Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Antibiotic resistance in chronic respiratory diseases: from susceptibility testing to the resistome

Hélène Pailhoriès, Jean-Louis Herrmann, Lourdes Velo-Suarez, Claudie Lamoureux, Clémence Beauruelle, Pierre-Régis Burgel, Geneviève Héry-Arnaud
European Respiratory Review 2022 31: 210259; DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0259-2021
Hélène Pailhoriès
1Laboratoire de Bactériologie, Institut de Biologie en Santé - PBH, CHU Angers, Angers, France
2HIFIH Laboratory UPRES EA3859, SFR ICAT 4208, Angers University, Angers, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jean-Louis Herrmann
3Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, INSERM, Infection and Inflammation, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France
4AP-HP, Groupe Hospitalo-Universitaire Paris-Saclay, Hôpital Raymond Poincaré, Garches, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lourdes Velo-Suarez
5Brest Center for Microbiota Analysis (CBAM), Brest University Hospital, Brest, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Claudie Lamoureux
6Dept of Bacteriology, Virology, Hospital Hygiene, and Parasitology-Mycology, Brest University Hospital, Brest, France
7Université de Brest, INSERM, EFS, UMR 1078, GGB, Brest, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Clémence Beauruelle
6Dept of Bacteriology, Virology, Hospital Hygiene, and Parasitology-Mycology, Brest University Hospital, Brest, France
7Université de Brest, INSERM, EFS, UMR 1078, GGB, Brest, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pierre-Régis Burgel
8Respiratory Medicine and National Cystic Fibrosis Reference Center, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université de Paris, Institut Cochin, INSERM U1016, Paris, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Pierre-Régis Burgel
Geneviève Héry-Arnaud
5Brest Center for Microbiota Analysis (CBAM), Brest University Hospital, Brest, France
6Dept of Bacteriology, Virology, Hospital Hygiene, and Parasitology-Mycology, Brest University Hospital, Brest, France
7Université de Brest, INSERM, EFS, UMR 1078, GGB, Brest, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Geneviève Héry-Arnaud
  • For correspondence: hery@univ-brest.fr
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The development of resistome analysis, i.e. the comprehensive analysis of antibiotic-resistance genes (ARGs), is enabling a better understanding of the mechanisms of antibiotic-resistance emergence. The respiratory microbiome is a dynamic and interactive network of bacteria, with a set of ARGs that could influence the response to antibiotics. Viruses such as bacteriophages, potential carriers of ARGs, may also form part of this respiratory resistome. Chronic respiratory diseases (CRDs) such as cystic fibrosis, severe asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and bronchiectasis, managed with long-term antibiotic therapies, lead to multidrug resistance. Antibiotic susceptibility testing provides a partial view of the bacterial response to antibiotics in the complex lung environment. Assessing the ARG network would allow personalised, targeted therapeutic strategies and suitable antibiotic stewardship in CRDs, depending on individual resistome and microbiome signatures. This review summarises the influence of pulmonary antibiotic protocols on the respiratory microbiome, detailing the variable consequences according to antibiotic class and duration of treatment. The different resistome-profiling methods are explained to clarify their respective place in antibiotic-resistance analysis in the lungs. Finally, this review details current knowledge on the respiratory resistome related to therapeutic strategies and provides insight into the application of resistome analysis to counter the emergence of multidrug-resistant respiratory pathogens.

Abstract

In chronic respiratory diseases, resistome analysis of respiratory samples provides a more comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms of resistance emergence, constituting a prospective complementary strategy to antibiotic susceptibility testing. https://bit.ly/3vOSPRL

Introduction

In the past years, connections have been established between disruption in the composition of the respiratory microbiome, also called dysbiosis, and the evolution of multiple chronic respiratory diseases (CRDs), strengthening the assumption of a role for the pulmonary microbiome in their pathophysiology [1]. Such new insights into the respiratory ecosystem have been revealed by next-generation sequencing (NGS) techniques, which allow an in-depth analysis of respiratory microbial communities. Among NGS approaches, shotgun metagenomics sequencing (mNGS) provides access to broader information than the sole taxonomic characterisation of the microbiome. This strategy includes analysing resistance markers, by identifying plasmid-borne or chromosome-borne antibiotic-resistance genes (ARGs), as well as virulence markers, which provides insight into the specific microenvironment. CRDs such as cystic fibrosis (CF), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and bronchiectasis (BE) are related to abnormal clearance of airway mucus, which can promote chronic infections and recurrent pulmonary exacerbations; these are deleterious because they contribute to lung inflammation [2–5]. Patients with these CRDs face multiple and prolonged courses of antibiotics, either as prophylaxis, chronic suppressive therapy or with curative intent, in order to reduce inflammation, the frequency of pulmonary exacerbations and disease progression. In parallel, severe asthma is related to chronic inflammation of the lower respiratory tract, with episodes of airflow obstruction [2, 6], and chronic suppressive therapies can be recommended in some severe conditions [7]. However, benefits associated with repeated exposure to antibiotic therapies come at the price of increased selection pressure on the respiratory ecosystem, leading to antibiotic resistance.

Traditional phenotypic methods used in the laboratory, e.g. in vitro antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST), appear to have some limits for analysing the phenotypic resistance of pathogens in CRDs. Several studies have pointed out the absence of correlation between in vitro AST results and clinical outcomes in CRDs such as CF [8–10]. This seems to be related to the difficulty in considering the complexity of the lung environment. Physiological aspects such as mucus composition or interbacterial cooperative/competitive interactions can also be essential in treatment success and bacterial eradication [9, 11]. The resistome was defined by Wright [12] as the collection of all the ARGs and their precursors in pathogenic and non-pathogenic bacteria. In contrast, AST focuses on susceptibility testing of bacteria considered as pathogens, substantially limiting the analysis. Deciphering the resistome should allow a more comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms underlying the emergence of antibiotic resistance and ARGs. Interbacterial horizontal gene transfer enables ARG dissemination in many interacting microbial communities that comprise the lung microbiome [13]; the challenge is to elucidate the respiratory reservoir of these resistance genes. Assessing the molecular network of ARGs might allow individualised, targeted therapeutic strategies and suitable prophylactic and curative antibiotic stewardship in CRDs, depending on individual resistome and microbiome signatures [14].

This review article describes the influence of antibiotic treatment recommended in CRDs on the respiratory microbiome and aims to decipher the respiratory resistome in these pathologies. First, the consequences of the antibiotic protocols prescribed in CRDs on the whole respiratory microbiome are detailed, with an analysis of the disparities between antibiotic classes and treatment durations. Second, the techniques used for respiratory resistome profiling are described and compared from the perspective of resistance analysis. Finally, this article reviews the current body of knowledge on the respiratory resistome in CRDs (figure 1) to reveal the potential of resistome analysis in future antimicrobial stewardship strategies.

FIGURE 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1

The respiratory resistome and its partners. The respiratory resistome is defined as the total of the antibiotic-resistance genes (ARGs) present in pathogenic and non-pathogenic bacteria in the respiratory airways. These ARGs can undergo mutations and spreading by horizontal gene transfer. A “core” resistome has been defined based on the similarity of ARGs found in healthy subjects and people with chronic respiratory disease (CRD). The “accessory” resistome refers to the resistome specific to CRD patients, and is affected by different factors, e.g. CRD pathophysiology, bacterial infection and antibiotic treatment. The resistome has an impact on the phenotypic antibiotic bacterial resistance, which is also affected by lung environment factors such as airway mucus composition, biofilm formation, bacterial interactions, human genetics and the immune response.

