Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Reference equations for oscillometry and their differences among populations: a systematic scoping review

Andy Deprato, Giovanni Ferrara, Mohit Bhutani, Lyle Melenka, Nicola Murgia, Omar S. Usmani, Paige Lacy, Subhabrata Moitra
European Respiratory Review 2022 31: 220021; DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0021-2022
Andy Deprato
1Faculty of Kinesiology, Sport, and Recreation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Giovanni Ferrara
2Alberta Respiratory Centre and Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Dept of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Giovanni Ferrara
Mohit Bhutani
2Alberta Respiratory Centre and Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Dept of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lyle Melenka
3Synergy Respiratory and Cardiac Care, Sherwood Park, AB, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nicola Murgia
4Dept of Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Omar S. Usmani
5Airways Disease Section, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
6Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paige Lacy
2Alberta Respiratory Centre and Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Dept of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Subhabrata Moitra
2Alberta Respiratory Centre and Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Dept of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Subhabrata Moitra
  • For correspondence: moitra@ualberta.ca
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Figures

  • Tables
  • Supplementary Materials
  • FIGURE 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1

    Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) flow diagram for the identification and selection process of studies that developed reference equations for oscillometric parameters of interest. #: MEDLINE: 348 results; Embase: 832 results; PubMed: 348 results; Scopus: 623 results; Web of Science Core Collection: 122 results; Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: 19 results; Google Scholar: first 100 results used; Cochrane Protocols: no results; PROSPERO: no results.

  • FIGURE 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2

    Bubble plot of the relative number of studies identified that developed oscillometric reference equations for three major ethnic groups in the past 20 years. Bubble size indicates the number of publications.

  • FIGURE 3
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3

    Differences in predicted values for oscillometric indices of interest from reference equations of included studies as functions of height for men and women. Predicted values for resistance and reactance at 6 Hz and 19 Hz are considered for some equations, please see the text and footnote of table 3 for details. R5: resistance at 5 Hz; R20: resistance at 20 Hz; X5: reactance at 5 Hz; AX: reactance area.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Supplementary Materials
  • TABLE 1

    Characteristics of included studies that developed reference equations for oscillometric parameters of interest

    StudyStudy countryStudy populationOscillometry device(s)Signal typeFrequencies considered (Hz)Reference parametersSmoker inclusion
    Shiota et al. [22]JapanNon-CaucasianMasterScreen IOSRecurrent impulses5, 20R5, R20, X5Never-smokers, active smokers, ex-smokers
    Newbury et al. [20]AustraliaCaucasianMasterScreen IOSRecurrent impulses5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 35Z5, Rrs, XrsNever-smokers, ex-smokers
    Brown et al. [18]AustraliaCaucasianCustom-madePseudorandom6, 11, 19Rrs, XrsNever-smokers, ex-smokers
    Aarli et al. [24]NorwayCaucasianMasterScreen IOSRecurrent impulses5, 20R5, R20, X5, Fres, AXNever-smokers, ex-smokers
    Schulz et al. [23]GermanyCaucasianMasterScreen IOSRecurrent impulses5, 20Z5, R5, R20, R5–20, X5, Fres, AXNever-smokers only
    Oostveen et al. [16]Belgium, the Netherlands, Hungary, AustraliaCaucasianCustom-made (C1, C3), ROS Oscilink (C2), Quark i2m (C4), MasterScreen IOS (C5)Pseudorandom (C1–C4), recurrent impulses (C5)4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 15, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26Rrs, Rm, Xrs, Fres, AXNever-smokers, ex-smokers
    Ribeiro et al. [21]BrazilCaucasian,
    Non-Caucasian
    Custom-madePseudorandom4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22Zrs, Rrs, Rm, R0, Xrs, Fres, XmNever-smokers only
    De et al. [19]IndiaNon-CaucasianResmon ProPseudorandom, relative primes5, 19R5, R19, R5–19, X5Never-smokers only
    Moitra et al. [15]IndiaNon-CaucasianMasterScreen IOSRecurrent impulses5, 20Z5, R5, R20, R5–20, X5, Fres, AXNever-smokers only
    Berger et al. [17]USACaucasianMasterScreen IOSRecurrent impulses5, 10, 15, 20R5, R10, R15, R20, R5–15, R5–20, X5, X10, Fres, AXNever-smokers only

    IOS: impulse oscillometry; R5: resistance at 5 Hz; R20: resistance at 20 Hz; X5: reactance at 5 Hz; Z5: impedance at 5 Hz; Rrs: respiratory resistance; Xrs: respiratory reactance; Fres: resonant frequency; AX: reactance area; Rm: mean respiratory resistance; R0: resistance at 0 Hz; R19: resistance at 19 Hz.

