Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Diagnostic workup of childhood interstitial lung disease

Nadia Nathan, Matthias Griese, Katarzyna Michel, Julia Carlens, Carlee Gilbert, Nagehan Emiralioglu, Alba Torrent-Vernetta, Honorata Marczak, Brigitte Willemse, Céline Delestrain, Ralph Epaud on behalf of the ERS CRC chILD-EU group
European Respiratory Review 2023 32: 220188; DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0188-2022
Nadia Nathan
1AP-HP, Sorbonne Université, Pediatric Pulmonology Department and Reference Center for Rare Lung Disease RespiRare, Armand Trousseau Hospital, Paris, France
2Sorbonne Université, Inserm UMR_S933 Laboratory of Childhood Genetic Diseases, Armand Trousseau Hospital, Paris, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Nadia Nathan
  • For correspondence: nadia.nathan@aphp.fr
Matthias Griese
3Department of Paediatric Pneumology, Dr von Hauner Children's Hospital, German Centre for Lung Research, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Katarzyna Michel
3Department of Paediatric Pneumology, Dr von Hauner Children's Hospital, German Centre for Lung Research, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Julia Carlens
4Clinic for Pediatric Pneumology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carlee Gilbert
5Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Carlee Gilbert
Nagehan Emiralioglu
6Department of Pediatric Pulmonology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Nagehan Emiralioglu
Alba Torrent-Vernetta
7Pediatric Allergy and Pulmonology Section, Department of Pediatrics, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Vall d’Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
8Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Madrid, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Alba Torrent-Vernetta
Honorata Marczak
8Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Madrid, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brigitte Willemse
9Department of Pediatric Pneumology and Allergy, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Céline Delestrain
10Department of Pediatric Pulmonology and Pediatric Allergology, Beatrix Children's Hospital, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
11Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Créteil, Service de Pédiatrie Générale, Créteil, France
12Centre des Maladies Respiratoires Rares (RESPIRARE®), CRCM, Créteil, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ralph Epaud
11Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Créteil, Service de Pédiatrie Générale, Créteil, France
12Centre des Maladies Respiratoires Rares (RESPIRARE®), CRCM, Créteil, France
13University Paris Est Créteil, INSERM, IMRB, Créteil, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ralph Epaud
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Childhood interstitial lung diseases (chILDs) are rare and heterogeneous diseases with significant morbidity and mortality. An accurate and quick aetiological diagnosis may contribute to better management and personalised treatment. On behalf of the European Respiratory Society Clinical Research Collaboration for chILD (ERS CRC chILD-EU), this review summarises the roles of the general paediatrician, paediatric pulmonologists and expert centres in the complex diagnostic workup. Each patient's aetiological chILD diagnosis must be reached without prolonged delays in a stepwise approach from medical history, signs, symptoms, clinical tests and imaging, to advanced genetic analysis and specialised procedures including bronchoalveolar lavage and biopsy, if necessary. Finally, as medical progress is fast, the need to revisit a diagnosis of “undefined chILD” is stressed.

Abstract

Childhood interstitial lung diseases are rare and severe diseases. A stepwise approach to an aetiological diagnosis includes specific investigations performed in expert centres. The term “undefined chILD” must be regularly reassessed. https://bit.ly/3YIWKvn

Introduction

Rare lung diseases in children comprise a variety of conditions that include cystic fibrosis, primary ciliary dyskinesia, congenital malformations of the lung, pulmonary hypertension, abnormal ventilatory drive and childhood interstitial lung diseases (chILDs). The latter is, by itself, a heterogeneous group of very rare lung diseases with an overall estimated prevalence of 1.6–46 per million depending on the few available reports [1–13]. Thus, they appear to be around 10 times rarer than in adults, covering different aetiologies with some of them being extremely severe [14]. Most general practitioners and paediatricians will face none or one of these patients in their whole career and even paediatric pulmonologists may manage only a few cases of chILD. Unspecific and often inconspicuous, clinical signs could also delay the diagnosis and worsen the prognosis for chILD [1, 5]. When an ILD in a child is suspected, further investigations should be performed by experienced radiologists, geneticists and pathologists. Despite an exhaustive workup, a proportion of 6–12% of chILD remains unexplained or undefined [5, 11, 15].

In the past years, most European countries have identified specialised clinicians in expert centres who developed a chILD network. The Clinical Research Collaboration for chILD-EU, supported by the European Respiratory Society (ERS CRC chILD-EU), focuses on improving the diagnosis and management of chILD. The present review provides an up-to-date overview of the stepwise diagnostic process of chILD, from the involvement of the general paediatrician to the minimal set of required tests performed in expert centres, and discusses the current definition of “undefined chILD”.

chILD definition and classification

The diagnosis of chILD has been defined as the presence of at least three of the following criteria: 1) respiratory symptoms, 2) clinical signs of respiratory insufficiency, 3) hypoxaemia or low pulsed oxygen saturation and 4) diffuse parenchymal lung disease on chest radiography or thoracic computed tomography (CT) scan [16, 17].

Respiratory symptoms and clinical signs of chILD are non-specific. They include tachypnoea, dyspnoea on exertion (such as feeding in infants/neonates) or at rest, persistent dry cough, failure to thrive, retractions, crackles, digital clubbing, cyanosis and, less frequently, chest wall deformity (pectus excavatum and others) [17]. Other clinical signs that can point to a chILD aetiology are haemoptysis, presence of pulmonary hypertension, signs of peripheral hypothyroidism, recurrent fever, skin lesions, joint pain and/or neurological issues such as hypotonia, developmental delay, chorea and sensorial defects [18, 19]. In neonates, an unexplained respiratory distress, especially in a term baby, should also raise suspicion of chILD [20, 21].

Based on this definition, the general paediatrician facing a patient with persistent respiratory symptoms consistent with chILD should actively pursue this diagnosis to identify such rare cases from the bulk of recurrent respiratory tract infections and other more frequently occurring entities. Detailed history, description of findings at examination and a chest radiograph should be performed before referring the patient to a paediatric pulmonologist or a paediatric pulmonary department. These specialists will exclude differential diagnoses, confirm the diagnosis of chILD and push forward the investigations to try to define the chILD aetiology.

The 2004 report of the ERS Task force on chronic ILD in immunocompetent children presented the first classification system for children that was closely linked to the classification system in adults [22]. In 2007, pathologists, together with clinicians, proposed a classification system based on the histology of lung tissue for children <2 years of age [15]. This system was later extended to all paediatric age groups. Altogether, the main identified groups of chILD are 1) ILD related to primary parenchymal disorder (mostly group A of the chILD-EU classification [23]), 2) ILD specific to infancy, 3) ILD related to systemic disease processes and 4) ILD related to exposure/environmental insults [23–28]. Among these categories, the most frequent diagnoses are neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia of infancy (NEHI) (also called persistent tachypnoea of infancy (PTI) in the absence of histology), inherited surfactant disorders, diffuse alveolar haemorrhage, pulmonary alveolar proteinosis, sarcoidosis, autoinflammatory diseases and connective tissue diseases. These disorders are highly heterogeneous, but sometimes present similarly and as a consequence may be difficult to diagnose. More than 50 conditions can be associated with a chILD and deciphering which exact aetiology is affecting the patient can be long and unsuccessful, emphasising the importance of a systematic diagnostic workup.

