TABLE 3

Recruitment, uptake, engagement and completion of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) sessions and trial attrition

Author, year [reference]Screened (reasons for ineligibility) Recruited: randomisedUptake of PR/usual care (reasons for nonstart)Dose of PR and definition of engagementEngaged with defined number of sessions (reasons for non-engagement)Completed PR programme (reasons for dropout)Trial attrition rate (reason for attrition)
Home-PR versus usual care
 Boxall, 2005 [50]
RoB: high
Eligibility screening not reported
60 recruited: home-PR n=30, usual care n=30
Uptake of PR: home-PR 28/30 (93%) (2 ill-health)Home-PR: 11 sessions (12 weeks: 11 visits + daily unsupervised exercise)
Engagement not defined
Engagement not reportedHome-PR: 23/30 (77%) (3 withdrew, 1 died, 1 ill-health)Post-PR
Home-PR: 7/30 (23%) (3 withdrew, 1 died, 3 ill-health)
Control: 7/30 (23%) (2 withdrew, 2 died, 1 ill-health, 2 moved)
 Chen, 2018 [51]
RoB: high
265 screened for eligibility
(77 lost to contact, 44 distances >44 km, 53 declined, 36 comorbidity, 38 other)
55 (21%) recruited: home-PR n=29, usual care n=26
Uptake not reportedHome-PR: 36 sessions (12 weeks: 3× per week unsupervised exercise)
Engagement not defined
Engagement not reportedHome-PR: 25/29 (86%) (3 ill-health, 1 moved)
Usual care: 22/26 (85%) (1 ill-health, 3 not serious enough)
Post-PR
Home-PR: 4/29 (14%) (1 moved, 3 ill-health)
Usual care: 4/26 (15%) (1 not serious, 1 ill-health)
 Ghanem, 2010 [53]
RoB: high
Eligibility screening not reported
39 recruited: home-PR n=25, usual care n=14
Uptake not reportedHome-PR: 48 sessions (8 weeks: alternate days unsupervised exercise)
Engagement not defined
Engagement not reportedCompletion not reportedPost-PR
Home-PR: 0/25 (0%)
Usual care: 0/14 (0%)
 Johnson-Warrington, 2016 [58]
RoB: moderate
464 screened for eligibility
175 declined, 76 not eligible, 49 comorbidity, 90 lost to contact
78 (17%) recruited: home-PR n=39, usual care n=39
Uptake not reportedHome-PR: 42 sessions (12 weeks 6 TCs + 3× per week unsupervised exercise)
Engagement not defined
Engagement not reportedHome-PR: 35/39 (90%) (2 ill-health, 1 preferred centre-PR, 1 not COPD)
Usual care: 36/39 (92%) (3 died)
Post-PR
Home-PR: 4/39 (10%)
(1 wanted centre-PR; 2 ill-health; 1 not COPD)
Usual care: 3/39 (8%)
(3 died)
 Mohammadi, 2013 [61]
RoB: high
106 assessed for eligibility
40 (38%) recruited: home-PR n=20, usual care n=20
Uptake not reportedHome-PR: 24 sessions
(8 weeks: 3 sessions then daily TCs + unsupervised sessions 3× per week)
Engagement not defined
Completion not reportedNot reported
No attrition reported
 Pradella, 2015 [63]
RoB: high
Eligibility screening not reported
50 recruited: home-PR n=32, usual care n=18
Uptake not reportedHome-PR: 24 sessions (8 weeks: weekly TCs + 3 unsupervised sessions per week)
Engagement not defined
Engagement not reportedHome-PR: 29/32 (91%) (1 withdrew; 1 died, 1 AECOPD)Post-PR
Home-PR: 3/32 (9%) (1 died, 1 withdrew, 1 AECOPD)
Usual care: 3/18 (17%) (2 withdrew, 1 AECOPD)
 Singh, 2003 [64]
RoB: high
Eligibility screening not reported
40 recruited: home-PR n=20, usual care n=20
Uptake not reportedHome-PR: 4 sessions (4 weeks: weekly visits + daily unsupervised exercise)
