TABLE 1

Pneumonia incidence in identified COPD clinical trials, ordered by treatment comparison and pneumonia capture

CitationStudy and study lengthStudy populationPneumonia capture method#Pneumonia incidence, % (n/N)Increased incidence of pneumonia versus comparator arm
ICS armComparator armComparisonFold increase in risk+
Studies comparing ICS/LAMA/LABA triple therapy with non-ICS-containing treatment
 Pneumonia capture: investigator reporting confirmed by radiographic imaging and independent adjudication
  Rabe, 2020 [14]ETHOS (52 weeks)Post-bronchodilator FEV1 25–50% pred and ≥1 moderate/severe exacerbation or post-bronchodilator FEV1 50–65% pred and ≥2 moderate or ≥1 severe exacerbation in the year prior to screening
CAT total score ≥10
Investigator reported, adjudicated by a clinical end-point independent committee
Radiographic imaging compatible with the diagnosis of pneumonia, ≥2 of a list of clinical signs, symptoms or laboratory findings, and treatment with antibiotics and/or antiviral and/or antifungal agents were also required to support the adjudication
BUD/GLY/FOR 320/18/9.6 µg twice daily: 4.2% (90/2144)
BUD/GLY/FOR 160/18/9.6 µg twice daily: 3.5% (75/2124)
BUD/FOR 320/9.6 µg twice daily: 4.5% (96/2136)
GLY/FOR 18/9.6 µg twice daily: 2.3% (48/2125)BUD/GLY/FOR 320/18/9.6 µg versus GLY/FOR1.9
BUD/GLY/FOR 160/18/9.6 µg versus GLY/FOR1.6
BUD/FOR versus GLY/FOR2.0
  Ferguson, 2018    [26]KRONOS (24 weeks)Post-bronchodilator FEV1 ≥25% and <80% pred
CAT total score ≥10
Investigator reported, adjudicated by an independent committee
Radiographic imaging compatible with the diagnosis of pneumonia, ≥2 of a list of clinical signs, symptoms or laboratory findings, and treatment with antibiotics and/or antiviral and/or antifungal agents were also required
BUD/GLY/FOR 320/18/9.6 μg twice daily via MDI: 1.9% (12/639)
BUD/FOR 320/9.6 μg twice daily via MDI: 1.9% (6/314)
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg twice daily via DPI: 1.3% (4/318)
GLY/FOR 18/9.6 μg twice daily via MDI: 1.6% (10/625)BUD/GLY/FOR versus GLY/FOR1.2
BUD/FOR 320/9.6 µg via MDI versus GLY/FOR1.2
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg via DPI versus GLY/FOR0.8
 Pneumonia capture: investigator reporting confirmed by radiographic imaging
  Chapman, 2018    [27]SUNSET (26 weeks)Post-bronchodilator FEV1 ≥40% and <80% pred
≤1 moderate/severe exacerbation in the year prior to screening
Investigator reported
Radiographic imaging was required to confirm the diagnosis of pneumonia
TIO 18 µg once daily plus SAL/FP 50/500 µg twice daily: 1.7% (9/526)IND/GLY 110/50 µg once daily: 1.1% (6/527)TIO+SAL/FP versus IND/GLY1.5
  Lipson, 2018   [13]IMPACT (52 weeks)Post-bronchodilator FEV1 <50% pred with ≥1 moderate/severe exacerbation in the year prior to screening, or post-bronchodilator FEV1 50–80% pred and ≥2 moderate or ≥1 severe exacerbation in the year prior to screening
CAT total score ≥10
Investigator reported
Radiographic imaging was required to confirm the diagnosis of pneumonia
FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg once daily: 7.6% (317/4151)
FF/VI 100/25 µg once daily: 7.1% (292/4134)
UMEC/VI 62.5/25 µg once daily: 4.7% (97/2070)FF/UMEC/VI versus UMEC/VI1.6
FF/VI versus UMEC/VI1.5
