Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Chronic cough: new insights and future prospects

Alyn Morice, Peter Dicpinigaitis, Lorcan McGarvey, Surinder S. Birring
European Respiratory Review 2021 30: 210127; DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0127-2021
Alyn Morice
1Centre for Clinical Sciences, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Alyn Morice
  • For correspondence: A.H.Morice@hull.ac.uk
Peter Dicpinigaitis
2Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Peter Dicpinigaitis
Lorcan McGarvey
3Centre for Experimental Medicine, Dentistry, and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University, Belfast, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Surinder S. Birring
4Centre for Human & Applied Physiological Sciences, School of Basic & Medical Biosciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College Hospital, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Chronic cough is defined in adults as a cough that lasts for ≥8 weeks. When it proves intractable to standard-of-care treatment, it can be referred to as refractory chronic cough (RCC). Chronic cough is now understood to be a condition of neural dysregulation. Chronic cough and RCC result in a serious, often unrecognized, disease burden, which forms the focus of the current review.

The estimated global prevalence of chronic cough is 2–18%. Patients with chronic cough and RCC report many physical and psychological effects, which impair their quality of life. Chronic cough also has a significant economic burden for the patient and healthcare systems. RCC diagnosis and treatment are often delayed for many years as potential treatable triggers must be excluded first and a stepwise empirical therapeutic regimen is recommended.

Evidence supporting most currently recommended treatments is limited. Many treatments do not address the underlying pathology, are used off-label, have limited efficacy and produce significant side-effects. There is therefore a significant unmet need for alternative therapies for RCC that target the underlying disease mechanisms. Early clinical data suggest that antagonists of the purinergic P2X3 receptor, an important mediator of RCC, are promising, though more evidence is needed.

Abstract

Chronic cough exerts a considerable burden on patients and healthcare systems. In addition to effective targeted therapies, further data are needed to understand the pathophysiology, epidemiology and disease burden. https://bit.ly/3Be9JZI

Introduction

Under normal circumstances, cough is a protective reflex preventing aspiration, but in some individuals, it can become prolonged, excessive and debilitating [1]. Generally accepted definitions of cough in adults in terms of duration are acute (≤3 weeks), subacute (between 3 and 8 weeks) and chronic (>8 weeks) [1]. The terms refractory chronic cough (RCC) or unexplained chronic cough (UCC) were used to define patients entering clinical trials. Whether they represent different subgroups of patients whose cough is considered either refractory to conventional treatments [2] or remains unexplained following assessment [3] is controversial. There was no difference in symptom profile, assessed with the Hull Airway Reflux Questionnaire (HARQ), between patients classified as having RCC or UCC in a rigorously defined population of patients in a recent clinical trial [4]. Regardless of how it is termed, chronic cough is associated with a serious disease burden and there is an unmet need for better treatments. While chronic cough has previously been regarded as a persistent symptom of other underlying conditions, recent advances in our understanding suggest it is a distinct condition with characteristic pathophysiology which can be targeted by new treatments [5].

Involuntary cough is a reflex activated by sensory nerves from the territory of the vagal afferents [6]. In response to detection of potentially noxious stimuli by airway sensory nociceptors, impulses travel up the vagus nerve via the nodose and jugular ganglia to the medulla, where they are modulated by central pathways. A signal is then sent through somatic efferents to the larynx, respiratory muscles and diaphragm to result in a cough [6–8]. Chronic cough is often triggered by low levels of thermal, mechanical or chemical exposure [2, 9], reflecting a common aetiology, known as cough hypersensitivity syndrome (CHS) [10]. CHS is characterized by dysregulation of neural pathways and receptors in the central nervous system, vagal afferent sensory nerves, and ganglia [5, 9–12] (figure 1 [5, 13]), as demonstrated by the observation that many antitussive drugs have neuromodulatory properties [1, 2, 14].

FIGURE 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1

a) Ascending and descending neural pathways involved in the cough reflex. b) Stimulation and activation of airway sensory neurons. Essentially, noxious stimuli or inflammation cause an increase in intracellular calcium which opens the pannexin channel and releases ATP to activate P2X3 channels on sensory nerves. This leads to cell depolarisation potentially triggering the opening of NaVs and generating an action potential which is carried through the vagus nerve to the central nervous system. Mechanisms for the cough reflex still have to be fully established in humans; many other pathways and receptors are probably involved. Ca2+: calcium; NaV: voltage-gated sodium channel; Na+: sodium; TRPA: transient receptor potential ankyrin; TRPM: transient receptor potential melastatin; TRPV: transient receptor potential vanilloid. Reproduced and modified from [5, 13].

CHS is an umbrella term encompassing multiple complex multifactorial processes and different cough phenotypes or traits [5, 15–17]. Traditionally, it was believed that chronic cough arose from acute cough associated with respiratory viral infections, from clinically diagnosed diseases such as asthma or gastro–oesophageal reflux disease (GORD), oesophageal dysmotility or, more controversially, from a poorly defined condition referred to as post-nasal drip syndrome or upper airways cough syndrome [2, 5, 16–19]. Additionally, certain drugs such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors can increase cough sensitivity [20]. These conditions, however, fail to capture the complex heterogeneity of presentation of these airway diseases in the clinic and there has been a move in recent years to think in terms of treatable traits when managing patients with chronic airway diseases [21]. Notably, sensitivity in the neural pathways responsible for eliciting cough appears to be a consistent feature of patients with chronic cough, regardless of the overall clinical presentation [5]. CHS therefore represents a specific disease state that can be targeted by therapeutic interventions. In the context of chronic cough, therefore, CHS represents a significant treatment target [9].

This review summarises the epidemiology of chronic cough and the burden it imposes on patients and healthcare systems. It presents an overview of our current understanding of patient burden and the important role of patient report-based measures in capturing this. It also highlights gaps in current treatment and describes emerging treatment options designed to target the underlying CHS.

Epidemiology

Cough is the most common presenting symptom in adults who seek medical treatment in non-hospital settings [22]. However, conclusions from epidemiological studies aimed at establishing the prevalence of chronic cough or RCC vary widely and reflect differences in study design, definitions of patient population, disease, conventional treatments and refractory status. The prevalence of RCC may be overestimated if patients are designated “refractory” because of a poor response to therapies that do not actually address the underlying pathology of the cough. Conversely, it may be under-reported or underestimated if the cough is regarded as a complication of another condition rather than as a distinct entity. This is demonstrated in a 1-year retrospective study of primary care data from approximately 200 000 patients in England, in which 18% of patients presented at least once with a cough-related condition, but only 0.2% were explicitly diagnosed with chronic cough [23]. Repeated presentation with “chest infections” was, however, common [23].

The global prevalence of self-reported chronic cough in adults has been estimated from a meta-analysis to be approximately 10% [24] with regional variations of 2% in Africa to 18% in Oceania [24]. In respiratory outpatient practice, it ranges from 10% to 38% [25]. In addition to differences in study designs or disease definitions, these differences in prevalence are likely to be driven by environmental and socioeconomic factors, such as levels of obesity or smoking [24]. Unlike chronic cough, prevalence data for RCC are very limited, although one study showed that 42% of patients referred to a UK chronic cough clinic (n=100) were diagnosed with RCC [26].

The population of patients with chronic cough is predominantly middle-aged, though there are some regional differences. In a survey conducted in the UK, the Netherlands, Sweden, South Korea, China and the USA (n=10 032), the most common age for presentation overall was 60–69 years, while a lower age (30–39 years) was observed in China [27]. Other studies have confirmed the early onset of chronic cough in China, with most patients presenting in their late thirties or early forties [28]. Age is a risk factor for chronic cough, as demonstrated in a Finnish community study (n=3697), which reported an adjusted odds ratio per decade for age of 1.15 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05–1.26; p<0.01) [29].

Chronic cough is more prevalent in females than males, with studies reporting 66–73% of patients to be female [27, 30]. This mirrors similar findings for chronic pain, and comorbid daily chronic pain and chronic cough, which are also more prevalent in women than in men [31], possibly due to shared neural pathways. Data from a functional magnetic resonance imaging study, involving inhalation of subtussive concentrations of capsaicin, suggest these gender prevalence effects may reflect differences in central neural processing of the cough sensation [27]. Interestingly, boys and girls have a similar cough reflex sensitivity, and this gender difference appears during puberty [32]. It can be speculated that women have evolved a heightened cough reflex to protect themselves against aspiration during pregnancy.

Gender and age effects are likely to be modulated by environmental or social influences. In some countries, such as South Korea [33] and China [28], chronic cough is more prevalent in males, with a study of chronic cough in the general population of South Korea (n=18 071) reporting a prevalence of 3% in males compared with 2% in females (p<0.001) [33]. The authors attributed this to differences in smoking habits. A study in China of 1882 patients with chronic cough, of whom 87% had never smoked, found that they tended to be younger (43 years) than is typically observed in Western countries, with no observable gender differences [34]. The authors speculated that the different characteristics of their patient population reflected the levels of air pollution to which their patients were exposed.