Diagnostic workup for chILD

Over the past decade, USA and European Union work groups have proposed some diagnostic approaches [16, 17]. The first was by Kurland et al. [16] in 2013, in the framework of the American Thoracic Society, and was based on a careful family screening for ILD, followed by the elimination of other diagnoses before proceeding to more specific chILD investigations such as CT scan, genetic tests and lung biopsy. At that time, the number of involved genes was limited to surfactant-related genes (SFTPB, SFTPC, ABCA3 and NKX2-1), pulmonary alveolar proteinosis genes (CSF2RA and CSF2RB) and FOXF1 for diffuse abnormalities of lung development. This first publication was of major help, and allowed improved diagnosis and classification of ILD in children. Two years later, Bush et al. [17] on behalf of the chILD-EU working group proposed another flowchart for the diagnosis of chILD, primarily based on CT scan and placing blood tests, especially genetic testing, before more invasive tests such as bronchoalveolar lavage and lung biopsy. The genetic evolution reflected the expansion and the wider availability of new molecular techniques allowing the study of a panel of genes (next-generation sequencing (NGS) and whole-exome sequencing (WES)) instead of one by one (Sanger sequencing). This led to the discovery of new genetic entities in chILD, such as MARS mutations, other cytosolic aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase (ARS) mutations or OAS1 in pulmonary alveolar proteinosis [29–33], COPA and STING1 mutations for ILD related to autoinflammatory disorders [34–36], and many other even rarer diseases related to mutations in FLNA, TBX4, NHLRC2 or ZNFX1 [25, 37–41].

The multiplication of new aetiologies has raised the question of prioritisation of the diagnostic approach, from the clinical approach to the choice and timing of genetic tests, but also the place of lung biopsy (figure 1a) and finally, when are we allowed to label a patient as “undefined chILD”?

FIGURE 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1

Investigations in childhood interstitial lung disease (chILD) diagnostic workup. a) The investigations are performed one after the other to reach a chILD aetiology. The first step is usually done by the general paediatrician (framed in red), and includes family history, clinical evaluation, chest radiography and routine laboratory tests. b) Age at onset is crucial information that helps to consider some aetiologies more than others. c) Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) eliminates infectious causes of ILD and provides clues to the most likely diagnoses. d) When thoracic computed tomography (CT) scan, specific blood tests, BAL and genetic analyses could not assess a diagnosis, lung biopsy is the last step of the diagnostic process, allowing to assess the most likely diagnoses in most cases. NEHI: neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia of infancy; PAP: pulmonary alveolar proteinosis; HSP: hypersensitivity pneumonitis; DAH: diffuse alveolar haemorrhage; PAS: Periodic acid–Schiff; AEC2: type 2 alveolar epithelial cells; LIP: lymphoid interstitial pneumonia; NSIP: non-specific interstitial pneumonia; OB: obliterans bronchiolitis.

Medical history, family screening and careful clinical examination

This remains the first and major step of chILD workup as valuable information can be retrieved from the patient and their family history.

Establishing a genealogical tree, also called a pedigree chart, is mandatory in all chILD. It is estimated that up to 20–30% of chILDs are due to monogenic diseases, some of them being associated with extrapulmonary involvement. Thus, collecting information on relatives and siblings can be highly useful: oxygen therapy, lung transplantation, neonatal respiratory distress or unexplained death, neurological issues such as hypotonia, developmental delay, chorea (NKX2-1), cerebral aneurysms (FARSA and FARSB), sensorial defects (ARS), peripheral hypothyroidism (NKX2-1), autoimmune diseases or general symptoms such as fever, skin lesions, joint pains (autoinflammatory disorders, connective tissue diseases), age and cause of death of older generation family members may be of interest. Consanguinity is also very important to be aware of, as it could increase the risk of rare recessive homozygous disease (ABCA3, MARS/other ARS genes and SFTPB).

The age at onset of the ILD is crucial information. Even though it is now well documented that almost all chILD can occur at any age, some diagnoses are much more frequent in newborns, infants or older children, as shown in figure 1b [42–44].

The habits and living conditions of the patient can orientate one to chILD related to lung toxicity (e.g. drugs, medications and radiation) or hypersensitivity pneumonitis and other exposure-related diseases (e.g. birds, hay, mould and air conditioners).

CT scan: the cornerstone of chILD diagnosis

As far as the patient's medical status makes it possible, and when the diagnosis of chILD is suspected, a high-resolution CT (HRCT) scan is the first-line investigation to be performed [45, 46]. The HRCT scan will allow to confirm ILD and to identify the ILD pattern. As the technique and the interpretation of the HRCT scan are crucial, it should be performed in expert centres for paediatric imaging using protocols for optimisation of image quality while keeping individual radiation exposure to the lowest level (especially in neonates and infants) [47–49]. The use of intravenous contrast is indicated if lymphadenopathies, gross structural abnormalities, or associated cardiac or vessel abnormalities need to be differentiated. The lung parenchyma analysis will search for elementary lesions of ILD such as ground-glass anomalies, consolidations, thickening of the bronchovascular interstitium, thickening of the interlobular septa, visualisation of intralobular lines, cystic lesions and micronodules or nodules. Their association, distribution, extent as well as the presence of signs of fibrosis will be sought [50, 51].

In the majority of cases, the picture remains non-specific, i.e. it is helpful for general ILD diagnosis but unable to identify a specific aetiology. The CT pattern observed varies depending on the age of the child. Infants most often present with diffuse ground-glass anomalies associated or not with other abnormalities/findings. Older children may have more cystic, nodular or even fibrosing abnormalities. However, in specific cases, the aetiological diagnosis may be guided by typical lesions, such as images of “crazy paving” favouring alveolar proteinosis or other patterns detailed in table 1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Childhood interstitial lung disease diagnostic assessment based on computed tomography scan pattern

Gas exchange and pulmonary function tests

Oxygen saturation at rest, during sleep and with exercise, the absence or presence of clinical signs, and pulmonary hypertension are used in the Fan severity score for chILD (rated 1 (low severity) to 5 (high severity)) [52]. Blood gas may be of interest to determine impairment of gas exchange. The 6-min walk test is particularly interesting in chILD because of its high sensitivity and ease of use from the age of 4–5 years [53].

The first pulmonary function tests (PFTs) should be performed as soon as possible after chILD diagnosis, if the child's condition allows it and depending on their age [54–60]. Although testing seldom provides an aetiology to the ILD, it allows to objectively assess the functional consequences of the pathology.

ILD is often characterised by a restrictive ventilatory disorder, with a decrease in total lung capacity and vital capacity. Measurement of diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) should be systematically performed according to the age of the child. Additionally, measurement of pulmonary compliance (an invasive examination which requires the placement of an oesophageal catheter) is done exceptionally to complete the evaluation [59]. In infants, PFTs can only be performed during sleep and therefore require the use of chloral pre-medication, the use of which is unauthorised in some countries and subject to signed informed consent in others. Between the ages of 3 and 6 years, PFTs require active cooperation (accepting at least a nose clip and a mouthpiece). After the age of 6–8 years, exploration approaches that of adults. Functional residual capacity is the most common measurement. Resistance, volumes and forced expiratory flows can complete the examination as association with an obstructive pathology is not exceptional.

Specific clinical laboratory tests

A number of blood and urinary tests are performed during the chILD workup. Most of them should be done only based on clinical orientation and age of onset. They are listed in table 2.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2

Biological investigations in childhood interstitial lung disease

Bronchoalveolar lavage

As long as the medical condition of the patient allows it, flexible bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) should be performed [61–65]. It allows cytological and microbiological analysis (bacteria, viral and fungi) of the alveolar fluid and collects the following information: volume and appearance of the fluid, cell count and staining (May–Grünwald Giemsa and Papanicolaou for cellular morphology, Perls to detect the presence of iron-containing cell samples, Periodic acid–Schiff (PAS) to detect polysaccharides such as glycogen, glycoproteins, glycolipids and mucins, and targeted staining (Ziehl and Grocott to detect mycobacteria and fungi, respectively)). A sample of BAL is kept (supernatant and cell pellets) for additional studies, in particular immunohistochemistry.