Impact of antibiotic therapy on the respiratory microbiome composition

Patients with CRDs are exposed to multiple courses of antibiotic therapy (table 1). Thus, to understand the development of these diseases, it seems critical that the impact of antibiotic treatments on the respiratory microbiome is explored. Table 2 summarises the reported effect of antibiotics on the respiratory microbiome. It has been reported that, in progressive CRDs such as CF, antibiotic use could decrease the bacterial diversity of the respiratory microbiome over the course of a decade, ahead of the effects of age and lung function [30]. In several observations, antibiotic use had a minor impact on microbial communities during clinical exacerbations, suggesting that microbiome composition shifts may instead be a long-term process [32, 41]. Microbiome modifications could also be due to a joint effect of antibiotic treatment and age in CF patients; the influence of age is complex to determine in this population independently from factors such as disease evolution and longer exposure to antibiotic treatments. Indeed, one study reported that, during the first year of life, the nasal microbiome had an increased Shannon diversity index after antibiotic treatment compared to samples collected before antibiotic administration, suggesting bacterial colonisation following antibiotic administration [39]. This increase in the relative abundance of some bacterial families after antibiotics was maintained after more than one antibiotic treatment, indicating some persistent changes in nasal microbiome under antibiotic treatment [39].

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Summary of antibiotic treatments recommended in CRDs

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2

Impact of antibiotics on the respiratory microbiome in CRDs

Influence of macrolides on the respiratory microbiome

Long-term macrolide treatment is recommended as chronic suppressive therapy in the CRDs investigated in this review. Azithromycin is associated with an antibiotic action, inhibiting bacterial protein synthesis and reducing bacterial virulence [46], as well as anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties [15, 47]. These properties, associated with a prolonged half-life, make azithromycin the preferred alternative for chronic suppressive treatment in several CRDs such as CF, diminishing the occurrence of respiratory exacerbations in chronically infected patients and thus contributing to the improvement of respiratory function [27]. The consequences of macrolide use on the respiratory microbiome have been intensively studied. A reduction in bacterial diversity has been observed after a 48-week treatment with azithromycin in patients with persistent uncontrolled asthma, with a decrease of Gammaproteobacteria including the pathogenic species Haemophilus influenzae [35]. Richness reduction and bacterial alteration of the respiratory microbiome were also confirmed in patients with moderate/severe asthma after a 6-month azithromycin course [36]. In COPD exacerbations, antibiotic treatment has also been associated with reduced abundance of many taxa in the respiratory microbiome (mostly Proteobacteria), with two of the four treatments evaluated being azithromycin [38]. These modifications persisted in samples taken 14–94 days after exacerbation onset [38]. These observations highlight the potential negative impact of such long-term antibiotic courses on the respiratory microbiome. This effect has also been shown in bacterial communities close to the respiratory environment. For example, the oropharyngeal microbiome composition of BE patients differed modestly but significantly after a 48-week erythromycin treatment, with a decrease in the relative abundance of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) assigned to Actinomyces or Streptococcus pseudopneumoniae and an increase in the OTUs assigned to Haemophilus in the group receiving erythromycin [33]. Similarly, oropharyngeal samples from patients with severe asthma showed an increase in the relative abundance of Streptococcus salivarius and a decrease in Leptotrichia, Actinomyces and Fusobacterium nucleatum after a 6-month azithromycin treatment versus untreated patients [34]. However, some studies also demonstrated similarity in the microbiome composition between pre- and post-treatment samples [34], suggesting a resilience of the respiratory microbiome even after a long-lasting macrolide treatment. The initial composition of the respiratory microbiome could explain these contradictory observations. The BLESS study, which evaluated sputum microbiome composition in BE patients treated for 48 weeks either by macrolides or placebo, detected a difference in the influence of macrolides according to the pulmotype [37]. No difference in the evolution of microbiome composition was recorded between baseline and 48-week samples in patients with airway microbiome dominated by Pseudomonas aeruginosa, despite a significant reduction in the frequency of exacerbations [37]. By contrast, more substantial microbiome changes were demonstrated in patients with microbiomes dominated by species other than P. aeruginosa, with a significant decline in the relative abundance of H. influenzae and a rise in intrinsically macrolide-tolerant organisms such as P. aeruginosa [37]. This study warns of potential deleterious consequences of long-term macrolide treatment and raises the question of its relevance in non-P. aeruginosa-dominated infections. Furthermore, some prudence should be advised for these long-lasting macrolide treatments, as in the CF population, because there is evidence of an antagonistic action between azithromycin and intravenous tobramycin use for the treatment of pulmonary exacerbations [48].

Influence of tobramycin on the respiratory microbiome

Inhaled tobramycin is used for chronic maintenance therapy for persistent P. aeruginosa infections in CF patients. Sputum microbiome composition under a 28-day course of tobramycin inhaled powder (TIP) has been shown to shift between the pre-treatment state and 1 month after the treatment. Surprisingly, this evolution is mainly driven by non-dominant taxa, with a decrease in the abundance of facultative and obligate anaerobes, i.e. untargeted bacteria at first sight [44]. The authors suggested that this observation might have been either associated with aminoside activity, although limited, under low-oxygen conditions or via an indirect effect through other interacting taxa [44]. However, this conclusion should be balanced with another study, which, in contrast, showed relative stability of the CF sputum microbiome after TIP or tobramycin inhaled solution (TIS) treatment over several months [45]. These disparities could be associated with the differences in tobramycin exposure, with the history of the patients (either naïve or with remote exposures to tobramycin depending on the study) or with the delay between the microbiome analysis and the initiation of the treatment. Further studies are needed to differentiate short- or long-term changes. Heirali et al. [45] also underlined that, in CF patients, some microbial predictors of the clinical response to TIP and TIS could exist in the respiratory microbiome: people with higher staphylococci relative abundance are better responders than people with higher P. aeruginosa relative abundance. This fact highlights the potential importance of respiratory microbiota composition analysis before introducing TIP or TIS chronic maintenance therapy.

Influence of β-lactams on the respiratory microbiome

β-lactams are recommended for the treatment of CF exacerbation episodes. In CF patients aged 1–21 years old, intravenous (i.v.) β-lactam therapeutic exposure during exacerbation episodes has been associated with a decrease in the diversity of the respiratory microbiome, and this modification was prolonged for more than 1 month after the end of the antibiotic treatment [40]. There was also a minimal change in microbial diversity in exacerbation episodes under sub-therapeutic antibiotic exposure, highlighting the role of the β-lactam dosage in these modifications [40]. The abundance of bacterial genera also changed during β-lactam treatment at therapeutic doses, with a decrease in Haemophilus, Clostridiales and Lachnospiraceae, and an increase in Fusobacterium and Pseudomonas [40]. The time of exposure to β-lactams above the minimum inhibitory concentrations also reportedly has consequences on the recovery of microbial diversity following antibiotic treatment for pulmonary exacerbations in CF [49]. Another study confirmed a decrease in diversity and a different composition of the core and accessory microbiome during treated CF exacerbation periods, but also resilience to the intervention of antibiotics 30 days after the end of treatment, with a return of the respiratory microbiome to the baseline state, in contrast to the previous observation [31]. Several studies have reported global stability of sputum communities throughout exacerbation episodes and antibiotic treatment in CF patients, with minimal or transient changes in microbial population structures and general stability of the dominant taxa between the onset of exacerbation, after antibiotic treatment and during stable intervals [32, 41]. Fodor et al. [41], however, did observe a small decrease in the richness of the respiratory microbiome at the end of antibiotic treatment but this was related to a decrease in the abundance of a small number of taxa: Gemella, two Pasteurella OTUs, two Streptococcus OTUs, Oribacterium and Neisseria. They also did not report any influence of the type of β-lactam on the respiratory microbiome structure [41]. Conversely, in a study on CF exacerbation episodes associated with P. aeruginosa and treated with i.v. β-lactams, some significant perturbations of the airway microbiome were noted in the first 72 h of antibiotic treatment, with a decrease in the relative abundance of P. aeruginosa, an increase in the overall microbiome diversity and an increase in the abundance of anaerobes such as Prevotella and Veillonella [42]. However, this perturbation was transient, with a bacterial community profile similar to the pre-treatment state after 8–10 days of antibiotic treatment [42]. Thus, the action of β-lactams through CF pulmonary exacerbations is contradictory between studies, with either a significant or minor impact on the whole structure of the respiratory microbiome during the treatment period, probably depending on the dosage of the treatment and the chronology of the samples. Most studies confirmed microbiome resilience of the bacterial communities after the discontinuation of antibiotic treatment [32, 31] or even during this treatment [42]. The number of β-lactam antibiotic courses should also be considered in these studies because repeated antibiotic exposure is a factor in decreasing microbiome diversity [30]. Variation in the definition of a pulmonary exacerbation could also contribute to the differences in the observations. In some studies the definition of pulmonary exacerbation was based on Fuchs’ criteria [40, 41], whereas in others only clinical signs were used [32] or the criterion was the physician's decision to use i.v. treatment for an increase in respiratory symptoms [42].

