Abstract
Altered breathing pattern is an aspect of dysfunctional breathing but few standardised techniques exist to evaluate it. This study investigates a technique for evaluating and quantifying breathing pattern, called the Manual Assessment of Respiratory Motion (MARM) and compares it to measures performed with Respiratory Induction Plethysmography (RIP). About 12 subjects altered their breathing and posture while 2 examiners assessed their breathing using the MARM. Simultaneous measurements with RIP were taken. Inter-examiner agreement and agreement between MARM and RIP were assessed. The ability of the measurement methods to differentiate between diverse breathing and postural patterns was compared. High levels of agreement between examiners were found with the MARM for measures of the upper rib cage relative to lower rib cage/abdomen motion during breathing but not for measures of volume. The measures of upper rib cage dominance during breathing correlated with similar measures obtained from RIP. Both RIP and MARM measures methods were able to differentiate between abdominal and thoracic breathing patterns, but only MARM was able to differentiate between breathing changes occurring as result of slumped versus erect sitting posture. This study suggests that the MARM is a reliable clinical tool for assessing breathing pattern.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aliverti, A., Cala, S. J., et al. (1997). Human respiratory muscle actions and control during exercise. Journal of Applied Physiology, 83(4), 1256–1269.
Aliverti, A., Dellaca, R., et al. (2000). Optoelectronic plethysmography in intensive care patients. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care, 161(5), 1546–1552.
Aliverti, A., Ghidoli, G., et al. (2003). Chest Wall kinematic determinants of diaphragm length by optoelectronic plethysmography and ultrasonography. Journal of Applied Physiology, 94(2), 621–630.
Aliverti, A., Kayser, B., et al. (2007). A human model of the pathophysiology of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respirology, 12(4), 478–485.
Chaitow, L., Bradley D., et al. (2002). Multidiciplinary approaches to breathing pattern disorders (131 pp). Edinburgh, London, New York, Philadelphia, St. Louis, Sydney, Toronto: Churchill Livingston.
Clanton, T., & Diaz, T. (1995). Clinical assessment of the respiratory muscles. Physical Therapy, 75(11), 983–999.
De Troyer, A., & Estenne, M. (1988). Functional anatomy of the respiratory muscles. Clinics in Chest Medicine, 9(2), 175–193.
Dixhoorn, J. v. (1994). Two year follow up of breathing pattern in cardiac patients. In Proceedings 25th Annual meeting. Association for Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback: Wheat Ridge, CO, USA.
Dixhoorn, J. v. (2004). A method for assessment of one dimension of dysfunctional breathing: distribution of breathing movement. Biological Psychology, 67, 415–416.
Dixhoorn, J. v. (2007). Whole-body breathing: A systems perspective on respiratory retraining. In P. M. Lehrer, R. L. Woolfolk, & W. E. Sime (Eds.), Principles and practice of stress management (pp. 291–332). New York: Guilford Press.
Morgan, M. (2002). Dysfunctional breathing asthma: Is it common, identifiable and correctable. Thorax, 57(Suppl II), ii31–ii35.
Pryor, J. A., & Prasad, S. A. (2002). Physiotherapy for respiratory and cardiac problems (pp. 9–24). Edinburg: Churchill Livingstone.
Smith, J. C., & Mead, J. (1986). Three degree of freedom description of movement of the chest wall. Journal of Applied Physiology, 60(2), 928–934.
Society (American Thoracic, European Respiratory. (2002). ATS/ERS statement on respiratory muscle testing. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 166, 518–624.
Thomas, M., McKinley, R. K., et al. (2001). Prevalence of dysfunctional breathing in patients treated for asthma in primary care: cross sectional survey. British Medical Journal, 322, 1098–1100.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Courtney, R., van Dixhoorn, J. & Cohen, M. Evaluation of Breathing Pattern: Comparison of a Manual Assessment of Respiratory Motion (MARM) and Respiratory Induction Plethysmography. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback 33, 91–100 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-008-9052-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-008-9052-3