Elsevier

The Lancet

Volume 351, Issue 9105, 14 March 1998, Pages 773-780
The Lancet

Articles
Multicentre randomised placebo-controlled trial of inhaled fluticasone propionate in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(97)03471-5Get rights and content

Summary

Background

The efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remains controversial because of a lack of placebo-controlled studies. We compared the effect of inhaled fluticasone propionate with placebo in the treatment of patients with COPD.

Methods

We used a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled design. We enrolled from 13 European countries, New Zealand, and South Africa, 281 outpatient current or ex-smokers, aged between 50 and 75 years. They had a forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) of between 35% and 90% of predicted normal values, a ratio of FEV1 to forced vital capacity of 70% or less and bronchodilator reversibility of less than 15%, as well as a history of chronic bronchitis. Patients were randomly assigned fluticasone propionate 500 μg (n=142) or placebo (n=139) twice daily via a metered-dose inhaler for 6 months. The main outcome measures were the number of patients who had at least one exacerbation by the end of treatment, the number and severity of exacerbations, clinic lung function, diary card symptoms and peak expiratory flow and 6 min walking distance.

Findings

51 (37%) patients in the placebo group compared with 45 (32%) in the fluticasone propionate group had had at least one exacerbation by the end of treatment (p=0·449). Significantly more patients had moderate or severe exacerbations in the placebo group than in the fluticasone propionate group (86% vs 60%, p<0·001). Diary-card and clinic morning peak expiratory flows improved significantly in the fluticasone propionate group (p<0·001, p=0·048, respectively), as did clinic FEV1 (p<0·001), forced vital capacity (p<0·001), and mid-expiratory flow (p=0·01). Symptom scores for median daily cough and sputum volume were significantly lower with fluticasone propionate treatment than with placebo (p=0·004 and p=0·016, respectively). At the end of treatment, patients on fluticasone propionate had increased their 6 min walking distance significantly more than those on placebo (p=0·032). Fluticasone propionate was tolerated as well as placebo, with few adverse effects and without a clinically important effect on mean serum cortisol concentration.

Interpretation

Fluticasone propionate may be of clinical benefit in patients with COPD over at least 6 months. Inhaled corticosteroids may have an important role in the long-term treatment of COPD.

Introduction

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a heterogeneous group of disorders, consisting of chronic bronchitis, emphysema, and small-airways disease, which lead to progressive, largely irreversible airflow obstruction that may be accompanied by airway hyper-responsiveness.1 COPD is characterised by cough, sputum production, and breathlessness associated with airflow obstruction. Patients generally have a progressive deterioration in lung function, which leads to substantial problems in their general health and quality of life, and eventual repiratory failure and early death.2 COPD is one of the leading causes of death worldwide, with an increasing prevalence and mortality rate.3

The major risk factor is cigarette smoking, but the pathogenesis of COPD is not clear. Airway inflammation seems to be involved, as it is in asthma.4 Corticosteroids have proved to be valuable in the treatment of asthma and may, therefore, be beneficial in patients with COPD, although their role in the management of COPD is less well established.5 Short-term inhaled corticosteroids in COPD have had little effect on airway hyper-responsiveness or forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), at doses that improve asthma.6, 7, 8, 9 Longer-term treatment has shown some benefit on lung function, but studies generally have not distinguished between COPD and asthma.10, 11 Exacerbations are an important clinical feature of asthma and COPD, and inhaled corticosteroids decrease their frequency and severity in asthma,10, 12 but this effect has not been proved in COPD.

Fluticasone propionate is effective and safe for patients with all grades of severity of asthma,12, 13, 14, 15 and has a therapeutic ratio superior to other inhaled corticosteroids.12, 16, 17 No clinical studies have assessed the effect of fluticasone propionate in COPD, although one study did show a reduction in neutrophil chemotactic activity and in the proteinase-antiproteinase ratio in the sputum of COPD patients treated for 8 weeks.18

We used a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled design to investigate the efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate in COPD patients.

Section snippets

Methods

We recruited 365 patients aged between 50 and 75 years with COPD. Our definition of COPD was consistent with the European Respiratory Society Consensus Statement,5 which defines COPD as a disorder characterised by decreased maximum expiratory flow and slow forced emptying of the lungs, which is slowly progressive, irreversible, and does not change markedly over several months. The patients were from 13 European countries, New Zealand, and South Africa, and recruited from hospital outpatient

Results

365 patients were initially enrolled into the study, but only 281 were assigned treatment (figure 1). 46 patients, 27 (19%) in the placebo group and 19 (13%) in the fluticasone proprionate group, withdrew, mostly because of adverse events, including exacerbations of COPD. One patient in the placebo group withdrew because of treatment failure, but had an exacerbation of COPD shortly before the withdrawal date. Patients were well-matched for age, sex, smoking history, baseline lung function, and

Discussion

We found no significant difference between treatments for the number of patients who experienced at least one exacerbation, but there was significant improvement in the other main clinical features in the patients on fluticasone propionate. There was also a numerical difference in favour of fluticasone propionate for total number of exacerbations.

Only about a third of patients in each group experienced an exacerbation, which was lower than our prediction when planning the size and power of the

References (32)

  • DC Weir et al.

    Corticosteroid trials in non-asthmatic chronic airflow obstruction

    Thorax

    (1990)
  • NB Pride et al.

    Bronchial hyper-responsiveness as a risk factor for progressive airflow obstruction in smokers

    Bull Eur Physiopathol Respir

    (1987)
  • E Dompeling et al.

    Slowing the deterioration of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease observed during bronchodilator therapy by adding inhaled corticosteroids: a 4-year prospective study

    Ann Intern Med

    (1993)
  • HAM Kerstjens et al.

    A comparison of bronchodilator therapy with or without inhaled corticosteroid therapy for obstructive airways disease

    N Engl J Med

    (1992)
  • L Fabbri et al.

    Comparison of fluticasone propionate with beclomethasone dipropionate in moderate to severe asthma treated for one year

    Thorax

    (1993)
  • P Leblanc et al.

    A comparison of fluticasone propionate 200 μg/day with beclomethasone dipropionate 400 μg/day in adult asthma

    Allergy

    (1994)
  • Cited by (502)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Members of group listed at end of paper

    View full text