Chronic cough can persist for many years [35]. In a cross-sectional European survey (n=1120), 20% of patients reported a cough duration of ≥10 years [36] and approximately 10% of patients reported a cough duration of ≥30 years in a questionnaire-based survey in the UK (n=373) [30]. A study in Finland (n=421) found that 57% and 26% of patients still had chronic cough 1 and 5 years, respectively, after their first assessment [37], with symptoms of peptic gastro–oesophageal reflux being the main predictor of persistence at 1 year (n=165) [38]. Of the patients with symptoms of peptic gastro–oesophageal reflux, 63% had received treatment with proton pump inhibitors. A longitudinal study of unexplained chronic cough in the UK over 7–10 years (n=42) also demonstrated that not only does cough persist, with cough severity unchanged in 24% of patients, but there was an increase in severity over time in 36% of patients. Unexpectedly, patients with longitudinal spirometry data were also found to have declines in forced expiratory volumes over 1 s that were well above what would be expected in a population of non-smoking patients of the same age [39].

Physical effects of chronic cough

Cough is typically assessed in terms of frequency using electronic cough monitors [40, 41] and in terms of severity with a visual analogue scale. Monitors assess cough frequency (typically expressed as coughs per hour measured over a 24 h period), but do not capture the episodic nature of chronic cough – a primary factor in the disease burden experienced by patients. Typically, higher cough rates are observed during the day, with recent clinical trials in patients with RCC recording mean rates of 37–65 coughs per hour during the day (awake) and 4–10 coughs per hour during sleep at baseline [42, 43]. Cough frequencies in excess of 700 per hour have been reported [44].

In addition to the physical act of coughing, patients report numerous physical and/or psychosocial effects associated with cough [45]. These commonly include breathlessness, wheezing, fatigue, exhaustion, sleep disturbance, impairment of speech, retching, vomiting and interference with daily activities [2, 30, 45, 46], as well as urinary incontinence. This last symptom is most common in women, with 55–66% of women versus only 5% of men reporting it as an issue with a significant impact on their quality of life (QoL) [2, 30, 47, 48]. If the cough is sufficiently severe, it can generate very high intra-abdominal and intrathoracic pressures, producing chest pain and, less commonly, rib fractures and hernias [46]. Around 10% of patients [30], almost exclusively male, develop cough syncope [49], sometimes with fatal consequences, and the mandatory driving licence loss has a major impact on employment prospects [50].

Misdiagnosis of the underlying cause of the cough also adds to patient burden since patients are unnecessarily exposed to inappropriate investigations or ineffective treatments. For example, cough is often reported as the most troublesome symptom in patients where CHS co-exists with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and oral corticosteroids may be escalated to treat the presumed asthma symptoms [5] with little impact on the chronic cough, but an increased risk of serious side-effects [51, 52]. More generally, antibiotics are also often prescribed to treat cough. In a recent UK survey (n=198 151), 43% of adult patients with probable chronic cough (n=1600) and 55% of patients with possible chronic cough (n=10 913) were prescribed an antibiotic on the index date of the study [23]. Such indiscriminate use of these medications not only has consequences for healthcare costs, but it also represents a risk to the patient in potential adverse events (AEs) as well as contributing to increased antibiotic resistance within the community.

A number of conditions, including irritable bowel syndrome [2], obstructive sleep apnoea [2], obesity [33, 53], thyroid disease [54], neuropathic syndromes [2], GORD [44], asthma [44] and allergic rhinitis [44], are common in patients with chronic cough, contributing to the disease burden.

Psychological effects of chronic cough

A high prevalence of psychological effects is associated with chronic cough and the impact on mental health has been reported to be comparable to that of stroke or Parkinson's disease [55]. In a US observational study of patients with chronic cough (n=136), the most frequent patient-reported problems were frustration, anger and anxiety [56]. A UK study assessing psychological profiles of patients with chronic cough (n=67 (explained cough, n=42; RCC, n=25)) versus 22 healthy participants without cough symptoms reported that RCC patients had significantly higher levels of anxiety, depression, fatigue and somatic physical symptoms than non-cough participants [57]. They also had higher depression and fatigue scores and significantly more negative illness representations than patients with explained cough [57]. Clinical levels of anxiety were more common in patients with RCC (52%) than patients with explained cough (38%) [57]. Anxiety and depression have been reported in 33–52% and 16–91% of patients with chronic cough, respectively [36, 57–59]. A UK-based study reported higher levels of emotional distress including anxiety (48% of cough patients) and psychoneurotic symptoms than would be expected in a healthy population [59]. One reason for this anxiety, as highlighted in a US study (n=39), is a fear that the chronic cough represents serious disease [45].

Gender-related differences in psychological effects have also been noted. In a European survey (n=1120), a significantly higher proportion of women than men reported feeling fed up or depressed (difference in proportion: 5% (95% CI 0–9%)) as well as experiencing more limitations on their activities (difference in proportion: 10% (95% CI 4–16%)) due to their cough [36].

Effects of chronic cough on QoL

Reflecting the frequency and the severity of bouts of coughing, chronic cough can have a serious negative impact on patients’ QoL. Indeed, the impact on QoL is reported to be similar to that of other respiratory diseases including COPD, asthma and bronchiectasis [45, 60]. This effect remains even after factoring out contributions from comorbid asthma and COPD, or other independent confounding variables such as depression or arthritis [61].

The psychological and physical impacts of chronic cough interfere with all aspects of patients’ lives, including daily living activities, social interactions, home management and recreational activities [30, 36]. Importantly, patients may experience cough in response to trivial triggers, such as odours, changes in air temperature, fatigue/stress or talking [62, 63], that are very difficult to avoid. As a result, chronic cough can have a substantial psychosocial impact, with the potential for reduced work productivity and even job loss [37, 61, 64]. In a multinational European survey (n=1120), 96% of patients reported that their cough affected their QoL, 94% that it disturbed or worried their family and friends, and 81% that it affected activities they liked to do [36]. QoL in women seems to be particularly affected by chronic cough. They tend to score higher than men on the Cough-specific QoL Questionnaire (CQLQ), possibly because they are more likely to be affected by incontinence with psychosocial consequences due to embarrassment [65]. They may also have a lower pain threshold which possibly indicates higher pain sensitivity [66]. Data from a Korean population (n=30 021), based on the EuroQoL five-dimension three-level component index score, further suggest that women aged ≥65 years with chronic cough are particularly impacted versus a similar group without chronic cough (0.55±0.04 versus 0.70±0.01, p<0.001) [61]. Patients may avoid or be uncomfortable in social situations due to the embarrassment of coughing or its effects (e.g. urinary incontinence, retching, vomiting) and/or the perception by others that they have a contagious condition (particularly epidemics associated with respiratory diseases) or are a heavy smoker [46]. This was demonstrated in a UK survey (n=373) in which 64% of patients felt that their cough interfered with their social life [30].

Chronic cough also has a negative impact on personal relationships, with “spouses not being able to tolerate the cough” stated as one of the key reasons for patients’ health-related dysfunction in a US observational study (n=39) [45]. The effect of chronic cough on QoL is not necessarily limited to the frequency or severity of the cough. Despite only occasional paroxysms of coughing, it may still seriously impact a patient's QoL if they experience effects such as cough-related double incontinence or life-threatening cough syncope [67].

Economic burden

Though little studied to date, chronic cough is likely to have a significant economic burden as a consequence of impacts on job productivity, including time missed from work and absenteeism to provide care to others [68, 69]. For example, in a Finnish survey (n=421), 16% of patients with chronic cough had ≥7 sick days and 20% had ≥3 doctor's visits due to cough within 12 months [37]. Further direct costs include physician fees or consultation costs, diagnostic tests and prescription or over-the-counter drug costs. These costs may be unaffordable for many patients, particularly in low-income countries [70].

Costs for treating cough are compounded by poor general understanding of chronic cough and RCC, and multiple unnecessary and often unhelpful investigations. In a community-based questionnaire survey about chronic cough (n=373), 91% of respondents had seen a general practitioner for their cough, while 61% had been referred to hospital specialists and only 40% had been successfully treated [30]. Furthermore, some investigations involving tools such as computerized tomography are unlikely to be informative about chronic cough, but the increased exposure to radiation increases the risk of AEs or cancers, particularly breast cancer, in a population of patients which predominantly comprises middle-aged women [2].

Diagnosis

The patient's journey to diagnosis of RCC is often protracted due to several limiting factors, further impacting the patient burden. Several respiratory societies have published guidelines for the diagnosis and management of cough, but they vary in the terminology and definitions of RCC [2, 3, 68, 71]. Generally, guidelines recommend a comprehensive clinical history [72], physical examination and focused diagnostic testing, followed by a stepwise empirical therapeutic regimen [2]. Initial investigations are designed to detect or exclude treatable causes or serious underlying disorders [2, 22, 25]. Once obvious causes for the cough have been excluded, clinicians can focus on understanding the impact of the cough on the patient and the options for management. Not surprisingly, treatment can be substantially delayed due to this prolonged diagnostic testing, with too many tests and physician visits and poor access to specialist cough centres. In one study of patients in tertiary care (n=136), the median duration of cough was 18 months, with the mean exceeding 4.5 years [56]. Patients complained about frequent physician visits and testing. This frustration can be further compounded if an explanation for the cause of their cough is not established. These findings highlight the need to consider patient satisfaction in patient management guidelines.