  Magnussen,   2014 [28]WISDOM (52 weeks)Post-bronchodilator FEV1 <50% pred
≥1 exacerbation in the year prior to screening
Investigator reported
Radiographic imaging was requested when pneumonia was suspected
FP/SAL/TIO (500 µg twice daily/50 µg twice daily/18 µg once daily): 5.8% (72/1243)SAL/TIO (50 µg twice daily/18 µg once daily): 5.5% (68/1242)FP/SAL/TIO versus SAL/TIO1.1
 Pneumonia capture: investigator reporting
  Papi, 2018 [12]TRIBUTE (52 weeks)Post-bronchodilator FEV1 <50% pred
≥1 moderate/severe exacerbation in the year prior to screening
CAT total score ≥10
Investigator reportedBDP/FOR/GLY 87/5/9 µg twice daily: 3.7% (28/764)IND/GLY 85/43 µg: 3.6% (27/768)BDP/FOR/GLY versus IND/GLY1.0
  Vestbo, 2017   [29]TRINITY (52 weeks)Post-bronchodilator FEV1 <50% pred
≥1 moderate/severe exacerbation in the year prior to screening
CAT total score ≥10
Investigator reportedBDP/FOR/GLY 100/6/12.5 µg (2 actuations twice daily): 2.6% (28/1077)
BDP/FOR 100/6 µg (2 actuations twice daily)+TIO 18 µg (1 actuation once daily): 2.2% (12/537)
TIO 18 µg once daily: 1.8% (19/1076)BDP/FOR/GLY versus TIO1.5
BDP/FOR+TIO versus TIO1.3
  Jung, 2012 [30](24 weeks)Post-bronchodilator FEV1 <65% predInvestigator reportedTIO 18 µg once daily+FP/SAL 250/50 µg twice daily: 0.9% (2/223)TIO 18 µg once daily: 0.9% (2/232)TIO+FP/SAL versus TIO1.0
Studies comparing ICS/LABA dual therapy with non-ICS-containing treatment
 Pneumonia capture: investigator reporting and independent adjudication with/without confirmation by radiographic imaging
  Hanania, 2020   [31]SOPHOS (52 weeks)Post-bronchodilator FEV1 ≥25% and <80% pred
≥1 moderate/severe exacerbation in the year prior to screening
CAT total score ≥10
Investigator reported, adjudicated by an independent committeeBUD/FOR 320/10 µg twice daily: 1.6% (10/619)
BUD/FOR 160/10 µg twice daily: 2.4% (15/617)
FOR 10 µg twice daily: 2.3% (14/607)BUD/FOR 320/10 µg versus FOR
BUD/FOR 160/10 µg versus FOR
0.7
1.1
  Ferguson, 2018    [32]TELOS (24 weeks)Post-bronchodilator FEV1 <80% pred
CAT total score ≥10
Investigator reported, adjudicated by an independent committee
Radiographic imaging compatible with the diagnosis of pneumonia, ≥2 of a list of clinical signs, symptoms or laboratory findings, and treatment with antibiotics and/or antiviral and/or antifungal agents were also required
BUD/FOR 320/10 μg twice daily via MDI: 0.8% (5/655)
BUD/FOR 160/10 μg twice daily via MDI: 1.1% (7/637)
BUD 320 µg twice daily via MDI: 0.5% (1/206)
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg twice daily via DPI: 1.4% (3/219)
FOR 10 µg twice daily via MDI: 1.4% (9/644)BUD/FOR 320/10 μg versus FOR0.5
BUD/FOR 160/10 μg versus FOR0.8
BUD versus FOR0.3
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg via DPI versus FOR1.0
 Pneumonia capture: investigator reporting confirmed by radiographic imaging
  Ferguson, 2017   [33]RISE (26 weeks)Post-bronchodilator FEV1 ≤70% pred
≥1 moderate/severe exacerbation in the year prior to screening
mMRC dyspnoea score ≥2
Investigator reported
Radiographic imaging compatible with the diagnosis of pneumonia and ≥2 of a list of clinical signs, symptoms or laboratory findings were also required
BUD/FOR 320/9 µg twice daily: 0.5% (3/605)FOR DPI 9 µg twice daily: 1.0% (6/613)BUD/FOR versus FOR0.5
