Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

The role of gene–ambient air pollution interactions in paediatric asthma

Jelte Kelchtermans, Hakon Hakonarson
European Respiratory Review 2022 31: 220094; DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0094-2022
Jelte Kelchtermans
1Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
2The Center of Applied Genomics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
3Division of Pulmonary Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jelte Kelchtermans
  • For correspondence: kelchtermj@chop.edu
Hakon Hakonarson
1Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
2The Center of Applied Genomics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
3Division of Pulmonary Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Globally, asthma prevention and treatment remain a challenge. Ambient air pollution (AAP) is an environmental risk factor of special interest in asthma research. AAP is poorly defined and has been subdivided either by the origin of the air pollution or by the specific bioactive compounds. The link between AAP exposure and asthma exacerbations is well established and has been extensively reviewed. In this narrative review, we discuss the specific genetic variants that have been associated with increased AAP sensitivity and impact in paediatric asthma. We highlight the relative importance of variants associated with genes with a role in oxidant defences and the nuclear factor-κB pathway supporting a potential central role for these pathways in AAP sensitivity.

Abstract

Genetic variants impact the sensitivity to ambient air pollution (AAP) in paediatric patients with asthma. Variants associated with oxidative stress or nuclear factor-κB pathways are linked to AAP sensitivity. https://bit.ly/3wYmLun

Introduction

Asthma remains one of the most significant noncommunicable diseases globally [1, 2]. However, our understanding of asthma pathogenesis and our ability to prevent asthma remain limited. Researchers have identified various lifestyle, infectious, dietary and medical risk factors for asthma [3–7]. Amongst these, ambient air pollution (AAP) was found to be a major risk factor for asthma [8–13]. Decreasing AAP has been shown to be associated with reduced asthma incidence and severity [14, 15]. Despite this, high levels of AAP remain a global problem, with significant associated morbidity and mortality [16]. We currently lack effective treatment strategies to protect paediatric asthma patients from the impact of AAP exposure. Developing these strategies has been complicated by significant heterogeneity in AAP sensitivity. As such, an improved insight into the mechanism at the basis of this heterogeneity is urgently needed.

Variation in AAP sensitivity is likely due in part to genetic variability. We know that, just like environmental factors, asthma risk is modified by genetic variants. In twin studies, the observed heritability for asthma ranges from 35 to 73% [17, 18]. Over the past 25 years, hundreds of genetic variants have been associated with asthma [19–26]. Despite this, the cumulative effect of these variants falls short of the observed heritability [26]. This gap between the large observed heritability and the heritability explained by identified variants has been termed the ‘missing heritability’ [27]. A possible explanation for this missing heritability is that interactions between genetic variants and environmental factors may increase the effect size beyond what can be explained by one factor alone [27].

In this narrative review, we discuss the interactions between genetic variants and AAP in paediatric asthma. In preparing this review, we queried the Medline, Cochrane Library, Scopus and Web of Science databases for publications related to AAP, genetic variants and paediatric asthma. This review is not an attempt to critically appraise the entirety of the published literature. Instead, we aimed to organise the available data and assess the patterns that are starting to emerge, thereby guiding future direction for the field.

First, we will discuss the evidence for a genetic component to AAP sensitivity. Then, we will take a closer look at the specific variants that have been identified to date and the molecular pathways they implicate. Of note, we will not include a discussion regarding the interaction between tobacco smoke, genetic variants and asthma as this has been recently reviewed elsewhere [28]. Similarly, as an excellent recent systematic review examined the interaction between several genetic variants and indoor air pollution, we will not repeat this discussion here [29].

AAP definition and link to asthma

While technical limitations and heterogeneous study designs have created different somewhat overlapping categories of AAP, several lines of evidence support its link with asthma. In this section we provide an overview of the different AAP classifications, briefly touch upon the evidence linking AAP to asthma and then discuss the population-level evidence for a genotypical influence on this relationship.

Types of AAP

AAP is a broad term that is typically subdivided either by the origin of the air pollution or by the specific bioactive compound that is measured.

In origin-based AAP classifications the effects of a gas mixture emitted by a specific source are evaluated. Examples are ‘traffic-related air pollution’ (TRAP), or ‘secondhand smoke’ also known as ‘environmental tobacco smoke’. The difficulty with this approach is that these categories encompass several bioactive components. The specific components of these mixtures are not necessarily consistent or reproducible. Conversely, an inherent advantage is that it captures possible interaction effects between different components. Studies assessing TRAP typically use some surrogate marker such as reported truck traffic on the street of residence or measured nitrogen dioxide (NO2) [30, 31]. Unfortunately, these surrogate markers come with their own limitations and confounders [32].

Studies looking directly at specific bioactive compounds have generally measured benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P), carbon monoxide (CO), lead, NO2, ozone (O3), particulate matter (PM) and/or sulphur dioxide (SO2) [33–35]. While this approach allows for more exact and reproducible measurements, distinguishing association from causation remains complex. For example, when Slaughter et al. [36] found a significant association between CO and asthma symptom severity, this was hypothesized to be due to the effect of nonmeasured combustion byproducts.

Compounds of particular interest in paediatric asthma research have been NO2, O3 and PM.

NO2 is a combustion byproduct and was initially viewed as mostly an indoor air pollutant [34]. However, since up to 80% of ambient NO2 is caused by traffic, it has been used as a proxy for TRAP [9, 30]. A limitation of this approach is that while ambient NO2 is mostly caused traffic, its specificity will be decreased in areas with other sources of exhaust fumes as it is a byproduct of all types of exhaust [32]. Increased NO2 levels as measured outside children's homes have been associated with increased new-onset asthma [30].

O3 is formed by an interaction between ultraviolet light and precursor compounds. It is most prevalent in areas with stagnant weather patterns and prolonged sunlight [37]. Several O3 precursors are found in industrial and vehicle exhaust [9, 37]. Increased O3 has been associated with increased asthma medication usage and morbidity [38–41]. Beyond this, higher mean 4-year O3 concentrations have also been associated with increased asthma diagnosis in children engaged in sports [42].