Assessing the impact of chronic cough in the clinic typically relies on the use of standard instruments for the assessment of other respiratory conditions such as asthma [2, 73]. However, these only consider cough as a symptom, and the possibility that the cough represents a distinct condition (CHS) is frequently overlooked, particularly in primary care [23]. These instruments also fail to capture some of the key issues impacting patients with unexplained cough, such as anger and frustration over the ineffectiveness of therapies and the perception of helplessness [56].

Patient report-based outcome (PRO) measures play a vital role in supporting assessment in clinical studies. They capture many issues that cannot be assessed effectively by objective measures as well as being cheap, readily available to all clinics, and convenient and easy to use for the patient, unlike objective measures of cough frequency. A number of PROs have been designed to capture different aspects of interest for the clinician (table 1 [74–98]).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Patient report-based outcome (PRO) to assess disease burden or treatment efficacy in adults with chronic cough

The simplest method for gauging cough severity is to ask the patient to score their cough out of 10. Patient diaries including the Cough Severity Diary [92] and more recently the Severity of Chronic Cough Diary [99] have been developed to capture the severity and impact of cough and potentially to define endpoints for clinical trials [99].

The HARQ was specifically developed to codify the symptom complex in chronic cough, assessing diagnostic components of the history [94]. It has since been used to assess patients with unexplained respiratory symptoms [18] and to support the diagnosis of chronic cough in patients participating in clinical trials [95, 96]. For, example, in COUGH-1 and COUGH-2, the HARQ score was elevated in 95% of over 2000 rigorously identified patients with chronic cough [4].

A number of health-related QoL (HRQoL) tools are available for assessing the impact of chronic cough on QoL (table 1). The most commonly used tools are the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) [74–76, 83–85] and the CQLQ [77, 86, 87], which have been used in numerous clinical trials [78–81, 88, 89] and are recommended by guidelines [2, 82]. HRQoL tools and PROs targeting symptoms, severity and impact of CHS will help to streamline the diagnostic pathway.

One way to improve the individualised management of cough is to move away from rigid definitions of airway disease and consider cough in terms of treatable traits [5, 21, 100]. It is important to diagnose the mechanism driving CHS in each patient and find validated methods to identify patients likely to respond. Predictors of response identified to date include eosinophilic airway inflammation as a predictor of corticosteroid response or elevated oesophageal acid as a marker of GORD-related cough and potential benefit of proton pump inhibitors [5, 100]. Higher baseline cough frequency may predict the response to P2X3 receptor antagonists [43], although further research is needed to identify predictors of the efficacy of these agents. Comprehensive understanding of the relationship between biological mechanisms (endotypes) and observed clinical features (phenotypes) is necessary if precision medicine is to become a reality for treatable traits [21, 100].

Current treatments for chronic cough

A range of treatments is currently recommended for managing chronic cough (table 2 [101–111]). The drugs with the strongest level of recommendation in European Respiratory Society (ERS) guidelines are neuromodulators including low-dose morphine [78], gabapentin [96, 80], pregabalin [81] and amitriptyline [112]. Identifying the correct treatment can be challenging, since it is often not clear which phenotype of cough should be treated and patients can vary greatly in responsiveness [2]. Moreover, many of the recommended treatments are used off-label, evidence for efficacy is limited or weak, and with the exception of non-pharmacological treatments [101, 102], they can produce AEs [103–105, 106–109]. The ERS guidelines thus recommend that treatments be given as short-term trials (generally 1–2 weeks for opiates and 2–4 weeks for other drugs) and either discontinued where there is no response or continued for a couple of months until the cough subsides [2]. While rational in the context of available treatments, this strategy can be lengthy.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2

Summary of current treatments recommended by the European Respiratory Society [2]

Treatments for RCC under investigation

The unsatisfactory efficacy of many current treatments is illustrated by a Europe-wide survey (n=1120), in which limited or no effectiveness was reported by 57% and 32% of subjects, respectively [36]. This reflects the fact that available treatments fail to target the underlying cough phenotypes [2]. New classes of treatment are, however, beginning to emerge.

The hypothesis that ATP is a neurotransmitter acting via specific purinergic receptors was first proposed by Geoffrey Burnstock in the 1970s [113, 114]. Subsequent research demonstrated that ATP is a co-transmitter in all peripheral and central nerves, leading to the investigation of purinergic receptor antagonists in a wide range of settings, including pain, overactive bladder, endometriosis and chronic cough [115–117]. Signalling by ATP occurs via purinergic P2 receptors, including ligand-gated ion channels (P2X) and G-protein-coupled receptors (P2Y) [118–120]. There are seven subunits of P2X receptor (P2X1–P2X7), which can form homotrimers (e.g. P2X3) and heterotrimers (e.g. P2X2/3) [120–122]. The P2X3 receptor has been shown to regulate afferent sensory nerve fibre ATP-mediated signalling in the vagus of animals and humans, provoking the cough reflex [7, 123–125]. It is still not clear whether CHS results from changes in P2X3 receptor function, increased receptor density or excessive release of ATP from damaged cells acting on the receptors, although recent studies have demonstrated increased airway sensory nerve density in chronic cough [12]. In reality, cough hypersensitivity is likely to be a combination of several pathophysiological mechanisms.

The development of new potential treatments for RCC, including the first-in-class P2X3 and P2X2/3 receptor antagonist gefapixant [41, 42, 126, 127], as well as more the recently developed eliapixant (BAY 1817080) [128], filapixant (BAY 1902607) [129], BLU-5937 [130], sivopixant (S-600918) [131, 132] and agents acting on other pathways, has provided new insights into the pathophysiology of RCC including the role of P2X3 receptors in humans [13, 133–135]. The clinical effects of these agents are in contrast to data from animal studies [136]; this observation demonstrates the marked differences in receptor distribution and function between species.

In randomized controlled trials, gefapixant was found to reduce cough reflex sensitivity, cough frequency and cough severity compared with placebo in patients with RCC [42, 43, 126, 137, 138]. It was also shown to diminish cough induced by ATP and distilled water, but not the protective cough reflex induced by either citric acid or capsaicin, providing evidence for the peripheral target engagement of ATP-activated P2X3 receptors in the pathophysiology of chronic cough [137]. However, though serious AEs were rare, taste AEs, mainly dysgeusia, were observed in 58–69% of patients receiving gefapixant 45 mg twice daily in phase III trials [138].

Gefapixant has marginal selectivity for P2X3 over P2X2/3 receptors and the observed taste disturbances are thought to reflect an off-target effect on the P2X2/3 heterotrimers located in the taste buds [2, 42, 130, 139]. Preclinical studies and early clinical trials suggest that compounds more selective for the P2X3 homotrimeric receptor over the P2X2/3 heterotrimer, such as eliapixant [128], BLU-5937 [130] and sivopixant [131, 132], reduce cough frequency (table 3) and severity (table 4), although substantial placebo effects complicate the interpretation of the results. The data also suggest a reduced risk of taste AEs compared with gefapixant, although the findings need to be treated with caution since no comparative studies between P2X3 receptor antagonists have been published, and comparisons across trials are complicated by differences in design, treatment duration, patient population and extent of placebo effects. Further investigations are therefore needed to confirm the potential of P2X3 receptor antagonists as a class for the treatment of patients with RCC.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 3

Clinical phase II and phase III trial results assessing effects of P2X3 receptor antagonists versus placebo on awake cough frequency in patients with refractory chronic cough (RCC)

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 4

Clinical phase II and phase III trial results assessing effects of P2X3 receptor antagonists versus placebo on cough severity (VAS) in patients with refractory chronic cough (RCC)

Apart from P2X3, other pathways/receptors appear to be involved in CHS, including neurokinin-1 receptor (NK-1) and the transient receptor potential vanilloid (TRPV) 1 and 4 receptors (figure 1). Alternative classes of drugs are in development to target these receptors [134], with mixed results. The archetypal TRPV1 agonist capsaicin is under investigation for the relief of cough and airway symptoms in patients with chronic idiopathic cough (NCT04125563). The NK-1 receptor antagonist orvepitant reduced cough frequency and severity in a phase 2 pilot trial [140]. Drugs acting as antagonists of the TRPV 1 and 4 receptors, TRPA 1 receptors and voltage-gated sodium channel subtype NaV1.7 have so far proven ineffective in phase II studies [1, 139, 141–144], as has the α7 neuronal nicotinic receptor agonist bradanicline [145].

