TABLE 1

Network estimates evaluating the impact of the interventions on primary and secondary outcomes in the overall population

ComparisonMD or OR (95% CI)p-valueI2 (%)τ2KGRADE#Classification of intervention
Re-intubation360.120
 HFNO versus COT0.60 (0.43–0.84)0.00311ModerateaLarge beneficial effect
 NIV versus COT0.61 (0.46–0.81)<0.00115ModerateaLarge beneficial effect
 NIV versus HFNO0.98 (0.69–1.40)0.8445Moderateb
VAP00
 HFNO versus COT0.36 (0.18–0.71)0.0033ModerateaLarge beneficial effect
 NIV versus COT0.49 (0.34–0.73)<0.0017ModerateaLarge beneficial effect
 NIV versus HFNO0.74 (0.39–1.38)0.8551Moderateb
Discomfort490.493
 HFNO versus COT2.60 (0.79–8.60)0.1177Lowa,bLarge harmful effect
 NIV versus COT13.14 (5.94–29.04)<0.0011ModerateaLarge harmful effect
 NIV versus HFNO0.20 (0.06–0.62)0.0501High
ICU mortality60.017
 HFNO versus COT0.81 (0.44–1.48)0.4895Lowa,bSmall beneficial effect
 NIV versus COT0.64 (0.39–1.05)0.0758ModerateaLarge beneficial effect
 NIV versus HFNO1.26 (0.63–2.52)0.8341Lowa,b
Hospital mortality60.017
 HFNO versus COT0.86 (0.62–1.18)0.4315ModerateaSmall beneficial effect
 NIV versus COT0.64 (0.47–0.87)0.00411ModerateaLarge beneficial effect
 NIV versus HFNO1.35 (0.97–1.86)0.1944Moderateb
ICU length of stay871.048
 HFNO versus COT−0.12 (−0.85–0.61)0.7419Very lowa,b,c,dTrivial beneficial effect
 NIV versus COT−0.72 (−1.44–0.00)0.04914Very lowa,c,dSmall beneficial effect
 NIV versus HFNO0.60 (−0.33–1.53)0.3204Very lowb,c,d
Hospital length of stay862.230
 HFNO versus COT−0.04 (−1.27–1.18)0.2648Very lowa,b,cTrivial beneficial effect
 NIV versus COT−2.38 (−3.69– −1.07)<0.00110Lowa,cLarge beneficial effect
 NIV versus HFNO2.34 (0.80–3.88)0.1893Very lowa,b,c
Time to re-intubation8987.485
 HFNO versus COT2.99 (−8.13–14.10)0.5643Very lowa,b,cTrivial harmful effect
 NIV versus COT9.17 (−1.06–19.40)0.1054Very lowa,b,cSmall harmful effect
 NIV versus HFNO−6.18 (−18.86–6.5)0.3711Very lowa,b,c

MD: mean difference; OR: odds ratio; τ2 and I2: loop heterogeneity; K: number of studies providing direct evidence; GRADE: Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluations; HFNO: high-flow nasal oxygen; COT: conventional oxygen therapy; NIV: noninvasive ventilation; VAP: ventilator-associated pneumonia; ICU: intensive care unit. #: GRADE certainty of evidence: a: lowered one level for risk of bias; b: lowered one level for imprecision as confidence intervals do not allow excluding harm; c: lowered one level for inconsistency; d: lowered one level for incoherence. : for dichotomous outcome variables, large intervention effects were considered for OR >1.3 or <0.7, moderate intervention effects for 1.2<OR≤1.3 or 0.7≤OR<0.8, small intervention effects for 1.1<OR≤1.2 or 0.8≤OR<0.9 and trivial intervention effects for 1.0<OR≤1.1 or 0.9≤OR<1.0; for length of stay, large intervention effects were considered for MD>2, moderate intervention effects for 1<MD≤2, small intervention effects for 0.5<MD≤1 and trivial intervention effects for 0<MD≤0.5; for time to re-intubation, large intervention effects were considered for MD>24, moderate intervention effects for 12<MD≤24, small intervention effects for 6<MD≤12 and trivial intervention effects for 0<MD≤6. COT was considered as the reference intervention. Bold indicates p<0.05.