    • TABLE 2

      Subject demographics from included studies that developed reference equations for oscillometric parameters of interest

      StudySubjects (n)Males (n)Height (cm)Weight (kg)Age (years)Smoking history (pack-years)
      Shiota et al. [22]16669162.7±8.358.9±11.238.6±17.2 (20–81)22.2±22.1
      Newbury et al. [20]12559175.89±8.77
      164.58±6.56
      87.3±11.49
      73.3±12.41
      49.54 (25–74)
      48.76 (25–74)
      <5
      Brown et al. [18]904341176.7±6.7
      163.5±6.5
      84.2±13.1
      69.3±13.5
      55.6±17.5
      54.7±17.7
      <5
      Aarli et al. [24]7540173±6
      159±6
      76.4±12.7
      65.5±10.8
      79.4±6.9
      78.8±6.3
      20/4
      Schulz et al. [23]#397154173.30 (163.00–188.41)
      160.07 (149.00–172.24)
      80.89 (67.02–106.76)
      68.37 (53.40–91.05)
      64.89 (46.00–84.75)
      67.26 (46.00–85.00)
      0
      Oostveen et al. [16]368180171.44#54–128
      43–111
      49.55# (18–84)4.4
      Ribeiro et al. [21]288144173±1 (153–189)
      160±1 (145–181)
      78.78±2.07 (49–128)
      65.02±1.79 (47–96)
      49.04±2.88 (20–81)
      49.0±2.88 (20–86)
      De et al. [19]323122168.1±8.2
      154.8±6.5
      65.5±13.342.7±13.7
      40.9±13.7
      <1
      Moitra et al. [15]1909245±18
      41±17
      Berger et al. [17]439223177±7 (157–203)
      164±7 (146–183)
      83.1±17.1 (51.3–170.0)
      63.9±12.7 (43.1–147.4)
      46.7±11.2 (21–85)
      44.0±11.9 (21–76)
      <5

      Data are presented as pooled totals (n) or according to sex (male/female) in mean±sd or mean (range), unless otherwise indicated. #: calculated from means of subgroups within study.

      • TABLE 3

        Reference equations developed from included studies for oscillometric parameters of interest