β-lactams are also used for CF long-term maintenance therapies, with cycles of inhaled aztreonam lysine. A study by Heirali et al. [43] revealed that even if the CF airway microbiome seems quite stable through one cycle of inhaled aztreonam lysine, the α-diversity assessed by the Shannon diversity index tends to decline with repeated exposure to this antibiotic, suggesting that increased exposure to β-lactams through repeated cycles is related to a decrease in microbiome diversity. Finally, the age of the patients, especially in CF in which paediatric and adult populations are studied, could also have an influence on the impact of β-lactams on the microbiome and on its resilience, with the hypothesis of persistent changes in the respiratory microbiome following antibiotic treatments in the paediatric CF population [39, 40].

The spread of ARGs through the respiratory microbiome can play a role in its behaviour under antibiotic treatment and its resilience following discontinuation. Therefore, analysis of all ARGs within the respiratory microbiome, i.e analysis of the respiratory resistome, seems crucial for a global understanding of the consequences of antibiotic treatment on the respiratory microbial community.

Deciphering the respiratory resistome

Different approaches have been used to explore the respiratory resistome: targeted methods (using quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR)), sequence-based analysis (using mNGS), functional metagenomics and three-dimensional modelling [50].

Targeted analysis techniques

Targeted approaches such as qPCR have been used to explore respiratory ARGs. These methods track the presence of specific ARGs within the microbiome and determine the relative abundance of these genes using a semi-quantitative technique [50]. The qPCR approach has been shown to be more sensitive than mNGS for detecting and estimating ARG abundance [51]. Ramsheh et al. [52] used a custom set of 296 primer pairs that targeted, among others, 283 ARGs to explore the airway resistome in COPD and healthy subjects. Some strategies have also associated 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing, with multiplex PCR targeting ARGs, for a more comprehensive approach [33].

Combining mNGS with validatory qPCR analyses provides new perspectives for resistome analysis [53]. The qPCR strategy is limited because it targets identified resistance genes, missing potential unknown or untargeted ARGs, and point mutations involved in the resistance phenotype. Besides, with these techniques it is impossible to identify the host carrying the ARGs, thus providing an incomplete view of microbial resistance. However, qPCR can be helpful as a more precise and efficient tool for specific ARG detection or quantification [53]. Therefore, qPCR should be helpful not as a particular technique given the limitation of this method, but to complement metagenomic analyses.

Shotgun metagenomics (mNGS)

Within genomic techniques, mNGS offers a potential alternative to decipher the lung resistome, with high-resolution profiling of ARGs. This method can generate millions of DNA reads from one sample, without prior amplification of a targeted gene [54]. mNGS should be considered a valuable clinical adjunct in introducing antibiotic therapy in CRDs by helping to predict the evolution of antibiotic resistance. In addition, the presence and abundance of ARGs can be monitored in the long term and analysed based on the clinical evolution. Exploration of the genetic environment of ARGs, achievable with this technique, also allows for investigation of the potential for horizontal gene transfer and spreading of these genes. Metagenomics and exploration of the resistome in different habitats can help to identify highly mobile resistance genes and hotspots for lateral gene transfer [55]. However, if mNGS is associated with the prospection of the lung resistome, some issues still need to be settled. mNGS data analyses rely on databases that do not necessarily reflect the exhaustive panel of ARGs, only the reference genes, limiting the interpretation. Comparisons based on similarities with reference ARGs allow the detection of known ARGs or variants but can rarely predict totally new ARGs. Also, some resistance predictions arise from specific gene mutations, which are more challenging to analyse, even if known chromosomal mutations conferring resistance can be detected [56]. Thus, although the prediction of phenotypic resistance based on mNGS results seems a tempting prospect, some false-negative results may still occur when compared with phenotypic methods [57]. In addition, the interrelationship between ARGs predicted by mNGS and the resistance phenotype may be unclear. It has been shown that some putative ARGs fail to confer resistance when expressed, such as the putative aminoglycoside kinases Rv3817 and Rv325c from Mycobacterium tuberculosis when expressed in Escherichia coli [12]. Some technical concerns also have to be accounted for when using mNGS, e.g. the high proportion of human DNA in the respiratory tract complicating the extraction of microbial sequences, and thus ARGs [1]. The relatively low abundance of ARGs also requires an adequate sequencing depth for an exhaustive and meaningful assessment of the respiratory resistome [58]. Another restriction is the high price of mNGS if applied to large patient cohorts, which may impede routine application for antibiotic stewardship. To increase the sensitivity of resistome analysis, some studies propose ARG enrichment using a targeted capture method with a set of probes designed from reference sequences of the Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database [59]. This method, applied for the analysis of gut ARGs, might be helpful to analyse the respiratory resistome, resulting in a better performance than mNGS with reduced depth of sequencing.

Functional metagenomic techniques

Some authors suggest applying a combination of metagenomic sequencing and culture methods as a functional analysis to explore the lung resistome. Functional metagenomics is an effective technique for analysing gene content and gene function in a polymicrobial sample. It allows a more complete analysis of the resistome, identifying the sequence of genes responsible for antibiotic resistance [56]. Allemann et al. [60] used this technique based on amplification and fragmentation of whole genomic DNA, with ligation of DNA fragments from metagenomic libraries into a cloning vector, to explore the respiratory resistome. This method was based on previous studies that developed functional metagenomics to characterise antibiotic resistance [13, 50, 61]. The cloning step was then performed in an E. coli cloning host. After clone amplification by culture, the ones corresponding to ARGs were selected on agar plates containing antibiotics, using the same antibiotics as for the treatment of infants with CF. Up to 50 clones per sample were then set, for which plasmids were extracted and the corresponding DNA sequences amplified and analysed using nanopore MinION sequencing (Oxford Nanopore Technologies) [60]. “Classic” mNGS recovered some resistance genes linked to antibiotics that were not tested with the functional metagenomic approach (lincosamide, fosfomycin, macrolides and aminoglycosides). However, the read coverage obtained with mNGS was relatively low compared with the alternative [60]. Thus, this functional metagenomic approach seems quite powerful and allows phenotypic features to be correlated with the identification of ARGs, with the capacity to discover new resistance genes. This method is, however, restricted to the analysis of resistance genes associated with the antibiotics used to select the clones, limiting the exploration of the resistome. The E. coli cloning system used also presents some limitations for exploring gram-positive ARGs [62]. Besides, the possible presence of regulators of ARGs that are not recognised by the cloning host's gene machinery can introduce bias in this functional analysis, by altering the expression of genes and generating either false-positive or false-negative results [63]. The choice of an appropriate vector seems therefore crucial in the design of the study. Additionally, culture conditions such as the medium, the antibiotic concentration and the conditions of incubation can affect the selection of resistant clones [63]. Overall, despite some constraints, this seems a novel complementary approach that allows a functional perspective attractive for respiratory resistome analysis.

Three-dimensional modelling

Other functional predictive approaches could be adapted from the exploration of the intestinal resistome to predict ARGs from metagenomic datasets. Ruppé et al. [64] developed a method based on protein homology modelling named “pairwise comparative modelling”. This method increases the functional prediction of proteins by building structural models and enables the classification of predicted antibiotic-resistance determinants. These can then be assigned to bacterial phyla and located and investigated for their mobility potential, distribution in the human microbiome, and dynamics within the antibiotic exposure being investigated [64]. This approach complements metagenomic analysis with the functional prediction of ARGs. Furthermore, three-dimensional modelling helps predict the harmful consequences of specific mutations in the reference protein [56]. However, while this method may be useful for predicting genes homologous to known antibiotic-resistance determinants, it could also exclude ARGs without homology to reference genes.