  Papi, 2017 [24]EFFECT (52 weeks)Post-bronchodilator FEV1 ≤50% pred
≥1 moderate/severe exacerbation in the year prior to screening
Investigator reported
Radiologically and/or clinically confirmed per British Thoracic Society criteria
FP/FOR 500/20 μg twice daily: 2.9% (17/587)
FP/FOR 250/10 μg twice daily: 3.9% (23/588)
FOR 12 µg twice daily: 1.9% (11/590)FP/FOR 500/20 μg versus FOR1.6
FP/FOR 250/10 μg versus FOR2.1
  Wedzicha, 2016   [34]FLAME (52 weeks)Post-bronchodilator FEV1 ≥25 to <60% pred
≥1 moderate/severe exacerbation in the year prior to screening
mMRC dyspnoea score ≥2
Investigator reported
Radiographic imaging was required
FP/SAL 500/50 µg twice daily: 4.8% (80/1680)IND/GLY 110/50 µg once daily: 3.2% (53/1678)FP/SAL versus IND/GLY1.5
  Ohar, 2014 [35]NCT01110200 (26 weeks)Post-bronchodilator FEV1 <70% pred
Recent exacerbation (≤14 days)
Investigator reported
Radiographic imaging was required
FP/SAL 250/50 µg twice daily: 4.1% (13/314)SAL 50 µg twice daily: 3.1% (10/325)FP/SAL versus SAL1.3
  Vogelmeier,   2013 [36]ILLUMINATE (26 weeks)Post-bronchodilator FEV1 40–80% pred
0 moderate/severe exacerbations in the year prior to screening
Investigator reported
Radiographic imaging was required
FP/SAL 500/50 µg twice daily: 1.5% (4/264)IND/GLY 110/50 µg once daily: 0 (0/258)
  Anzueto, 2009   [10]NCT00115492 (52 weeks)Post-bronchodilator FEV1 ≤50% pred
≥1 moderate/severe exacerbation in the year prior to screening
Investigator reported
Radiographic imaging was required
FP/SAL 250/50 µg twice daily: 6.6% (26/394)SAL 50 µg twice daily: 2.5% (10/403)FP/SAL versus SAL2.7
 Pneumonia capture: investigator reporting
  Suissa, 2018   [37]Up to 1-year follow-upCohort of patients aged ≥55 years with COPD initiating treatment with a LAMA or ICS/LABA during 2002–2015 from the UK's Clinical Practice Research DatalinkHospital admissions due to severe pneumonia (according to diagnostic codes)ICS/LABA: 3.1% (380/12 366)LAMA: 2.3% (279/12 366) of patientsICS/LABA versus LAMA1.4
  Vestbo, 2016   [38],   Crim, 2017   [39]SUMMIT (event driven, common end date of 3 years)Post-bronchodilator FEV1 ≥50% and ≤70% pred
History or increased risk of cardiovascular disease
mMRC dyspnoea score ≥2
Investigator reportedFF/VI 100/25 µg once daily: 5.7% (237/4140)
FF 100 µg once daily: 5.5% (228/4157)
VI 25 µg once daily: 3.9% (163/4140)
Placebo: 5.2% (214/4131)
FF/VI versus VI1.5
FF versus placebo1.1
  Vestbo, 2016   [40]Salford Lung Study (52 weeks)≥1 COPD exacerbations in the previous 3 yearsInvestigator reported pneumonia SAEsFF/VI 100/25 µg once daily: 6.7% (94/1396)Usual care: 5.9% (83/1403)FF/VI 100/25 µg versus usual care1.1
  Vogelmeier,   2016 [41]AFFIRM (24 weeks)Post-bronchodilator FEV1 <80% pred
CAT total score ≥10
Investigator reportedFP/SAL 500/50 µg twice daily: 1.9% (9/466)ACL/FOR 400/12 µg twice daily: 0.6% (3/467)FP/SAL versus ACL/FOR3.2
  Zheng, 2015   [42]NCT01376245 (24 weeks)Asian patients
Post-bronchodilator FEV1 ≤70% pred
mMRC dyspnoea score ≥2
Investigator reportedFF/VI 50/25 µg: 1.3% (2/160)
FF/VI 100/25 µg: 0.6% (1/161)
FF/VI 200/25 µg: 3.1% (5/160)
Placebo: 2.5% (4/162)FF/VI 50/25 µg versus placebo0.5
FF/VI 100/25 µg versus placebo0.3
FF/VI 200/25 µg versus placebo1.3