PM is a heterogeneous group that is typically subdivided based on the size of particulates. PM10 and PM2.5 refer to particulates with an aerodynamic diameter below 10 and 2.5 μm, respectively [8, 34]. This group includes fine solids, dust, aerosols, soot, ash and pollen [37]. There is significant temporal and spatial variation in the content of PM [34]. PM can encompass compounds of specific interest such as polyaromatic hydrocarbons including B[a]P and diesel soot or diesel exhaust particulate (DEP) [37, 43]. PM is sometimes subdivided by pH and acidic PM was specifically associated with decreased lung function in children [44]. Both PM10 and PM2.5 exposure have been associated with increased asthma symptom frequency and decreased asthma control [8].

Link between AAP and asthma

The link between AAP exposure and asthma exacerbations is well established and has been extensively reviewed [8, 9]. This association remained significant in a meta-analysis [10].

Whether AAP causes asthma, however, has been a topic of discussion [45]. While an epidemiological link has been evident for years, it is only recently that evidence has supported a causal link. This link was reviewed by both Burbank et al. [11] and Hehua et al. [12] and was further supported in a recent systemic review by Khreis et al. [13].

As data highlighting the role of AAP in both asthma severity and incidence became available, differences in AAP sensitivity between ethnic groups became apparent. In 2014, Wendt et al. [46] noted a significantly higher effect of increased O3 levels on black patients as opposed to white patients with asthma. Recently, Native American ancestry was also shown to interact with AAP and influence response to bronchodilator therapy [47]. This increased sensitivity likely contributes to the high asthma burden of disease in these populations. While differences in environmental exposures likely play a role, a genetic modification of the effect of air pollution was suggested as far back as 2004 [37]. Of note, environmental and genetic factors may also work synergistically. For example, as we will describe further in the article, many genetic variants associated with oxidative stress are related to AAP sensitivity. Socio–economic factors leading to a diet poor in antioxidants could logically further predispose at-risk populations. Beyond cohorts based on ethnicity, differences in AAP sensitivity in cohorts based on ancestral atopic disease status have been described in France [48]. This observation seems to support the notion that the observed differences are in part due to genetic differences and not solely due to differences in environmental factors secondary to socio–economic status.

Specific pathways linked to air pollution sensitivity

Here, we discuss the specific genetic variants that have been linked to AAP sensitivity. An overview of the implicated genes and associated pathways is presented in figure 1 while table 1 summarises the genetic variants and their effect. In our discussion, we start with the genes that control antioxidant defences, then move to those that control the immune response, genes involved in airway development and repair, and conclude with genes controlling bronchial responsiveness.

FIGURE 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1

Overview of genes and pathways related to pulmonary oxidative stress implicated in ambient air pollution sensitivity. Genes associated with variants that impact ambient air pollution sensitivity are in green ovals and biological processes marked in red rectangles. ADCY2: adenylate cyclase 2; ARG1: arginase 1; B4GALT4: beta-1,4-galactosyltransferase 1; CAT: catalase; CTLA4: cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4; CYP2E1: cytochrome P450 2E1; GSTM1: glutathione S-transferase Mu 1; GSTP1: glutathione-S-transferase Pi 1; HMOX-1: heme oxygenase 1; MPO: myeloperoxidase; NLRP3: NOD-, LRR- and pyrin domain-containing protein 3; NF-κB: nuclear factor κB; STAT4: signal transducer and activator of transcription 4; TGF-B1: transforming growth factor B1; TLR: Toll-like receptor; TNF-α: tumour necrosis factor α; TXNDC8: thioredoxin domain containing 8.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Overview of the published variants, the implicated pathways and the described effect

Genes controlling antioxidant defences

Oxidative stress is defined as an imbalance between oxidants and antioxidant systems with excessive oxidant availability [49]. AAP is known to induce oxidants and increase oxidative stress. This is thought to be one of the major pathways by which AAP influences asthma [50, 51].

The specific oxidising systems in the lung and the potential role of air pollution in shifting the oxidative balance has been extensively reviewed elsewhere [52]. Here, we will focus on how genetic variants that weaken the response to oxidative stress seem to increase the sensitivity to AAP in asthma. These appear to be localised along one of five antioxidant pathways.

First, the glutathione pathway is likely the best studied in the context of AAP sensitivity. Glutathione-S-transferase (GST) enzymes conjugate reactive oxygen species with reduced glutathione to facilitate their elimination [53, 54]. The cytosolic GST enzymes are subdivided into α, µ, π, σ and θ classes based on their isoform [54]. Regarding the effect of AAP, the θ and μ members of the GST family, encoded by GST Pi 1 (GSTP1) and GST Mu 1 (GSTM1), respectively, have been of particular interest [54]. This is both due to their relative importance in the lung, with GSTP1 estimated to provide up to 90% of pulmonary GST activity, and the relatively high frequency of GSTP1 or GSTM1 null genotypes [55].

The GSTM1 null genotype was shown to be associated with increased markers of oxidative stress after ozone exposure and facilitates DEP-induced allergic inflammation in adults [56, 57]. Specifically in paediatric asthma, Romieu et al. [58] showed patients with this genotype experienced significant decreases in forced mid-expiratory flow at 25–75% of forced vital capacity when exposed to high O3 concentrations whereas others did not.

The results of specific variants within these genes have been more heterogeneous. Up to 40% of the population has two isoleucines as opposed to valine in GSTP1 codon 105 (genotype GSTP1 I/I) [57]. The GSTP1 I/I genotype is associated with DEP-induced allergic inflammation in adults and increased paediatric asthma [57, 59, 60]. Conversely, NOx exposure led to allergic sensitisation only in patients with genotype GSTP1 I/V or V/V but not in those with GSTP1 I/I [55]. Furthermore, there was a negative association between asthma, O3 and PM2.5 exposure for GSTP1 I/I homozygotes as opposed to a positive association for those with a GSTP1 I/V or V/V genotype [61]. Finally, in high PM10 exposure communities, GSTP1 I/V or V/V was a risk factor for asthma [60]. We currently lack a clear explanation for these seemingly contradictory findings related to these specific GSTP1 variants.