Currently, there is no gold-standard method for the exploration and prediction of the resistome. However, using several complementary approaches might allow a deeper insight into the respiratory resistome.

Respiratory resistome

Bacteria constituting the lung microbiome of patients with CRDs are associated with a diverse set of resistance mechanisms. Significant promotion of antibiotic resistance is observed in patients with CF and advanced pulmonary disease, which is related to long-term antibiotic treatments [65]. Lists of ARGs documented in respiratory samples in healthy and CRD populations are presented in the supplementary material. Some studies have also reported the presence of a complex nasal resistome in the first year of life in CF patients not yet exposed to antibiotics, suggesting that exposure to antibiotic treatments might not be the only factor in developing the bacterial resistome [60]. A wide respiratory resistome has also been identified in patients with COPD, BE or severe asthma, with a higher repertoire of resistance determined in patients with COPD and BE [66]. Another study identified that ARGs were 37% more prevalent in the sputum from COPD patients than in expectorations from healthy subjects [52], and this was mostly attributable to the increase in the bacterial burden in COPD patients compared with healthy individuals [52]. This attests to the issue of assessing the ARG reservoir in these CRDs. Furthermore, the instability of the respiratory resistome has been highlighted, with “losses” of resistance to antibiotic classes reported simultaneously by metagenomic and in-culture analyses [67]. Therefore, mechanisms underlying the evolution of the respiratory resistome would be interesting to dissect. This review focused on whole respiratory resistome analyses, excluding specific PCR on bacterial isolates obtained by standard culture.

The “core” respiratory resistome

The concept of a core respiratory resistome has emerged in the last few years. Indeed, a core respiratory resistome common to healthy individuals and patients with COPD, BE or severe asthma has been identified [66]. It is composed of ARGs from β-lactams (oxa-255, cfxA2), diaminopyrimidine (dfrA1), fluoroquinolones (pmrA), macrolides (msrD, ermB, ermX and ermF), lincosamides (lnuC), chloramphenicol (catS), aminoglycosides (aac(3)-VIIa and aph(3)-IIIa) and tetracycline classes (tetW, tetA, tetB, tetD and tetO) [66]. In another study comparing the resistome of COPD patients and healthy subjects, carbapenemases, extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) and ampC genes were identified in the respiratory resistome of the healthy control group [52]. The presence of a core resistome with abundant macrolide-resistance genes is a recent and crucial finding for the future management of CRD. The notion of a core resistome questions the diagnostic implications and the potential benefit of screening ARGs in the respiratory microbiota of CRD patients prior to introducing long-term antibiotic therapies such as macrolides.

The “accessory” resistome in CRDs

There are distinctive features in the composition of the respiratory resistome in the context of CRD. It has been shown that patients with COPD and BE have a higher load of ARGs than patients with severe asthma and healthy individuals [66]. One explanation could be the different physiopathology of these diseases, and the fact that patients with severe asthma are often less subjected to multiple courses of antibiotic treatment [68]. However, surprisingly, recent antibiotic exposure does not seem to result in a higher abundance of ARGs in COPD or BE [52, 66]. In these previous studies, antibiotic treatment was either stopped 6 weeks before resistome analysis [52] or used 6 months before recruitment [66]. It is possible that the impact of antibiotic therapy on the resistome is a short-term effect but longitudinal analyses of the resistome are needed to corroborate this hypothesis. However, these metagenomic data concerning the impact of antibiotics on the ARG reservoir must be balanced with phenotypic analyses. Long-term antibiotic therapy for the prevention of COPD exacerbation episodes is associated with a rise in antibiotic resistance, with a significant increase of moxifloxacin, doxycycline and azithromycin minimal inhibitory concentrations (with a three to six times increase) compared to pre-treatment values after a 13-week treatment [69]. In COPD records, no correlation was established between exacerbation episodes (based on forced expiratory volume in 1 s and the modified Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire (mCRQ) score) and ARG prevalence [52]. These contradictory data identify an area for further study that might help elucidate the chronology and evolution of the respiratory resistome with antibiotic use and development of the pathology.

Multidrug efflux-mediated systems

Multidrug efflux-mediated systems are the most represented gene function within the resistance mechanisms in the CF lung resistome [60, 65], representing >50% of identified respiratory ARGs in this population [67], and thus seem to play an essential role in bacterial resistance (supplementary material). Some are associated with bacteriophage sequences in the CF population [70], leading to speculation of horizontal transmission of these genes in the bacterial population. In functional metagenomic analyses performed on the nasal resistome of CF patients in the first year of life, multidrug-resistance efflux pumps of the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) and major facilitator superfamily transporters were the most common resistance mechanisms identified (in 4.6% and 7.7% of the nasal swabs, respectively) [60]. But while these genes seem to be present in the early life of CF patients, the abundance of these resistance genes can vary through disease progression. A metagenomic functional analysis performed on the sputum samples of 12 CF patients with either mild or severe lung disease indicated enrichment of multidrug-resistance efflux pumps of the ABC and resistance-nodulation-cell division superfamilies in the group with severe disease [65]. In this same study, resistance genes were associated with only three bacterial species: Achromobacter xylosoxidans, F. periodonticum and an unclassified member of the Bordetella genus [65]. In BE patients, some multidrug efflux pump genes, such as hmrM, appear to increase significantly after treatment with erythromycin [53]. However, qPCR analyses revealed that this gene was significantly correlated with H. influenzae because it is chromosomally encoded on this species. Thus, as in this example, the influence of antibiotic treatment on the abundance of resistance genes can instead be associated with variation in the abundance of the bacterial load following antibiotic treatment [53].

The resistome and β-lactam-resistance genes

β-lactam resistance is frequently identified within the CF respiratory resistome. In their study of the nasal resistome in the first year of life in CF patients, Allemann et al. [60] found that 64 predicted sequences were associated with β-lactamases among the 171 resistance genes identified. Within these sequences, eight had <85% identity over 90% of sequences to any known β-lactamase, bringing to light the existence of an undiscovered resistome. Surprisingly, eight proteins with a β-lactamase profile were associated with the ESBL phenotype [60]. The β-lactamases, highly abundant in the CF respiratory resistome, have also been identified in the respiratory virome of CF patients, suggesting a potential phage-mediated spread in the bacterial community [67, 70]. This interesting result underlines the interest in resistome analysis for a greater understanding of ARG dissemination mechanisms. Allemann et al. [60] also reported that the β-lactam-resistant phenotypes were more frequent in infants who received one or more antibiotic therapies, although with a nonsignificant trend. The presence of β-lactamases, including ESBLs, at an early stage in the life course of CF patients might impact further antibiotic treatment outcomes. The β-lactamases from classes A and B were mainly associated with the phyla Proteobacteria, Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes. β-lactamases from classes C and D were exclusively associated with Proteobacteria [60]. With regard to the COPD resistome, the pbp2x gene related to the Streptococcus genus has been detected at least 20% more frequently in COPD patients than in healthy subjects [52]. In this population, ESBLs and AmpC β-lactamase genes showed a modest excess compared with healthy subjects [52]. A high copy number of blaVIM genes has been associated with bacteriophages in sputum samples of CF patients [71]. Carbapenemases have also been detected in the COPD respiratory resistome, including the New Dehli metallo-β-lactamase-1 (NDM-1) gene [52].