Engagement not defined
Engagement not reportedEngagement not reportedPost-PR
Home-PR: 0/20 (0%)
Control: 0/20 (0%)
 Varas, 2018 [65]
RoB: high
Eligibility screening not reported
40 recruited: home-PR n=21, usual care n=19
Uptake of PR:
home-PR 19/21 (90%) (2 withdrew)
Home-PR: 8 sessions (1× per week + unsupervised exercise ×8 weeks)
Engagement not defined
Engagement not reportedHome-PR: 17/21 (81%)
(2 did not complete)
Post-PR
Home-PR: 4/21 (19%) (4 withdrew)
Usual care: 3/19 (16%) (3 withdrew)
3 months and 12 months
Home-PR: 4/21 (19%)
Usual care: 3/19 (16%)
Cluster randomised implementation trial: home-PR versus usual care
 Liang, 2019 [59]
RoB: high
Cluster RCT: 21 practices/group
1050 screened for eligibility
272 (26%) recruited: home-PR n=157, control n=115
GP referred for PR: home-PR 107/157 (68%)
Uptake of PR: home-PR 71/107 (66%)
Home-PR: 8 sessions (8 weeks: 1 session + weekly TC unsupervised exercise)
Engagement defined as ≥70% sessions attended
Engaged ≥70%
Home-PR: 49/107 (46%)
Completion not reported6 months
Home-PR: 39/157 (25%)
Usual care: 21/115 (18%)
12 months
Home-PR: 44/157 (28%) (27 lost to follow-up, 15 withdrew, 2 died)
Usual care: 38/115 (33%) (29 lost to follow-up, 7 withdrew, 1 moved, 1 died)
Home-PR versus centre-PR
 Güell, 2008 [54]
RoB: high
Eligibility screening not reported
57 recruited: home-PR n=28, centre-PR n=29
Uptake not reportedHome-PR: 27 sessions (9 weeks: 4 sessions + 3× per week unsupervised
Centre-PR: 27 sessions (9 weeks: 3× per week)
Engagement not defined
Engagement not reportedHome-PR: 23/28 (82%) (4 dropped out, 1 chest pain)
Centre-PR: 28/29 (96%) (1 dropped out)
Post-PR
Home-PR: 5/28 (18%)
Centre-PR: 1/29 (4%)
6 months
Home-PR: 8/28 (29%) (4 withdrew, 1 ill-health, 3 lost to follow-up)
Centre-PR: 6/29 (21%) (1 dropped out, 5 lost to follow-up)
 Hansen, 2020 [55]
RoB: low
1099 assessed for eligibility:
(608 declined centre-PR, 251 declined home-PR, 40 comorbidity, 66 other)
134 (12%) recruited: home-PR n=67, centre-PR n=67
Uptake not reportedHome-PR: 30 sessions (10 weeks: 3 sessions per week)
Centre-PR: 20 sessions (10 weeks: 2 sessions per week)
Engagement defined as ≥70% sessions attended
Attendance defined as participating in the whole session
Engaged ≥70%
Home-PR: 49/67 (73%)
Centre-PR: 42/67 (63%)
Median (IQR) number sessions attended
Home-PR: 25/30 (20–28)
Centre-PR 16/20 (8/19)
Home-PR >70% engagement: OR 1.68, 95% CI 0.78–3.37; p<0.27
Home-PR: 57/67 (85%) (6 dropped out, 2 ill-health, 1 died, 1 AECOPD)
Centre-PR: 43/67 (64%) (10 dropped out, 8 ill-health, 2 died, 4 AECOPD)
Home-PR completing: OR 3.18, 95% CI 1.37–7.35; p<0.01
Post-PR
Home-PR: 20/67 (30%)
Centre-PR: 26/67 (39%)
3-month follow-up
Home-PR: 29/67 (43%)
Centre-PR: 26/67 (39%)
 Holland, 2017 [56]
RoB: low
295 assessed for eligibility
(27 recent PR, 10 comorbidities, 5 recent AECOPD, 67 declined (54 wanted centre-PR), 120 other)
166 (56%) recruited: home-PR n=80, centre-PR n=86
Uptake not reportedHome-PR: 8 sessions (8 weeks: visit then weekly TCs + unsupervised sessions)
Centre-PR: 16 sessions (8 weeks: twice weekly)
Engagement defined as ≥70% sessions attended
Mean/total sessions attended (range)
Home-PR: 7.4/8 (0–8)
Centre-PR 8.3/16 (0–16)
Engaged ≥70%
Home-PR: 73/80 (91%)