The BAL profile can guide the diagnosis, first with its macroscopic aspect and second with its cell count and specific staining (figure 1c). A global increase of the BAL cell count in the presence of a proven case of chILD and after exclusion of an infection may reflect alveolitis; however, the reference values for total BAL cell counts vary widely, so that this variable is not useful in everyday practice [61, 66]. The cytological examination makes it possible to search for pathogenic agents, viral inclusions, unusual macrophages (e.g. haemosiderin-laden macrophages and foamy macrophages), foreign bodies and abnormal cell populations [18]. Surfactant protein analysis by Western blot may be of interest but is not used routinely [67].

These results, together with those of the HRCT scan, allow a definite chILD diagnosis for some conditions, including hypersensitivity pneumonitis, pulmonary alveolar proteinosis, pulmonary haemorrhage and several infectious conditions such as Pneumocystis jirovecii infection [64].

Cardiac ultrasound

Cardiac ultrasound must be carried out early and systematically as part of the severity assessment. It has three main purposes in the evaluation of chILD: 1) the search for pulmonary hypertension, which is an important prognostic factor and part of the Fan severity score items [52], but can also guide toward specific aetiologies such as diffuse developmental disorders of the lung and surfactant disorders in newborns [68], 2) the search for a left-sided heart pathology (to eliminate a differential diagnosis), and 3) the search for cardiac involvement in the context of a general illness (search for pericarditis and associated heart malformation).

Genetic tests

A genetic cause is currently identified in ∼20% of patients with chILD (table 3) [11]. Genetic analysis is recommended for all paediatric patients with chronic ILD, whether sporadic or familial with no identified cause [69–72]. The analysis must be carried out by specialised genetics centres, and the detection of a genetic anomaly must always be explained to the patient and their family during genetic counselling consultation [71, 73].

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 3

Main genes and proteins currently implicated in childhood interstitial lung disease (chILD) groups, their mode of transmission and the associated phenotypes

The majority of patients in whom a genetic abnormality related to chILD is identified have a mutation in the genes encoding proteins of surfactant metabolism [25, 74–80]. Mutations in the SFTPB and SFTPC genes, encoding surfactant protein (SP)-B and SP-C, the surfactant transporter ABCA3 (ATP binding cassette subfamily A member 3), and the transcription factor NKX2-1 (or TTF1 (thyroid transcription factor 1)) are most often implicated [81–85]. SFTPA1 and SFTPA2 (SP-A1 and SP-A2) and FLNA (filamin A) mutations have also very rarely been involved in chILD (but more often in adult ILD) [86–89]. If alveolar proteinosis is suspected, the genes MARS (methionyl-tRNA synthetase), particularly when elevated liver values are noted, and CSF2RA and CSF2RB (subunits α and β of the receptor) are studied [29, 90–92]. Other ARS (FARSA, FARSB, YARS, IARS and LARS) mutations have also been associated with rare cases of syndromic chILD [30, 31, 93–95].

Genetic abnormalities responsible for autoinflammatory diseases with autoimmunity have also been described in early chILD such as SAVI syndrome (STING-associated vasculitis of infancy) related to mutations in TMEM173 (transmembrane protein 173) and COPA syndrome due to mutations in COPA (coatomer protein complex subunit α) [34–36, 96–98].

Finally, in the event of chILD secondary to a metabolic disease such as Niemann–Pick disease (NPC1 and NPC2), mucopolysaccharidosis, alveolar microlithiasis (SLC34A2) or dibasic protein intolerance (SLC7A7), a targeted analysis of the involved genes is carried out.

Lung biopsy

The indications for lung biopsy are currently declining with the progress of genetic diagnostics. Previously considered as the gold standard for chILD diagnosis, it is now discussed as a last line of investigation [16, 17]. The lung biopsy is usually done as a surgical thoracoscopic or an open procedure depending on the centre's expertise and the child's age [99–101]. Transbronchial and transthoracic biopsies are not recommended for the diagnosis of chILD, as the samples obtained may be too small. Transbronchial biopsies are also limited by the size of the fibrescope, the biopsy forceps being larger than the operator channel of the smallest fibrescope. Histology analysis of the lung sample requires an expert pathologist as lung architecture has to be analysed in relation to the age of the child and the low number of lung biopsies reduces the experience of pathologists in centres without chILD expertise. If possible, a sample is dedicated to histology, another is fixed in glutaraldehyde buffer for electron microscopy and a frozen sample could be used for further somatic genetic analyses. Microscopic examination is carried out on standard stains (haematoxylin/eosin), special stains (Perls, PAS, Grocott, reticulin and Masson's Trichrome) and immunostaining (TTF-1, bombesin, surfactant proteins and vascular markers). The topography of the lesions is evaluated at low magnification and the elementary lesions are systematically analysed. The lesion profile must be correlated with the imaging data. This morphological analysis can identify specific histological profiles (figure 1d).

In the case of chILD with extrapulmonary involvement, the diagnosis may be obtained by biopsy of an organ that is easier to access than the lung. This is the case, for example, for sarcoidosis (salivary glands, adenopathy, liver, etc.) or dermatomyositis (skin, muscle, etc.) [102].

A stepwise approach to chILD diagnosis

As described in the previous section, the number of investigations required to approach a chILD diagnosis may be substantial and time consuming. Meanwhile, supporting treatment including oxygen therapy and nutritional supplementation are started [16, 17, 25]. The final diagnosis is often awaited to start more specific medications such as corticosteroids, azithromycin, hydroxychloroquine or anti-fibrosing therapies [103–112]. In chILD related to connective tissue diseases or autoinflammatory syndromes, immunosuppressive drugs such as mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, rituximab or Janus kinase inhibitors may be discussed [96, 97, 113–116].

Figure 2 attempts to schematise the step-by-step workup of chILD. Workup step 1 includes clinical evaluation, family history, routine biological tests, chest radiography and echocardiography. A normal chest radiograph does not rule out the presence of chILD. It may often allow suspecting a chILD diagnosis by the paediatrician. However, in all cases, the confirmation of the ILD diagnosis and its classification requires specialised expertise and sometimes non-routine testing. Workup step 2 is thus realised in expert centres and includes HRCT and further explorations (BAL and specific laboratory tests) that could allow assessing, in typical cases, the diagnoses of exposure-related ILD, hypersensitivity pneumonitis, systemic and autoimmune diseases, metabolic diseases, PTI/NEHI or diffuse alveolar haemorrhage. However, in most cases, genetic tests and/or lung biopsy are still required at that stage. Genetic tests can confirm the diagnosis of surfactant disorders, monogenic forms of pulmonary alveolar proteinosis, SAVI, COPA syndrome and others (table 3). Lung biopsy can confirm the diagnosis of NEHI, sarcoidosis and pulmonary interstitial glycogenosis. Diffuse developmental disorders usually require both investigations to precisely determine the stage of developmental arrest (acinar dysplasia, congenital alveolar dysplasia and alveolar capillary dysplasia with or without misalignment of pulmonary veins) and the extent of the lesions.

