TABLE 1

Main characteristics and results of the studies included in the systematic review

Study, year, referenceclinicaltrials.gov identifierStudy characteristicsTreatment duration (weeks)Number of analysed patientsDrugs, doses and regimen of administration#Inhaler device (brand)Patient characteristicsAge (years)Male (%)Current smokers (%)Smoking history (pack-years)Post-bronchodilator FEV1 (% predicted)Outcome measurements of the impact on airway mucusJadad scoreMain results
Smith et al. 2019 [37]NCT02375724Multicentre, phase IV, randomised, double-blind, PCB-controlled, parallel-group8269ACL 400 μg twice daily versus PCBACL: multidose DPI (Genuair/Pressair)Moderate COPD62.060.264.0NA64.2E-RS cough and sputum domain score and LCQ total score2ACL significantly improved cough and sputum production in symptomatic patients with moderate COPD compared to placebo
Beier et al. 2017 [27]NCT01462929Post hoc analysis of a multicentre, phase IIIB, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, PCB- and active-controlled, parallel-group6277ACL 400 μg twice daily versus TIO 18 μg once daily versus PCBACL: MDI (Genuair/Pressair); TIO: DPI (HandiHaler)Symptomatic moderate to severe COPD (FEV1 ≥30% and <80% of predicted; post- bronchodilator FEV1/FVC<0.7; E-RS in COPD baseline score ≥10 units)62.164.154.141.054.6E-RS cough and sputum domain score and in severity of early-morning cough and phlegm symptoms5ACL provided additional improvements compared to TIO in E-RS cough and sputum symptoms in patients with moderate to severe COPD
Tagaya et al. 2016 [28]NAOpen-label, non-controlled822TIO 18 μg once dailyDPI (HandiHaler)COPD67.081.80.0NA59.0CASA-Q score, nasal clearance time, and level of mucin concentration in sputumNATIO decreased symptoms associated with sputum in COPD patients
Jones et al. 2016 [38]NCT01001494 (ATTAIN study) [46]; NCT01437397 (AUGMENT COPD I study) [47]Post hoc pooled analysis of two multicentre, phase III, randomised, double-blind, PCB-controlled, parallel-group studies241161ACL 400 μg twice daily versus PCBMDI (Genuair/Pressair);Moderate to severe stable COPD (FEV1 ≥30% and <80% of predicted; post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC<0.7)63.260.651.947.154.4E-RS cough and sputum domain scoreATTAIN: 5; AUGMENT COPD I: 5ACL significantly improved E-RS cough and sputum symptoms regardless of the patients’ level of symptoms at baseline
Lange et al. 2016 [39]NAMulticentre, real-life, prospective, non-interventional≃24874ACL 400 μg twice daily (either as initial therapy, switch of treatment or as add-on therapy)MDI (Genuair)COPD (NA)69.346.036.0NA54.9CAT score for cough and mucusNAACL was associated with a significant improvement in CAT score for cough and mucus, an effect more pronounced in the LAMA naïve group
McGarvey et al. 2016 [29]NCT00891462 (ACCORD COPD I study) [42]; NCT01001494 (ATTAIN study) [46]; NCT01462929 [31]Post hoc analysis of three multicentre, phase III, randomised, double-blind, PCB-controlled (and active-controlled for NCT01462929), parallel-group studies12 (ACCORD COPD I study), 24 (ATTAIN study), 6 NCT014629291792ACL 400 μg twice daily versus TIO 18 μg once daily versus PCBACL: multidose DPI (Genuair/Pressair); TIO: DPI (HandiHaler)Moderate to severe stable COPD (FEV1 ≥30% and <80% of predicted; post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC<0.7)63.162.551.445.355.6E-RS cough and sputum domain score and frequency/severity of morning and night-time cough and sputum symptomsACCORD COPD I: 5; ATTAIN: 5; NCT01462929: 5ACL improved cough and sputum expectoration compared to PCB in stable COPD
Bateman et al. 2015 [40]NCT01462942 (ACLIFORM-COPD study) [43]; NCT01437397 (AUGMENT COPD I study) [47]Post hoc pooled analysis of two multicentre, phase III, randomised, double-blind, PCB-controlled, parallel-group studies242680ACL/FOR 400/12 μg twice daily versus ACL 400 μg twice daily versus FOR 12 μg twice daily versus PCBMultidose DPI (Genuair/Pressair)Moderate to severe stable COPD (FEV1 ≥30% and <80% of predicted; post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC<0.7)63.660.049.3≥10.053.6E-RS cough and sputum domain score and in early-morning and night-time cough and difficulty in bringing up phlegm symptoms scoreACLIFORM-COPD: 5; AUGMENT COPD I: 5ACL/FOR significantly improved the early-morning and night-time difficulty in bringing up phlegm compared to PCB in patients with moderate to severe COPD
Marth et al. 2015 [41]NAMulticentre, real-life, prospective, non-interventional≃12795ACL 400 μg twice daily (either as initial therapy, switch of treatment or as add-on therapy)Multidose DPI (Eklira Genuair)COPD (NA)63.256.044.0≥10.0NACAT score for cough and phlegmNAACL significantly reduced the CAT score for phlegm and cough in COPD patients