Centre-PR: 42/86 (49%)
Relative risk of noncompletion in centre-PR 1.91 (95% CI 1.52–2.41)
Home-PR: 73/80 (91%) (1 died, 1 lost to follow-up, 5 declined)
Centre-PR: 77/86 (89%) (1 died, 1 lost to follow-up, 7 declined)
Post-PR
Home-PR: 7/80 (9%)
Centre-PR: 9/86 (11%)
12-month follow-up
Home-PR: 18/80 (24%) (4 lost to follow-up, 9 declined follow-up, 5 died)
Centre-PR: 24/86 (28%) (10 lost to follow-up, 10 declined follow-up, 4 died)
 Horton, 2018 [57]
RoB: low
1162 assessed for eligibility
(185 DNA, 32 comorbidities, 606 not eligible, 140 wanted centre-PR, 100 declined, 199 other)
287 (25%) recruited: home-PR n=145, centre-PR n=142
Uptake not reportedHome-PR: 21 sessions (7 weeks: 3 unsupervised sessions a week)
Centre-PR: 14 sessions (7 weeks: twice weekly)
Engagement not defined
Engagement not reportedHome-PR: 94/145 (85%) (16 lost to follow-up, 16 comorbidities, 2 died, 2 wanted centre-PR, 17 other)
Centre-PR: 84/142 (59%) (30 lost to follow-up, 12 comorbidities, 1 died, 3 wanted home-PR, 12 others)
Post-PR
Home-PR: 51/145 (35%)
Centre-PR: 58/142 (41%)
6 months
Home-PR: 70/145 (48%) (7 lost to follow-up, 3 DNA, 3 declined, 13 comorbidities, 3 other)
Centre-PR: 72/142 (51%) (8 lost to follow-up, 1 comorbidity, 3 died, 2 others)
 Maltais, 2008 [60]
RoB: moderate
631 assessed for eligibility (214 declined, 27 transport problems, 1 died, 29 others)
252 (40%) recruited: home-PR n=126, centre-PR n=126
Uptake not reportedHome-PR: 24 sessions (8 weeks: 3 unsupervised sessions per week)
Centre-PR: 24 sessions (4× 8 weeks: 3 sessions per week)
Engagement defined as ≥60% sessions attended
Engaged ≥60%
Home-PR: 123/126 (98%)
Centre-PR:117/126 (93%)
Completion not reportedPost-PR
Home-PR: 7/126 (6%)
Centre-PR: 12/126 (10%)
12 months
Home-PR: 19/126 (15%) (2 lost to follow-up, 16 withdrew, 1 died)
Centre-PR: 17/126 (13%) (2 lost to follow-up, 14 withdrew, 1 died)
 Pehlivan, 2020 [62]
RoB: high
71 assessed for eligibility
71 recruited: home-PR n=39, centre-PR n=32
Uptake not reportedHome-PR: 32 sessions (8 weeks: 4 unsupervised sessions per week)
Centre-PR: 16 sessions (8 weeks: 2 sessions per week)
Engagement not defined
Engagement not reported
4 home-PR patients were excluded for “noncompliance”
Home-PR: 35/39 (4 discontinued)
Centre-PR: 32/32
Post-PR
Home-PR: 4/39 (10%) (4 withdrew)
Centre-PR: 0/32 (0%)
Three-arm trial (home-PR versus centre PR versus usual care
 Mendes de Oliveira, 2010 [52]
RoB: high
216 assessed for eligibility (65 declined, 32 ineligible, 2 died)
117 (54%) recruited: home-PR n=42, centre-PR n=46, usual care n=29
Uptake not reportedHome-PR: 36 sessions (12 weeks: TCs + 3 unsupervised sessions per week)
Centre-PR: 36 sessions (12 weeks: 3 sessions per week)
Engagement not defined
Engagement not reportedHome-PR: 35/42 (83%) (7 “abandoned” the programme)
Centre-PR: 27/46 (59%) (7 “abandoned” the programme)
Post-PR
Home-PR: 9/42 (21%) (2 lost to follow-up)
Centre-PR: 22/45 (50%) (4 lost to follow-up)
Usual care: 0/29 (0%)

Home-PR: home-based pulmonary rehabilitation; RoB: risk of bias; centre-PR: centre-based pulmonary rehabilitation; TC: telephone contact; AECOPD: acute exacerbation of COPD; RCT: randomised controlled trial; GP: general practitioner; IQR: interquartile range; DNA: did not attend.