Abstract
Nanoparticle chain aggregates (NCAs) are often sized and collected using instruments that rely on inertial transport mechanisms. The instruments size segregate aggregates according to the diameter of a sphere with the same aerodynamic behavior in a mechanical force field. A new method of interpreting the aerodynamic diameter of NCAs is described. The method can be used to calculate aggregate surface area or volume. This is useful since inertial instruments are normally calibrated for spheres, and the calibrations cannot be directly used to calculate aggregate properties. A linear relationship between aggregate aerodynamic diameter and primary particle diameter based on published Monte-Carlo drag calculations is derived. The relationship shows that the aggregate aerodynamic diameter is independent of the number of primary particles that compose an aggregate, hence the aggregate mass. The analysis applies to aggregates with low fractal dimension and uniform primary particle diameter. This is often a reasonable approximation for the morphology of nanoparticles generated in high temperature gases. An analogy is the use of the sphere as an approximation for compact particles. The analysis is applied to the collection of NCAs by a low-pressure impactor. Our results indicate the low-pressure impactor collects aggregates with a known surface area per unit volume on each stage. Combustion processes often produce particles with aggregate structure. For diesel exhaust aggregates, the surface area per unit volume calculated by our method was about twice that of spheres with diameter equal to the aerodynamic diameter. Measurements of aggregates collected near a major freeway and at Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) were made for two aerodynamic cutoff diameter diameters (d a,50), 50 and 75 nm. (Aerodynamic cutoff diameter refers to the diameter of particles collected with 50% efficiency on a low-pressure impactor stage.) Near-freeway aggregates were probably primarily a mixture of diesel and internal combustion engine emissions. Aggregates collected at LAX were most likely present as a result of aircraft emissions. In both measurements, the aggregate aerodynamic diameters calculated from the primary particle diameter were fairly close to the stage cutoff diameter. The number of primary particles per aggregate varied one order of magnitude for particles depositing on the same stage. The average aggregate surface area per unit volume was 2.41 × 106 cm−1 and 2.59 × 106 cm−1 (50 nm d a,50) and 1.81 × 106 cm−1 and 1.68 × 106 cm−1 (75 nm d a,50) for near-freeway and LAX measurements, respectively. These preliminary measurements are consistent with values calculated from theory.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barone T., 2004. The Nature of Ultrafine Atmospheric Aerosol: A Comparison of the Aerodynamic and Electrical Mobility Diameters. M.S. Thesis, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
Bérubé K.A., Jones T.P., Williamson B.J., Winters C., Morgan A.J., Richards R.J. (1999). Physicochemical characterisation of diesel exhaust particles: Factors for assessing biological activity. Atmos. Environ. 33:1599–1614
Blevins L.G., G.W. Mulholland, B.A. Benner & E.B. Steel, 2002. Morphology and chemistry of aircraft engine soot. In: Proceedings of the 2002 Spring Technical Meeting of the Western States Section of the Combustion Institute, The Combustion Institute, Pittsburg, PA, MS014
Blevins L.G., 2003. Particulate matter emitted from aircraft engines. AIAA Paper 2003–2764
Brasil A.M., Farias T.L., Carvalho M.G. (2000) Evaluation of the fractal properties of cluster-cluster aggregates. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 33: 440–454
Cass G.R., Hughes L.S., Bhave P., Kleeman M.J., Allen J.O., Salmon L.G. (2000). The chemical composition of atmospheric ultrafine particles. Philos. Trans. Roy Soc. Lond. a Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 358(1775):2581–2592