FIGURE 2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2

Stepwise approach to childhood interstitial lung disease (chILD) diagnosis. Workup step 1 represents the general paediatrician's role in chILD diagnostic workup. If the chILD suspicion is confirmed, the patient is referred to paediatric pulmonologists in expert centres for workup step 2: chILD confirmation and aetiological assessment. After specific investigations, usually including molecular analyses and/or lung biopsy, a chILD aetiology can be assessed in most cases. Other patients meet the definition of “undefined chILD”. HRCT: high-resolution computed tomography; BAL: bronchoalveolar lavage; PTI: persistent tachypnoea of infancy; DAH: diffuse alveolar haemorrhage; NEHI: neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia of infancy.

Multidisciplinary team approach and periodic re-investigation of “undefined chILD”

At each step of the diagnostic process, multidisciplinary team meetings are of major help to ascertain the diagnostic suspicion or its confirmation and discuss the management of the patient. In chILD, an assessment of the diagnosis reached by the referring team by a central peer review team did not confirm the diagnosis in 13% [11]. However, expert clinicians also need training in subcategorisation of the final diagnosis, as the overall inter-rater agreement was only 64% [11].

Undefined chILD?

While these multiple investigations are still pending, chILD with no identified cause may be labelled as a “working diagnosis of undefined ILD”. However, when performed, a significant proportion of chILDs (up to 12%) still remain unclassified. Based on the current (and evolving) knowledge, only those should be labelled as “undefined chILD”.

It is indeed important to regularly reconsider undefined diagnoses regarding the evolution of the disease, the repetition of biological tests (especially autoimmune tests that can become positive with time) and the advances in chILD classifications in terms of new reported entities or new available molecular diagnoses. Some centres offer NGS panels, others propose WES systematically or after a negative NGS panel, and whole-genome sequencing is now available in some countries, blurring the line between diagnosis and research.

Points for clinical practice

  • chILDs are rare and heterogeneous diseases with significant morbidity and mortality.

  • The number of different chILD aetiologies is high and the diagnostic process requires a stepwise approach.

  • The role of the general paediatrician facing a chILD suspicion is to question about the family and medical history and to initiate investigations (routine laboratory tests and chest radiography) before referring the patient rapidly to a specialised centre.

  • Specific investigations, including CT scan, laboratory tests, BAL, PFTs, genetic testing and eventually lung biopsy, are run in expert centres and their results are discussed during multidisciplinary team meetings.

  • This diagnostic workup, when complete, allows identification of a chILD aetiology in most cases.

  • The remaining patients meet the definition of “undefined chILD”. As medical progress is rapid, this diagnosis must be regularly reassessed.

Conclusions

The chILD diagnostic process can be simple and relatively short if a systematic two-step approach is followed. The role of the general paediatrician is crucial in untangling the personal and family medical history and the clinical signs, and in referring the patient to specialised centres when chILD is suspected. Even if easily accessible, the HRCT scan should be performed in a specialised centre to optimise its profitability. Lung biopsy is being dethroned by the fantastic progress in molecular diagnostics. However, a low number of expert geneticists may induce a prolonged delay in getting the results. Thus, for each patient, a multidisciplinary case-by-case discussion based on coherent algorithms (figure 2) could minimise chILD diagnostic delay and reduce the proportion of undefined chILD, allowing a maximum of these young patients to receive personalised treatments and to benefit from an improved prognosis.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the European Respiratory Society Clinical Research Collaboration chILD-EU – The European Research Collaboration for Children's Interstitial Lung Disease. They also thank the COST Innovator Grant (IG16125): Open ILD: An Open Access Repository of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Children and Adults with Interstitial Lung Disease.

ERS CRC chILD-EU group members: Killian Hurley, Ireland; Adam Jaffe, Australia; Ernst Eber, Austria; Petr Pohunek, Czech Republic; Chiara Sileo, France; Aurore Coulomb, France; Elias Seidl, Germany; Florian Gothe, Germany; Nicolaus Schwerk, Germany; Effrosyne Manali, Greece; Deborah Snijders, Italy; Nicola Ullmann, Italy; Suzanne Terheggen-Lagro, The Netherlands; Katarzyna Krenke, Poland; Stanislaw Bogusławski, Poland; Antonio Moreno, Spain; Dilber Ademhan Tural, Turkey; Tugba Sismanlar, Turkey; Andrew Bush, UK; Jeanette Boyd, UK; Steve Cunningham, UK; Robin Deterding, USA.

Footnotes

  • Provenance: Commissioned article, peer reviewed.

  • Previous articles in this series: No. 1: Simonneau G, Fadel E, Vonk Noordegraaf A, et al. Highlights from the International Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension Congress 2021. Eur Respir Rev 2023; 32: 220132. No. 2: Buschulte K, Cottin V, Wijsenbeek M, et al. The world of rare interstitial lung diseases. Eur Respir Rev 2023; 32: 220161. No. 3: Dumoulin DW, Bironzo P, Passiglia F, et al. Rare thoracic cancers: a comprehensive overview of diagnosis and management of small cell lung cancer, malignant pleural mesothelioma and thymic epithelial tumours. Eur Respir Rev 2023; 32: 220174. No. 4: Cullivan S, Gaine S, Sitbon O. New trends in pulmonary hypertension. Eur Respir Rev 2023; 32: 220211.

  • This article has an editorial commentary: https://doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0006-2023

  • Number 5 in the Series “The world of rare lung diseases” Edited by Michael Kreuter, Marc Humbert, Thomas Wagner and Marlies Wijsenbeek

  • Author contributions: N. Nathan, M. Griese and R. Epaud wrote the manuscript. K. Michel, B. Willemse, A. Torrent-Vernetta, N. Emiralioglu, J. Carlens, H. Marczak, C. Gilbert and C. Delestrain critically reviewed the manuscript. The ERS CRC chILD-EU group participated in manuscript conception. The authors meet criteria for authorship as recommended by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.

  • Conflict of interest: None declared.

  • Received October 1, 2022.
  • Accepted December 18, 2022.
  • Copyright ©The authors 2023
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This version is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0. For commercial reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions{at}ersnet.org