  Zhong, 2015   [43]LANTERN (26 weeks)Post-bronchodilator FEV1 ≥30% and <80% pred
≤1 moderate/severe exacerbation in the year prior to screening
mMRC dyspnoea score ≥2
Investigator reportedFP/SAL 500/50 µg: 2.7% (10/369)IND/GLY 110/50 µg: 0.8% (3/372)FP/SAL versus IND/GLY3.4
  Rossi, 2014   [44]INSTEAD (26 weeks)GOLD stage II
0 moderate/severe exacerbation in the year prior to screening
Investigator-reported pneumonia SAEsFP/SAL 500/50 µg twice daily: 0.7% (2/288)IND 150 µg once daily: 0 (0/293)FP/SAL versus IND
  Wedzicha, 2014   [45]FORWARD (48 weeks)Post-bronchodilator FEV1 ≥30% and <50% pred
≥1 moderate/severe exacerbation in the year prior to screening
Investigator reportedBDP/FOR 200/12 µg twice daily: 3.8% (23/601)FOR 12 µg twice daily: 1.8% (11/596)BDP/FOR versus FOR2.1
  Dransfield,   2013 [46],   Crim, 2015   [47]NCT01009463, NCT01017952 (52 weeks)Post-bronchodilator FEV1 <70% pred
≥1 moderate/severe exacerbation in the year prior to screening
Investigator reportedFF/VI 200/25 µg once daily: 6.8% (55/811)
FF/VI 100/25 µg once daily: 6.3% (51/806)
FF/VI 50/25 µg once daily: 5.9% (48/820)
VI 25 µg once daily: 3.3% (27/818)FF/VI 50/25 µg versus VI1.8
FF/VI 100/25 µg versus VI1.9
FF/VI 200/25 µg versus VI2.1
  Kerwin, 2013   [48]NCT01053988 (24 weeks)Post-bronchodilator FEV1 ≤70% pred
mMRC dyspnoea score ≥2
Investigator reportedFF/VI 100/25 µg once daily: 2.4% (5/206)
FF/VI 50/25 µg once daily: 1.5% (3/206)
FF 100 µg once daily: 1.9% (4/206)
VI 25 µg once daily: 2.4% (5/205)
Placebo: 1.4% (3/207)
FF/VI 100/25 µg versus VI1.0
FF/VI 50/25 µg versus VI0.6
FF versus placebo1.3
  Martinez, 2013   [49]NCT01054885 (24 weeks)Post-bronchodilator FEV1 ≤70% pred
mMRC dyspnoea score ≥2
Investigator reportedFF/VI 200/25 µg once daily: 2.0% (4/205)
FF/VI 100/25 µg once daily: 0.5% (1/204)
FF 200 µg once daily: 1.5% (3/203)
FF 100 µg once daily: 1.0% (2/204)
VI 25 µg once daily: 1.0% (2/203)
Placebo: 0 (0/205)
FF/VI 200/25 µg versus VI2.0
FF/VI 100/25 µg versus VI0.5
FF 200 µg versus VI1.5
FF 100 µg versus VI1.0
  Doherty, 2012   [50](52 weeks)Post-bronchodilator FEV1 25–60% pred
Symptoms of COPD for ≥24 months prior to enrolment
Investigator reportedMF/FOR 400/10 µg twice daily: 3.1% (7/225)
MF/FOR 200/10 µg twice daily: 1.7% (4/239)
MF 400 µg twice daily: 2.0% (5/253)
FOR 10 µg twice daily: 1.6% (4/243)
Placebo: 0.8% (2/236)
MF/FOR 400/10 µg versus FOR1.9
MF/FOR 200/10 µg versus FOR1.0
MF versus placebo2.3
  Tashkin, 2012   [51]NCT00383435 (52 weeks)Post-bronchodilator FEV1 ≥25% and ≤60% pred
Symptoms of COPD for ≥24 months
Investigator reportedMF/FOR 400/10 µg twice daily: 1.8% (4/217)
MF/FOR 200/10 µg twice daily: 0.5% (1/207)
MF 400 µg twice daily: 1.0% (2/210)
FOR 10 µg twice daily: 1.9% (4/209)MF/FOR 400/10 µg versus FOR1.0
MF/FOR 200/10 µg versus FOR0.3
MF versus FOR0.5
  Sharafkhaneh,   2012 [52]NCT00419744 (52 weeks)Pre-bronchodilator FEV1 ≤50% pred
≥1 moderate/severe exacerbation in the year prior to screening
Investigator reportedBUD/FOR 320/9 µg twice daily: 6.4% (26/407)
BUD/FOR 160/9 µg:
4.7% (19/408)
FOR 9 µg twice daily: 2.7% (11/403)BUD/FOR 320/9 µg versus FOR2.3
BUD/FOR 160/9 µg versus FOR1.7
  Calverley, 2010   [53]NCT00476099 (48 weeks)Post-bronchodilator FEV1 30–50% pred