        StudyIndicesMaleFemale
        Shiota et al. [22]R5R5=8.67158−3.841167·log(h)R5=8.67158−3.841167·log(h)
        R20R20=5.841867−2.546561·log(h)R20=5.841867−2.546561·log(h)
        X5X5= −2.343672−0.000097a+1.018597·log(h)X5= −2.343672−0.000097a+1.018597·log(h)
        AXNot availableNot available
        Newbury et al. [20]R5R5=1.1672−0.0017a−0.007h+0.0043wR5=0.768−0.00064a−0.00276h
        R20R20=0.9216−0.0013a−0.0049h+0.0027wR20=0.4821+0.00034a−0.00125h
        X5X5= −0.3593+0.00013a+0.0016hX5= −0.4689−0.00092a+0.00245h
        AXNot availableNot available
        Brown et al. [18]#R6log(R6)=3.18955−0.01617h+0.00882wlog(R6)=3.88965−0.01944h+0.00812w
        R19log(R19)=2.89318−0.01445h+0.00789wlog(R19)=3.25796−0.01519h+0.00605w
        X6exp(X6)= −1.23047+0.01286a−0.00013712a2+0.01098h−0.00323wexp(X6)= −1.36295+0.00845a−0.0001035a2+0.01282h−0.00449w
        AXNot availableNot available
        Aarli et al. [24]R5ln(R5)=3.02−0.023hln(R5)=2.68−0.026h+0.012w
        R20ln(R20)=1.52−0.016hln(R20)=1.26−0.017h+0.009w
        X5ln(−X5)=3.57−0.033hln(−X5)=3.85−0.041h+0.014w
        AXln(AX)=12.0−0.074hln(AX)=10.8−0.074h
        Schulz et al. [23]R55th quantile: R5=1.0685571−0.0022403a−0.004312hR5=0.5012224+0.0002940a−0.0037866h+0.0045199w
        50th quantile: R5=0.9861137−0.0001223a−0.0055278h+0.0029891wR5=0.7887960+0.0015118a−0.0046594h+0.0029768w
        95th quantile: R5=0.6683472+0.0029051a−0.0026280hR5=0.1926787+0.0004133a+0.0016756h
        R205th quantile: R20=0.6342369−0.0019656a−0.0021069hR20=0.5970057−0.0006897a−0.0030934h+0.0016623h
        50th quantile: R20=0.7722257−0.0006446a−0.0037120h+0.0013924wR20=0.4505645+0.0001251a−0.0020488h+0.0017939w
        95th quantile: R20=1.1824320−0.0003590a−0.0048639hR20=0.8177947−0.0003549a−0.0025771h
        X55th quantile: X5= −0.5568254−0.0004762a+0.0025397hX5= −0.5446960−0.0018068a+0.0029323h
        50th quantile: X5= −0.4670275−0.0003344a+0.0027755h−0.0010424wX5= −0.3313017−0.0007541a+0.0022090h−0.001413w
        95th quantile: X5= −0.2058333+0.0006944a+0.0006944hX5= −0.1831886+0.0003607a+0.0005743h
        AX5th quantile: AX=0.0430162+0.0012195a−0.0002327hAX=1.0968758−0.0001349a−0.0077805h+0.0048793w
        50th quantile: AX=1.7584772+0.0027451a−0.0132469h+0.0077552wAX=1.7909627+0.0110077a−0.0168559h+0.0104360w
        95th quantile: AX=2.2955939+0.0161916a−0.0139157hAX=2.7124098+0.0173679a−0.0227368h+0.0152978w
        Oostveen et al. [16]¶,+R5ln(R5)=5.327−0.00381a−3.032h+0.01390wln(R5)=2.591+0.00279a−1.461h+0.0121w
        R20ln(R20)=3.540−0.0033a−1.824h+0.00888wln(R20)=2.482+0.00135a−1.122h+0.00695w
        X5ln(4−X5)=2.683+0a−0.703h+0.0019wln(4−X5)=2.373+0.0015a−0.607h+0.00312w
        AX5ln(AX5)=9.730+0a−6.107h+0.02122wln(AX5)=5.490+0.00960a−4.122h+0.02836w
        Ribeiro et al. [21]#,¶R6ln(R6)=2.964−0.002a−1.545h+0.009wR6=8.164−0.006a−3.563h+0.014w
        R20ln(R20)=2.196−0.002a−0.970h+0.005wR20=9.142−0.005a−3.811h+0.003w
        X6exp(X6)= −1.082+0a+0.983h−0.003wX6= −5.293+0a+2.759h−0.007w
        AXNot availableNot available
        De et al. [19]#R5R5=10.035+0.008a−0.057h+0.036wR5=9.697−0.046h+0.033w
        R19R19=8.077−0.040h+0.02wR19=8.683−0.038h+0.019w
        X5X5= −3.334−0.004a+0.018h−0.009wX5= −4.40+0.02h
        AXNot availableNot available
        Moitra et al. [15]¶R5ln(R5)= −0.30+0.003a−0.83h+0.01wln(R5)=0.003+0.004a−0.66h+0.007w
        R20ln(R20)= −0.14−0.001a−0.99h+0.01wln(R20)=0.164+0.0003a−0.92h+0.007w
        X5X5= −0.23−0.002a+0.15h−0.002wX5= −0.60−0.004a+0.37h−0.001w
        AXln(AX)= −0.20+1.24ln(a)−2.98h+0.01wln(AX)= −2.33+0.76ln(a)−0.004h+0.004w
        Berger et al. [17]¶,+R5ln(R5)=2.07069−1.05124h+0.03337·BMIln(R5)=2.22395−0.98351h+0.02903·BMI
        R20ln(R20)=1.95570−0.81148h+0.02042·BMIln(R20)=2.01077−0.72768h+0.02009·BMI
        X5ln(X5+4)=0.10509+0.82626h−0.01775·BMIln(X5+4)=0.29066+0.73387h−0.01984·BMI
        AXln(AX)=4.36142−3.47450h+0.08784·BMIln(AX)=4.67153−3.31633h+0.06719·BMI