References

  1. ↵
    1. Dinwiddie R,
    2. Sharief N,
    3. Crawford O
    . Idiopathic interstitial pneumonitis in children: a national survey in the United Kingdom and Ireland. Pediatr Pulmonol 2002; 34: 23–29. doi:10.1002/ppul.10125
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Laverty A,
    2. Jaffe A,
    3. Cunningham S
    . Establishment of a web-based registry for rare (orphan) pediatric lung diseases in the United Kingdom: the BPOLD registry. Pediatr Pulmonol 2008; 43: 451–456. doi:10.1002/ppul.20783
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Kornum JB,
    2. Christensen S,
    3. Grijota M, et al.
    The incidence of interstitial lung disease 1995–2005: a Danish nationwide population-based study. BMC Pulm Med 2008; 8: 24. doi:10.1186/1471-2466-8-24
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Griese M,
    2. Haug M,
    3. Brasch F, et al.
    Incidence and classification of pediatric diffuse parenchymal lung diseases in Germany. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2009; 4: 26. doi:10.1186/1750-1172-4-26
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Nathan N,
    2. Taam RA,
    3. Epaud R, et al.
    A national internet-linked based database for pediatric interstitial lung diseases: the French network. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2012; 7: 40. doi:10.1186/1750-1172-7-40
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Casamento K,
    2. Laverty A,
    3. Wilsher M, et al.
    Assessing the feasibility of a web-based registry for multiple orphan lung diseases: the Australasian Registry Network for Orphan Lung Disease (ARNOLD) experience. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2016; 11: 42. doi:10.1186/s13023-016-0389-z
    OpenUrl
    1. Saddi V,
    2. Beggs S,
    3. Bennetts B, et al.
    Childhood interstitial lung diseases in immunocompetent children in Australia and New Zealand: a decade's experience. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2017; 12: 133. doi:10.1186/s13023-017-0637-x
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Soares JJ,
    2. Deutsch GH,
    3. Moore PE, et al.
    Childhood interstitial lung diseases: an 18-year retrospective analysis. Pediatrics 2013; 132: 684–691. doi:10.1542/peds.2013-1780
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Young L,
    2. Nevel R,
    3. Casey A, et al.
    A national registry for childhood interstitial and diffuse lung diseases in the United States. Eur Respir J 2018; 52: Suppl. 62, OA3786. doi:10.1183/13993003.congress-2018.OA3786
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Tang X,
    2. Li H,
    3. Liu H, et al.
    Etiologic spectrum of interstitial lung diseases in Chinese children older than 2 years of age. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2020; 15: 25. doi:10.1186/s13023-019-1270-7
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Griese M,
    2. Seidl E,
    3. Hengst M, et al.
    International management platform for children's interstitial lung disease (chILD-EU). Thorax 2018; 73: 231–239. doi:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2017-210519
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Torrent-Vernetta A,
    2. Gaboli M,
    3. Castillo-Corullón S, et al.
    Incidence and prevalence of children's diffuse lung disease in Spain. Arch Bronconeumol 2022; 58: 22–29. doi:10.1016/j.arbres.2021.06.001
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. Nathan N
    . Childhood interstitial lung diseases (chILD) recognition: when epidemiology increases a rare disease incidence. Arch Bronconeumol 2022; 58: 217–218. doi:10.1016/j.arbres.2022.01.009
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. Griese M
    . Chronic interstitial lung disease in children. Eur Respir Rev 2018; 27: 170100. doi:10.1183/16000617.0100-2017
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Deutsch GH,
    2. Young LR,
    3. Deterding RR, et al.
    Diffuse lung disease in young children: application of a novel classification scheme. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2007; 176: 1120–1128. doi:10.1164/rccm.200703-393OC
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Kurland G,
    2. Deterding RR,
    3. Hagood JS, et al.
    An official American Thoracic Society clinical practice guideline: classification, evaluation, and management of childhood interstitial lung disease in infancy. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013; 188: 376–394. doi:10.1164/rccm.201305-0923ST
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Bush A,
    2. Cunningham S,
    3. de Blic J, et al.
    European protocols for the diagnosis and initial treatment of interstitial lung disease in children. Thorax 2015; 70: 1078–1084. doi:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-207349
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Nathan N,
    2. Berdah L,
    3. Borensztajn K, et al.
    Chronic interstitial lung diseases in children: diagnosis approaches. Expert Rev Respir Med 2018; 12: 1051–1060. doi:10.1080/17476348.2018.1538795
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    1. Nathan N,
    2. Berdah L,
    3. Delestrain C, et al.
    Interstitial lung diseases in children. Presse Med 2020; 49: 103909. doi:10.1016/j.lpm.2019.06.007
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    1. Nogee LM
    . Interstitial lung disease in newborns. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2017; 22: 227–233. doi:10.1016/j.siny.2017.03.003
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Bush A,
    2. Griese M,
    3. Seidl E, et al.
    Early onset children's interstitial lung diseases: discrete entities or manifestations of pulmonary dysmaturity? Paediatr Respir Rev 2019; 30: 65–71. doi:10.1016/j.prrv.2018.09.004
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. Clement A
    . Task force on chronic interstitial lung disease in immunocompetent children. Eur Respir J 2004; 24: 686–697. doi:10.1183/09031936.04.00089803
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Griese M,
    2. Irnstetter A,
    3. Hengst M, et al.
    Categorizing diffuse parenchymal lung disease in children. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2015; 10: 122. doi:10.1186/s13023-015-0339-1
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Clement A,
    2. Nathan N,
    3. Epaud R, et al.
    Interstitial lung diseases in children. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2010; 5: 22. doi:10.1186/1750-1172-5-22
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Nathan N,
    2. Borensztajn K,
    3. Clement A
    . Genetic causes and clinical management of pediatric interstitial lung diseases. Curr Opin Pulm Med 2018; 24: 253–259. doi:10.1097/MCP.0000000000000471
    OpenUrl
    1. Rice A,
    2. Tran-Dang M-A,
    3. Bush A, et al.
    Diffuse lung disease in infancy and childhood: expanding the chILD classification. Histopathology 2013; 63: 743–755. doi:10.1111/his.12185
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Fan LL,
    2. Dishop MK,
    3. Galambos C, et al.
    Diffuse lung disease in biopsied children 2 to 18 years of age. Application of the chILD classification scheme. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2015; 12: 1498–1505. doi:10.1513/AnnalsATS.201501-064OC
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Griese M
    . Etiologic classification of diffuse parenchymal (interstitial) lung diseases. J Clin Med 2022; 11: 1747. doi:10.3390/jcm11061747
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    1. Hadchouel A,
    2. Wieland T,
    3. Griese M, et al.
    Biallelic mutations of methionyl-tRNA synthetase cause a specific type of pulmonary alveolar proteinosis prevalent on Réunion Island. Am J Hum Genet 2015; 96: 826–831. doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2015.03.010
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Krenke K,
    2. Szczałuba K,
    3. Bielecka T, et al.
    FARSA mutations mimic phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase deficiency caused by FARSB defects. Clin Genet 2019; 96: 468–472. doi:10.1111/cge.13614
    OpenUrl
  19. ↵
    1. Antonellis A,
    2. Oprescu SN,
    3. Griffin LB, et al.
    Compound heterozygosity for loss-of-function FARSB variants in a patient with classic features of recessive aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase-related disease. Hum Mutat 2018; 39: 834–840. doi:10.1002/humu.23424
