Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

End-point definition and trial design to advance tuberculosis vaccine development

Alberto L. Garcia-Basteiro, Richard G. White, Dereck Tait, Alexander C. Schmidt, Molebogeng X. Rangaka, Matthew Quaife, Elisa Nemes, Robin Mogg, Philip C. Hill, Rebecca C. Harris, Willem A. Hanekom, Mike Frick, Andrew Fiore-Gartland, Tom Evans, Alemnew F. Dagnew, Gavin Churchyard, Frank Cobelens, Marcel A. Behr, Mark Hatherill
European Respiratory Review 2022 31: 220044; DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0044-2022
Alberto L. Garcia-Basteiro
1Centro de Investigação em Sade de Manhiça (CISM), Maputo, Mozambique
2ISGlobal, Hospital Clínic - Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
3Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Infecciosas (CIBERINFECT), Barcelona, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Alberto L. Garcia-Basteiro
  • For correspondence: alberto.garcia-basteiro@manhica.net
Richard G. White
4London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dereck Tait
5International AIDS Vaccine Initiative (IAVI) NPC, Cape Town, South Africa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexander C. Schmidt
6Bill and Melinda Gates Medical Research Institute, Cambridge, MA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Molebogeng X. Rangaka
7Institute for Global Health and MRC Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, London, UK
8CIDRI-AFRICA, Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthew Quaife
4London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elisa Nemes
9South African Tuberculosis Vaccine Initiative, Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine and Division of Immunology, Dept of Pathology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Elisa Nemes
Robin Mogg
10Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Cambridge, MA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Philip C. Hill
11Centre for International Health, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rebecca C. Harris
4London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
12Sanofi Pasteur, Singapore
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Willem A. Hanekom
13Africa Health Research Institute, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
14Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mike Frick
15Treatment Action Group, New York, NY, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew Fiore-Gartland
16Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Andrew Fiore-Gartland
Tom Evans
17Vaccitech, Oxford, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alemnew F. Dagnew
6Bill and Melinda Gates Medical Research Institute, Cambridge, MA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Alemnew F. Dagnew
Gavin Churchyard
18The Aurum Institute, Parktown, South Africa
19Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
20University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Frank Cobelens
21Dept of Global Health and Amsterdam Institute for Global health and development, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marcel A. Behr
22Dept of Medicine, McGill University; McGill International TB Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark Hatherill
9South African Tuberculosis Vaccine Initiative, Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine and Division of Immunology, Dept of Pathology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1

    Vaccine strategies along the natural history of tuberculosis (TB), according to the expected effect. Vaccines developed with the strategy to prevent infection (POI) are mostly targeted for populations not yet exposed to Mycobacterium tuberculosis (i.e. pre-infection). Vaccines developed for prevention of disease (POD) could be useful if administered post- or pre-TB infection to prevent development of symptomatic disease. Therapeutic vaccines could have effects both in treatment-shortening and/or prevention of recurrence. Vaccines primarily developed for a prevention of recurrence (POR) strategy could be given with the aim of prevention of either re-infection or recurrence of disease (true relapse).

  • FIGURE 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2

    Hypothesised interferon gamma (IFN-γ) release assay (IGRA) dynamics after vaccination with a prevention of infection candidate. QuantiFERON-TB (QFT) negative participants receiving vaccine or placebo. Rates of acquisition of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection (QFT conversion), established infection (sustained QFT conversion through 6 months post conversion) and transient infection (QFT reversion within 6 months post conversion) are compared between the study arms. Participants with sustained QFT conversion and QFT >4 IU·mL−1 are considered at higher risk of tuberculosis compared to non-converters and reverters. The dotted line represents the standard QFT cut-off at 0.35 IU·mL−1.

Tables

  • Figures
  • TABLE 1

    Advantages and disadvantages of possible end-point definitions for tuberculosis (TB) vaccine efficacy trials