Chan P., Dahneke B. (1981) Free-molecule drag on straight chains of uniform spheres. J. Appl. Phys. 52(5):3106–3110
Dahneke B. (1982) Viscous resistance of straight-chain aggregates of uniform spheres. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 1: 179–185
Davies C.N. (1945) Definitive equations for the fluid resistance of spheres. Proc. Phys. Soc. 57(4): 259–270
Dye A.L., Rhead M.M., Trier C.J. (2000) The quantitative morphology of roadside and background urban aerosol in Plymouth, UK. Atmos. Environ. 34: 3139–3148
Fenton D.L., E.H. Luebcke & E. Norstrom, 1979. Physical characterization of particle material from a turbine engine. ASME 79-GT-179
Friedlander S.K. (2000) Smoke, Dust and Haze: Fundamentals of Aerosol Dynamics (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press, New York
Fuchs, N.A., 1964. The Mechanics of Aerosols. Oxford: Pergamon. Republished by Dover, New York (1989)
Goschnick J., Natzeck C., & Sommer M. (2004) Depth-resolved analysis of traffic soot sampled in the vicinity of a German motorway. Surf. Interf. Anal. 36: 857–861
Harrison R.M., Tilling R., Romero M.S.C., Harrad S., Jarvis K. (2003) A study of trace metals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the roadside environment. Atmos. Environ. 37(17):2391–2402
Hering S.V., Flagan R.C., Friedlander S.K. (1978). Design and evaluation of a new low-pressure impactor. Environ. Sci. Technol. 12(6): 667–672
Hering S.V., Collins J.J., Richards W.L., Friedlander S.K. (1979). Design and evaluation of a new low-pressure impactor. 2. Environ. Sci. Technol. 13(2):184–188
Jung H., Kittelson D.B., Zachariah M.R. (2004) Kinetics and visualization of soot oxidation using transmission electron microscopy. Combust. Flame 136: 445–456
Kasper G. (1982). Dynamics and measurement of smokes. 2. The aerodynamic diameter of chain aggregates in the transition regime. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 1(2):201–214
Kasper G., Shaw D.T. (1983). Comparative size distribution measurements on chain aggregates. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 2:369–381
Kaye B.H. (1995) Applied fractal geometry and powder technology. Chaos, Solitons Fract. 6: 245–253
Kendall M., Brown L., Trought K. (2004) Molecular adsorption at particle surfaces: A PM toxicity mediation mechanism. Inhal. Toxicol. 16(Suppl. 1):99–105
Kim S., Jaques P.A., Chang M.C., Barone T., Xiong C., Friedlander S.K., Sioutas C. (2001) Versatile aerosol concentration enrichment system (VACES) for simultaneous in vivo and in vitro evaluation of toxic effects of ultrafine, fine and coarse ambient particles. 2. Field evaluation. J. Aerosol Sci. 32:1299–1314
Kleeman M.J., Schauer J.J., Cass G.R. (2000). Size and composition of fine particulate matter emitted from motor vehicles. Environ. Sci. Technol. 34(7): 1132–1142
Kodas T.T., Hampden-Smith M. (1999). Aerosol Processing of Materials. Wiley-VCH, New York
Kops J., Dibbets G., Hermans L., Van De Vate J.F. (1975). The aerodynamic diameter of branched chain-like aggregates. J. Aerosol Sci. 6: 329–333
Köylü ü.ö., Faeth G.M., Farias T.L., Carvalho M.G. (1995) Fractal and projected structure properties of soot aggregates. Combust. Flame 100: 621–633
Kütz S., 1994. In-situ Methoden zur Bestimmung von Struktureigenschaften gasgetragener Agglomerate, PhD Thesis, University of Duisburg, Duisburg
Lall A.A., Friedlander S.K. (2006). On-line measurement of ultrafine aggregate surface area and volume distributions by electrical mobility analysis. 1. Theoretical analysis. J. Aerosol Sci. 37(3): 260–271
Li X.Y., Gilmour P.S., Donaldson K., MacNee W. (1996) Free radical activity and pro-inflammatory effects of particulate air pollution (PM10) in vivo and in vitro. Thorax 51: 1216–1222
Liscinsky D.S., M.B. Colket, D.J. Hautman & B. True, 2001. Particle formation in gas turbine combustors. AIAA Paper 2001–3745
Liu B.B., S. Srinivasachar, & J.J. Helble (2000). The effect of chemical composition on the fractal-like structure of combustion-generated inorganic aerosols. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 33: 459–469