In the search for an effective treatment for RCC, it is important to note that there are many gaps in current understanding of the condition, including its complex pathophysiology, epidemiology, assessment and management, and more particularly its disease burden [2]. It is clear, however, that RCC is heterogeneous in its central and peripheral nervous pathways, underlying diseases and clinical presentations [5, 146]. It is unlikely that a single treatment will be effective in all patients and combination therapy may be required in selected patients. To identify more effective antitussives, it will be important to establish effective research collaborations across multiple sites supported by common investigative and management approaches. With this end in mind, the NEw Understanding in the tReatment Of COUGH (NEUROCOUGH) Clinical Research Collaboration was recently set up [147]. Its key aims are to improve patient care by enhancing clinical expertise, to establish a registry of patients with chronic cough, to increase general understanding of chronic cough through public engagement and to enhance training and research capacity through encouraging young clinicians to enter the cough field.

Other issues that should be considered when evaluating treatments for RCC include placebo effects and regression to the mean. Some studies have suggested that up to 85% of the efficacy of cough medicines is due to a placebo effect [148]. This effect derives partly from “physiological” actions relating to the formulation or taste of the preparation, and possibly a specific effect of a sweet taste, independent of any active ingredient [148–150]. This is a substantial component in the efficacy of cough syrups, though it has little or no relevance to tablet or capsule formulations [148–150]. There is also the “psychological” placebo effect of the patient's belief in the efficacy of therapy, which may influence central cough pathways [149, 151], and natural recovery during the period of administration [148]. Regarding regression to the mean, patients with high activity of a variable disease tend to have values closer to the mean on reassessment even without treatment [152, 153]. When such individuals receive treatment or are recruited into clinical trials, this can lead to artificial inflation of efficacy results [152, 153]. Randomized, placebo-controlled trials can diminish this tendency, as all treatment groups should be equally subject to regression effects, and analysis of covariance can be used to adjust each patient's follow-up measurement based on their baseline values [152, 153].

Conclusions

CHS, the underlying entity of chronic cough and RCC, has been recognized as a distinct condition in recent years. Available evidence suggests a considerable disease burden of chronic cough, including physical and particularly psychological effects that significantly impair QoL. There is also an economic burden, both on patients and on society, from loss of productivity and ineffective use of healthcare resources. This is particularly true in patients with RCC, who by definition are refractory to current therapy, reflecting the fact that these therapies are only partially effective in treating the underlying pathology of cough. New treatments targeting underlying CHS are in advanced development, with the potential to reduce the enormous clinical and societal burden of RCC.

Acknowledgements

Medical writing services were provided by Richard Murphy PhD of Adelphi Communications Ltd, Macclesfield, UK, funded by Bayer AG (Berlin, Germany) in accordance with Good Publications Practice (GPP3) guidelines.

Footnotes

  • Provenance: Submitted article, peer reviewed.

  • Author contributions: A. Morice: review concept and design; draft review and editing; supervision; approval of final draft. P. Dicpinigaitis: review design; review and editing; approval of final draft. L. McGarvey: review design; draft review and editing; approval of final draft. S.S. Birring: review design; draft review and editing; approval of final draft.

  • Conflict of interest: A. Morice reports grants, personal fees, non-financial support and other from Bayer AG, grants, personal fees, non-financial support and other from Bayer US, during the conduct of the study; personal fees, non-financial support and other from Bellus Health, grants, personal fees, non-financial support and other from Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp, personal fees and non-financial support from AstraZeneca, grants, personal fees, non-financial support and other from Sanofi, personal fees and non-financial support from Chiesi Ltd, grants, personal fees and non-financial support from GlaxoSmithKline, personal fees and non-financial support from Boehringer Ingelheim, grants, personal fees and other from NeRRe Therapeutics, grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Respivant Sciences, Inc, grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Phillips Respironics, grants from Menio Therapeutics, consulting fees from Afferent, Pfizer and Proctor & Gamble, and grant support from Afferent, Infirst, and Proctor & Gamble outside the submitted work.

  • Conflict of interest: P. Dicpinigaitis reports personal fees from Merck, Bellus, Bayer, Shionogi, and Chiesi, outside the submitted work.

  • Conflict of interest: L. McGarvey reports grants and personal fees from Bayer AG, during the conduct of the study; grants and personal fees from Merck & Co., Inc., grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Chiesi, grants and personal fees from Bellus Health, non-financial support from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees from Applied Clinical Intelligence, personal fees from Shionogi Inc., personal fees from GlaxoSmithKline, personal fees from NeRRe Therapeutics, from Nocion Therapeutics, other from AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work.

  • Conflict of interest: S.S. Birring reports personal fees from Bayer, grants and personal fees from Merck, personal fees from Shionogi, personal fees from Bellus, personal fees from NeRRe, personal fees from Nocion, personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees from GSK, and consulting fees from Afferent, outside the submitted work.

  • Support statement: Bayer AG. Funding information for this article has been deposited with the Crossref Funder Registry.

  • Received May 27, 2021.
  • Accepted August 20, 2021.
  • Copyright ©The authors 2021
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This version is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0. For commercial reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions{at}ersnet.org

