Original article
Predictors of long-term orthodontic side effects from mandibular advancement devices in patients with snoring and obstructive sleep apnea

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.10.004Get rights and content

Introduction: Orthodontic side effects can complicate the long-term use of mandibular advancement devices (MADs) in the treatment of patients with snoring and obstructive sleep apnea. The aim of this study was to find predictors of dental side effects from monoblock MADs. Methods: Four hundred fifty patients, who consecutively received treatment with either soft elastomeric or hard acrylic devices, were followed up after 5.4 ± 0.8 years (mean ± SD). The continuing patients responded to questionnaires and had dental examinations and plaster casts made. Results: Twenty-seven patients had moved or died during the follow-up period. Two hundred thirty-six of the remaining 423 patients (56%) continued treatment, and 187 of them reported compliance rates of ≥50% at night. A small reduction in overjet of <1 mm was associated with a deepbite with an overbite of >3 mm and an overjet of ≤3 mm (odds ratio [OR] = 7.5; P = .015), nasal congestion (OR = 2.9; P = .005), or the use of a soft elastomeric device (OR = 2.7; P = .014) controlled for age, sex, treatment time, and mandibular displacement. A small reduction in overbite of <1 mm was related to a small opening of the mandible of <11 mm (OR = 2.5; P = .008). Conclusions: Orthodontic side effects might be predictable on the basis of initial characteristics in dental occlusion and the design of MADs.

Section snippets

Subjects and follow-up

Four hundred fifty patients, consecutively treated by the author, were evaluated in relation to the long-term use of MADs at a 5-year follow-up. At the start of the study, the median age of these patients was 51 years (range, 22-74), with a median apnea-hypopnea index of 13 (range, 0-76) and a median body mass index of 27 kg/m2 (range, 19-42). There were 82 women and 368 men in the sample. Patients with periodontal diseases, craniomandibular disorders, few teeth to anchor the appliance, or

Results

The sample of 450 patients is described in Figure 3. At the 5-year follow-up, 27 patients had moved or died, 187 had discontinued treatment, and 236 (56%) were still using their devices. One hundred eighty-seven of these 236 patients (79%) were frequent users, and 51 of them had taken part in a previous 2-year follow-up of orthodontic side effects.

One hundred eighty-seven of the continuing 236 patients were evaluated in terms of dental side effects (Fig 3). Thirty-one patients had initial casts

Discussion

The frequent use of monoblock MADs with full occlusal coverage for 5 years resulted in median reductions in overjet and overbite of 0.6 mm in this sample of patients with snoring and obstructive sleep apnea. Infrequent users had smaller bite changes. Overjet decreased during both the first and second halves of the treatment period, and overbite changes diminished with time. A deepbite, the use of a soft elastomeric device, or nasal congestion were related to a high chance of experiencing only

Conclusions

About half of the patients treated for snoring and sleep apnea were still using their MADs after 5 years. The orthodontic side effects increased with treatment time and more frequent use of the device. Overjet decreased continuously, whereas overbite changes diminished with time. A deepbite and the use of a soft elastomeric device provided protection from large reductions in overjet, and the small vertical displacement of the mandible was related to a small reduction in overbite. Consequently,

References (22)

  • L. Bondemark

    Does 2 years’ nocturnal treatment with a mandibular advancement splint in adult patients with snoring and OSAS cause a change in the posture of the mandible?

    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop

    (1999)
  • K.M. Fritsch et al.

    Side effects of mandibular advancement devices for sleep apnea treatment

    Am J Respir Crit Care Med

    (2001)
  • M. Marklund et al.

    Orthodontic side-effects of mandibular advancement devices during treatment of snoring and sleep apnoea

    Eur J Orthod

    (2001)
  • E.C. Rose et al.

    Occlusal and skeletal effects of an oral appliance in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea

    Chest

    (2002)
  • L. Bondemark et al.

    Craniomandibular status and function in patients with habitual snoring and obstructive sleep apnoea after nocturnal treatment with a mandibular advancement splinta 2-year follow-up

    Eur J Orthod

    (2000)
  • C.J. Robertson

    Dental and skeletal changes associated with long-term mandibular advancement

    Sleep

    (2001)
  • E.C. Rose et al.

    Occlusal side effects caused by a mandibular advancement appliance in patients with obstructive sleep apnea

    Angle Orthod

    (2001)
  • C.C. Pantin et al.

    Dental side effects of an oral device to treat snoring and obstructive sleep apnea

    Sleep

    (1999)
  • M. Ringqvist et al.

    Dental and skeletal changes after 4 years of obstructive sleep apnea treatment with a mandibular advancement devicea prospective, randomized study

    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop

    (2003)
  • A.M. Fransson et al.

    Influence of mandibular protruding device on airway passages and dentofacial characteristics in obstructive sleep apnea and snoring

    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop

    (2002)
  • C. Robertson et al.

    Dental and occlusal changes during mandibular advancement splint therapy in sleep disordered patients

    Eur J Orthod

    (2003)
  • Cited by (106)

    • Mandibular advancement splints for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea

      2023, Encyclopedia of Sleep and Circadian Rhythms: Volume 1-6, Second Edition
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Supported by grants from the Swedish Dental Society.

    View full text