Abstract
Objectives
To characterise the imaging findings of patients with chylothorax and to identify the leak site using unenhanced MRI.
Methods
Seven patients with chylothorax and 30 healthy individuals (as the control group) underwent three-dimensional heavily and routine T2-weighted MRI. Morphological changes and diameters of the thoracic duct, chyloma display, and some dilated accessory lymph channels were evaluated and measured. The differences between patients and the control group were compared. The leak sites of the thoracic duct and parietal pleura were also identified.
Results
The patients had a higher display rate of the entire thoracic duct and some accessory lymphatic channels, enlarged diameters and tortuous configuration of the thoracic duct, and existence of chylomas compared with the control group (P < 0.05). Seven leaks of the thoracic duct in five patients and five leaks of the parietal pleura in four patients were identified. Close relationships between the leak of thoracic duct and the chylomas or the meshworks of tiny lymphatics were found (P < 0.05).
Conclusion
Unenhanced MRI appears reliable in the detection of morphological changes of thoracic lymphatics and in the identification of chyloma and leak sites in patients with chylothorax, which helps appropriate treatment planning and follow-up.
Key Points
• Unenhanced MRI can display the abnormal imaging findings in patients with chylothorax.
• MRI can reveal the leak sites of the thoracic duct and parietal pleura.
• MRI provides a useful tool for appropriate treatment planning and follow-up.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
McGrath EE, Blades Z, Anderson PB (2010) Chylothorax: aetiology, diagnosis and therapeutic options. Respir Med 104:1–8
Talwar A, Lee HJ (2008) A contemporary review of chylothorax. Indian J Chest Dis Allied Sci 50:343–351
Smoke A, Delegge MH (2008) Chyle leaks: consensus on management? Nutr Clin Pract 23:529–532
Restrepo CS, Eraso A, Ocazionez D, Lemos J, Martinez S, Lemos DF (2008) The diaphragmatic crura and retrocrural space: normal imaging appearance, variants, and pathologic conditions. Radiographics 28:1289–1305
Hayashi S, Miyazaki M (1999) Thoracic duct: visualization at nonenhanced MR lymphography–initial experience. Radiology 212:598–600
Kos S, Haueisen H, Lachmund U, Roeren T (2007) Lymphangiography: forgotten tool or rising star in the diagnosis and therapy of postoperative lymphatic vessel leakage. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 30:968–973
Deso S, Ludwig B, Kabutey NK, Kim D, Guermazi A (2012) Lymphangiography in the diagnosis and localization of various chyle leaks. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 35:117–126
Erden A, Fitoz S, Yagmurlu B, Erden I (2005) Abdominal confluence of lymph trunks: detectability and morphology on heavily T2-weighted images. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:35–40
Takahashi H, Kuboyama S, Abe H, Aoki T, Miyazaki M, Nakata H (2003) Clinical feasibility of noncontrast-enhanced magnetic resonance lymphography of the thoracic duct. Chest 124:2136–2142
Matsushima S, Ichiba N, Hayashi D, Fukuda K (2007) Nonenhanced magnetic resonance lymphoductography: visualization of lymphatic system of the trunk on 3-dimensional heavily T2-weighted image with 2-dimensional prospective acquisition and correction. J Comput Assist Tomogr 31:299–302
Okuda I, Udagawa H, Takahashi J, Yamase H, Kohno T, Nakajima Y (2009) Magnetic resonance-thoracic ductography: imaging aid for thoracic surgery and thoracic duct depiction based on embryological considerations. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 57:640–646
Kato T, Takase K, Ichikawa H, Satomi S, Takahashi S (2011) Thoracic duct visualization: combined use of multidetector-row computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 35:260–265
Yu DX, Ma XX, Zhang XM, Wang Q, Li CF (2010) Morphological features and clinical feasibility of thoracic duct: detection with nonenhanced magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 T. J Magn Reson Imaging 32:94–100
Eibenberger KL, Dock WI, Ammann ME, Dorffner R, Hörmann MF, Grabenwöger F (1994) Quantification of pleural effusions: sonography versus radiography. Radiology 191:681–684
Doerr CH, Miller DL, Ryu JH (2001) Chylothorax. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 22:617–626
Akcali O, Kiray A, Ergur I, Tetik S, Alici E (2006) Thoracic duct variations may complicate the anterior spine procedures. Eur Spine J 15:1347–1351
Doerr CH, Allen MS, Nichols FC 3rd, Ryu JH (2005) Etiology of chylothorax in 203 patients. Mayo Clin Proc 80:867–870
Nair SK, Petko M, Hayward MP (2007) Aetiology and management of chylothorax in adults. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 32:362–369
Denk PM, Gatta P, Swanström LL (2008) Multimedia article. Prone thoracoscopic thoracic duct ligation for postsurgical chylothorax. Surg Endosc 22:2742
Verma SK, Mitchell DG, Bergin D et al (2009) Dilated cisternae chyli: a sign of uncompensated cirrhosis at MR imaging. Abdom Imaging 34:211–216
Erden A (2004) Cisterna chyli: an incidental finding on MR cholangiopancreatography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 82:262
Liu ME, Branstetter BF 4th, Whetstone J, Escott EJ (2006) Normal CT appearance of the distal thoracic duct. AJR Am J Roentgenol 18:1615–1620
Pinto PS, Sirlin CB, Andrade-Barreto OA, Brown MA, Mindelzun RE, Mattrey RF (2004) Cisterna chyli at routine abdominal MR imaging: a normal anatomic structure in the retrocrural space. Radiographics 4:809–817
Ozturk A, Yousem DM (2007) Magnetic resonance imaging findings in diffuse lymphangiomatosis: neuroradiological manifestations. Acta Radiol 48:560–564
Motoyama S, Okuyama M, Saito R, Kitamura M, Ishiyama K, Ogawa J (2005) Magnetic resonance imaging for chylothorax after esophagectomy. Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 53:434–436
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yu, Dx., Ma, Xx., Wang, Q. et al. Morphological changes of the thoracic duct and accessory lymphatic channels in patients with chylothorax: detection with unenhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 23, 702–711 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2642-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2642-8