References

  1. ↵
    1. Roe NA,
    2. Lundy FT,
    3. Litherland GJ, et al.
    Therapeutic targets for the treatment of chronic cough. Curr Otorhinolaryngol Rep 2019; 7: 116–128. doi:10.1007/s40136-019-00239-9
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. Morice AH,
    2. Millqvist E,
    3. Bieksiene K, et al.
    ERS guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of chronic cough in adults and children. Eur Respir J 2020; 55: 1901136. doi:10.1183/13993003.01136-2019
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Gibson P,
    2. Wang G,
    3. McGarvey L, et al.
    Treatment of unexplained chronic cough: CHEST guideline and expert panel report. Chest 2016; 149: 27–44. doi:10.1378/chest.15-1496
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. ↵
    1. Morice AH
    . On chronic cough diagnosis, classification, and treatment. Lung 2021; 199: 433–434. doi: 10.1007/s00408-021-00452-8
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. Mazzone SB,
    2. Chung KF,
    3. McGarvey L
    . The heterogeneity of chronic cough: a case for endotypes of cough hypersensitivity. Lancet Respir Med 2018; 6: 636–646. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30150-4
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Mazzone SB,
    2. Undem BJ
    . Vagal afferent innervation of the airways in health and disease. Physiol Rev 2016; 96: 975–1024. doi:10.1152/physrev.00039.2015
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Bonvini SJ,
    2. Belvisi MG
    . Cough and airway disease: the role of ion channels. Pulm Pharmacol Ther 2017; 47: 21–28. doi:10.1016/j.pupt.2017.06.009
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Pacheco A
    . Chronic cough: from a complex dysfunction of the neurological circuit to the production of persistent cough. Thorax 2014; 69: 881–883. doi:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2014-205661
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Song WJ,
    2. Morice AH
    . Cough hypersensitivity syndrome: a few more steps forward. Allergy Asthma Immunol Res 2017; 9: 394–402. doi:10.4168/aair.2017.9.5.394
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Morice AH,
    2. Millqvist E,
    3. Belvisi MG, et al.
    Expert opinion on the cough hypersensitivity syndrome in respiratory medicine. Eur Respir J 2014; 44: 1132–1148. doi:10.1183/09031936.00218613
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Canning BJ,
    2. Chang AB,
    3. Bolser DC, et al.
    Anatomy and neurophysiology of cough: CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel report. Chest 2014; 146: 1633–1648. doi:10.1378/chest.14-1481
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Shapiro CO,
    2. Proskocil BJ,
    3. Oppegard LJ, et al.
    Airway sensory nerve density is increased in chronic cough. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2020; 203: 348–355. doi:10.1164/rccm.201912-2347OC
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. Mazzone SB,
    2. McGarvey L
    . Mechanisms and rationale for targeted therapies in refractory and unexplained chronic cough. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2021; 109: 619–636. doi:10.1002/cpt.2003
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. Ryan NM,
    2. Vertigan AE,
    3. Birring SS
    . An update and systematic review on drug therapies for the treatment of refractory chronic cough. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2018; 19: 687–711. doi:10.1080/14656566.2018.1462795
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Song WJ,
    2. Chung KF
    . Exploring the clinical relevance of cough hypersensitivity syndrome. Expert Rev Respir Med 2020; 14: 275–284. doi:10.1080/17476348.2020.1713102
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. Chung KF,
    2. McGarvey L,
    3. Mazzone SB
    . Chronic cough as a neuropathic disorder. Lancet Respir Med 2013; 1: 414–422. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(13)70043-2
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. Morice AH
    . Chronic cough hypersensitivity syndrome. Cough 2013; 9: 14. doi:10.1186/1745-9974-9-14
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Burke JM,
    2. Jackson W,
    3. Morice AH
    . The role of high resolution oesophageal manometry in occult respiratory symptoms. Respir Med 2018; 138: 47–49. doi:10.1016/j.rmed.2018.03.027
    OpenUrl
  18. ↵
    1. Patterson N,
    2. Mainie I,
    3. Rafferty G, et al.
    Nonacid reflux episodes reaching the pharynx are important factors associated with cough. J Clin Gastroenterol 2009; 43: 414–419. doi:10.1097/MCG.0b013e31818859a3
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Morice AH,
    2. Lowry R,
    3. Brown MJ, et al.
    Angiotensin-converting enzyme and the cough reflex. Lancet 1987; 2: 1116–1118. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(87)91547-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Agusti A,
    2. Bel E,
    3. Thomas M, et al.
    Treatable traits: toward precision medicine of chronic airway diseases. Eur Respir J 2016; 47: 410–419. doi:10.1183/13993003.01359-2015
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Kaplan AG
    . Chronic cough in adults: make the diagnosis and make a difference. Pulm Ther 2019; 5: 11–21. doi:10.1007/s41030-019-0089-7
    OpenUrl
  22. ↵
    1. Holden SE,
    2. Morice A,
    3. Birring SS, et al.
    Cough presentation in primary care and the identification of chronic cough: a need for diagnostic clarity? Curr Med Res Opin 2020; 36: 139–150. doi:10.1080/03007995.2019.1673716
    OpenUrl
  23. ↵
    1. Song WJ,
    2. Chang YS,
    3. Faruqi S, et al.
    The global epidemiology of chronic cough in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Respir J 2015; 45: 1479–1481. doi:10.1183/09031936.00218714
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Gibson PG,
    2. Vertigan AE
    . Management of chronic refractory cough. BMJ 2015; 351: h5590. doi:10.1136/bmj.h5590
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. Haque RA,
    2. Usmani OS,
    3. Barnes PJ
    . Chronic idiopathic cough: a discrete clinical entity? Chest 2005; 127: 1710–1713. doi:10.1378/chest.127.5.1710
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Chronic Cough Registry
    1. Morice AH,
    2. Jakes AD,
    3. Faruqi S, et al.
    Chronic Cough Registry. A worldwide survey of chronic cough: a manifestation of enhanced somatosensory response. Eur Respir J 2014; 44: 1149–1155. doi:10.1183/09031936.00217813
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Long L,
    2. Lai K
    . Characteristics of Chinese chronic cough patients. Pulm Pharmacol Ther 2019; 57: 101811. doi:10.1016/j.pupt.2019.101811
    OpenUrl
  28. ↵
    1. Lätti AM,
    2. Pekkanen J,
    3. Koskela HO
    . Defining the risk factors for acute, subacute and chronic cough: a cross-sectional study in a Finnish adult employee population. BMJ Open 2018; 8: e022950. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022950
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Everett CF,
    2. Kastelik JA,
    3. Thompson RH, et al.
    Chronic persistent cough in the community: a questionnaire survey. Cough 2007; 3: 5. doi:10.1186/1745-9974-3-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Arinze JT,
    2. Verhamme KMC,
    3. Luik AI, et al.
    The interrelatedness of chronic cough and chronic pain. Eur Respir J 2020; 57: 2002651. doi:10.1183/13993003.02651-2020
    OpenUrl
  31. ↵
    1. Varechova S,
    2. Plevkova J,
    3. Hanacek J, et al.
    Role of gender and pubertal stage on cough sensitivity in childhood and adolescence. J Physiol Pharmacol 2008; 59: Suppl. 6, 719–726.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Kang MG,
    2. Song WJ,
    3. Kim HJ, et al.
    Point prevalence and epidemiological characteristics of chronic cough in the general adult population: The Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2010–2012. Medicine 2017; 96: e6486. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000006486
    OpenUrlPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Lai K,
    2. Long L,
    3. Yi F, et al.
    Age and sex distribution of Chinese chronic cough patients and their relationship with capsaicin cough sensitivity. Allergy Asthma Immunol Res 2019; 11: 871–884. doi:10.4168/aair.2019.11.6.871
    OpenUrl
  34. ↵
    1. Kang SY,
    2. Song WJ,
    3. Won HK, et al.
    Cough persistence in adults with chronic cough: a 4-year retrospective cohort study. Allergol Int 2020; 69: 588–593. doi:10.1016/j.alit.2020.03.012
    OpenUrl
  35. ↵
    1. Chamberlain SA,
    2. Garrod R,
    3. Douiri A, et al.
    The impact of chronic cough: a cross-sectional European survey. Lung 2015; 193: 401–408. doi:10.1007/s00408-015-9701-2
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Koskela HO,
    2. Lätti AM,
    3. Pekkanen J
    . The impacts of cough: a cross-sectional study in a Finnish adult employee population. ERJ Open Res 2018; 4: 00113-02018. doi:10.1183/23120541.00113-2018
    OpenUrl
  37. ↵
    1. Lätti AM,
    2. Pekkanen J,
    3. Koskela HO
    . Persistence of chronic cough in a community-based population. ERJ Open Res 2020; 6: 00229–02019. doi:10.1183/23120541.00229-2019
    OpenUrl
  38. ↵
    1. Yousaf N,
    2. Montinero W,
    3. Birring SS, et al.
    The long term outcome of patients with unexplained chronic cough. Respir Med 2013; 107: 408–412. doi:10.1016/j.rmed.2012.11.018
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Birring SS,
    2. Fleming T,
    3. Matos S, et al.
    The Leicester Cough Monitor: preliminary validation of an automated cough detection system in chronic cough. Eur Respir J 2008; 31: 1013–1018. doi:10.1183/09031936.00057407
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. ↵
    1. McGuinness K,
    2. Holt K,
    3. Dockry R, et al.
    P159 validation of the VitaloJAK™ 24 h ambulatory cough monitor. Thorax 2012; 67: A131–A131. doi:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2012-202678.220
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. ↵
    1. Abdulqawi R,
    2. Dockry R,
    3. Holt K, et al.
    P2X3 receptor antagonist (AF-219) in refractory chronic cough: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 study. Lancet 2015; 385: 1198–1205. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61255-1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Smith JA,
    2. Kitt MM,
    3. Butera P, et al.