DUrzo et al. 2014 [30]NCT01005901 (GLOW1) [44]; NCT00929110 (GLOW2) [45]Post hoc pooled analysis of two phase III, multicentre, randomised, double-blind (open-label TIO in GLOW2), PCB-controlled, active-controlled (only GLOW2), parallel-group studies26 (GLOW1); 52 (GLOW2)1854GLY 50 μg once daily versus PCB (GLOW1);
GLY 50 μg once daily versus PCB versus open-label TIO 18 μg once daily (GLOW2)
GLY: DPI (Breezhaler); TIO: DPI (HandiHaler)Moderate to severe stable COPD (FEV1 ≥30% and <80% of predicted; post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC<0.7)63.871.040.547.355.4Symptom score for cough, sputum production, and sputum colourGLOW1: 3;
GLOW2: 3
TIO and GLY significantly improved the sputum production in moderate to severe COPD patients
Beier et al. 2013 [31]NCT01462929Multicentre, phase IIIB, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, PCB- and active-controlled, parallel-group6414ACL 400 μg twice daily versus TIO 18 μg once daily versus PCBACL: MDI (Genuair/Pressair); TIO: DPI (HandiHaler)Moderate to severe COPD (FEV1 ≥30% and <80% of predicted; post- bronchodilator FEV1/FVC<0.7)62.365.553.642.055.8E-RS cough and sputum domain score5Improvement in E-RS cough and sputum symptoms were significantly greater for ACL and TIO compared to PCB
Kerwin et al. 2012 [42] (ACCORD COPD I study)NCT00891462Multicentre, phase III, randomised, double-blind, PCB-controlled, parallel-group12560ACL 200 μg twice daily versus ACL 400 μg twice daily versus PCBACL: MDI (Genuair/Pressair)Moderate to severe stable COPD (FEV1 ≥30% and <80% of predicted; post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC<0.7)64.353.044.854.347.2Frequency of night-time cough and sputum production, and severity of cough5Treatment of moderate-to-severe COPD patients with ACL was associated with significant improvements in night-time symptoms due to cough and sputum production, and severity of cough, compared to PCB
Welte et al. 2009 [32]NCT00496470Multicentre, phase IV, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group24660TIO 18 μg once daily+BUD/FOR 320/9 μg twice daily versus TIO 18 μg once daily+PCBTIO: DPI (HandiHaler); BUD/FOR: DPI (Turbuhaler)COPD (pre- bronchodilator FEV1 ≤50% of predicted; history of exacerbations requiring systemic steroids and/or antibiotics)62.575.0NA37.037.9Symptom score for cough4In patients with COPD TIO added to BUD/FOR FDC provided rapid and sustained improvement in symptom score for cough compared to TIO alone
Powrie et al. 2007 [33]NCT00405236Single-centre, randomised, double-blind, PCB-controlled, parallel-group52142TIO 18 μg once daily versus PCBTIO: DPI (HandiHaler)COPD (FEV1 <80% of predicted and FEV1/FVC<0.7)66.462.958.555.250.1Sputum reduction3Administration of TIO was significantly associated with a subjective decrease in sputum production compared to COPD patients treated with PCB
Hasani et al. 2004 [34]NASingle-centre, randomised, double-blind, PCB-controlled, parallel-group334TIO 18 μg once daily versus PCBTIO: DPI (HandiHaler)COPD (FEV1 ≥30% and ≤65% of predicted; post- bronchodilator FEV1/FVC≤0.7)66.079.458.852.044.0Number of coughs4Cough frequency was reduced with TIO compared to PCB during 6 h post administration
Casaburi et al. 2002 [35]NATwo multicentre, randomised, double-blind, PCB-controlled studies52921TIO 18 μg once daily versus PCBTIO: DPI (HandiHaler)COPD (FEV1 ≤65% of predicted; post- bronchodilator FEV1/FVC≤0.7)65.265.0NA61.038.6Symptom score for cough5In patients with stable COPD, TIO did not modulate the symptom score for cough after 52 weeks of treatment compared to PCB
Casaburi et al. 2000 [36]NAMulticentre, randomised, double-blind, PCB-controlled, parallel-group13470TIO 18 μg once daily versus PCBTIO: DPI (HandiHaler)COPD (FEV1 ≤65% of predicted; post- bronchodilator FEV1/FVC<0.7)65.265.3NA62.939.0Symptom score for cough4In patients with stable COPD, TIO reduced the symptom score for cough after 8 days of treatment but not at week 13, compared to PCB

#: All studies analysed long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) administered through oral inhalation. ACL: aclidinium bromide; BUD: budesonide; CASA-Q: Cough and Sputum Assessment - Questionnaire; CAT: COPD Assessment Test; DPI: dry powder inhaler; E-RS: Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Tool–Respiratory Symptoms; FDC: fixed-dose combination; FEV1: forced expiratory volume in 1 s; FOR: formoterol; FVC: forced vital capacity; GLY: glycopyrronium; LCQ: Leicester Cough Questionnaire; MDI: metered-dose inhaler; NA: not available; PCB: placebo; pMDI: pressurised metered dose inhaler; TIO: tiotropium bromide.