The resistome and macrolide-resistance genes

The influence of macrolide chronic maintenance therapy on antibiotic resistance has been discussed earlier; bacterial isolates from the respiratory microbiome are significantly more resistant to macrolides in CRDs treated with this therapy [72, 73]. However, macrolide resistance cannot solely be associated with macrolide chronic maintenance therapy because macrolide-resistance markers have been described not only in the core respiratory resistome of patients with COPD, bronchiectasis or severe asthma, but also in that of healthy individuals [66]. In the same study, the rRNA methylase gene ermX was associated with several taxa, mainly consisting of upper airway commensals. Some taxa, such as Actinomyces and streptococci, were directly associated with ermX and ermB, and a strong association was also found between ermF and Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron [66]. Some associations between msrD and Clostridioides difficile or Morococcus cerebrosus were also found in respiratory samples of patients with respiratory diseases [66]. The association between macrolide-resistance genes and some gut species whose presence is unusual in the respiratory microbiome, such as B. thetaiotaomicron and C. difficile, suggests seeding of the airway resistome. Silent aspiration or gastro-oesophageal reflux has indeed been proposed to occur in CRDs [74–77]. These mechanisms could be an interesting explanation for the exchange of species and resistance genes between the gut and the respiratory microbiome. The mefA efflux pump system gene has also frequently been identified in respiratory samples of patients with COPD and is one of the most commonly detected ARGs [77, 78]. Thus, resistance genes from the macrolide–lincosamide–streptogramin axis seem highly abundant, dominating the core airway resistome [66]. This result is important, given the high use of macrolides in the context of CRDs: long-term macrolide therapy is recommended to reduce rates of pulmonary exacerbations. The selective pressure exerted on the respiratory microbiome by this class of antibiotics seems critical. Exploring the core macrolide resistome with mNGS before introducing long-term macrolide therapy might help monitor the treatment. Long-term macrolide therapy also has an impact on the respiratory resistome, resulting in a significant increase in macrolide resistance, especially in viridans streptococci, with an increase in the relative abundance of ermB or ermF methylase genes as well as mel, msrE and mefA efflux pump system genes [35, 69, 77, 79]. The increase in abundance of transmissible plasmid-encoded genes following macrolide therapy, such as ermB, is worrying and requires further study of the macrolide resistome in long-term therapy [53].

The resistome and fluoroquinolone-resistance genes

Fluoroquinolone-resistance genes have been identified as being associated with bacteriophage sequences in the CF virome [70], underlining a role for prophages in disseminating resistance genes in the respiratory resistome. In BE patients, a decrease in the relative abundance of patA, a chromosomally encoded fluoroquinolone-resistance gene, was observed following macrolide treatment, but this decrease correlated with a reduction in the abundance of S. pneumoniae [53].

The resistome and tetracycline-resistance genes

Tetracycline non-susceptibilities seem rare in the nasal respiratory microbiome of CF infants; the ARGs most frequently identified are tetK and tetM within Firmicutes [60]. tetM has also been commonly detected in the respiratory samples of patients with COPD diseases [78]. In severe asthma, long-term azithromycin treatment (500 mg three times a week for 48 weeks) was related to an increase in tetW and tetM resistance genes, significantly associated with resistant viridans streptococci [35]. In this previous study, tetM was found predominantly combined with ermB on a Tn916 mobile genetic element in streptococci, clarifying the increase of this gene after macrolide therapy [35]. Similarly, tetW is also reportedly associated with ermB in transferable genetic elements in streptococci [80]. These observations underline the vast potential consequences of macrolide usage in CRDs on antibiotic resistance.

The airborne-associated respiratory resistome

Some studies have reported the co-occurrence of ARGs in the context of CRDs in the environment, e.g. in inhalers [66], illustrating the potential of such therapeutic devices to act both as reservoirs for antibiotic-resistance determinants and a place for the exchange of these determinants between the environment and the airway. Another study using face-mask sampling highlighted the presence of ARGs in the aerosols of 69% of COPD patients, and these were also present in sputum [78]. These studies attest to the airborne dissemination of ARGs from the respiratory resistome in COPD patients and the complex interactions between the respiratory tract of patients with CRDs and their environment, which require further study.

Advantages, challenges and limits of resistome analysis

The genotypic prediction of phenotypic bacterial resistance is an expected benefit from resistome analysis (figure 2). Recently, a scoring system based on mutation-driven and horizontally acquired resistance analysis by whole-genome sequencing has been established for several antibiotics in P. aeruginosa [81]. Other profiling strategies have used machine learning to generate a predictive model of antibiotic resistance in this same species, obtaining high sensitivity and high predictive values by combining whole-genome sequencing and transcriptome analyses [82]. These methods would consolidate resistome analyses by developing tools for predicting antibiotic resistance from metagenomic data, thus laying the foundations for targeted antibiotic therapy based on NGS. The long-term monitoring of resistome data of patients with CRDs would also help to rapidly adapt antibiotic therapy to the evolution of ARG composition.

FIGURE 2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2

Advantages, challenges and issues of resistome analysis in chronic respiratory diseases. Resistome data interpretation for the implementation of antibiotic resistance prediction relies on different strategies. A scoring system, based on analysis of mutations and horizontally acquired antibiotic-resistance genes (ARGs), has been developed [81]. Another method uses machine-learning strategies to predict phenotypic resistance by combining sequencing and transcriptome analysis [82]. Three-dimensional modelling, by building structural models, can also help in protein function prediction [64]. Functional metagenomics, which correlates phenotypic resistance and metagenomics data, can also provide insight into the interpretation of bacterial resistance [60]. However, some issues need to be settled. The variation in respiratory resistome data depending on the methodology used complicates inter-study comparison [83, 84]. Also, some variation in ARG abundance and resistome data can be associated with the intrinsic resistance of a single bacterial taxa, and needs to be correlated with microbiome analysis [53]. Finally, some difficulties can emerge in the phenotypic prediction of resistance to antibiotic molecules. SOP: standard operating procedure.

Therefore, respiratory resistome analysis provides access to a broad range of information regarding bacterial antibiotic resistance. However, it is a complex process to compare the results of respiratory resistome analysis between different studies. Heterogeneous results are a result of the different clinical features of the patients, the types of sample collected, the processing of the samples and the kind of techniques used for the analysis [83]. The control of oral contamination is a key element in interpreting respiratory microbiome analyses, with a variable extent of oral contamination depending on the sampling method [84]. No gold-standard sample has been defined for lung microbiome and resistome studies [83]. Differences in bacterial communities have been demonstrated between the types of respiratory specimens in CF patients, with distinct communities in the upper and lower airways [81]. Oral contamination of respiratory samples could, therefore, also have an impact on lung resistome results. Similar to studies of pulmonary microbiota, it is therefore difficult to envisage a single sample that could reflect the entire pulmonary resistome, particularly given the compartmentalisation of certain chronic pulmonary infections and pulmonary biogeography.

Lastly, particular attention should be given to the microbiome analysis. In several studies, the variation in the composition of the respiratory resistome following antibiotic treatment was associated with the influence of these treatments on single bacterial taxa. Variation in ARG abundance was thus related to the intrinsic resistance of specific bacterial species that emerged after antibiotic treatment [53]. This highlights the corresponding requirement of combining microbiome and resistome analyses for a comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms underlying ARG evolution.

Points for future research and clinical practice

Question for future research

• How to correlate resistome data with phenotypic antimicrobial resistance?

Points for clinical practice

• In the future, resistome analysis will be key for the introduction of a personalised antibiotic strategy in CRDs and support for antimicrobial stewardship.

Conclusion

CRDs are associated with antibiotic regimens administered for the prophylaxis and treatment of exacerbation episodes, which might shed light on the emergence of antibiotic-resistance mechanisms spreading throughout the lung bacterial community. This lung bacterial community is now considered to be a complex interactive network of bacteria. In terms of resistance, these microbial community interactions seem decisive with the horizontal transfer of genes or delivery of resistance enzymes that can shield other species from the action of antibiotic molecules [85, 86]. Thus, classical techniques for determining bacterial susceptibility to antibiotic agents in the context of infections in CRD appear to have some limits. In the last few years, resistome analysis has made it possible to decipher the genes involved in resistance mechanisms within the complex respiratory microbiome of patients with CRD. This provides interesting perspectives for the future and the possibility of implementing new strategies for predicting and managing bacterial resistance in these diseases, potentially allowing the implementation of personalised antibiotic therapy depending on the composition of the respiratory resistome.

Supplementary material

Supplementary Material

Please note: supplementary material is not edited by the Editorial Office, and is uploaded as it has been supplied by the author.

Supplementary material ERR-0259-2021.SUPPLEMENT

Footnotes

  • Provenance: Submitted article, peer reviewed.