    Gefapixant in two randomised dose-escalation studies in chronic cough. Eur Respir J 2020; 55: 1901615. doi:10.1183/13993003.01615-2019
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. ↵
    1. Morice AH,
    2. Birring SS,
    3. Smith JA, et al.
    Characterization of patients with refractory or unexplained chronic cough participating in a Phase 2 clinical trial of the P2X3-receptor antagonist gefapixant. Lung 2021; 199: 121–129. doi:10.1007/s00408-021-00437-7
    OpenUrl
  44. ↵
    1. French CL,
    2. Irwin RS,
    3. Curley FJ, et al.
    Impact of chronic cough on quality of life. Arch Intern Med 1998; 158: 1657–1661. doi:10.1001/archinte.158.15.1657
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. Young EC,
    2. Smith JA
    . Quality of life in patients with chronic cough. Ther Adv Respir Dis 2010; 4: 49–55. doi:10.1177/1753465809358249
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. Dicpinigaitis PV
    . Prevalence of stress urinary incontinence in women presenting for evaluation of chronic cough. ERJ Open Research 2021; 7: 00012-2021. doi: 10.1183/23120541.00012-2021
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. ↵
    1. Zoglmann R,
    2. Nguyen T,
    3. Engberts M, et al.
    Do patients with stress incontinence cough or do cough patients suffer from urinary incontinence? Eur Respir J 2015; 46: PA713. doi: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2015.PA713
    OpenUrl
  48. ↵
    1. Dicpinigaitis PV,
    2. Lim L,
    3. Farmakidis C
    . Cough syncope. Respir Med 2014; 108: 244–251. doi:10.1016/j.rmed.2013.10.020
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    1. Rehal SS,
    2. Aijaz F
    . Cough syncope whilst driving – An unusual yet serious presentation. Respir Med Case Rep 2020; 31: 101155.
    OpenUrl
  50. ↵
    1. Lee SE,
    2. Lee JH,
    3. Kim HJ, et al.
    Inhaled corticosteroids and placebo treatment effects in adult patients with cough: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Allergy Asthma Immunol Res 2019; 11: 856–870. doi:10.4168/aair.2019.11.6.856
    OpenUrl
  51. ↵
    1. Sullivan PW,
    2. Ghushchyan VH,
    3. Globe G, et al.
    Oral corticosteroid exposure and adverse effects in asthmatic patients. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2018; 141: 110–116.e117. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2017.04.009
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. ↵
    1. Colak Y,
    2. Nordestgaard BG,
    3. Laursen LC, et al.
    Risk factors for chronic cough among 14,669 individuals from the general population. Chest 2017; 152: 563–573. doi:10.1016/j.chest.2017.05.038
    OpenUrlPubMed
  53. ↵
    1. Birring SS,
    2. Morgan AJ,
    3. Prudon B, et al.
    Respiratory symptoms in patients with treated hypothyroidism and inflammatory bowel disease. Thorax 2003; 58: 533–536. doi:10.1136/thorax.58.6.533
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  54. ↵
    1. Song WJ,
    2. Morice AH,
    3. Kim MH, et al.
    Cough in the elderly population: relationships with multiple comorbidity. PLoS One 2013; 8: e78081. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078081
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. ↵
    1. Kuzniar TJ,
    2. Morgenthaler TI,
    3. Afessa B, et al.
    Chronic cough from the patient's perspective. Mayo Clin Proc 2007; 82: 56–60. doi:10.1016/S0025-6196(11)60967-1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. ↵
    1. Hulme K,
    2. Deary V,
    3. Dogan S, et al.
    Psychological profile of individuals presenting with chronic cough. ERJ Open Res 2017; 3: 00099-2016. doi:10.1183/23120541.00099-2016
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Dicpinigaitis PV,
    2. Tso R,
    3. Banauch G
    . Prevalence of depressive symptoms among patients with chronic cough. Chest 2006; 130: 1839–1843. doi:10.1378/chest.130.6.1839
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  57. ↵
    1. McGarvey LP,
    2. Carton C,
    3. Gamble LA, et al.
    Prevalence of psychomorbidity among patients with chronic cough. Cough 2006; 2: 4. doi:10.1186/1745-9974-2-4
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. ↵
    1. Polley L,
    2. Yaman N,
    3. Heaney L, et al.
    Impact of cough across different chronic respiratory diseases: comparison of two cough-specific health-related quality of life questionnaires. Chest 2008; 134: 295–302. doi:10.1378/chest.07-0141
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  59. ↵
    1. Won HK,
    2. Lee JH,
    3. An J, et al.
    Impact of chronic cough on health-related quality of life in the Korean adult general population: the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2010–2016. Allergy Asthma Immunol Res 2020; 12: 964–979. doi:10.4168/aair.2020.12.6.964
    OpenUrl
  60. ↵
    1. Morice AH,
    2. McGarvey L
    . Clinical cough II: therapeutic treatments and management of chronic cough. Handb Exp Pharmacol 2009; 187: 277–295. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-79842-2_14
    OpenUrl
  61. ↵
    1. Matsumoto H,
    2. Tabuena RP,
    3. Niimi A, et al.
    Cough triggers and their pathophysiology in patients with prolonged or chronic cough. Allergol Int 2012; 61: 123–132. doi:10.2332/allergolint.10-OA-0295
    OpenUrlPubMed
  62. ↵
    1. Johansson H,
    2. Johannessen A,
    3. Holm M, et al.
    Prevalence, progression and impact of chronic cough on employment in Northern Europe. Eur Respir J 2021; 57: 2003344. doi:10.1183/13993003.03344-2020
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  63. ↵
    1. French CT,
    2. Fletcher KE,
    3. Irwin RS
    . Gender differences in health-related quality of life in patients complaining of chronic cough. Chest 2004; 125: 482–488. doi:10.1378/chest.125.2.482
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  64. ↵
    1. Bartley EJ,
    2. Fillingim RB
    . Sex differences in pain: a brief review of clinical and experimental findings. Br J Anaesth 2013; 111: 52–58. doi:10.1093/bja/aet127
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  65. ↵
    1. Morice AH,
    2. Millqvist E,
    3. Belvisi MG, et al.
    Cough hypersensitivity syndrome: clinical measurement is the key to progress. Eur Respir J 2015; 45: 1509–1510. doi:10.1183/09031936.00014215
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  66. ↵
    1. Morice AH,
    2. McGarvey L,
    3. Pavord I
    , British Thoracic Society Cough Guideline Group. Recommendations for the management of cough in adults. Thorax 2006; 61 i1–i24. doi:10.1136/thx.2006.065144
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  67. ↵
    1. Irwin RS,
    2. French CT,
    3. Lewis SZ, et al.
    Overview of the management of cough: CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report. Chest 2014; 146: 885–889. doi:10.1378/chest.14-1485
    OpenUrl
  68. ↵
    1. Sichali JM,
    2. Khan JAK,
    3. Gama EM, et al.
    Direct costs of illness of patients with chronic cough in rural Malawi–Experiences from Dowa and Ntchisi districts. PLoS One 2019; 14: e0225712. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0225712
    OpenUrl
  69. ↵
    1. Lai K,
    2. Shen H,
    3. Zhou X, et al.
    Clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis and management of cough–Chinese Thoracic Society (CTS) Asthma Consortium. J Thorac Dis 2018; 10: 6314–6351. doi:10.21037/jtd.2018.09.153
    OpenUrl
  70. ↵
    1. Morice AH
    . Cough. www.issc.info/cough.html Date last accessed: 6 August 2021.
  71. ↵
    1. Natarajan S,
    2. Free RC,
    3. Bradding P, et al.
    The relationship between the Leicester Cough Questionnaire, eosinophilic airway inflammation and asthma patient related outcomes in severe adult asthma. Respir Res 2017; 18: 44. doi:10.1186/s12931-017-0520-2
    OpenUrl
  72. ↵
    1. Birring SS,
    2. Prudon B,
    3. Carr AJ, et al.
    Development of a symptom specific health status measure for patients with chronic cough: Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ). Thorax 2003; 58: 339–343. doi:10.1136/thorax.58.4.339
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Birring SS,
    2. Muccino DR,
    3. Bacci E, et al.
    Defining minimal clinically important differences (MCID) on the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ): analyses of a phase 2 randomized controlled trial in chronic cough. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2019; 143: AB52. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2018.12.158
    OpenUrl
  73. ↵
    1. Yousaf N,
    2. Lee KK,
    3. Jayaraman B, et al.
    The assessment of quality of life in acute cough with the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ-acute). Cough 2011; 7: 4. doi:10.1186/1745-9974-7-4
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  74. ↵
    1. Spinou A,
    2. Birring SS
    . An update on measurement and monitoring of cough: what are the important study endpoints? J Thorac Dis 2014; 6: S728–S734.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  75. ↵
    1. Morice AH,
    2. Menon MS,
    3. Mulrennan SA, et al.
    Opiate therapy in chronic cough. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2007; 175: 312–315. doi:10.1164/rccm.200607-892OC
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Yousaf N,
    2. Monteiro W,
    3. Parker D, et al.
    Long-term low-dose erythromycin in patients with unexplained chronic cough: a double-blind placebo controlled trial. Thorax 2010; 65: 1107–1110. doi:10.1136/thx.2010.142711
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  76. ↵
    1. Ryan NM,
    2. Birring SS,
    3. Gibson PG
    . Gabapentin for refractory chronic cough: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2012; 380: 1583–1589. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60776-4
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  77. ↵
    1. Vertigan AE,
    2. Kapela SL,
    3. Ryan NM, et al.
    Pregabalin and speech pathology combination therapy for refractory chronic cough: a randomized controlled trial. Chest 2016; 149: 639–648. doi:10.1378/chest.15-1271
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  78. ↵
    1. Boulet LP,
    2. Coeytaux RR,
    3. McCrory DC, et al.
    Tools for assessing outcomes in studies of chronic cough: CHEST guideline and expert panel report. Chest 2015; 147: 804–814. doi:10.1378/chest.14-2506
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  79. ↵
    1. Pornsuriyasak P,
    2. Kawamatawong T,
