New technologyA Feasibility and Safety Study of Bronchoscopic Thermal Vapor Ablation: A Novel Emphysema TherapyDisclaimer
Section snippets
Patient Selection Criteria
Eleven patients on optimal medical management for severe heterogeneous upper lobe emphysema underwent unilateral upper lobe BLVR. All patients were assessed according to standard acceptance criteria for surgical LVR and BLVR [1, 2, 3]. Key inclusion and exclusion criteria are outlined in Table 1. The study was approved by Alfred Hospital and Prince Charles Hospital Institutional Ethics Committees.
Device Description
The Uptake Medical BTVA treatment system consists of a multiuse generator with a fiberoptic
Procedure Description
Anesthesia was according to local standard techniques using a large (size 9 or 10) single-lumen endotracheal tube or laryngeal mask. Two operators performed the procedure, one controlled the fiberoptic bronchoscope (Olympus BF type 1T180, Tokyo, Japan) and the other controlled and manipulated the catheter system and handpiece. The vapor catheter was then introduced into the target segmental airway, the occlusion balloon was inflated (0.5 to 1.5 mL) to create a seal, and the desired dose of
Clinical Experience
Patient demographics and base line characteristics are outlined in Table 3.
Comment
This assessment demonstrates the technical feasibility and safety of applying thermal energy unilaterally to targeted segmental airways in patients with severe heterogeneous emphysema. The inflammatory response induced by the steam has effects on the proximal airways and distal lung parenchyma. The adverse effects reflected this, with relatively minor airway-predominant COPD exacerbations and two potentially more important bouts of pneumonitis. CT scan analyses demonstrated loss of volume in
Disclosures and Freedom of Investigation
Financial, technical, and equipment support was provided from the sponsor Uptake Medical Corp, Seattle, Washington, to undertake this study. The authors had full control of the study design, methods used, outcome parameters, data analysis and the production of this report.
References (10)
- et al.
Lung volume reduction surgery in emphysema: a systematic review
Ann Thorac Surg
(2001) - et al.
The potential for bronchoscopic lung volume reduction using bronchial prostheses: a pilot study
Chest
(2003) - et al.
Effect of lung-volume-reduction surgery in patients with severe emphysema
N Engl J Med
(2000) - et al.
Clinical application of airway bypass utilizing paclitaxel-eluting stents: early results
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
(2007) - et al.
Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction in severe emphysema
Proc Am Thorac Soc
(2008)
Cited by (110)
Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction: A New Hope for Patients With Severe Emphysema and Air Trapping
2021, Mayo Clinic ProceedingsCitation Excerpt :Alternative bronchoscopic methods to achieve LVR are being explored. Bronchoscopic thermal vapor ablation (BTVA)23,24 may represent an alternative method for BLVR when fissure completeness is less than 80%. BTVA results in atelectasis of the targeted lobe by applying heated water vapor to produce a thermal reaction, resulting in an intense but localized inflammatory response that results in lobar atelectasis.
Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction
2018, Clinics in Chest MedicineCitation Excerpt :This technique administers steam vapor directly to the segmental airways most affected by emphysema, using a reusable vapor generator and a disposable bronchoscopic catheter that delivers heated water vapor. The goal is to cause a local inflammatory reaction that causes occlusion and atelectasis of each chosen segment.37 A recent multicenter randomized controlled study using thermal vapor ablation, the STEP-UP trial (Sequential Staged Treatment of Emphysema with Upper Lobe Predominance), showed a significant improvement in FEV1 and SGRQ at 6 months.38
Surgical and bronchoscopic pulmonary function-improving procedures in lung emphysema
2023, European Respiratory Review
- Disclaimer
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, the Southern Thoracic Surgical Association, and The Annals of Thoracic Surgery neither endorse nor discourage use of the new technology described in this article.