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Magg T,
    2. Okano T,
    3. Koenig LM, et al.
    Heterozygous OAS1 gain-of-function variants cause an autoinflammatory immunodeficiency. Sci Immunol 2021; 6: eabf9564. doi:10.1126/sciimmunol.abf9564
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Seidl E,
    2. Schramm D,
    3. Schön C, et al.
    Pulmonary alveolar proteinosis due to heterozygous mutation in OAS1: whole lung lavages for long-term bridging to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Pediatr Pulmonol 2022; 57: 273–277. doi:10.1002/ppul.25728
    OpenUrl
  21. ↵
    1. Watkin LB,
    2. Jessen B,
    3. Wiszniewski W, et al.
    COPA mutations impair ER-Golgi transport and cause hereditary autoimmune-mediated lung disease and arthritis. Nat Genet 2015; 47: 654–660. doi:10.1038/ng.3279
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Liu Y,
    2. Jesus AA,
    3. Marrero B, et al.
    Activated STING in a vascular and pulmonary syndrome. N Engl J Med 2014; 371: 507–518. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1312625
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Jeremiah N,
    2. Neven B,
    3. Gentili M, et al.
    Inherited STING-activating mutation underlies a familial inflammatory syndrome with lupus-like manifestations. J Clin Invest 2014; 124: 5516–5520. doi:10.1172/JCI79100
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Galambos C,
    2. Mullen MP,
    3. Shieh JT, et al.
    Phenotype characterisation of TBX4 mutation and deletion carriers with neonatal and paediatric pulmonary hypertension. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: 1801965. doi:10.1183/13993003.01965-2018
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Haarman MG,
    2. Kerstjens-Frederikse WS,
    3. Berger RMF
    . The ever-expanding phenotypical spectrum of human TBX4 mutations: from toe to lung. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: 1901504. doi:10.1183/13993003.01504-2019
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Szafranski P,
    2. Coban-Akdemir ZH,
    3. Rupps R, et al.
    Phenotypic expansion of TBX4 mutations to include acinar dysplasia of the lungs. Am J Med Genet A 2016; 170: 2440–2444. doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.37822
    OpenUrl
    1. Rapp CK,
    2. Van Dijck I,
    3. Laugwitz L, et al.
    Expanding the phenotypic spectrum of FINCA (fibrosis, neurodegeneration, and cerebral angiomatosis) syndrome beyond infancy. Clin Genet 2021; 100: 453–461. doi:10.1111/cge.14016
    OpenUrl
  24. ↵
    1. Vavassori S,
    2. Chou J,
    3. Faletti LE, et al.
    Multisystem inflammation and susceptibility to viral infections in human ZNFX1 deficiency. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2021; 148: 381–393. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2021.03.045
    OpenUrl
  25. ↵
    1. Nathan N,
    2. Pautrat J,
    3. L'Hermine AC, et al.
    Pulmonary sarcoid-like granulomatous disease in an 11-month-old girl. BMJ Case Rep 2013; 2013: bcr2012008024. doi:10.1136/bcr-2012-008024
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Cottin V,
    2. Nunes H,
    3. Brillet P-Y, et al.
    Combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema: a distinct underrecognised entity. Eur Respir J 2005; 26: 586–593. doi:10.1183/09031936.05.00021005
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Cottin V,
    2. Reix P,
    3. Khouatra C, et al.
    Combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema syndrome associated with familial SFTPC mutation. Thorax 2011; 66: 918–919. doi:10.1136/thx.2010.151407
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Guillerman RP
    . Imaging of childhood interstitial lung disease. Pediatr Allergy Immunol Pulmonol 2010; 23: 43–68. doi:10.1089/ped.2010.0010
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Semple TR,
    2. Ashworth MT,
    3. Owens CM
    . Interstitial lung disease in children made easier … well, almost. Radiographics 2017; 37: 1679–1703. doi:10.1148/rg.2017170006
    OpenUrl
  29. ↵
    1. Pearce MS,
    2. Salotti JA,
    3. Little MP, et al.
    Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 2012; 380: 499–505. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60815-0
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Mathews JD,
    2. Forsythe AV,
    3. Brady Z, et al.
    Cancer risk in 680,000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians. BMJ 2013; 346: f2360. doi:10.1136/bmj.f2360
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    1. Brody AS,
    2. Guillerman RP
    . Ten rules for ordering chest CTs. Pediatr Pulmonol 2021; 56: 1868–1871. doi:10.1002/ppul.25399
    OpenUrl
  31. ↵
    1. Brody AS
    . Imaging considerations: interstitial lung disease in children. Radiol Clin North Am 2005; 43: 391–403. doi:10.1016/j.rcl.2004.12.002
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Brody AS
    . New perspectives in imaging interstitial lung disease in children. Pediatr Radiol 2008; 38: Suppl. 2, S205–S207. doi:10.1007/s00247-008-0766-4
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Fan LL,
    2. Kozinetz CA
    . Factors influencing survival in children with chronic interstitial lung disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997; 156: 939–942. doi:10.1164/ajrccm.156.3.9703051
    OpenUrlPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Klepper SE,
    2. Muir N
    . Reference values on the 6-minute walk test for children living in the United States. Pediatr Phys Ther 2011; 23: 32–40. doi:10.1097/PEP.0b013e3182095e44
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Amsallem F,
    2. Gauthier R,
    3. Ramonatxo M, et al.
    Respiratory function testing in infants: recommendations on normal values. Rev Mal Respir 2008; 25: 405–432. doi:10.1016/S0761-8425(08)71583-3
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Quanjer PH,
    2. Stanojevic S,
    3. Cole TJ, et al.
    Multi-ethnic reference values for spirometry for the 3–95-yr age range: the global lung function 2012 equations. Eur Respir J 2012; 40: 1324–1343. doi:10.1183/09031936.00080312
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Beydon N
    . Épreuves fonctionnelles respiratoires de l'enfant de 3 à 5 ans: quel matériel, quelles mesures? [PFTing in children aged 3–5 years: which material, which measurements?] Arch Pediatr 2010; 17: 442–445. doi:10.1016/j.arcped.2010.01.003
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Hughes JMB,
    2. Pride NB
    . Examination of the carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (DlCO) in relation to its Kco and Va components. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2012; 186: 132–139. doi:10.1164/rccm.201112-2160CI
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Kim Y-J,
    2. Christoph K,
    3. Yu Z, et al.
    Pulmonary diffusing capacity in healthy African-American and Caucasian children. Pediatr Pulmonol 2016; 51: 84–88. doi:10.1002/ppul.23205
    OpenUrl
  36. ↵
    1. Khirani S,
    2. Nathan N,
    3. Ramirez A, et al.
    Work of breathing in children with diffuse parenchymal lung disease. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 2015; 206: 45–52. doi:10.1016/j.resp.2014.11.015
    OpenUrl
  37. ↵
    1. Ring AM,
    2. Carlens J,
    3. Bush A, et al.
    Pulmonary function testing in children's interstitial lung disease. Eur Respir Rev 2020; 29: 200019. doi:10.1183/16000617.0019-2020
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    1. de Blic J,
    2. Midulla F,
    3. Barbato A, et al.
    Bronchoalveolar lavage in children. ERS Task Force on bronchoalveolar lavage in children. Eur Respir J 2000; 15: 217–231. doi:10.1183/09031936.00.15121700
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    1. Midulla F,
    2. Villani A,
    3. Merolla R, et al.
    Bronchoalveolar lavage studies in children without parenchymal lung disease: cellular constituents and protein levels. Pediatr Pulmonol 1995; 20: 112–118. doi:10.1002/ppul.1950200211
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Popler J,
    2. Wagner BD,
    3. Tarro HL, et al.
    Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid cytokine profiles in neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia of infancy and follicular bronchiolitis. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2013; 8: 175. doi:10.1186/1750-1172-8-175