Two possible explanations for this observed heterogeneity have been described. On one side, we know that the components of PM have a wide spatio–temporal variation. Since these variants change the catalytic properties of the GST enzymes, it is possible that the effect of the variant is dependent on the specific PM components to which a patient is exposed [62]. On the other, gene–gene interactions may complicate the observed gene–environment relationship. For example, variants within the nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide plus hydrogen (NAD(P)H) quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1) gene modulate the asthma risk associated with a GSTM1 null genotype [63, 64]. This gene encodes NAD(P)H dehydrogenase 1, a phase 2 detoxification reaction protein that helps protect against damage from oxidative stress.

A further example of a gene–gene–environment interaction can be found when looking at variants within epoxide hydrolase 1 (EPHX1). This gene encodes the microsomal EPH, an important class of enzymes involved in detoxification. These variants impacted the risk of early persistent asthma only in children with a GSTM1 null genotype that lived within 75 m of a major road [65].

The second and third antioxidant pathways involved in AAP are the catalase (encoded by CAT) and myeloperoxidase (encoded by MPO) pathways. These enzymes catalyse the reduction of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). Children with variants in both the promotor region of the CAT and MPO genes were found to be more likely to be absent from school due to respiratory illness when exposed to AAP [66].

The fourth pathway is the heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1 encoded by HMOX-1) pathway [67]. By catalysing heme, HO-1 creates both biliverdin and bilirubin which in turn act as scavengers of reactive oxygen species [67]. HMOX-1 is induced by oxidative stress and this inducibility is inversely correlated to the number of (GT)n repeats. Non-Hispanic white children with fewer than 23 (GT)n repeats were found to be at a reduced risk for asthma. This effect was more pronounced for children living in a low-O3 community. It was hypothesised that the difference in promotor activity may allow children to respond more optimally to temporary increases in oxidative stress but that this effect is less significant if the antioxidant defences are chronically stimulated by high background O3 concentrations [68].

The fifth pathway is centred around thioredoxin. Reduced thioredoxin can catalyse the reduction of oxidised cellular proteins. It in turn is then reduced again by thioredoxin reductase. Deficiencies within this system have been associated with COPD, asthma and lung injury [69]. A recent genome wide interaction study linked variants within thioredoxin domain containing 8 (TXNDC8), a gene encoding one of the thioredoxin reductase enzymes, to sensitivity to NO2 in Caucasians [70].

Aside from variants within the oxidative stress defences, two variants that expose the host to increased intrinsic oxidative stress also increase the sensitivity to AAP. First, a variant within cytochrome P450 2E1 (encoded by CYP2E1) increased air pollution sensitivity [35]. This enzyme plays a central role in detoxification reactions and is known to increase oxidative stress [71]. Second, a variant leading to increased expression of B4GALT5 significantly modified the effect of traffic related AAP on asthma in children [72]. This gene encodes the enzyme B4GALT5 involved in the synthesis of lactosylceramide. The lactosylceramide-centric signalling pathways increase oxidative stress when activated [73].

Closely related to oxidative stress is nitrosative stress. Nitrosative stress is defined as an overproduction of NO free radicals [74]. These can react with reactive oxygen species to form reactive nitrogen species (RNS). Both NO and RNS have been shown to play a significant role in allergic asthma [75]. Arginase, encoded by ARG1 and ARG2, competes with NO synthase and decreases the nitrosative stress. Variants within both ARG1 and ARG2 are associated with asthma but the relationship between variants within ARG1 and asthma was found to be modulated by ozone exposure [76].

There has been significant research interest in modulating oxidative stress in asthma. The results of both paediatric and adult studies were recently expertly reviewed by Sahiner et al. [77]. In brief, the current literature is heterogeneous with inconsistent results of anti-oxidant supplementation. While a study by Romieu et al. [78] analysed subjects by ozone exposure, to our knowledge, no studies have stratified patients by AAP exposure and genetic profile.

Genes controlling the immune response

Beyond variants in genes directly related to antioxidant defences, variants in genes controlling the response of the immune system have also been found to interact with AAP. Most of the variants described to date are closely associated with the nuclear factor κΒ (NF-κB) pathway. NF-κB is a family of nuclear transcription factors that functions as a central pro-inflammatory regulator in both the innate and adaptive immune system [79]. When activated, NF-κB upregulates the transcription of inflammatory proteins and can regulate cell differentiation and proliferation [79]. One of NF-κB's downstream effectors, the NOD-, LRR- and pyrin domain-containing protein 3 inflammasome, has been suggested as a possible target in severe asthma [80]. Mitochondrial damage, secretion of tumour necrosis factor α (TNF-α) and activation of Toll-like receptors (TLRs) can lead to activation of the NF-κB pathway.

TNF-α is a pro-inflammatory cytokine that plays a role in the innate immune response [81]. It is primarily released by macrophages and leads to phosphorylation of NF-κB. Dysregulation of this pathway has been implicated in asthma and is of particular interest in refractory asthma [81]. With regards to the interaction between AAP and asthma, patients with variants associated with the TNF-α gene were found to be protected from asthma if they grew up in a low O3 exposure community [82]. The authors speculated that this variant may dampen the inflammatory response to lower doses of oxidative stress [82]. The TLR-2 and TLR-4 receptors bind to either Gram-positive bacteria, mycoplasma, yeast and spirochetes or Gram-negative bacteria, respectively. Variants within these genes were shown to significantly modulate the risk for doctor-diagnosed asthma in children exposed to PM2.5 [83].