        Reference equations developed by included studies for R6, R19 and X6 instead of R5, R19 and X5, respectively were considered. Respiratory resistance (Rrs) and respiratory reactance (Xrs) measured in kPa·L−1·s−1 and AX measured in kPa·L−1 unless otherwise indicated. Age (a), height (h), weight (w) and body mass index (BMI) measured in years, cm, kg and kg·m−2, respectively, unless otherwise indicated. Shiota et al. [22] developed unisex reference equations. Schulz et al. [23] developed reference equations for the 5th, 50th and 95th quantiles. For Oostveen et al. [16] the equations for AX5 are included. R5: resistance at 5 Hz; R20: resistance at 20 Hz; X5: reactance at 5 Hz; AX: reactance area; R6: resistance at 6 Hz; R19: resistance at 19 Hz; X6: reactance at 6 Hz. #: Rrs and Xrs measured in cmH2O·L−1·s−1 and AX measured in cmH2O·L−1; ¶: height measured in metres (m); +: Rrs and Xrs measured in hPa·L−1·s−1 and AX measured in hPa·L−1.

        • TABLE 4

          Assessments of agreement between predicted values for oscillometric parameters of interest from reference equations of included studies and a standard reference for men and women

          Oostveen et al. [16] versusSexR5R20X5AX
          Shiota et al. [22]MaleBias (LoA)0.15 (0.06, 0.25)0.08 (0.01, 0.15)−0.02 (−0.03, −0.01)NA
          ρc0.190.220.65NA
          FemaleBias (LoA)0.09 (−0.05, 0.23)0.09 (0.006, 0.17)−0.01 (−0.04, 0.01)NA
          ρc0.140.150.67NA
          Newbury et al. [20]MaleBias (LoA)0.07 (0.04, 0.10)0.03 (0.02, 0.05)−0.01 (−0.03, 0.005)NA
          ρc0.410.570.68NA
          FemaleBias (LoA)−0.01 (−0.07, 0.04)0.04 (0.01, 0.07)0.001 (−0.02, 0.02)NA
          ρc0.270.110.93NA
          Brown et al. [18]#MaleBias (LoA)−0.69 (−0.94, −0.43)−0.57 (−0.78, −0.36)−0.06 (−0.08, −0.03)NA
          ρc0.030.020.10NA
          FemaleBias (LoA)−1.35 (−2.09, −0.61)−1.09 (−1.59, −0.60)−0.06 (−0.09, −0.04)NA
          ρc0.0060.0070.09NA
          Aarli et al. [24]MaleBias (LoA)−0.16 (−0.24, −0.08)−0.06 (−0.11, −0.02)0.03 (0.01, 0.06)−0.26 (−0.69, 0.18)
          ρc0.160.280.550.31
          FemaleBias (LoA)−0.21 (−0.41, −0.01)−0.07 (−0.11, −0.04)0.03 (−0.01, 0.07)0.01 (−0.30, 0.32)
          ρc0.050.170.440.49
          Schulz et al. [23]MaleBias (LoA)0.01 (−0.02, 0.04)0.04 (0.006, 0.07)−0.02 (−0.04, −0.006)0.20 (0.09, 0.31)
          ρc0.840.550.550.18
          FemaleBias (LoA)0.01 (−0.01, 0.04)0.06 (0.03, 0.08)−0.03 (−0.04, −0.01)−0.25 (−0.66, 0.15)
          ρc0.790.100.460.28
          Ribeiro et al. [21]#MaleBias (LoA)0.02 (−0.03, 0.06)0.02 (−0.006, 0.04)−0.006 (−0.02, 0.01)NA
          ρc0.660.550.86NA
          FemaleBias (LoA)−0.01 (−0.05, 0.04)0.02 (−0.02, 0.06)0.01 (−0.01, 0.03)NA
          ρc0.430.510.72NA
          De et al. [19]¶MaleBias (LoA)−0.05 (−0.11, 0.01)−0.01 (−0.03, 0.01)0.004 (−0.03, 0.04)NA
          ρc0.340.780.59NA
          FemaleBias (LoA)−0.12 (−0.15, −0.10)−0.05 (−0.06, −0.03)0.003 (−0.02, 0.03)NA
          ρc0.050.220.73NA
          Moitra et al. [15]MaleBias (LoA)−0.15 (−0.25, −0.06)−0.06 (−0.10, −0.02)0.09 (0.01, 0.17)−0.68 (−1.46, 0.10)
          ρc−0.010.11−0.020.03
          FemaleBias (LoA)−0.33 (−0.38, −0.28)−0.09 (−0.11, −0.08)0.12 (0.02, 0.21)−1.68 (−2.68, −0.69)
          ρc0.010.060.120.02
          Berger et al. [17]MaleBias (LoA)−0.03 (−0.07, 0.01)−0.04 (−0.06, −0.01)−0.01 (−0.02, −0.0001)0.16 (0.05, 0.26)
          ρc0.590.370.890.18
          FemaleBias (LoA)−0.07 (−0.10, −0.03)−0.04 (−0.06, −0.03)−0.0001 (−0.02, 0.02)0.17 (0.06, 0.28)
          ρc0.180.280.820.20