Marple V.A., Rubow K.L., Behm S.M. (1991) A miroorifice uniform deposition impactor (MOUDI): Description, calibration, and use. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 14: 434–445
Marple V.A., Rubow K.L., Olson B.A. (2001). Inertial, gravitational, centrifugal, and thermal collection techniques. In: Willeke K., Baron P.A. (eds) Aerosol Measurement. Principles, Techniques and Applications. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York
Miguel A.H., Eiguren-Fernandez A., Sioutas C., Fine P.M., Geller M., Mayo P.R. (2005). Observations of twelve USEPA priority polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the Aitken size range (10–32 nm Dp). Aerosol Sci. Technol. 39(5): 415–418
Oberdörster G., Gelein R., Johnston C.J., Mercer P., Corson N., Finkelstein J.N. (1998). Ambient ultrafine particles: Inducers of acute lung injury?. In: Dungworth D.L. et al (eds) Relationships between Respiratory Disease and Exposure to Air Pollution. ILSI Press, Washington
Park K., Kittelson D.B., Zachariah M.R., McMurry P.H. (2004). Measurement of inherent material density of nanoparticle agglomerates. J. Nanoparticle Res. 6(2): 267–272
Pratsinis S.E. (1998). Flame aerosol synthesis of ceramic powders. Progress Energy Combust. Sci. 24(3): 197–219
Renwick L.C., Brown D., Clouter A., Donaldson K. (2005). Increased inflammation and altered macrophage chemotactic responses caused by two ultrafine particle types. Occup. Environ. Med. 61:442–447
Samson R.J., Mulholland G.W., Gentry J.W. (1987) Structural analysis of soot agglomerates. Langmuir 3: 272–281
Schmidt-Ott A., Baltensperger U., Gaggeler H.W., Jost D.T. (1990). Scaling behavior of physical parameters describing agglomerates. J. Aerosol Sci. 21(6): 711–717
Seagrave J., Knall C., McDonald J., Mauderly J. (2004). Diesel particulate material binds and concentrates a proinflammatory cytokine that causes neutrophil migration. Inhal. Toxicol. 16(Suppl. 1):93–98
Singh M., Jaques P.A., Sioutas C. (2002). Size distribution and diurnal characteristics of particle-bound metals in source and receptor sites of the Los Angeles Basin. Atmos. Environ. 36: 1675–1689
Stöber W., Berner A., Blaschke R. (1969) The aerodynamic diameter of aggregates of uniform spheres. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 29(4): 710–719
Van Gulijk C., Marijnissen J.C.M., Makkee M., Moulijn J.A., Schmidt-Ott A. (2004). Measuring diesel soot with a scanning mobility particle sizer and an electrical low-pressure impactor: Performance assessment with a model for fractal like aggregates. J. Aerosol Sci. 35: 633–655
Wang C.S., Friedlander S.K., Mädler L. (2005). Nanoparticle aerosol science and technology: An overview. China Particuol. 3: 243–254
Xiong C., Friedlander S.K. (2001). Morphological properties of atmospheric aerosol aggregates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98(21): 11851–11856
Zhu Y.F., Hinds W.C., Kim S., Sioutas C. (2002). Concentration and size distribution of ultrafine particles near a major highway. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 52: 1032–1042
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Eva Schmidt for help with the image analysis. This work was supported in part by NSF grant ATM 0124590 and NIEHS grant 5 P30 ES07048-07. Support also came from the Southern California Particle Center and Supersite, funded by the USEPA through grant R82735201, and the California Air Resources Board under contract 98–316. The research has not been subjected to the USEPA peer and policy review and therefore does not necessarily reflect the views of the Agency and no official endorsement should be inferred.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barone, T.L., Lall, A.A., Zhu, Y. et al. Inertial deposition of nanoparticle chain aggregates: Theory and comparison with impactor data for ultrafine atmospheric aerosols. J Nanopart Res 8, 669–680 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-006-9128-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-006-9128-z