  • Conflict of interest: P-R. Burgel reports grants or contracts from GSK, Boehringer Ingelheim and Vertex; consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Chiesi, GSK and Insmed; and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, GSK, Insmed, Novartis, Pfizer, Vertex and Zambon, all outside the submitted work. The remaining authors have nothing to disclose.

  • Received November 28, 2021.
  • Accepted March 2, 2022.
  • Copyright ©The authors 2022
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This version is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0. For commercial reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions{at}ersnet.org

References

  1. ↵
    1. Budden KF,
    2. Shukla SD,
    3. Rehman SF, et al.
    Functional effects of the microbiota in chronic respiratory disease. Lancet Respir Med 2019; 7: 907–920. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30510-1
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. Chung KF,
    2. Wenzel SE,
    3. Brozek JL, et al.
    International ERS/ATS guidelines on definition, evaluation and treatment of severe asthma. Eur Respir J 2014; 43: 343–373. doi:10.1183/09031936.00202013
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Farrell PM,
    2. White TB,
    3. Ren CL, et al.
    Diagnosis of cystic fibrosis: consensus guidelines from the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation. J Pediatr 2017; 181S: S4–S15. doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.09.064
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Mirza S,
    2. Clay RD,
    3. Koslow MA, et al.
    COPD guidelines: a review of the 2018 GOLD report. Mayo Clin Proc 2018; 93: 1488–1502. doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.05.026
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Welsh EJ,
    2. Evans DJ,
    3. Fowler SJ, et al.
    Interventions for bronchiectasis: an overview of Cochrane systematic reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 7: CD010337. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD010337.pub2
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. Mims JW
    . Asthma: definitions and pathophysiology. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2015; 5: Suppl. 1, S2–S6. doi:10.1002/alr.21609
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Gibson PG,
    2. Yang IA,
    3. Upham JW, et al.
    Effect of azithromycin on asthma exacerbations and quality of life in adults with persistent uncontrolled asthma (AMAZES): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2017; 390: 659–668. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31281-3
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Hurley MN,
    2. Ariff AHA,
    3. Bertenshaw C, et al.
    Results of antibiotic susceptibility testing do not influence clinical outcome in children with cystic fibrosis. J Cyst Fibros 2012; 11: 288–292. doi:10.1016/j.jcf.2012.02.006
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Flynn JM,
    2. Cameron LC,
    3. Wiggen TD, et al.
    Disruption of cross-feeding inhibits pathogen growth in the sputa of patients with cystic fibrosis. mSphere 2020; 5: e00343-20. doi:10.1128/mSphere.00343-20
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Somayaji R,
    2. Parkins MD,
    3. Shah A, et al.
    Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) and associated clinical outcomes in individuals with cystic fibrosis: a systematic review. J Cyst Fibros 2019; 18: 236–243. doi:10.1016/j.jcf.2019.01.008
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Man WH,
    2. de Steenhuijsen Piters WAA,
    3. Bogaert D
    . The microbiota of the respiratory tract: gatekeeper to respiratory health. Nat Rev Microbiol 2017; 15: 259–270. doi:10.1038/nrmicro.2017.14
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Wright GD
    . The antibiotic resistome: the nexus of chemical and genetic diversity. Nat Rev Microbiol 2007; 5: 175–186. doi:10.1038/nrmicro1614
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Sommer MOA,
    2. Dantas G,
    3. Church GM
    . Functional characterization of the antibiotic resistance reservoir in the human microflora. Science 2009; 325: 1128–1131. doi:10.1126/science.1176950
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Brégeon F,
    2. Rolain J-M
    . Lung resistome. Med Sci (Paris) 2015; 31: 947–950. doi:10.1051/medsci/20153111003
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. Sherrard LJ,
    2. Tunney MM,
    3. Elborn JS
    . Antimicrobial resistance in the respiratory microbiota of people with cystic fibrosis. Lancet 2014; 384: 703–713. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61137-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Castellani C,
    2. Duff AJA,
    3. Bell SC, et al.
    ECFS best practice guidelines: the 2018 revision. J Cyst Fibros 2018; 17: 153–178. doi:10.1016/j.jcf.2018.02.006
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Rosenfeld M,
    2. Rayner O,
    3. Smyth AR
    . Prophylactic anti-staphylococcal antibiotics for cystic fibrosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; 9: CD001912.
    OpenUrl
    1. Visser SK,
    2. Bye P,
    3. Morgan L
    . Management of bronchiectasis in adults. Med J Aust 2018; 209: 177–183. doi:10.5694/mja17.01195
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Polverino E,
    2. Goeminne PC,
    3. McDonnell MJ, et al.
    European Respiratory Society guidelines for the management of adult bronchiectasis. Eur Respir J 2017; 50: 1700629. doi:10.1183/13993003.00629-2017
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Elborn JS,
    2. Flume PA,
    3. Van Devanter DR, et al.
    Management of chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection with inhaled levofloxacin in people with cystic fibrosis. Future Microbiol 2021; 16: 1087–1104. doi:10.2217/fmb-2021-0150
    OpenUrl
    1. Mogayzel PJ,
    2. Naureckas ET,
    3. Robinson KA, et al.
    Cystic fibrosis pulmonary guidelines. Chronic medications for maintenance of lung health. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013; 187: 680–689. doi:10.1164/rccm.201207-1160OE
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Oermann CM,
    2. Retsch-Bogart GZ,
    3. Quittner AL, et al.
    An 18-month study of the safety and efficacy of repeated courses of inhaled aztreonam lysine in cystic fibrosis. Pediatr Pulmonol 2010; 45: 1121–1134. doi:10.1002/ppul.21301
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Ng C,
    2. Nadig T,
    3. Smyth AR, et al.
    Treatment of pulmonary exacerbations in cystic fibrosis. Curr Opin Pulm Med 2020; 26: 679–684. doi:10.1097/MCP.0000000000000730
    OpenUrl
    1. Herath SC,
    2. Normansell R,
    3. Maisey S, et al.
    Prophylactic antibiotic therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; 10: CD009764.
    OpenUrl
    1. Hopkinson NS,
    2. Molyneux A,
    3. Pink J, et al.
    Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: diagnosis and management: summary of updated NICE guidance. BMJ 2019; 366: l4486. doi:10.1136/bmj.l4486
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
    . Bronchiectasis (Non-Cystic Fibrosis), Acute Exacerbation: Antimicrobial Prescribing. www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng117/chapter/recommendations Date last accessed: April 14, 2021.
  14. ↵
    1. Southern KW,
    2. Barker PM,
    3. Solis-Moya A, et al.
    Macrolide antibiotics for cystic fibrosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 11: CD002203.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Vestbo J,
    2. Hurd SS,
    3. Agustí AG, et al.
    Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: GOLD executive summary. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013; 187: 347–365. doi:10.1164/rccm.201204-0596PP
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Le Conte P,
    2. Terzi N,
    3. Mortamet G, et al.
    Management of severe asthma exacerbation: guidelines from the Société Française de Médecine d'Urgence, the Société de Réanimation de Langue Française and the French Group for Pediatric Intensive Care and Emergencies. Ann Intensive Care 2019; 9: 115. doi:10.1186/s13613-019-0584-x
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. Zhao J,
    2. Schloss PD,
    3. Kalikin LM, et al.
    Decade-long bacterial community dynamics in cystic fibrosis airways. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012; 109: 5809–5814. doi:10.1073/pnas.1120577109
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Cuthbertson L,
    2. Rogers GB,
    3. Walker AW, et al.
    Respiratory microbiota resistance and resilience to pulmonary exacerbation and subsequent antimicrobial intervention. ISME J 2016; 10: 1081–1091. doi:10.1038/ismej.2015.198
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  17. ↵
    1. Price KE,
    2. Hampton TH,
    3. Gifford AH, et al.
    Unique microbial communities persist in individual cystic fibrosis patients throughout a clinical exacerbation. Microbiome 2013; 1: 27. doi:10.1186/2049-2618-1-27
