Potential error class | Potential error | Risk | Solution |
Measurement | Catheter balloon over-inflation | False high or low PAWP readings [41] | Half inflation of the balloon (diameter ∼0.9 cm, 0.75 mL air) [42] |
Pulmonary arterial rupture [41] | Avoid repeated inflations and deflations of the balloon [29] | ||
Catheter balloon under-inflation | False elevation of PAWP readings [41] | Half inflation of the balloon (diameter ∼0.9 cm, 0.75 mL air) [42] | |
Use of end-expiratory PAWP readings | Misdiagnosis of patients with a pre-capillary phenotype [43, 44] | Average PAWP readings across respiratory cycles [44] | |
Analysing single cycle | Potential data inaccuracy [44] | Mean values of multiple respiratory cycles should be used [44] | |
Variation in the location of the pressure transducer | Nonuniformity of the pressure transducer setting and zero levelling [29, 45] | Standardised location of pressure transducer according to guideline recommendations [1, 2, 40, 44] or adoption of micromanometer-tipped catheters [44] | |
Data interpretation | Failure to review traces | Data inaccuracy (measurement artefacts) [41] | Each trace should be scrutinised to ensure that it is not affected by artefacts [41] |
Technical | Incorrectly maintained or calibrated equipment | Errors in data acquisition [41] | Equipment maintained to a high standard and regular calibration [41] |
Inadequate flushing of the catheter | Dampened waveforms [41] | Adequate flushing [41] |
PAWP: pulmonary arterial wedge pressure.