As noted above, NF-κB also plays a central role in T-cell activation and differentiation [79]. Paradoxically, besides leading to T-cell activation, NF-κB activation also stimulates differentiation of regulatory T-cells (Treg). These Tregs play a central role in controlling the immune response and preventing chronic inflammation [79]. This dual action is of specific interest within asthma as excessive activation of type 2 helper T-cells (Th2 cells) and insufficient downregulation by Treg cells is thought to play a central role in allergic asthma [84]. Unsurprisingly, variants within genes that affect the balance between Treg and Th2 cells have been associated with increased AAP sensitivity. Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA4, encoded by CTLA4) has a Treg-cell mediated inhibitory effect on T-cells [85]. Variants within CTLA4 leading to decreased CTLA4 activity seemed associated with increased ambient B[a]P asthma risk [35]. Signal transducer and activator of transcription 4 (encoded by STAT4) is another protein with a central role in T-cell differentiation [35]. Variants within STAT4 have been shown to increase the odds for asthma in patients exposed to high levels of AAP [35].

Finally, Ierodiakonou et al. [70] identified variants within EPHA3 in their NO2 genome-wide interaction study. This gene encodes an Eph receptor and member of the family of tyrosine kinases. This receptor is known to play a role in cell–cell interactions and has been studied mostly in an oncogenic context [86]. To date, its potential role in asthma remains unclear.

It is worth noting that many of the proteins associated with these variants have been targeted either in asthma or other inflammatory processes. For example, due to interesting experimental and animal model results, TNF-α blockade has been an area of extensive research in paediatric asthma [87]. Unfortunately, the results of clinical studies have been mixed. Given the data available from genetic studies, one wonders if these mixed results are partially due to different exposures and genetic susceptibilities in the populations studied.

Other implicated variants

Variants in genes with a role in airway development and repair and bronchial responsiveness have also been associated with AAP sensitivity. Children homozygous for threonine as opposed to cysteine in the 508 position of TGF-B1 were found to be at increased risk for asthma if they resided close to a major roadway. This variant is known to increase transforming growth factor B1 (TGF-B1) expression [88]. The transforming growth factor superfamily proteins serve a wide array of functions including regulating cell growth, proliferation and apoptosis [89]. These proteins are secreted in an inactive form and rely on external stimuli, such as oxidative stress, for their activation [89]. Specifically in asthma, TGF-B1 increases smooth muscle proliferation and airway remodelling. Furthermore, TGF-B1 helps to regulate the balance between T-cell populations and is required to maintain peripheral Treg cells [89].

Finally, variants associated with ADCY2 were shown to significantly interact with NO2 on asthma risk [72]. ADCY2 encodes adenylyl cyclase type 2, a receptor expressed on airway smooth muscle cells [90]. Activity of the adenylyl cyclases is upregulated by stimulation of the B-adrenergic receptor and causes smooth muscle relaxation [90].

Conclusion

Despite the high global burden of AAP exposure in paediatric asthma, we currently have no effective therapies to protect our patients. Understanding and predicting individual AAP sensitivity is a prerequisite for developing these therapies. To this end, we have tried to organise the current genetic evidence linking specific genetic variants to AAP sensitivity. The bulk of the variants identified to date appear to follow the model put forth by Li et al. [64]. In this model, cells initially respond to oxidative stress by upregulating the antioxidant defences. When these fail and tissue damage occurs, inflammation mediated by the NF-κB pathway follows. However, as highlighted in figure 1, even in the absence of oxidative stress, AAP can worsen asthma via direct activation of the immune system or irritation of the airways. A key next challenge will be the development of sensitive and specific biomarkers for both AAP exposure and the consequences of this exposure. First, such biomarkers could support the biological plausibility of causation as opposed to association. Second, if causation is supported, they could allow us to rapidly identify and target those patients most at risk for developing AAP related morbidity. Finally, they could be incorporated in future clinical trials to guard against inadvertently biassing results. Given the genetic evidence laid out in this review, markers of oxidative stress, airway remodelling and NF-κB mediated inflammation with associated abnormal T-cell differentiation may be especially valuable. Lastly, medications targeting proteins implicated by genetic evidence have been estimated to be roughly twice as likely to make it to the market [91]. As such, proteins discussed in this review may be especially promising therapeutic targets.

Points for clinical practice and directions for future research

  • While the role of AAP in paediatric asthma severity and incidence has been established, we are only beginning to understand the complexities of individual sensitivity.

  • Genetic evidence implicates pulmonary oxidative stress defences and the NF-κB pathway as playing roles in the sensitivity to AAP in paediatric asthma.

  • Identifying reliable and reproducible biomarkers of AAP exposure and sensitivity would allow us to prioritise therapeutic and policy interventions.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Rachel Locke of the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine for her thoughtful suggestions and edits.

Footnotes

  • Provenance: Submitted article, peer reviewed.

  • Author contributions: J. Kelchtermans: conceptualisation, investigation, writing – original draft preparation, visualisation. H. Hakonarson: conceptualisation, supervision, writing – reviewing and editing.

  • Conflict of interest: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

  • Support statement: This work was supported by Institutional Development Funds and the Endowed Chair in Genomic Research grant from The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) under award number TL1TR001880. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. This publication was made possible by grant number P30 ES013508 from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), NIH. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NIEHS, NIH. Funding information for this article has been deposited with the Crossref Funder Registry.