    OpenUrl
  39. ↵
    1. Ratjen F,
    2. Costabel U,
    3. Griese M, et al.
    Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid findings in children with hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Eur Respir J 2003; 21: 144–148. doi:10.1183/09031936.03.00035703a
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. ↵
    1. Wuyts WA,
    2. Dooms C,
    3. Verleden GM
    . The clinical utility of bronchoalveolar lavage cellular analysis in interstitial lung disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013; 187: 777. doi:10.1164/ajrccm.187.7.777
    OpenUrl
  41. ↵
    1. Griese M,
    2. Felber J,
    3. Reiter K, et al.
    Airway inflammation in children with tracheostomy. Pediatr Pulmonol 2004; 37: 356–361. doi:10.1002/ppul.10432
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Griese M,
    2. Lorenz E,
    3. Hengst M, et al.
    Surfactant proteins in pediatric interstitial lung disease. Pediatr Res 2016; 79: 34–41. doi:10.1038/pr.2015.173
    OpenUrlPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Sinha IP,
    2. Bhatt JM,
    3. Cleator A, et al.
    1. Soreze Y,
    2. Sileo C,
    3. Coulomb l'Hermine A, et al.
    Interstitial lung diseases in the neonatal period. In: Sinha IP, Bhatt JM, Cleator A, et al., eds. Respiratory Diseases of the Newborn Infant (ERS Monograph). Sheffield, European Respiratory Society, 2021; pp. 213–230.
  44. ↵
    1. Borie R,
    2. Kannengiesser C,
    3. Nathan N, et al.
    Familial pulmonary fibrosis. Rev Mal Respir 2015; 32: 413–434. doi:10.1016/j.rmr.2014.07.017
    OpenUrl
    1. Borie R,
    2. Kannengiesser C,
    3. Crestani B
    . Familial forms of nonspecific interstitial pneumonia/idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: clinical course and genetic background. Curr Opin Pulm Med 2012; 18: 455–461. doi:10.1097/MCP.0b013e328356b15c
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. Borie R,
    2. Kannengiesser C,
    3. Amselem S, et al.
    Multidisciplinary team dedicated to suspected heritable pulmonary fibrosis. Eur Respir J 2018; 52: Suppl. 62, PA2233. doi:10.1183/13993003.congress-2018.PA2233
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  46. ↵
    1. Borie R,
    2. Kannengiesser C,
    3. de Fontbrune FS, et al.
    Management of suspected monogenic lung fibrosis in a specialised centre. Eur Respir Rev 2017; 26: 160122. doi:10.1183/16000617.0122-2016
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. ↵
    1. Kelada L,
    2. Wakefield C,
    3. Vidic N, et al.
    Genomic testing for children with interstitial and diffuse lung disease (chILD): parent satisfaction, understanding and health-related quality of life. BMJ Open Respir Res 2022; 9: e001139. doi:10.1136/bmjresp-2021-001139
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. ↵
    1. Nogee LM
    . Genetics of pediatric interstitial lung disease. Curr Opin Pediatr 2006; 18: 287–292. doi:10.1097/01.mop.0000193310.22462.1f
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Epaud R,
    2. Jonard L,
    3. Ducou-le-Pointe H, et al.
    Pathologies génétiques du surfactant. [Genetic disorders of surfactant.] Arch Pediatr 2012; 19: 212–219. doi:10.1016/j.arcped.2011.12.004
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Gupta A,
    2. Zheng SL
    . Genetic disorders of surfactant protein dysfunction: when to consider and how to investigate. Arch Dis Child 2017; 102: 84–90. doi:10.1136/archdischild-2012-303143
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Hartl D,
    2. Griese M
    . Interstitial lung disease in children – genetic background and associated phenotypes. Respir Res 2005; 6: 32. doi:10.1186/1465-9921-6-32
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Hayasaka I,
    2. Cho K,
    3. Akimoto T, et al.
    Genetic basis for childhood interstitial lung disease among Japanese infants and children. Pediatr Res 2018; 83: 477–483. doi:10.1038/pr.2017.217
    OpenUrl
    1. Kröner C,
    2. Wittmann T,
    3. Reu S, et al.
    Lung disease caused by ABCA3 mutations. Thorax 2017; 72: 213–220. doi:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-208649
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. ↵
    1. Kröner C,
    2. Reu S,
    3. Teusch V, et al.
    Genotype alone does not predict the clinical course of SFTPC deficiency in paediatric patients. Eur Respir J 2015; 46: 197–206. doi:10.1183/09031936.00129414
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. ↵
    1. Nogee LM,
    2. Garnier G,
    3. Dietz HC, et al.
    A mutation in the surfactant protein B gene responsible for fatal neonatal respiratory disease in multiple kindreds. J Clin Invest 1994; 93: 1860–1863. doi:10.1172/JCI117173
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Nogee LM,
    2. de Mello DE,
    3. Dehner LP, et al.
    Brief report: deficiency of pulmonary surfactant protein B in congenital alveolar proteinosis. N Engl J Med 1993; 328: 406–410. doi:10.1056/NEJM199302113280606
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Shulenin S,
    2. Nogee LM,
    3. Annilo T, et al.
    ABCA3 gene mutations in newborns with fatal surfactant deficiency. N Engl J Med 2004; 350: 1296–1303. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa032178
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Devriendt K,
    2. Vanhole C,
    3. Matthijs G, et al.
    Deletion of thyroid transcription factor-1 gene in an infant with neonatal thyroid dysfunction and respiratory failure. N Engl J Med 1998; 338: 1317–1318. doi:10.1056/NEJM199804303381817
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. ↵
    1. Nogee LM,
    2. Dunbar AE 3rd.,
    3. Wert SE, et al.
    A mutation in the surfactant protein C gene associated with familial interstitial lung disease. N Engl J Med 2001; 344: 573–579. doi:10.1056/NEJM200102223440805
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. ↵
    1. Nathan N,
    2. Giraud V,
    3. Picard C, et al.
    Germline SFTPA1 mutation in familial idiopathic interstitial pneumonia and lung cancer. Hum Mol Genet 2016; 25: 1457–1467. doi:10.1093/hmg/ddw014
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Legendre M,
    2. Butt A,
    3. Borie R, et al.
    Functional assessment and phenotypic heterogeneity of SFTPA1 and SFTPA2 mutations in interstitial lung diseases and lung cancer. Eur Respir J 2020; 56: 2002806. doi:10.1183/13993003.02806-2020
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Lange M,
    2. Kasper B,
    3. Bohring A, et al.
    47 patients with FLNA associated periventricular nodular heterotopia. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2015; 10: 134. doi:10.1186/s13023-015-0331-9
    OpenUrl
  53. ↵
    1. Shelmerdine SC,
    2. Semple T,
    3. Wallis C, et al.
    Filamin A (FLNA) mutation – a newcomer to the childhood interstitial lung disease (ChILD) classification. Pediatr Pulmonol 2017; 52: 1306–1315. doi:10.1002/ppul.23695
    OpenUrl
  54. ↵
    1. Hildebrandt J,
    2. Yalcin E,
    3. Bresser H-G, et al.
    Characterization of CSF2RA mutation related juvenile pulmonary alveolar proteinosis. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2014; 9: 171. doi:10.1186/s13023-014-0171-z
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Suzuki T,
    2. Maranda B,
    3. Sakagami T, et al.
    Hereditary pulmonary alveolar proteinosis caused by recessive CSF2RB mutations. Eur Respir J 2011; 37: 201–204. doi:10.1183/09031936.00090610
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  55. ↵
    1. Lenz D,
    2. Stahl M,
    3. Seidl E, et al.
    Rescue of respiratory failure in pulmonary alveolar proteinosis due to pathogenic MARS1 variants. Pediatr Pulmonol 2020; 55: 3057–3066. doi:10.1002/ppul.25031
    OpenUrl
  56. ↵
    1. Schuch LA,
    2. Forstner M,
    3. Rapp CK, et al.
    FARS1-related disorders caused by bi-allelic mutations in cytosolic phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase genes: look beyond the lungs! Clin Genet 2021; 99: 789–801. doi:10.1111/cge.13943
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Nowaczyk MJM,
    2. Huang L,
    3. Tarnopolsky M, et al.
    A novel multisystem disease associated with recessive mutations in the tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase (YARS) gene. Am J Med Genet A 2017; 173: 126–134. doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.37973