    3. Rattanasiri S, et al.
    Validity and reliability of the Thai version of the Leicester Cough Questionnaire in chronic cough. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol 2016; 34: 212–216.
    OpenUrl
    1. Gao YH,
    2. Guan WJ,
    3. Xu G, et al.
    Validation of the Mandarin Chinese version of the Leicester Cough Questionnaire in bronchiectasis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2014; 18: 1431–1437. doi:10.5588/ijtld.14.0195
    OpenUrl
  80. ↵
    1. Kwon JW,
    2. Moon JY,
    3. Kim SH, et al.
    Reliability and validity of a Korean version of the Leicester Cough Questionnaire. Allergy Asthma Immunol Res 2015; 7: 230–233. doi:10.4168/aair.2015.7.3.230
    OpenUrlPubMed
  81. ↵
    1. French CT,
    2. Irwin RS,
    3. Fletcher KE, et al.
    Evaluation of a cough-specific quality-of-life questionnaire. Chest 2002; 121: 1123–1131. doi:10.1378/chest.121.4.1123
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  82. ↵
    1. Fletcher KE,
    2. French CT,
    3. Irwin RS, et al.
    A prospective global measure, the Punum Ladder, provides more valid assessments of quality of life than a retrospective transition measure. J Clin Epidemiol 2010; 63: 1123–1131. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.09.015
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  83. ↵
    1. Field SK,
    2. Conley DP,
    3. Thawer AM, et al.
    Effect of the management of patients with chronic cough by pulmonologists and certified respiratory educators on quality of life: a randomized trial. Chest 2009; 136: 1021–1028. doi:10.1378/chest.08-2399
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  84. ↵
    1. Shaheen NJ,
    2. Crockett SD,
    3. Bright SD, et al.
    Randomised clinical trial: high-dose acid suppression for chronic cough – a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2011; 33: 225–234. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2010.04511.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Hsu JY,
    2. Stone RA,
    3. Logan-Sinclair RB, et al.
    Coughing frequency in patients with persistent cough: assessment using a 24 h ambulatory recorder. Eur Respir J 1994; 7: 1246–1253. doi:10.1183/09031936.94.07071246
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Kwon JW,
    2. Moon JY,
    3. Kim SH, et al.
    Korean version of the Cough Symptom Score: clinical utility and validity for chronic cough. Korean J Intern Med 2017; 32: 910–915. doi:10.3904/kjim.2016.132
    OpenUrl
  85. ↵
    1. Vernon M,
    2. Kline Leidy N,
    3. Nacson A, et al.
    Measuring cough severity: development and pilot testing of a new seven-item cough severity patient-reported outcome measure. Ther Adv Respir Dis 2010; 4: 199–208. doi:10.1177/1753465810372526
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Martin Nguyen A,
    2. Bacci E,
    3. Dicpinigaitis P, et al.
    Quantitative measurement properties and score interpretation of the Cough Severity Diary in patients with chronic cough. Ther Adv Respir Dis 2020; 14: 1753466620915155. doi:10.1177/1753466620915155
    OpenUrl
  86. ↵
    1. Morice AH,
    2. Faruqi S,
    3. Wright CE, et al.
    Cough hypersensitivity syndrome: a distinct clinical entity. Lung 2011; 189: 73–79. doi:10.1007/s00408-010-9272-1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  87. ↵
    1. Morice A,
    2. Birring S,
    3. Dicpinigaitis P, et al.
    Cough triggers and symptoms among patients with refractory or unexplained chronic cough in two phase 3 trials of the P2X3 receptor antagonist gefapixant (COUGH-1 and COUGH-2). J Allergy Clin Immunol 2021; 147: AB61. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2020.12.242
    OpenUrl
  88. ↵
    1. Zhang M,
    2. Chen Q,
    3. Dong R, et al.
    Prediction of therapeutic efficacy of gabapentin by Hull Airway Reflux Questionnaire in chronic refractory cough. Ther Adv Chronic Dis 2020; 11: 2040622320982463.
    OpenUrl
    1. Huang Y,
    2. Yu L,
    3. Xu XH, et al.
    Validation of the Chinese version of Hull Airway Reflux Questionnaire and its application in the evaluation of chronic cough. Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi 2016; 39: 355–361.
    OpenUrl
    1. Johansson EL,
    2. Ternesten-Hasséus E
    . Reliability and validity of the Swedish version of the Hull Airway Reflux Questionnaire (HARQ-S). Lung 2016; 194: 997–1005. doi:10.1007/s00408-016-9937-5
    OpenUrl
  89. ↵
    1. De La Orden Abad M,
    2. Haberland C,
    3. Filonenko A, et al.
    The Severity of Chronic Cough Diary (SCCD): development of a novel patient-reported outcomes instrument. ISPOR Europe 2020; 23: Suppl. 2, S731.
    OpenUrl
  90. ↵
    1. Shrimanker R,
    2. Choo XN,
    3. Pavord ID
    . A new approach to the classification and management of airways diseases: identification of treatable traits. Clin Sci (Lond) 2017; 131: 1027–1043. doi:10.1042/CS20160028
    OpenUrl
  91. ↵
    1. Vertigan AE,
    2. Theodoros DG,
    3. Gibson PG, et al.
    Efficacy of speech pathology management for chronic cough: a randomised placebo controlled trial of treatment efficacy. Thorax 2006; 61: 1065–1069. doi:10.1136/thx.2006.064337
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  92. ↵
    1. Chamberlain S,
    2. Garrod R,
    3. Birring SS
    . Cough suppression therapy: does it work? Pulm Pharmacol Ther 2013; 26: 524–527. doi:10.1016/j.pupt.2013.03.012
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  93. ↵
    1. Korsgaard J,
    2. Ledet M
    . Potential side effects in patients treated with inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting β2-agonists. Respir Med 2009; 103: 566–573. doi:10.1016/j.rmed.2008.10.028
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Wang K,
    2. Birring SS,
    3. Taylor K, et al.
    Montelukast for postinfectious cough in adults: a double-blind randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Respir Med 2014; 2: 35–43. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(13)70245-5
    OpenUrl
  94. ↵
    1. Calapai G,
    2. Casciaro M,
    3. Miroddi M, et al.
    Montelukast-induced adverse drug reactions: a review of case reports in the literature. Pharmacology 2014; 94: 60–70. doi:10.1159/000366164
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  95. ↵
    1. Calverley P,
    2. Pauwels R,
    3. Vestbo J, et al.
    Combined salmeterol and fluticasone in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2003; 361: 449–456. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12459-2
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Suissa S,
    2. Patenaude V,
    3. Lapi F, et al.
    Inhaled corticosteroids in COPD and the risk of serious pneumonia. Thorax 2013; 68: 1029–1036. doi:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2012-202872
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Berkhof FF,
    2. Doornewaard-ten Hertog NE,
    3. Uil SM, et al.
    Azithromycin and cough-specific health status in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and chronic cough: a randomised controlled trial. Respir Res 2013; 14: 125. doi:10.1186/1465-9921-14-125
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  96. ↵
    1. Hansen MP,
    2. Scott AM,
    3. McCullough A, et al.
    Adverse events in people taking macrolide antibiotics versus placebo for any indication. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 1: CD011825. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD011825.pub2
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Belvisi MG,
    2. Geppetti P
    . Cough 7: current and future drugs for the treatment of chronic cough. Thorax 2004; 59: 438–440. doi:10.1136/thx.2003.013490
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  97. ↵
    1. Song SA,
    2. Choksawad K,
    3. Franco RA, Jr
    . The effectiveness of nortriptyline and tolerability of side effects in neurogenic cough patients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2021; 130: 781–787. doi:10.1177/0003489420970234
    OpenUrl
  98. ↵
    1. Jeyakumar A,
    2. Brickman TM,
    3. Haben M
    . Effectiveness of amitriptyline versus cough suppressants in the treatment of chronic cough resulting from postviral vagal neuropathy. Laryngoscope 2006; 116: 2108–2112. doi:10.1097/01.mlg.0000244377.60334.e3
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  99. ↵
    1. Burnstock G,
    2. Campbell G,
    3. Satchell D, et al.
    Evidence that adenosine triphosphate or a related nucleotide is the transmitter substance released by non-adrenergic inhibitory nerves in the gut. Br J Pharmacol 1970; 40: 668–688. doi:10.1111/j.1476-5381.1970.tb10646.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  100. ↵
    1. Burnstock G,
    2. Dumsday B,
    3. Smythe A
    . Atropine resistant excitation of the urinary bladder: the possibility of transmission via nerves releasing a purine nucleotide. Br J Pharmacol 1972; 44: 451–461. doi:10.1111/j.1476-5381.1972.tb07283.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  101. ↵
    1. Burnstock G,
    2. Brouns I,
    3. Adriaensen D, et al.
    Purinergic signaling in the airways. Pharmacol Rev 2012; 64: 834–868. doi: 10.1124/pr.111.005389
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Burnstock G
    . Therapeutic potential of purinergic signalling for diseases of the urinary tract. BJU Int 2011; 107: 192–204. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09926.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  102. ↵
    1. Ding S,
    2. Zhu L,
    3. Tian Y, et al.
    P2X3 receptor involvement in endometriosis pain via ERK signaling pathway. PLoS One 2017; 12: e0184647.
    OpenUrl
  103. ↵
    1. Burnstock G,
    2. Kennedy C
    . Is there a basis for distinguishing two types of P2-purinoceptor? Gen Pharmacol 1985; 16: 433–440. doi:10.1016/0306-3623(85)90001-1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Burnstock G
    . Purinergic signalling: from discovery to current developments. Exp Physiol 2014; 99: 16–34. doi:10.1113/expphysiol.2013.071951
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  104. ↵
    1. Burnstock G
    . Purine and purinergic receptors. Brain Neurosci Adv 2018; 2: 2398212818817494. doi:10.1177/2398212818817494
    OpenUrl
    1. Abbracchio MP,
    2. Burnstock G
    . Purinoceptors: are there families of P2X and P2Y purinoceptors? Pharmacol Ther 1994; 64: 445–475. doi:10.1016/0163-7258(94)00048-4
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  105. ↵