  • Received May 16, 2022.
  • Accepted August 22, 2022.
  • Copyright ©The authors 2022
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This version is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0. For commercial reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions{at}ersnet.org

References

  1. ↵
    1. Global Asthma Network
    . The Global Asthma Report 2018. http://globalasthmareport.org/resources/Global_Asthma_Report_2018.pdf Date last updated: 2018.
  2. ↵
    1. Yaghoubi M,
    2. Adibi A,
    3. Safari A, et al.
    The projected economic and health burden of uncontrolled asthma in the United States. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2019; 200: 1102–1112. doi:10.1164/rccm.201901-0016OC
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Dharmage SC,
    2. Perret JL,
    3. Custovic A
    . Epidemiology of asthma in children and adults. Front Pediatr 2019; 7: 246. doi:10.3389/fped.2019.00246
    OpenUrl
    1. Beasley R,
    2. Semprini A,
    3. Mitchell EA
    . Risk factors for asthma: is prevention possible? Lancet 2015; 386: 1075–1085. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00156-7
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Strachan DP,
    2. Cook DG
    . Health effects of passive smoking. 6. Parental smoking and childhood asthma: longitudinal and case-control studies. Thorax 1998; 53: 204–212. doi:10.1136/thx.53.3.204
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Tatum AJ,
    2. Shapiro GG
    . The effects of outdoor air pollution and tobacco smoke on asthma. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am 2005; 25: 15–30. doi:10.1016/j.iac.2004.09.003
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Huang YJ,
    2. Boushey HA
    . The microbiome in asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2015; 135: 25–30. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2014.11.011
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Guarnieri M,
    2. Balmes JR
    . Outdoor air pollution and asthma. Lancet 2014; 383: 1581–1592. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60617-6
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Tiotiu AI,
    2. Novakova P,
    3. Nedeva D, et al.
    Impact of air pollution on asthma outcomes. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17: 6212. doi:10.3390/ijerph17176212
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. Orellano P,
    2. Quaranta N,
    3. Reynoso J, et al.
    Effect of outdoor air pollution on asthma exacerbations in children and adults: systematic review and multilevel meta-analysis. PLoS One 2017; 12: e0174050. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0174050
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Burbank AJ,
    2. Sood AK,
    3. Kesic MJ, et al.
    Environmental determinants of allergy and asthma in early life. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2017; 140: 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2017.05.010
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Hehua Z,
    2. Qing C,
    3. Shanyan G, et al.
    The impact of prenatal exposure to air pollution on childhood wheezing and asthma: a systematic review. Environ Res 2017; 159: 519–530. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2017.08.038
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Khreis H,
    2. Kelly C,
    3. Tate J, et al.
    Exposure to traffic-related air pollution and risk of development of childhood asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ Int 2017; 100: 1–31. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2016.11.012
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Garcia E,
    2. Berhane KT,
    3. Islam T, et al.
    Association of changes in air quality with incident asthma in children in California, 1993–2014. JAMA 2019; 321: 1906–1915. doi:10.1001/jama.2019.5357
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Guerriero C,
    2. Chatzidiakou L,
    3. Cairns J, et al.
    The economic benefits of reducing the levels of nitrogen dioxide (NO2) near primary schools: the case of London. J Environ Manage 2016; 181: 615–622. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.06.039
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. World Health Organization
    . Ambient air pollution: A global assessment of exposure and burden of disease. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/250141 Date last updated: 2016.
  14. ↵
    1. Polderman TJ,
    2. Benyamin B,
    3. de Leeuw CA, et al.
    Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies. Nat Genet 2015; 47: 702–709. doi:10.1038/ng.3285
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Thomsen SF,
    2. Duffy DL,
    3. Kyvik KO, et al.
    Genetic influence on the age at onset of asthma: a twin study. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2010; 126: 626–630. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2010.06.017
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Daniels SE,
    2. Bhattacharrya S,
    3. James A, et al.
    A genome-wide search for quantitative trait loci underlying asthma. Nature 1996; 383: 247–250. doi:10.1038/383247a0
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Hakonarson H,
    2. Halapi E
    . Genetic analyses in asthma: current concepts and future directions. Am J Pharmacogenomics 2002; 2: 155–166. doi:10.2165/00129785-200202030-00001
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Moffatt MF,
    2. Kabesch M,
    3. Liang L, et al.
    Genetic variants regulating ORMDL3 expression contribute to the risk of childhood asthma. Nature 2007; 448: 470–473. doi:10.1038/nature06014
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Moffatt MF,
    2. Gut IG,
    3. Demenais F, et al.
    A large-scale, consortium-based genomewide association study of asthma. N Engl J Med 2010; 363: 1211–1221. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0906312
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Sleiman PM,
    2. Hakonarson H
    . Recent advances in the genetics and genomics of asthma and related traits. Curr Opin Pediatr 2010; 22: 307–312. doi:10.1097/MOP.0b013e328339553d
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. March ME,
    2. Sleiman PM,
    3. Hakonarson H
    . The genetics of asthma and allergic disorders. Discov Med 2011; 11: 35–45. doi:10.1111/j.1600-065X.2011.01029.x
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Vicente CT,
    2. Revez JA,
    3. Ferreira MAR
    . Lessons from ten years of genome-wide association studies of asthma. Clin Transl Immunology 2017; 6: e165. doi:10.1038/cti.2017.54
