem that is expensive to diagnose and treat in primary and specialty care settings. This review has emphasized the major advances in understanding the diagnosis and treatment of GERD over the last 5 years. These are summarized below.

  • GERD is increasing in prevalence in the Western world, with important risk factors being obesity and healthy stomachs resulting from H. pylori eradication.

  • The sensitivity of classic reflux symptoms is poor (55%) for

Acknowledgment

The author thanks Elizabeth Koniz for excellent secretarial assistance in the preparation of this manuscript.

References (94)

  • P. Sharma et al.

    The development and validation of an endoscopic grading system for Barrett's esophagus: the Prague C&M criteria

    Gastroenterology

    (2006)
  • P. Sharma et al.

    A critical review of the diagnosis and management of Barrett's esophagram: the AGA Chicago workshop

    Gastroenterology

    (2004)
  • P. Moayyedi et al.

    Gastroesophageal reflux disease

    Lancet

    (2006)
  • I.M. Gralnek et al.

    Esomeprazole versus other proton pump inhibitors in erosive esophagitis: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol

    (2006)
  • A.F. Barrison et al.

    Patterns of proton pump inhibitors in clinical practice

    Am J Med

    (2001)
  • R. Fass et al.

    Treatment of patients with persistent heartburn symptoms: a double-blind randomized trial

    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol

    (2006)
  • J.E. Richter

    New investigational therapies for gastroesophageal reflux disease

    Thorac Surg Clin

    (2005)
  • R. Rothstein et al.

    Endoscopic full-thickness plication for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a randomized, sham-controlled trail

    Gastroenterology

    (2006)
  • D.I. Watson

    Laparoscopic treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

    Best Practice and Research Clinical Gastroenterology

    (2004)
  • J.A. Dominitz et al.

    Complications and anti-reflux medication use after antireflux surgery

    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol

    (2006)
  • K.F. Hatch et al.

    Failed fundoplication

    Am J Surg

    (2004)
  • N.J. Shaheen et al.

    The burden of gastrointestinal and liver diseases, 2006

    Am J Gastroenterol

    (2006)
  • N. Vakil et al.

    The Montreal definition and classification of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a global evidence based consensus

    Am J Gastroenterol

    (2006)
  • J. Dent et al.

    Epidemiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review

    Gut

    (2005)
  • J. Ronkainen et al.

    High prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms and esophagitis with or without symptoms in the general adult Swedish population: a Kalixandra study report

    Scand J Gastroenterol

    (2005)
  • A.C. Ford et al.

    Ethnicity, gender and socioeconomic status as risk factors for esophagitis and Barrett's esophagus

    Am J Epidemiol

    (2005)
  • H. Howard et al.

    Meta-analysis: obesity and the risk for gastroesophageal reflux disease and its complications

    Ann Intern Med

    (2005)
  • B.C. Jacobson et al.

    Body-mass index and symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux in women

    N Engl J Med

    (2006)
  • D.A. Corley et al.

    Body mass index and gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Am J Gastroenterol

    (2006)
  • H.B. El-Serag et al.

    Opposing time trends of peptic ulcer and reflux disease

    Gut

    (1998)
  • A. Raghunath et al.

    Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori in patients with gastro-esophageal reflux disease: a systematic review

    BMJ

    (2003)
  • J. Labenz et al.

    Helicobacter pylori in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: causal agent, independent or protective factor?

    Gut

    (1997)
  • I. Mohammed et al.

    Genetic influences in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a twin study

    Gut

    (2003)
  • F.Z. Hu et al.

    Mapping of a gene for severe pediatric reflux disease on chromosome 13q14

    JAMA

    (2000)
  • R. Carlsson et al.

    The usefulness of a structured questionnaire in the assessment of symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease

    Scand J Gastroenterol

    (1998)
  • J.E. Helm et al.

    Acid neutralizing capacity of human saliva

    Gastroenterol

    (1987)
  • P. Moayyedi et al.

    Can the clinical history distinguish between organic and functional dyspepsia?

    JAMA

    (2006)
  • D.A. Johnson et al.

    Esophageal acid sensitivity in Barrett's esophagus

    J Clin Gastroenterol

    (1987)
  • J.E. Richter

    Diagnostic tests for gastroesophageal reflux disease

    Am J Med Sci

    (2003)
  • D.W. Nayer et al.

    Classification of esophagitis: who needs it?

    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

    (2004)
  • L.R. Lundell et al.

    Endoscopic assessment of oesophagitis: clinical and functional correlation and further validation of the Los Angeles classification

    Gut

    (1999)
  • J. Labenz et al.

    Prospective follow-up from the ProGERD study suggests that GERD is not a categorical disease

    Am J Gastroenterol

    (2006)
  • J.M. Wo et al.

    Clinical impact of upper endoscopy in the management of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease

    Am J Gastroenterol

    (2004)
  • K.R. DeVault et al.

    American College of Gastroenterology updated guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease

    Am J Gastroenterol

    (2005)
  • J. Dent

    Microscopic esophageal mucosal injury in non-erosive reflux disease

    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol

    (2007)
  • R. Cavigilia et al.

    Dilated intercellular spaces as a marker of esophageal damage: comparative results in GERD with or without bile reflux

    Aliment Pharmacol Ther

    (2003)
  • G.J. Wiener et al.

    Ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring: reproducibility and variability of pH parameters

    Dig Dis Sci

    (1988)
  • Cited by (54)

    • Physiology and Pathogenesis of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

      2015, Surgical Clinics of North America
      Citation Excerpt :

      It is estimated that up to 20% of Americans experience symptomatic GERD weekly and that an even higher percentage of people have heartburn monthly.1 The cost of managing a disease of this prevalence is substantial, with estimates of direct and indirect costs exceeding $14 billion in the United States, 60% of which is accounted for by medication costs.2 Although the physiology and pathogenesis of GERD are poorly understood, heartburn, the most common symptom, occurs in most patients and is thought to be due to the stimulation and activation of mucosal chemoreceptors in the distal esophagus.3

    • Sleep-Related Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

      2012, Therapy in Sleep Medicine
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text