TABLE 4

Studies included and excluded after full text review

Intervention areaIncluded reviewsExcluded reviewsFull text screen total
Direct effects#Indirect effects#Risk factors
HighModerateLowVery lowHighModerateLowVery low
Vaccination4 [15–18]01 [19]8 [20–27]00000417
Screening003 [28–30]01 [31]04 [32–35]10 [36–45]01130
Diagnosis1 [46]001 [47]7 [48–54]05 [55–59]3 [60–62]0422
Treatment4 [63–66]1 [67]03 [68–70]9 [71–79]04 [80–83]4 [84–87]2 [88, 89]1036
Adherence1 [90]0008 [91–98]02 [99–101]12 [102–113]1 [114]530
HIV/TB3 [115–117]02 [118, 119]4 [120–123]1 [124]02 [125, 126]3 [127–129]0722
Multidrug-resistant TB3 [130–132]001 [133]003 [134–136]14 [137–150]0930
Contacts and transmission000001 [151]2 [152, 153]3 [154–156]3 [157–159]413
Healthcare-associated infection0001 [160]1 [161]01 [162]4 [163–166]4 [167–170]917
Social support and vulnerable groups1 [171]001 [172]1 [173]001 [174]015
Healthcare systems0000001 [175]4 [176–179]2 [180, 181]1219
Pregnancy and sex0001 [182]00005 [183–187]17
Prisons0001 [188]0001 [189]1 [190]14
Environment and behaviours0000000011 [191–201]113
Subtotals17162128125592979266

Direct effect: evidence that intervention has a direct effect in preventing cases or reducing incidence, reported as a primary or secondary outcome measure of the review; indirect effect: intervention has a plausible indirect effect in preventing tuberculosis (TB) cases or reducing TB incidence, regardless of the outcome measures reported in the review; risk factors: no intervention was evaluated but the review described risk (or contextual) factors which could modify the effects of interventions or which, if targeted in a hypothetical intervention, could lead to a reduction in TB incidence. #: the AMSTAR2 criteria were used to categorise the included reviews as either “core” reviews (providing an evidence base for interventions) of high quality or “supplementary” reviews (providing additional information) of moderate, low or very low quality.