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. El-Husseini ZW,
    2. Gosens R,
    3. Dekker F, et al.
    The genetics of asthma and the promise of genomics-guided drug target discovery. Lancet Respir Med 2020; 8: 1045–1056. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30363-5
    OpenUrl
  18. ↵
    1. Manolio TA,
    2. Collins FS,
    3. Cox NJ, et al.
    Finding the missing heritability of complex diseases. Nature 2009; 461: 747–753. doi:10.1038/nature08494
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Morales E,
    2. Duffy D
    . Genetics and gene–environment interactions in childhood and adult onset asthma. Front Pediatr 2019; 7: 499. doi:10.3389/fped.2019.00499
    OpenUrl
  20. ↵
    1. Dai X,
    2. Bowatte G,
    3. Lowe AJ, et al.
    Do glutathione S-transferase genes modify the link between indoor air pollution and asthma, allergies, and lung function? A systematic review. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 2018; 18: 20. doi:10.1007/s11882-018-0771-0
    OpenUrlPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Jerrett M,
    2. Shankardass K,
    3. Berhane K, et al.
    Traffic-related air pollution and asthma onset in children: a prospective cohort study with individual exposure measurement. Environ Health Perspect 2008; 116: 1433–1438. doi:10.1289/ehp.10968
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Brunekreef B,
    2. Stewart AW,
    3. Anderson HR, et al.
    Self-reported truck traffic on the street of residence and symptoms of asthma and allergic disease: a global relationship in ISAAC phase 3. Environ Health Perspect 2009; 117: 1791–1798. doi:10.1289/ehp.0800467
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Health Effects Institute
    . Traffic-related air pollution: a critical review of the literature on emissions, exposure, and health effects. www.healtheffects.org/publication/traffic-related-air-pollution-critical-review-literature-emissions-exposure-and-health Date last updated: 2010.
  24. ↵
    1. Katsouyanni K,
    2. Schwartz J,
    3. Spix C, et al.
    Short term effects of air pollution on health: a European approach using epidemiologic time series data: the APHEA protocol. J Epidemiol Community Health 1996; 50: Suppl 1, S12–SS8. doi:10.1136/jech.50.Suppl_1.S12
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. Teague WG,
    2. Bayer CW
    . Outdoor air pollution. Pediatr Clin North Am 2001; 48: 1167–1183. doi:10.1016/S0031-3955(05)70367-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Choi H,
    2. Tabashidze N,
    3. Rossner P, et al.
    Altered vulnerability to asthma at various levels of ambient benzo[a]pyrene by CTLA4, STAT4 and CYP2E1 polymorphisms. Environ Pollut 2017; 231: 1134–1144. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2017.07.057
    OpenUrl
  27. ↵
    1. Slaughter JC,
    2. Lumley T,
    3. Sheppard L, et al.
    Effects of ambient air pollution on symptom severity and medication use in children with asthma. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2003; 91: 346–353. doi:10.1016/S1081-1206(10)61681-X
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Graham LM
    . All I need is the air that I breath: outdoor air quality and asthma. Paediatr Respir Rev 2004; 5: S59–S64. doi:10.1016/S1526-0542(04)90012-7
    OpenUrlPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. White MC,
    2. Etzel RA,
    3. Wilcox WD, et al.
    Exacerbations of childhood asthma and ozone pollution in Atlanta. Environ Res 1994; 65: 56–68. doi:10.1006/enrs.1994.1021
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Delfino RJ,
    2. Coate BD,
    3. Zeiger RS, et al.
    Daily asthma severity in relation to personal ozone exposure and outdoor fungal spores. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996; 154: 633–641. doi:10.1164/ajrccm.154.3.8810598
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Fauroux B,
    2. Sampil M,
    3. QuNel P, et al.
    Ozone: A trigger for hospital pediatric asthma emergency room visits. Pediatr Pulmonol 2000; 30: 41–46. doi:10.1002/1099-0496(200007)30:1<41::AID-PPUL7>3.0.CO;2-4
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Tolbert PE,
    2. Mulholland JA,
    3. Macintosh DL, et al.
    Air quality and pediatric emergency room visits for asthma in Atlanta, Georgia, USA. Am J Epidemiol 2000; 151: 798–810. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a010280
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. McConnell R,
    2. Berhane K,
    3. Gilliland F, et al.
    Asthma in exercising children exposed to ozone: a cohort study. Lancet 2002; 359: 386–391. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07597-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Villanyi V
    1. Lee B-K
    . Sources, distribution and toxicity of polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in particulate matter. In:Villanyi V, ed. Air Pollution. London, IntechOpen, 2010. Available from: https://www.intechopen.com/books/3677 doi: 10.5772/269
  33. ↵
    1. Studnicka MJ,
    2. Frischer T,
    3. Meinert R, et al.
    Acidic particles and lung function in children. A summer camp study in the Austrian Alps. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995; 151: 423–430. doi:10.1164/ajrccm.151.2.7842201
    OpenUrlPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Gowers AM,
    2. Cullinan P,
    3. Ayres JG, et al.
    Does outdoor air pollution induce new cases of asthma? Biological plausibility and evidence; a review. Respirology 2012; 17: 887–898. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1843.2012.02195.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Wendt JK,
    2. Symanski E,
    3. Stock TH, et al.
    Association of short-term increases in ambient air pollution and timing of initial asthma diagnosis among Medicaid-enrolled children in a metropolitan area. Environ Res 2014; 131: 50–58. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2014.02.013
    OpenUrl
  36. ↵
    1. Contreras M,
    2. Keys K,
    3. Magana J, et al.
    Native American ancestry and air pollution interact to impact bronchodilator response in Puerto Rican children with asthma. Ethn Dis 2021; 31: 77–88. doi:10.18865/ed.31.1.77
    OpenUrl
  37. ↵
    1. Rancière F,
    2. Bougas N,
    3. Viola M, et al.
    Early exposure to traffic-related air pollution, respiratory symptoms at 4 years of age, and potential effect modification by parental allergy, stressful family events, and sex: a prospective follow-up study of the PARIS birth cohort. Environ Health Perspect 2017; 125: 737–745. doi:10.1289/EHP239