          Data presented as bias (lower and upper LoA) and Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (ρc). Reference values developed by Oostveen et al. [16] were considered as the standard model and these were compared with other reference values for R5, R20 and X5. Bias and LoA should be read as a percentage (e.g. a bias of 0.15 should be read as 15%). #: resistance and reactance values measured at 6 Hz (R6, X6) and 19 Hz (R19) were considered in the comparison; ¶: resistance value at 19 Hz (R19) was considered in the comparison. R5: resistance at 5 Hz; R20: resistance at 20 Hz; X5: reactance at 5 Hz; AX: reactance area; LoA: limit of agreement; NA: not applicable.

          Supplementary Materials

          • Figures
          • Tables
          • Supplementary Material

            Please note: supplementary material is not edited by the Editorial Office, and is uploaded as it has been supplied by the author.

            Supplementary material ERR-0021-2022.SUPPLEMENT

          PreviousNext
          Back to top
          View this article with LENS
          Vol 31 Issue 165 Table of Contents
          European Respiratory Review: 31 (165)
          • Table of Contents
          • Index by author
          Email

          Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

          NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

          Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
          Reference equations for oscillometry and their differences among populations: a systematic scoping review
          (Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
          (Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
          CAPTCHA
          This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
          Print
          Citation Tools
          Reference equations for oscillometry and their differences among populations: a systematic scoping review
          Andy Deprato, Giovanni Ferrara, Mohit Bhutani, Lyle Melenka, Nicola Murgia, Omar S. Usmani, Paige Lacy, Subhabrata Moitra
          European Respiratory Review Sep 2022, 31 (165) 220021; DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0021-2022

          Citation Manager Formats

          • BibTeX
          • Bookends
          • EasyBib
          • EndNote (tagged)
          • EndNote 8 (xml)
          • Medlars
          • Mendeley
          • Papers
          • RefWorks Tagged
          • Ref Manager
          • RIS
          • Zotero

          Share
          Reference equations for oscillometry and their differences among populations: a systematic scoping review
          Andy Deprato, Giovanni Ferrara, Mohit Bhutani, Lyle Melenka, Nicola Murgia, Omar S. Usmani, Paige Lacy, Subhabrata Moitra
          European Respiratory Review Sep 2022, 31 (165) 220021; DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0021-2022
          Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
          Full Text (PDF)

          Jump To

          • Article
            • Abstract
            • Abstract
            • Introduction
            • Methods
            • Results
            • Discussion
            • Conclusions
            • Supplementary material
            • Acknowledgements
            • Footnotes
            • References
          • Figures & Data
          • Info & Metrics
          • PDF

          Subjects

          • Respiratory clinical practice
          • Tweet Widget
          • Facebook Like
          • Google Plus One

          More in this TOC Section

          • The role of smoking on COVID-19 progression: a meta-analysis
          • PAP therapy for post-stroke sleep disordered breathing
          • Severe COVID-19 versus multisystem inflammatory syndrome
          Show more Reviews

          Related Articles

          Navigate

          • Home
          • Current issue
          • Archive

          About the ERR

          • Journal information
          • Editorial board
          • Press
          • Permissions and reprints
          • Advertising
          • Sponsorship

          The European Respiratory Society

          • Society home
          • myERS
          • Privacy policy
          • Accessibility

          ERS publications

          • European Respiratory Journal
          • ERJ Open Research
          • European Respiratory Review
          • Breathe
          • ERS books online
          • ERS Bookshop

          Help

          • Feedback

          For authors

          • Instructions for authors
          • Publication ethics and malpractice
          • Submit a manuscript

          For readers

          • Alerts
          • Subjects
          • RSS

          Subscriptions

          • Accessing the ERS publications

          Contact us

          European Respiratory Society
          442 Glossop Road
          Sheffield S10 2PX
          United Kingdom
          Tel: +44 114 2672860
          Email: journals@ersnet.org

          ISSN

          Print ISSN: 0905-9180
          Online ISSN: 1600-0617

          Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society