≥1 moderate/severe exacerbation in the year prior to screening
Investigator reportedBDP/FOR 200/12 µg twice daily: 2.2% (5/232)
BUD/FOR 400/12 µg twice daily: 2.9% (7/238)
FOR 12 µg twice daily: 0.4% (1/233)BDP/FOR versus FOR5.0
BUD/FOR versus FOR6.9
  Rennard, 2009   [54]NCT00206167 (52 weeks)Post-bronchodilator FEV1 ≤50% pred
≥1 moderate/severe exacerbation in the year prior to screening
mMRC dyspnoea score ≥2
Investigator reportedBUD/FOR 320/9 µg twice daily: 4.0% (20/494)
BUD/FOR 160/9 µg twice daily: 3.4% (17/494)
FOR 9 µg twice daily: 3.4% (17/495)
Placebo: 5.0% (24/481)
BUD/FOR 320/9 µg versus FOR1.2
BUD/FOR 160/9 µg versus FOR1.0
  Ferguson, 2008   [11]NCT00144911 (52 weeks)Post-bronchodilator FEV1 ≤50% pred
≥1 moderate/severe exacerbation in the year prior to screening
Investigator reportedFP/SAL 250/50 µg twice daily: 7.4% (29/394)SAL 50 µg twice daily: 3.9% (15/388)FP/SAL versus SAL1.9
  Tashkin, 2008   [55]NCT00206154 (26 weeks)Pre-bronchodilator FEV1 ≤50% pred
≥1 moderate/severe exacerbation in the year prior to screening
mMRC dyspnoea score ≥2
Investigator reportedBUD/FOR 320/9 µg twice daily: 0.4% (1/277)
BUD/FOR 160/9 µg twice daily: 0.7% (2/281)
BUD 320 µg twice daily+FOR 9 µg twice daily: 0.7% (2/287)
BUD 320 µg twice daily: 1.1% (3/275)
FOR 9 µg twice daily: 0.4% (1/284)
Placebo: 0.3% (1/300)
BUD/FOR 320/9 µg versus FOR1.0
BUD/FOR 160/9 µg versus FOR2.0
BUD 320 µg+FOR 9 µg versus FOR2.0
BUD versus placebo3.3
  Wedzicha, 2008   [56],   Calverley,   2011 [57]INSPIRE (2 years)Post-bronchodilator FEV1 <50% pred, mMRC dyspnoea score ≥2, clinical history of exacerbationsInvestigator reportedFP/SAL 500/50 µg twice daily: 7.6% (50/658)TIO 18 µg once daily: 3.6% (24/665)FP/SAL versus TIO2.1
  Calverley, 2007   [58],   Crim, 2009   [59]TORCH (3 years) (pneumonia incidences from a post hoc analysis focusing on pneumonia are reported here)Pre-bronchodilator FEV1 <60% predInvestigator reportedFP 500 µg twice daily: 14.4% (224/1552)
FP/SAL 500/50 µg twice daily: 16.0% (248/1546)
SAL 50 µg twice daily: 10.5% (162/1542)
Placebo: 9.0% (139/1544)
FP/SAL versus SAL1.5
FP versus placebo1.6

ICS: inhaled corticosteroid; LAMA: long-acting muscarinic antagonist; LABA: long-acting β2-agonist; FEV1: forced expiratory volume in 1 s; CAT: COPD Assessment Test; BUD: budesonide; GLY: glycopyrronium; FOR: formoterol; MDI: metered-dose inhaler; DPI: dry powder inhaler; TIO: tiotropium; SAL: salmeterol; FP: fluticasone propionate; FF: fluticasone furoate; UMEC: umeclidinium; VI: vilanterol; BDP: beclomethasone dipropionate; mMRC: modified Medical Research Council; SAE: serious adverse event; ACL: aclidinium; IND: indacaterol; GOLD: Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease; MF: mometasone furoate. #: when a study uses different sets of criteria to define pneumonia and reports different pneumonia incidences when using these different criteria, only the pneumonia incidence for the most stringent pneumonia capture method is reported. The corresponding method is summarised in the “pneumonia capture method” column; : N is the total number of patients in the subgroup of interest, n the number of patients with events; +: fold increase calculated as (incidence in treatment arm of interest)/(incidence in comparator arm).