    OpenUrl
  38. ↵
    1. Birben E,
    2. Sahiner UM,
    3. Sackesen C, et al.
    Oxidative stress and antioxidant defense. World Allergy Organ J 2012; 5: 9–19. doi:10.1097/WOX.0b013e3182439613
    OpenUrl
  39. ↵
    1. Lodovici M,
    2. Bigagli E
    . Oxidative stress and air pollution exposure. J Toxicol 2011; 2011: 487074. doi:10.1155/2011/487074
    OpenUrlPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Bernstein JA,
    2. Alexis N,
    3. Barnes C, et al.
    Health effects of air pollution. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2004; 114: 1116–1123. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2004.08.030
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Comhair SAA,
    2. Erzurum SC
    . Redox control of asthma: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities. Antioxid Redox Signal 2010; 12: 93–124. doi:10.1089/ars.2008.2425
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Piacentini S,
    2. Polimanti R,
    3. Simonelli I, et al.
    Glutathione S-transferase polymorphisms, asthma susceptibility and confounding variables: a meta-analysis. Mol Biol Rep 2013; 40: 3299–3313. doi:10.1007/s11033-012-2405-2
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. To-Figueras J
    . Glutathione S-transferase M1 (GSTM1) and T1 (GSTT1) polymorphisms and lung cancer risk among Northwestern Mediterraneans. Carcinogenesis 1997; 18: 1529–1533. doi:10.1093/carcin/18.8.1529
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    1. Melén E,
    2. Nyberg F,
    3. Lindgren CM, et al.
    Interactions between glutathione S-transferase P1, tumor necrosis factor, and traffic-related air pollution for development of childhood allergic disease. Environ Health Perspect 2008; 116: 1077–1084. doi:10.1289/ehp.11117
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. Corradi M,
    2. Alinovi R,
    3. Goldoni M, et al.
    Biomarkers of oxidative stress after controlled human exposure to ozone. Toxicol Lett 2002; 134: 219–225. doi:10.1016/S0378-4274(02)00169-8
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. Gilliland FD,
    2. Li Y-F,
    3. Saxon A, et al.
    Effect of glutathione-S-transferase M1 and P1 genotypes on xenobiotic enhancement of allergic responses: randomised, placebo-controlled crossover study. Lancet 2004; 363: 119–125. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(03)15262-2
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    1. Romieu I,
    2. Sienra-Monge JJ,
    3. Ramírez-Aguilar M, et al.
    Genetic polymorphism of GSTM1 and antioxidant supplementation influence lung function in relation to ozone exposure in asthmatic children in Mexico City. Thorax 2004; 59: 8–10.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. ↵
    1. Lee YL,
    2. Lin YC,
    3. Lee YC, et al.
    Glutathione S-transferase P1 gene polymorphism and air pollution as interactive risk factors for childhood asthma. Clin Exp Allergy 2004; 34: 1707–1713. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2222.2004.02099.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    1. Su MW,
    2. Tsai CH,
    3. Tung KY, et al.
    GSTP1 is a hub gene for gene–air pollution interactions on childhood asthma. Allergy 2013; 68: 1614–1617. doi:10.1111/all.12298
    OpenUrl
  50. ↵
    1. Hwang B-F,
    2. Young L-H,
    3. Tsai C-H, et al.
    Fine particle, ozone exposure, and asthma/wheezing: effect modification by glutathione S-transferase P1 polymorphisms. PLoS One 2013; 8: e52715. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0052715
    OpenUrl
  51. ↵
    1. Sundberg K
    . Differences in the catalytic efficiencies of allelic variants of glutathione transferase P1-1 towards carcinogenic diol epoxides of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Carcinogenesis 1998; 19: 433–436. doi:10.1093/carcin/19.3.433
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. ↵
    1. David GL,
    2. Romieu I,
    3. Sienra-Monge JJ, et al.
    Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (phosphate) reduced: quinone oxidoreductase and glutathione S-transferase m1 polymorphisms and childhood asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003; 168: 1199–1204. doi:10.1164/rccm.200305-684OC
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. ↵
    1. Li N,
    2. Hao M,
    3. Phalen RF, et al.
    Particulate air pollutants and asthma. Clin Immunol 2003; 109: 250–265. doi:10.1016/j.clim.2003.08.006
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. ↵
    1. Salam MT,
    2. Lin PC,
    3. Avol EL, et al.
    Microsomal epoxide hydrolase, glutathione S-transferase P1, traffic and childhood asthma. Thorax 2007; 62: 1050–1057. doi:10.1136/thx.2007.080127
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  55. ↵
    1. Wenten M,
    2. Gauderman WJ,
    3. Berhane K, et al.
    Functional variants in the catalase and myeloperoxidase genes, ambient air pollution, and respiratory-related school absences: an example of epistasis in gene-environment interactions. Am J Epidemiol 2009; 170: 1494–1501. doi:10.1093/aje/kwp310
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. ↵
    1. Tanaka G,
    2. Aminuddin F,
    3. Akhabir L, et al.
    Effect of heme oxygenase-1 polymorphisms on lung function and gene expression. BMC Med Genet 2011; 12: 117. doi:10.1186/1471-2350-12-117
    OpenUrlPubMed
  57. ↵
    1. Islam T,
    2. McConnell R,
    3. Gauderman WJ, et al.
    Ozone, oxidant defense genes, and risk of asthma during adolescence. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2008; 177: 388–395. doi:10.1164/rccm.200706-863OC
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. ↵
    1. Xu J,
    2. Li T,
    3. Wu H, et al.
    Role of thioredoxin in lung disease. Pulm Pharmacol Ther 2012; 25: 154–162. doi:10.1016/j.pupt.2012.01.002
    OpenUrlPubMed
  59. ↵
    1. Ierodiakonou D,
    2. Coull BA,
    3. Zanobetti A, et al.
    Pathway analysis of a genome-wide gene by air pollution interaction study in asthmatic children. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 2019; 29: 539–547. doi:10.1038/s41370-019-0136-3
    OpenUrl
  60. ↵
    1. Gonzalez FJ
    . Role of cytochromes P450 in chemical toxicity and oxidative stress: studies with CYP2E1. Mutation Res 2005; 569: 101–110. doi:10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2004.04.021
    OpenUrl
  61. ↵
    1. Gref A,
    2. Merid SK,
    3. Gruzieva O, et al.
    Genome-wide interaction analysis of air pollution exposure and childhood asthma with functional follow-up. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2017; 195: 1373–1383. doi:10.1164/rccm.201605-1026OC
