Table 2. Histopathological criteria for usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP)
UIP pattern#Probable UIP patternPossible UIP patternNot UIP pattern+
Evidence of marked fibrosis/architectural distortion±honeycombing in a predominantly subpleural/paraseptal distributionEvidence of marked fibrosis/architectural distortion±honeycombingPatchy or diffuse involvement of lung parenchyma by fibrosis, with or without interstitial inflammationHyaline membranes§
Presence of patchy involvement of lung parenchyma by fibrosisAbsence of either patchy involvement or fibroblastic foci, but not bothAbsence of other criteria for UIP (see first column)Organising pneumonia§,ƒ
Presence of fibroblast fociAbsence of features against a diagnosis of UIP suggesting an alternative diagnosis (see fourth column)
OR
Honeycomb changes only##
Absence of features against a diagnosis of UIP suggesting an alternative diagnosis (see fourth column)Granulomasƒ
Absence of features against a diagnosis of UIP suggesting an alternative diagnosis (see fourth column)Marked interstitial inflammatory cell infiltrate away from honeycombing
Predominant airway centred changes
Other features suggestive of an alternative diagnosis
  • #: all four features. : all three features. +: any of the six features. §: can be associated with acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. ƒ: an isolated or occasional granuloma and/or a mild component of organising pneumonia pattern may rarely be co-existing in lung biopsies with an otherwise UIP pattern. ##: this scenario usually represents end-stage fibrotic lung disease where honeycombed segments have been sampled but where a UIP pattern might be present in other areas. Such areas are usually represented by overt honeycombing on high-resolution computed tomography and can be avoided by pre-operative targeting of biopsy sites away from these areas using high-resolution computed tomography. Reproduced from [2] with permission from the publisher.