    1. Fredholm BB,
    2. Abbracchio MP,
    3. Burnstock G, et al.
    Nomenclature and classification of purinoceptors. Pharmacol Rev 1994; 46: 143–156.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  106. ↵
    1. Bonvini SJ,
    2. Birrell MA,
    3. Grace MS, et al.
    Transient receptor potential cation channel, subfamily V, member 4 and airway sensory afferent activation: role of adenosine triphosphate. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2016; 138: 249–261.e212. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2015.10.044
    OpenUrl
    1. Kamei J,
    2. Takahashi Y
    . Involvement of ionotropic purinergic receptors in the histamine-induced enhancement of the cough reflex sensitivity in guinea pigs. Eur J Pharmacol 2006; 547: 160–164. doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2006.07.034
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  107. ↵
    1. Kamei J,
    2. Takahashi Y,
    3. Yoshikawa Y, et al.
    Involvement of P2X receptor subtypes in ATP-induced enhancement of the cough reflex sensitivity. Eur J Pharmacol 2005; 528: 158–161. doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2005.10.030
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  108. ↵
    1. Smith JA,
    2. Kitt MM,
    3. Morice AH, et al.
    Gefapixant, a P2X3 receptor antagonist, for the treatment of refractory or unexplained chronic cough: a randomised, double-blind, controlled, parallel-group, phase 2b trial. Lancet Respir Med 2020; 8: 775–785. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(19)30471-0
    OpenUrl
  109. ↵
    1. Muccino D,
    2. Green S
    . Update on the clinical development of gefapixant, a P2X3 receptor antagonist for the treatment of refractory chronic cough. Pulm Pharmacol Ther 2019; 56: 75–78. doi:10.1016/j.pupt.2019.03.006
    OpenUrl
  110. ↵
    1. Morice A,
    2. Smith J,
    3. McGarvey L, et al.
    Eliapixant (BAY 1817080), a P2X3 receptor antagonist, in refractory chronic cough: a randomised, placebo-controlled, crossover phase 2a study. Eur Respir J 2021; 52: 2004240. doi:10.1183/13993003.04240-2020
    OpenUrl
  111. ↵
    1. Friedrich C,
    2. Franke K,
    3. Birring SS, et al.
    Safety and efficacy of P2X3 antagonist BAY 1902607 in refractory chronic cough. Eur Respir J 2020; 56: Suppl. 64, 4566. doi: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2020.4566
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  112. ↵
    1. Garceau D,
    2. Chauret N
    BLU-5937: A selective P2X3 antagonist with potent anti-tussive effect and no taste alteration. Pulm Pharmacol Ther 2019; 56: 56–62. doi:10.1016/j.pupt.2019.03.007
    OpenUrl
  113. ↵
    1. Niimi A,
    2. Ishihara H,
    3. Hida H, et al.
    Late breaking abstract – Phase 2a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study of a novel P2X3 receptor antagonist S-600918 in patients with refractory chronic cough. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Suppl. 63, RCT452. doi: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.RCT452
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  114. ↵
    1. Niimi A,
    2. Ishihara H,
    3. Hida H, et al.
    Phase 2a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study of a P2X3 receptor antagonist S-600918: effects on health-related quality of life in patients with refractory chronic cough. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2020; 201: A7647.
    OpenUrl
  115. ↵
    1. Dicpinigaitis PV,
    2. McGarvey LP,
    3. Canning BJ
    . P2X3-receptor antagonists as potential antitussives: summary of current clinical trials in chronic cough. Lung 2020; 198: 609–616. doi:10.1007/s00408-020-00377-8
    OpenUrl
  116. ↵
    1. Smith JA,
    2. Badri H
    . Cough: new pharmacology. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2019; 7: 1731–1738. doi:10.1016/j.jaip.2019.04.027
    OpenUrl
  117. ↵
    1. Singh N,
    2. Driessen AK,
    3. McGovern AE, et al.
    Peripheral and central mechanisms of cough hypersensitivity. J Thorac Dis 2020; 12: 5179–5193. doi:10.21037/jtd-2020-icc-007
    OpenUrl
  118. ↵
    1. Kwong K,
    2. Kollarik M,
    3. Nassenstein C, et al.
    P2X2 receptors differentiate placodal vs. neural crest C-fiber phenotypes innervating guinea pig lungs and esophagus. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2008; 295: L858–L865. doi:10.1152/ajplung.90360.2008
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  119. ↵
    1. Morice AH,
    2. Kitt MM,
    3. Ford AP, et al.
    The effect of gefapixant, a P2X3 antagonist, on cough reflex sensitivity: a randomised placebo-controlled study. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: 1900439. doi:10.1183/13993003.00439-2019
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  120. ↵
    1. McGarvey L,
    2. Birring S,
    3. Morice A, et al.
    Two phase 3 randomized clinical trials of gefapixant, a P2X3 receptor antagonist, in refractory or unexplained chronic cough (COUGH-1 and COUGH-2). Eur Respir J 2020; 56: Suppl. 64, 3800.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  121. ↵
    1. Morice A
    . ATP cough challenge. Pulm Pharmacol Ther 2019; 58: 101835. doi:10.1016/j.pupt.2019.101835
    OpenUrl
  122. ↵
    1. Smith J,
    2. Allman D,
    3. Badri H, et al.
    The neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist orvepitant is a novel antitussive therapy for chronic refractory cough: results from a phase 2 pilot study (VOLCANO-1). Chest 2020; 157: 111–118. doi:10.1016/j.chest.2019.08.001
    OpenUrl
  123. ↵
    1. Belvisi MG,
    2. Birrell MA,
    3. Wortley MA, et al.
    N-D0501, a novel transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 antagonist, does not reduce cough in patients with refractory cough. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2017; 196: 1255–1263. doi:10.1164/rccm.201704-0769OC
    OpenUrl
    1. Morice AH
    . TRPA1 receptors in chronic cough. Pulm Pharmacol Ther 2017; 47: 42–44. doi:10.1016/j.pupt.2017.05.004
    OpenUrl
    1. Khalid S,
    2. Murdoch R,
    3. Newlands A, et al.
    Transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1) antagonism in patients with refractory chronic cough: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2014; 134: 56–62. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2014.01.038
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  124. ↵
    1. Smith JA,
    2. McGarvey LPA,
    3. Badri H, et al.
    Effects of a novel sodium channel blocker, GSK2339345, in patients with refractory chronic cough. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 2017; 55: 712–719. doi:10.5414/CP202804
    OpenUrl
  125. ↵
    1. Kanemitsu Y,
    2. Smith JA,
    3. Butera P, et al.
    The efficacy of bradanicline in refractory chronic cough. Eur Respir J 2020; 56: 4564. doi:10.1183/13993003.congress-2020.4564
  126. ↵
    1. Mazzone SB
    . Chronic cough: a disorder of response inhibition? Eur Respir J 2019; 53: 1900254. doi:10.1183/13993003.00254-2019
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  127. ↵
    1. McGarvey L,
    2. Dupont L,
    3. Birring SS, et al.
    New understanding in the treatment of cough (NEUROCOUGH) ERS Clinical Research Collaboration: improving care and treatment for patients with cough. Eur Respir J 2019; 53: 1900787. doi:10.1183/13993003.00787-2019
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  128. ↵
    1. Eccles R
    . The powerful placebo in cough studies? Pulm Pharmacol Ther 2002; 15: 303–308. doi:10.1006/pupt.2002.0364
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  129. ↵
    1. Eccles R
    . The powerful placebo effect in cough: relevance to treatment and clinical trials. Lung 2020; 198: 13–21. doi:10.1007/s00408-019-00305-5
    OpenUrl
  130. ↵
    1. Eccles R
    . What is the role of over 100 excipients in over the counter (OTC) cough medicines? Lung 2020; 198: 727–734. doi:10.1007/s00408-020-00390-x
    OpenUrl
  131. ↵
    1. Leech J,
    2. Mazzone SB,
    3. Farrell MJ
    . Brain activity associated with placebo suppression of the urge-to-cough in humans. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013; 188: 1069–1075. doi:10.1164/rccm.201306-1079OC
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  132. ↵
    1. Linden A
    . Assessing regression to the mean effects in health care initiatives. BMC Med Res Methodol 2013; 13: 119. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-13-119
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  133. ↵
    1. Barnett AG,
    2. van der Pols JC,
    3. Dobson AJ
    . Regression to the mean: what it is and how to deal with it. Int J Epidemiol 2005; 34: 215–220. doi:10.1093/ije/dyh299
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
View this article with LENS
Vol 30 Issue 162 Table of Contents
European Respiratory Review: 30 (162)
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Chronic cough: new insights and future prospects
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
Chronic cough: new insights and future prospects
Alyn Morice, Peter Dicpinigaitis, Lorcan McGarvey, Surinder S. Birring
European Respiratory Review Dec 2021, 30 (162) 210127; DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0127-2021

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Chronic cough: new insights and future prospects
Alyn Morice, Peter Dicpinigaitis, Lorcan McGarvey, Surinder S. Birring
European Respiratory Review Dec 2021, 30 (162) 210127; DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0127-2021
Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Epidemiology
    • Physical effects of chronic cough
    • Psychological effects of chronic cough
    • Effects of chronic cough on QoL
    • Economic burden
    • Diagnosis
    • Current treatments for chronic cough
    • Treatments for RCC under investigation
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Subjects

  • Respiratory clinical practice
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • The role of smoking on COVID-19 progression: a meta-analysis
  • PAP therapy for post-stroke sleep disordered breathing
  • Severe COVID-19 versus multisystem inflammatory syndrome
Show more Reviews

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERR

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising
  • Sponsorship

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN: 0905-9180
Online ISSN: 1600-0617

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society