    OpenUrl
  62. ↵
    1. Chatterjee S,
    2. Balram A,
    3. Li W
    . Convergence: lactosylceramide-centric signaling pathways induce inflammation, oxidative stress, and other phenotypic outcomes. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22: 1816. doi:10.3390/ijms22041816
    OpenUrl
  63. ↵
    1. Ganten D,
    2. Ruckpaul K,
    3. Birchmeier W, et al.
    eds. Nitrosative stress. In: Encyclopedic Reference of Genomics and Proteomics in Molecular Medicine. Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2006; p. 1293.
  64. ↵
    1. Zuo L,
    2. Koozechian MS,
    3. Chen LL
    . Characterization of reactive nitrogen species in allergic asthma. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2014; 112: 18–22. doi:10.1016/j.anai.2013.10.007
    OpenUrl
  65. ↵
    1. Salam MT,
    2. Islam T,
    3. Gauderman WJ, et al.
    Roles of arginase variants, atopy, and ozone in childhood asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2009; 123: 596–602.e8. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2008.12.020
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  66. ↵
    1. Sahiner UM,
    2. Birben E,
    3. Erzurum S, et al.
    Oxidative stress in asthma: part of the puzzle. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2018; 29: 789–800. doi:10.1111/pai.12965
    OpenUrl
  67. ↵
    1. Romieu I,
    2. Sienra-Monge JJ,
    3. Ramírez-Aguilar M, et al.
    Antioxidant supplementation and lung functions among children with asthma exposed to high levels of air pollutants. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002; 166: 703–709. doi:10.1164/rccm.2112074
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  68. ↵
    1. Liu T,
    2. Zhang L,
    3. Joo D, et al.
    NF-κB signaling in inflammation. Signal Transduct Target Ther 2017; 2: 17023. doi:10.1038/sigtrans.2017.23
    OpenUrl
  69. ↵
    1. Theofani E,
    2. Semitekolou M,
    3. Morianos I, et al.
    Targeting NLRP3 inflammasome activation in severe asthma. J Clin Med 2019; 8: 1615. doi:10.3390/jcm8101615
    OpenUrl
  70. ↵
    1. Berry M,
    2. Brightling C,
    3. Pavord I, et al.
    TNF-α in asthma. Curr Opin Pharmacol 2007; 7: 279–282. doi:10.1016/j.coph.2007.03.001
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  71. ↵
    1. Li Y-F,
    2. Gauderman WJ,
    3. Avol E, et al.
    Associations of tumor necrosis factor G-308A with childhood asthma and wheezing. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006; 173: 970–976. doi:10.1164/rccm.200508-1256OC
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  72. ↵
    1. Kerkhof M,
    2. Postma DS,
    3. Brunekreef B, et al.
    Toll-like receptor 2 and 4 genes influence susceptibility to adverse effects of traffic-related air pollution on childhood asthma. Thorax 2010; 65: 690–697. doi:10.1136/thx.2009.119636
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  73. ↵
    1. Zhao S-T,
    2. Wang C-Z
    . Regulatory T cells and asthma. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B 2018; 19: 663–673. doi:10.1631/jzus.B1700346
    OpenUrl
  74. ↵
    1. Wei SC,
    2. Duffy CR,
    3. Allison JP
    . Fundamental mechanisms of immune checkpoint blockade therapy. Cancer Discov 2018; 8: 1069–1086. doi:10.1158/2159-8290.CD-18-0367
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  75. ↵
    1. Janes PW,
    2. Slape CI,
    3. Farnsworth RH, et al.
    EphA3 biology and cancer. Growth Factors 2014; 32: 176–189. doi:10.3109/08977194.2014.982276
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  76. ↵
    1. Yilmaz O,
    2. Yuksel H
    . Where does current and future pediatric asthma treatment stand? Remodeling and inflammation: bird's eye view. Pediatr Pulmonol 2016; 51: 1422–1429. doi:10.1002/ppul.23488
    OpenUrl
  77. ↵
    1. Salam MT,
    2. Gauderman WJ,
    3. McConnell R, et al.
    Transforming growth factor-β1 C-509T polymorphism, oxidant stress, and early-onset childhood asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2007; 176: 1192–1199. doi:10.1164/rccm.200704-561OC
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  78. ↵
    1. Saito A,
    2. Horie M,
    3. Nagase T
    . TGF-β signaling in lung health and disease. Int J Mol Sci 2018; 19: 2460. doi:10.3390/ijms19082460
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  79. ↵
    1. Bogard AS,
    2. Xu C,
    3. Ostrom RS
    . Human bronchial smooth muscle cells express adenylyl cyclase isoforms 2, 4, and 6 in distinct membrane microdomains. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2011; 337: 209–217. doi:10.1124/jpet.110.177923
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  80. ↵
    1. Nelson MR,
    2. Tipney H,
    3. Painter JL, et al.
    The support of human genetic evidence for approved drug indications. Nat Genet 2015; 47: 856–860. doi:10.1038/ng.3314
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
View this article with LENS
Vol 31 Issue 166 Table of Contents
European Respiratory Review: 31 (166)
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The role of gene–ambient air pollution interactions in paediatric asthma
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
The role of gene–ambient air pollution interactions in paediatric asthma
Jelte Kelchtermans, Hakon Hakonarson
European Respiratory Review Dec 2022, 31 (166) 220094; DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0094-2022

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
The role of gene–ambient air pollution interactions in paediatric asthma
Jelte Kelchtermans, Hakon Hakonarson
European Respiratory Review Dec 2022, 31 (166) 220094; DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0094-2022
Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • AAP definition and link to asthma
    • Specific pathways linked to air pollution sensitivity
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Subjects

  • Asthma and allergy
  • Epidemiology, occupational and environmental lung disease
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • PROMs for paediatric acute lower respiratory infection studies
  • Forbearance with endobronchial stenting: cognisance before conviction
  • Prevalence, imaging patterns, and risk factors of ILD in CTD
Show more Reviews

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERR

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising
  • Sponsorship

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN: 0905-9180
Online ISSN: 1600-0617

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society