    AdvantagesDisadvantages
    POI
     IGRA (QTF) conversion  (>0.35 IU·mL−1)∼10-fold more frequent than TB disease
    Widely used threshold in routine practice
    Higher sensitivity for detecting MTB infection compared to higher thresholds
    Does not detect all true MTB infections
    IGRA reversion is common, but of unclear clinical significance
    Significance of protection unclear
    Test performance in PLHIV, people with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases taking immunosuppressive treatment, and very young children is unclear
     IGRA (QTF) conversion  (>4.0 IU·mL−1)Higher risk of progression to TB disease than conversion at manufacturer threshold
    Higher specificity for detecting MTB infection than manufacturer threshold
    Less frequent event than conversion at manufacturer threshold
    Lower sensitivity for detecting MTB infection than manufacturer threshold
     Sustained IGRA  conversion (6 months)Might represent sustained (persistent) MTB infection
    Might be associated with higher risk of TB disease compared to a single conversion
    Lower risk of false-positive result compared to a single test
    Less frequent event than initial IGRA conversion
    Does not encompass IGRA conversion–reversion–conversion events
    Need for TB preventive therapy precludes nested POI in POD efficacy trial design
    POD
     MTB liquid culture  (sputum)Gold standard (most sensitive) tool
    Allows genotyping of MTB strain
    Need for central laboratory
    Variable contamination rate (largely laboratory-dependent)
    Lower yield in pauci-bacillary TB disease:
    - HIV-associated TB
    - childhood TB
      - One sampleLogistically simple
    Lower sensitivity
    Potential false-positive results
      - Two or more separate samples (processed independently)Higher specificity (if both need to be positive)Logistically complex
    Less frequent than single positive sample
    Decreased sensitivity (if both need to be positive), especially in pauci-bacillary TB disease:
    - HIV-associated TB
    - childhood TB
      - Before treatment of the TB episode startsNot affected by effect of vaccination on response to TB therapyLogistically complex
    Lower sensitivity than before or after treatment starts
     Xpert Ultra (sputum)Does not need central laboratory
    Available at district-level hospitals
    Rapid turnaround
    Does not allow to genotype MTB strain
    Lower sensitivity and specificity than culture (higher false-positive rate, especially among trace results)
     MTB liquid culture OR Xpert  Ultra (sputum)
      - With symptomsProtection associated with direct health benefitNo opportunity to assess vaccine efficacy against subclinical disease
      - Without symptomsAllows assessment of vaccine efficacy against subclinical TB diseaseSignificance of clinical protection unclear
    Need for TB treatment precludes subsequent assessment of vaccine efficacy against symptomatic TB disease
     Digital chest radiograph  (with or without CAD)High sensitivity for TB, widely available and with high added value in populations with paucibacillary disease, such as:
    - HIV-associated TB
    - childhood TB
    Limited specificity
     Urine LAMHigh specificity in PLHIV with low CD4 countsLimited sensitivity with increasing levels of CD4 counts
     TB symptoms (clinical  diagnosis)High sensitivity, especially in pulmonary TB among HIV-negative individuals, cheap, no laboratory infrastructure needed
    Sometimes used to define unconfirmed TB
    Limited specificity
    Subjective interpretation of symptoms
    Prevention of recurrence/therapeutic
     M. tuberculosis liquid culture  (sputum)Gold standard
    Allows genotyping of MTB strain (true relapse versus reinfection) if collected before treatment
    Need for central laboratory
     Xpert Ultra (sputum)Logistically simple at treatment startCannot distinguish viable from non-viable MTB bacilli
    No opportunity to genotype MTB strain

    CAD: computer-aided detection; IGRA: interferon gamma release assay; LAM: lipoarabinomannan MTB: Mycobacterium tuberculosis; PLHIV: people living with HIV; POD: prevention of disease; POI: prevention of infection; QFT: QuantiFERON-TB.

    PreviousNext
    Back to top
    View this article with LENS
    Vol 31 Issue 164 Table of Contents
    European Respiratory Review: 31 (164)
    • Table of Contents
    • Index by author
    Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    End-point definition and trial design to advance tuberculosis vaccine development
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Print
    Citation Tools
    End-point definition and trial design to advance tuberculosis vaccine development
    Alberto L. Garcia-Basteiro, Richard G. White, Dereck Tait, Alexander C. Schmidt, Molebogeng X. Rangaka, Matthew Quaife, Elisa Nemes, Robin Mogg, Philip C. Hill, Rebecca C. Harris, Willem A. Hanekom, Mike Frick, Andrew Fiore-Gartland, Tom Evans, Alemnew F. Dagnew, Gavin Churchyard, Frank Cobelens, Marcel A. Behr, Mark Hatherill
    European Respiratory Review Jun 2022, 31 (164) 220044; DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0044-2022

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero

    Share
    End-point definition and trial design to advance tuberculosis vaccine development
    Alberto L. Garcia-Basteiro, Richard G. White, Dereck Tait, Alexander C. Schmidt, Molebogeng X. Rangaka, Matthew Quaife, Elisa Nemes, Robin Mogg, Philip C. Hill, Rebecca C. Harris, Willem A. Hanekom, Mike Frick, Andrew Fiore-Gartland, Tom Evans, Alemnew F. Dagnew, Gavin Churchyard, Frank Cobelens, Marcel A. Behr, Mark Hatherill
    European Respiratory Review Jun 2022, 31 (164) 220044; DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0044-2022
    Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
    Full Text (PDF)

    Jump To

    • Article
      • Abstract
      • Abstract
      • Introduction
      • Prevention of infection (POI) approaches to accelerate candidate vaccines into prevention of disease (POD) efficacy trials
      • Optimising TB disease end-points for future efficacy trials
      • End-point definition in vaccine trials including PLHIV
      • Conclusions
      • Acknowledgements
      • Footnotes
      • References
    • Figures & Data
    • Info & Metrics
    • PDF
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    More in this TOC Section

    • Forbearance with endobronchial stenting: cognisance before conviction
    • Prevalence, imaging patterns, and risk factors of ILD in CTD
    • Strength of association between comorbidities and asthma
    Show more Reviews

    Related Articles

    Navigate

    • Home
    • Current issue
    • Archive

    About the ERR

    • Journal information
    • Editorial board
    • Press
    • Permissions and reprints
    • Advertising
    • Sponsorship

    The European Respiratory Society

    • Society home
    • myERS
    • Privacy policy
    • Accessibility

    ERS publications

    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS books online
    • ERS Bookshop

    Help

    • Feedback

    For authors

    • Instructions for authors
    • Publication ethics and malpractice
    • Submit a manuscript

    For readers

    • Alerts
    • Subjects
    • RSS

    Subscriptions

    • Accessing the ERS publications

    Contact us

    European Respiratory Society
    442 Glossop Road
    Sheffield S10 2PX
    United Kingdom
    Tel: +44 114 2672860
    Email: journals@ersnet.org

    ISSN

    Print ISSN: 0905-9180
    Online ISSN: 1600-0617

    Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society