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Choo JM,
    2. Abell GCJ,
    3. Thomson R, et al.
    Impact of long-term erythromycin therapy on the oropharyngeal microbiome and resistance gene reservoir in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis. mSphere 2018; 3: e00103-18.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Lopes Dos Santos Santiago G,
    2. Brusselle G,
    3. Dauwe K, et al.
    Influence of chronic azithromycin treatment on the composition of the oropharyngeal microbial community in patients with severe asthma. BMC Microbiol 2017; 17: 109. doi:10.1186/s12866-017-1022-6
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. ↵
    1. Taylor SL,
    2. Leong LEX,
    3. Mobegi FM, et al.
    Long-term azithromycin reduces Haemophilus influenzae and increases antibiotic resistance in severe asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2019; 200: 309–317. doi:10.1164/rccm.201809-1739OC
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Slater M,
    2. Rivett DW,
    3. Williams L, et al.
    The impact of azithromycin therapy on the airway microbiota in asthma. Thorax 2014; 69: 673–674. doi:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2013-204517
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Rogers GB,
    2. Bruce KD,
    3. Martin ML, et al.
    The effect of long-term macrolide treatment on respiratory microbiota composition in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis: an analysis from the randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled BLESS trial. Lancet Respir Med 2014; 2: 988–996. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(14)70213-9
    OpenUrl
  23. ↵
    1. Huang YJ,
    2. Sethi S,
    3. Murphy T, et al.
    Airway microbiome dynamics in exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Clin Microbiol 2014; 52: 2813–2823. doi:10.1128/JCM.00035-14
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Mika M,
    2. Korten I,
    3. Qi W, et al.
    The nasal microbiota in infants with cystic fibrosis in the first year of life: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Respir Med 2016; 4: 627–635. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(16)30081-9
    OpenUrl
  25. ↵
    1. Hahn A,
    2. Fanous H,
    3. Jensen C, et al.
    Changes in microbiome diversity following β-lactam antibiotic treatment are associated with therapeutic versus subtherapeutic antibiotic exposure in cystic fibrosis. Sci Rep 2019; 9: 2534. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-38984-y
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Fodor AA,
    2. Klem ER,
    3. Gilpin DF, et al.
    The adult cystic fibrosis airway microbiota is stable over time and infection type, and highly resilient to antibiotic treatment of exacerbations. PLoS One 2012; 7: e45001. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0045001
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Smith DJ,
    2. Badrick AC,
    3. Zakrzewski M, et al.
    Pyrosequencing reveals transient cystic fibrosis lung microbiome changes with intravenous antibiotics. Eur Respir J 2014; 44: 922–930. doi:10.1183/09031936.00203013
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Heirali AA,
    2. Acosta N,
    3. Storey DG, et al.
    The effects of cycled inhaled aztreonam on the cystic fibrosis (CF) lung microbiome. J Cyst Fibros 2019; 18: 829–837. doi:10.1016/j.jcf.2019.02.010
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Nelson MT,
    2. Wolter DJ,
    3. Eng A, et al.
    Maintenance tobramycin primarily affects untargeted bacteria in the CF sputum microbiome. Thorax 2020; 75: 780–790. doi:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2019-214187
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    1. Heirali A,
    2. Thornton C,
    3. Acosta N, et al.
    Sputum microbiota in adults with CF associates with response to inhaled tobramycin. Thorax 2020; 75: 1058–1064. doi:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2019-214191
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    1. Imperi F,
    2. Leoni L,
    3. Visca P
    . Antivirulence activity of azithromycin in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Front Microbiol 2014; 5: 178. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2014.00178
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  32. ↵
    1. Guillot L,
    2. Tabary O,
    3. Nathan N, et al.
    Macrolides: new therapeutic perspectives in lung diseases. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2011; 43: 1241–1246. doi:10.1016/j.biocel.2011.05.009
    OpenUrlPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Cogen JD,
    2. Faino AV,
    3. Onchiri F, et al.
    Effect of concomitant azithromycin and tobramycin use on cystic fibrosis pulmonary exacerbation treatment. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2021; 18: 266–272. doi:10.1513/AnnalsATS.202002-176OC
    OpenUrlPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Hahn A,
    2. Burrell A,
    3. Chaney H, et al.
    Importance of β-lactam pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics on the recovery of microbial diversity in the airway of persons with cystic fibrosis. J Investig Med 2021; 69: 1350–1359. doi:10.1136/jim-2021-001824
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    1. Mullany P
    . Functional metagenomics for the investigation of antibiotic resistance. Virulence 2014; 5: 443–447. doi:10.4161/viru.28196
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Bengtsson-Palme J,
    2. Larsson DGJ,
    3. Kristiansson E
    . Using metagenomics to investigate human and environmental resistomes. J Antimicrob Chemother 2017; 72: 2690–2703. doi:10.1093/jac/dkx199
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  37. ↵
    1. Ramsheh MY,
    2. Haldar K,
    3. Bafadhel M, et al.
    Resistome analyses of sputum from COPD and healthy subjects reveals bacterial load-related prevalence of target genes. Thorax 2020; 75: 8–16. doi:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2019-213485
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    1. Taylor SL,
    2. Leong LEX,
    3. Mobegi FM, et al.
    Understanding the impact of antibiotic therapies on the respiratory tract resistome: a novel pooled-template metagenomic sequencing strategy. Multidiscip Respir Med 2018; 13: 30. doi:10.1186/s40248-018-0140-9
    OpenUrl
  39. ↵
    1. Willmann M,
    2. Peter S
    . Translational metagenomics and the human resistome: confronting the menace of the new millennium. J Mol Med Berl Ger 2017; 95: 41–51. doi:10.1007/s00109-016-1478-0
    OpenUrl
  40. ↵
    1. Gillings MR,
    2. Paulsen IT,
    3. Tetu SG
    . Genomics and the evolution of antibiotic resistance. Ann NY Acad Sci 2017; 1388: 92–107. doi:10.1111/nyas.13268
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  41. ↵
    1. Hadjadj L,
    2. Baron SA,
    3. Diene SM, et al.
    How to discover new antibiotic resistance genes? Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2019; 19: 349–362. doi:10.1080/14737159.2019.1592678
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  42. ↵
    1. Feigelman R,
    2. Kahlert CR,
    3. Baty F, et al.
    Sputum DNA sequencing in cystic fibrosis: non-invasive access to the lung microbiome and to pathogen details. Microbiome 2017; 5: 20. doi:10.1186/s40168-017-0234-1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Asante J,
    2. Osei Sekyere J
    . Understanding antimicrobial discovery and resistance from a metagenomic and metatranscriptomic perspective: advances and applications. Environ Microbiol Rep 2019; 11: 62–86. doi:10.1111/1758-2229.12735
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  44. ↵
    1. Guitor AK,
    2. Raphenya AR,
    3. Klunk J, et al.
    Capturing the resistome: a targeted capture method to reveal antibiotic resistance determinants in metagenomes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2019; 64: e01324-19. doi:10.1128/AAC.01324-19
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. ↵
    1. Allemann A,
    2. Kraemer JG,
    3. Korten I, et al.
    Nasal resistome development in infants with cystic fibrosis in the first year of life. Front Microbiol 2019; 10: 212. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2019.00212
    OpenUrl
  46. ↵
    1. van der Helm E,
    2. Imamovic L,
    3. Ellabaan MM H, et al.
    Rapid resistome mapping using nanopore sequencing. Nucleic Acids Res 2017; 45: e61. doi:10.1093/nar/gkw951
    OpenUrl
  47. ↵
    1. Crofts TS,
    2. Gasparrini AJ,
    3. Dantas G
    . Next-generation approaches to understand and combat the antibiotic resistome. Nat Rev Microbiol 2017; 15: 422–434. doi:10.1038/nrmicro.2017.28
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. Schmieder R,
    2. Edwards R
    . Insights into antibiotic resistance through metagenomic approaches. Future Microbiol 2012; 7: 73–89. doi:10.2217/fmb.11.135
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    1. Ruppé E,