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  57. ↵
    1. Fuchs SA,
    2. Schene IF,
    3. Kok G, et al.
    Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase deficiencies in search of common themes. Genet Med 2019; 21: 319–330. doi:10.1038/s41436-018-0048-y
    OpenUrlPubMed
  58. ↵
    1. Frémond M-L,
    2. Legendre M,
    3. Fayon M, et al.
    Use of ruxolitinib in COPA syndrome manifesting as life-threatening alveolar haemorrhage. Thorax 2020; 75: 92–95. doi:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2019-213892
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  59. ↵
    1. Frémond M-L,
    2. Nathan N
    . COPA syndrome, 5 years after: where are we? Joint Bone Spine 2020; 88: 105070. doi:10.1016/j.jbspin.2020.09.002
    OpenUrl
  60. ↵
    1. Lepelley A,
    2. Martin-Niclós MJ,
    3. Le Bihan M, et al.
    Mutations in COPA lead to abnormal trafficking of STING to the Golgi and interferon signaling. J Exp Med 2020; 217: e20200600. doi:10.1084/jem.20200600
    OpenUrl
  61. ↵
    1. Langston C,
    2. Patterson K,
    3. Dishop MK, et al.
    A protocol for the handling of tissue obtained by operative lung biopsy: recommendations of the chILD pathology co-operative group. Pediatr Dev Pathol 2006; 9: 173–180. doi:10.2350/06-03-0065.1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Chan CD,
    2. Niyogi A,
    3. Jaffray B, et al.
    Lung biopsy in children: when is it useful? Arch Dis Child 2021; 106: 291–293. doi:10.1136/archdischild-2019-318443
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  62. ↵
    1. Lamoshi AY,
    2. Nakayama DK
    . Usefulness of lung biopsy in pediatric pulmonary conditions. Am Surg 2015; 81: 31–33. doi:10.1177/000313481508100121
    OpenUrlPubMed
  63. ↵
    1. Nathan N,
    2. Marcelo P,
    3. Houdouin V, et al.
    Lung sarcoidosis in children: update on disease expression and management. Thorax 2015; 70: 537–542. doi:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-206825
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  64. ↵
    1. Perisson C,
    2. Epaud R,
    3. Fayon M, et al.
    Beneficial effect of azithromycin in children with diffuse parenchymal lung disease. Eur Respir J 2014; 44: Suppl. 58, P3495.
    OpenUrl
    1. Epaud R,
    2. Kron C,
    3. Flamei F, et al.
    Azithromycin in interstitial lung disease associated with surfactant metabolism disorders. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2010; 181: A3993. doi:10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2010.181.1_MeetingAbstracts.A3993
    OpenUrl
    1. Thouvenin G,
    2. Nathan N,
    3. Epaud R, et al.
    Diffuse parenchymal lung disease caused by surfactant deficiency: dramatic improvement by azithromycin. BMJ Case Rep 2013; 2013: bcr2013009988. doi:10.1136/bcr-2013-009988
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Parnham MJ,
    2. Erakovic Haber V,
    3. Giamarellos-Bourboulis EJ, et al.
    Azithromycin: mechanisms of action and their relevance for clinical applications. Pharmacol Ther 2014; 143: 225–245. doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2014.03.003
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Braun S,
    2. Ferner M,
    3. Kronfeld K, et al.
    Hydroxychloroquine in children with interstitial (diffuse parenchymal) lung diseases. Pediatr Pulmonol 2015; 50: 410–419. doi:10.1002/ppul.23133
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Griese M,
    2. Köhler M,
    3. Witt S, et al.
    Prospective evaluation of hydroxychloroquine in pediatric interstitial lung diseases: study protocol for an investigator-initiated, randomized controlled, parallel-group clinical trial. Trials 2020; 21: 307. doi:10.1186/s13063-020-4188-4
    OpenUrl
    1. Williamson M,
    2. Wallis C
    . Ten-year follow up of hydroxychloroquine treatment for ABCA3 deficiency. Pediatr Pulmonol 2014; 49: 299–301. doi:10.1002/ppul.22811
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Misra HP,
    2. Rabideau C
    . Pirfenidone inhibits NADPH-dependent microsomal lipid peroxidation and scavenges hydroxyl radicals. Mol Cell Biochem 2000; 204: 119–126. doi:10.1023/A:1007023532508
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Deterding R,
    2. Griese M,
    3. Deutsch G, et al.
    Study design of a randomised, placebo-controlled trial of nintedanib in children and adolescents with fibrosing interstitial lung disease. ERJ Open Res 2021; 7: 00805-2020. doi:10.1183/23120541.00805-2020
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  65. ↵
    1. Griese M,
    2. Kappler M,
    3. Stehling F, et al.
    Randomized controlled phase 2 trial of hydroxychloroquine in childhood interstitial lung disease. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2022; 17: 289. doi:10.1186/s13023-022-02399-2
    OpenUrl
  66. ↵
    1. Sanchez GAM,
    2. Reinhardt A,
    3. Ramsey S, et al.
    JAK1/2 inhibition with baricitinib in the treatment of autoinflammatory interferonopathies. J Clin Invest 2018; 128: 3041–3052. doi:10.1172/JCI98814
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Crow YJ,
    2. Neven B,
    3. Frémond M-L
    . JAK inhibition in the type I interferonopathies. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2021; 148: 991–993. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2021.07.028
    OpenUrl
    1. Jamois C,
    2. Gibiansky L,
    3. Chavanne C, et al.
    Rituximab pediatric drug development: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling to inform regulatory approval for rituximab treatment in patients with granulomatosis with polyangiitis or microscopic polyangiitis. Clin Transl Sci 2022; 15: 2172–2183. doi:10.1111/cts.13351
    OpenUrl
  67. ↵
    1. Nishi K,
    2. Ogura M,
    3. Tamai N, et al.
    Successful rituximab treatment for severe rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease with anti-MDA5 antibody-positive juvenile dermatomyositis: a case report and literature review. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J 2022; 20: 60. doi:10.1186/s12969-022-00723-5
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top
View this article with LENS
Vol 32 Issue 167 Table of Contents
European Respiratory Review: 32 (167)
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Diagnostic workup of childhood interstitial lung disease
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
Diagnostic workup of childhood interstitial lung disease
Nadia Nathan, Matthias Griese, Katarzyna Michel, Julia Carlens, Carlee Gilbert, Nagehan Emiralioglu, Alba Torrent-Vernetta, Honorata Marczak, Brigitte Willemse, Céline Delestrain, Ralph Epaud
European Respiratory Review Mar 2023, 32 (167) 220188; DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0188-2022

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Diagnostic workup of childhood interstitial lung disease
Nadia Nathan, Matthias Griese, Katarzyna Michel, Julia Carlens, Carlee Gilbert, Nagehan Emiralioglu, Alba Torrent-Vernetta, Honorata Marczak, Brigitte Willemse, Céline Delestrain, Ralph Epaud
European Respiratory Review Mar 2023, 32 (167) 220188; DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0188-2022
Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • chILD definition and classification
    • Diagnostic workup for chILD
    • A stepwise approach to chILD diagnosis
    • Multidisciplinary team approach and periodic re-investigation of “undefined chILD”
    • Undefined chILD?
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Subjects

  • Interstitial and orphan lung disease
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

Series

  • Supplemental oxygen and noninvasive ventilation
  • Nonpharmacological management of psychological distress in COPD
  • Lung transplantation for COPD/pulmonary emphysema
Show more Series

The world of rare lung diseases

  • New trends in pulmonary hypertension
  • Highlights from the International CTEPH Congress 2021
Show more The world of rare lung diseases

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERR

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising
  • Sponsorship

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN: 0905-9180
Online ISSN: 1600-0617

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society