    2. Ghozlane A,
    3. Tap J, et al.
    Prediction of the intestinal resistome by a three-dimensional structure-based method. Nat Microbiol 2019; 4: 112–123. doi:10.1038/s41564-018-0292-6
    OpenUrl
  50. ↵
    1. Bacci G,
    2. Mengoni A,
    3. Fiscarelli E, et al.
    A different microbiome gene repertoire in the airways of cystic fibrosis patients with severe lung disease. Int J Mol Sci 2017; 18: 1654. doi:10.3390/ijms18081654
    OpenUrl
  51. ↵
    1. Mac Aogáin M,
    2. Lau KJX,
    3. Cai Z, et al.
    Metagenomics reveals a core macrolide resistome related to microbiota in chronic respiratory disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2020; 202: 433–447. doi:10.1164/rccm.201911-2202OC
    OpenUrl
  52. ↵
    1. Lim YW,
    2. Evangelista JS,
    3. Schmieder R, et al.
    Clinical insights from metagenomic analysis of sputum samples from patients with cystic fibrosis. J Clin Microbiol 2014; 52: 425–437. doi:10.1128/JCM.02204-13
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  53. ↵
    1. Reddel HK,
    2. Bacharier LB,
    3. Bateman ED, et al.
    Global Initiative for Asthma Strategy 2021: executive summary and rationale for key changes. Eur Respir J 2022; 59: 2102730. doi:10.1183/13993003.02730-2021
    OpenUrl
  54. ↵
    1. Brill SE,
    2. Law M,
    3. El-Emir E, et al.
    Effects of different antibiotic classes on airway bacteria in stable COPD using culture and molecular techniques: a randomised controlled trial. Thorax 2015; 70: 930–938. doi:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-207194
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  55. ↵
    1. Fancello L,
    2. Desnues C,
    3. Raoult D, et al.
    Bacteriophages and diffusion of genes encoding antimicrobial resistance in cystic fibrosis sputum microbiota. J Antimicrob Chemother 2011; 66: 2448–2454. doi:10.1093/jac/dkr315
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. ↵
    1. Brown-Jaque M,
    2. Rodriguez Oyarzun L,
    3. Cornejo-Sánchez T, et al.
    Detection of bacteriophage particles containing antibiotic resistance genes in the sputum of cystic fibrosis patients. Front Microbiol 2018; 9: 856. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.00856
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  57. ↵
    1. Grinwis ME,
    2. Sibley CD,
    3. Parkins MD, et al.
    Macrolide and clindamycin resistance in Streptococcus milleri group isolates from the airways of cystic fibrosis patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2010; 54: 2823–2829. doi:10.1128/AAC.01845-09
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  58. ↵
    1. Hare KM,
    2. Grimwood K,
    3. Chang AB, et al.
    Nasopharyngeal carriage and macrolide resistance in Indigenous children with bronchiectasis randomized to long-term azithromycin or placebo. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2015; 34: 2275–2285. doi:10.1007/s10096-015-2480-0
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  59. ↵
    1. Lee AL,
    2. Goldstein RS
    . Gastroesophageal reflux disease in COPD: links and risks. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2015; 10: 1935–1949. doi:10.2147/COPD.S77562
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Mandal P,
    2. Morice AH,
    3. Chalmers JD, et al.
    Symptoms of airway reflux predict exacerbations and quality of life in bronchiectasis. Respir Med 2013; 107: 1008–1013. doi:10.1016/j.rmed.2013.04.006
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Raghu G,
    2. Meyer KC
    . Silent gastro-oesophageal reflux and microaspiration in IPF: mounting evidence for anti-reflux therapy? Eur Respir J 2012; 39: 242–245. doi:10.1183/09031936.00211311
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  60. ↵
    1. Djamin RS,
    2. Talman S,
    3. Schrauwen EJA, et al.
    Prevalence and abundance of selected genes conferring macrolide resistance genes in COPD patients during maintenance treatment with azithromycin. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2020; 9: 116. doi:10.1186/s13756-020-00783-w
    OpenUrl
  61. ↵
    1. Kennedy M,
    2. Ramsheh MY,
    3. Williams CML, et al.
    Face mask sampling reveals antimicrobial resistance genes in exhaled aerosols from patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and healthy volunteers. BMJ Open Respir Res 2018; 5: e000321. doi:10.1136/bmjresp-2018-000321
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  62. ↵
    1. Valery PC,
    2. Morris PS,
    3. Byrnes CA, et al.
    Long-term azithromycin for Indigenous children with non-cystic-fibrosis bronchiectasis or chronic suppurative lung disease (Bronchiectasis Intervention Study): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Respir Med 2013; 1: 610–620. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(13)70185-1
    OpenUrl
  63. ↵
    1. Palmieri C,
    2. Princivalli MS,
    3. Brenciani A, et al.
    Different genetic elements carrying the tet(W) gene in two human clinical isolates of Streptococcus suis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2011; 55: 631–636. doi:10.1128/AAC.00965-10
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  64. ↵
    1. Cortes-Lara S,
    2. Barrio-Tofiño ED,
    3. López-Causapé C, et al.
    Predicting Pseudomonas aeruginosa susceptibility phenotypes from whole genome sequence resistome analysis. Clin Microbiol Infect 2021; 27: 1631–1637. doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2021.05.011
    OpenUrl
  65. ↵
    1. Khaledi A,
    2. Weimann A,
    3. Schniederjans M, et al.
    Predicting antimicrobial resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa with machine learning-enabled molecular diagnostics. EMBO Mol Med 2020; 12: e10264. doi:10.15252/emmm.201910264
    OpenUrl
  66. ↵
    1. Carney SM,
    2. Clemente JC,
    3. Cox MJ, et al.
    Methods in lung microbiome research. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2020; 62: 283–299. doi:10.1165/rcmb.2019-0273TR
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  67. ↵
    1. Jorth P,
    2. Ehsan Z,
    3. Rezayat A, et al.
    Direct lung sampling indicates that established pathogens dominate early infections in children with cystic fibrosis. Cell Rep 2019; 27: 1190–1204.e3. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2019.03.086
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  68. ↵
    1. Welp AL,
    2. Bomberger JM
    . Bacterial community interactions during chronic respiratory disease. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2020; 10: 213. doi:10.3389/fcimb.2020.00213
    OpenUrl
  69. ↵
    1. Sherrard LJ,
    2. McGrath SJ,
    3. McIlreavey L, et al.
    Production of extended-spectrum β-lactamases and the potential indirect pathogenic role of Prevotella isolates from the cystic fibrosis respiratory microbiota. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2016; 47: 140–145. doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2015.12.004
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
View this article with LENS
Vol 31 Issue 164 Table of Contents
European Respiratory Review: 31 (164)
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Antibiotic resistance in chronic respiratory diseases: from susceptibility testing to the resistome
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
Antibiotic resistance in chronic respiratory diseases: from susceptibility testing to the resistome
Hélène Pailhoriès, Jean-Louis Herrmann, Lourdes Velo-Suarez, Claudie Lamoureux, Clémence Beauruelle, Pierre-Régis Burgel, Geneviève Héry-Arnaud
European Respiratory Review Jun 2022, 31 (164) 210259; DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0259-2021

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Antibiotic resistance in chronic respiratory diseases: from susceptibility testing to the resistome
Hélène Pailhoriès, Jean-Louis Herrmann, Lourdes Velo-Suarez, Claudie Lamoureux, Clémence Beauruelle, Pierre-Régis Burgel, Geneviève Héry-Arnaud
European Respiratory Review Jun 2022, 31 (164) 210259; DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0259-2021
Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Impact of antibiotic therapy on the respiratory microbiome composition
    • Deciphering the respiratory resistome
    • Respiratory resistome
    • Advantages, challenges and limits of resistome analysis
    • Conclusion
    • Supplementary material
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Subjects

  • Respiratory clinical practice
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Severe COVID-19 versus multisystem inflammatory syndrome
  • PROMs for paediatric acute lower respiratory infection studies
  • Forbearance with endobronchial stenting: cognisance before conviction
Show more Reviews

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERR

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising
  • Sponsorship

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN: 0905-9180
Online ISSN: 1600-0617

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society