Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Impairment of hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction in acute respiratory distress syndrome

Mareike Gierhardt, Oleg Pak, Dieter Walmrath, Werner Seeger, Friedrich Grimminger, Hossein A. Ghofrani, Norbert Weissmann, Matthias Hecker, Natascha Sommer
European Respiratory Review 2021 30: 210059; DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0059-2021
Mareike Gierhardt
1Dept of Internal Medicine, Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Justus-Liebig University, Giessen, Germany
2Excellence Cluster Cardio-Pulmonary Institute (CPI), Giessen, Germany
3Instituto de Investigación en Biomedicina de Buenos Aires (IBioBA) – CONICET – Partner Institute of the Max Planck Society, Buenos Aires, Argentina
4Department of Lung Development and Remodeling, Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Member of the Cardio-Pulmonary Institute (CPI) Bad Nauheim, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Oleg Pak
1Dept of Internal Medicine, Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Justus-Liebig University, Giessen, Germany
2Excellence Cluster Cardio-Pulmonary Institute (CPI), Giessen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dieter Walmrath
1Dept of Internal Medicine, Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Justus-Liebig University, Giessen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Werner Seeger
1Dept of Internal Medicine, Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Justus-Liebig University, Giessen, Germany
2Excellence Cluster Cardio-Pulmonary Institute (CPI), Giessen, Germany
3Instituto de Investigación en Biomedicina de Buenos Aires (IBioBA) – CONICET – Partner Institute of the Max Planck Society, Buenos Aires, Argentina
5Institute for Lung Health (ILH), Giessen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Werner Seeger
Friedrich Grimminger
1Dept of Internal Medicine, Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Justus-Liebig University, Giessen, Germany
2Excellence Cluster Cardio-Pulmonary Institute (CPI), Giessen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hossein A. Ghofrani
1Dept of Internal Medicine, Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Justus-Liebig University, Giessen, Germany
2Excellence Cluster Cardio-Pulmonary Institute (CPI), Giessen, Germany
6Dept of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Hossein A. Ghofrani
Norbert Weissmann
1Dept of Internal Medicine, Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Justus-Liebig University, Giessen, Germany
2Excellence Cluster Cardio-Pulmonary Institute (CPI), Giessen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthias Hecker
1Dept of Internal Medicine, Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Justus-Liebig University, Giessen, Germany
7Both authors contributed equally
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Natascha Sommer
1Dept of Internal Medicine, Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Justus-Liebig University, Giessen, Germany
2Excellence Cluster Cardio-Pulmonary Institute (CPI), Giessen, Germany
7Both authors contributed equally
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a serious complication of severe systemic or local pulmonary inflammation, such as caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. ARDS is characterised by diffuse alveolar damage that leads to protein-rich pulmonary oedema, local alveolar hypoventilation and atelectasis. Inadequate perfusion of these areas is the main cause of hypoxaemia in ARDS. High perfusion in relation to ventilation (V/Q<1) and shunting (V/Q=0) is not only caused by impaired hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction but also redistribution of perfusion from obstructed lung vessels. Rebalancing the pulmonary vascular tone is a therapeutic challenge. Previous clinical trials on inhaled vasodilators (nitric oxide and prostacyclin) to enhance perfusion to high V/Q areas showed beneficial effects on hypoxaemia but not on mortality. However, specific patient populations with pulmonary hypertension may profit from treatment with inhaled vasodilators. Novel treatment targets to decrease perfusion in low V/Q areas include epoxyeicosatrienoic acids and specific leukotriene receptors. Still, lung protective ventilation and prone positioning are the best available standard of care. This review focuses on disturbed perfusion in ARDS and aims to provide basic scientists and clinicians with an overview of the vascular alterations and mechanisms of V/Q mismatch, current therapeutic strategies, and experimental approaches.

Abstract

Our review provides a detailed overview of mechanisms underlying the V/Q mismatch in ARDS and its contribution to hypoxaemia, and could help to assess the relevance of treatment options currently being discussed for treatment of ARDS in COVID-19 patients https://bit.ly/3gs2Afj

Clinical definition and current therapeutic options for ARDS

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS; formerly also called “adult respiratory distress syndrome”) was first described in 1967 [1] and later defined by pulmonary oedema, atelectasis and severe ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) mismatch, which cause hypoxaemia and eventually hypercapnia. ARDS is caused by local or systemic inflammation and delayed mechanisms of repair [2]. Vascular alterations include unbalanced vasoconstriction and vasodilation of pulmonary vessels leading to both unfavourable blood flow distribution and pulmonary hypertension (PH) [3].

Diagnosis is currently based on the “Berlin definition” of ARDS, including a staging based on the ratio of arterial PO2 and inspired oxygen fraction (FIO2) [4]. Previous nomenclature distinguished ARDS from “acute lung injury” (ALI). As the term “ALI” remains common in animal studies, we use it in this context in this review.

Despite improvements in ventilation strategies and patient positioning, the in-hospital mortality of ARDS patients is still reported as up to 44% [3]. Importantly, there are currently no specific pharmacological treatments available to address the pathomechanisms underlying ARDS or the vascular alterations that occur with it [5], which have drawn attention due to the current severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic. This review will describe the vascular alterations resulting in hypoxaemia in ARDS with a specific focus on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-induced pathomechanisms and provide an outlook on potential therapies.

General pathomechanisms underlying ARDS

ARDS most commonly develops in the setting of a primary pulmonary insult such as pneumonia (bacterial or viral) or secondary to systemic sepsis. Although the initial clinical phase may differ depending on its aetiology, the common pathophysiological hallmarks of ARDS include an early “exudative” and a later “proliferative” phase (for a recent review please refer to [2]). In brief, the exudative phase, lasting approximately 7 days, is characterised by early and massive epithelial and endothelial damage that leads to increased capillary permeability and a protein-rich exudate, resulting in interstitial and alveolar oedema. The loss of surfactant producing alveolar type II cells facilitates atelectasis. In the later proliferative phase, which can last more than 3 weeks, the release of proliferative and pro-fibrotic mediators activates repair processes and the hyperplasia of alveolar type II cells, eventually leading to interstitial fibrosis [2]. Although the exact pathogenesis and cytokine patterns differ between ARDS caused by bacteria and viruses [6], similar histopathological features are apparent.

V/Q mismatch in ARDS

Hypoxaemia in ARDS

Atelectasis and the obstruction of alveoli with protein-rich fluid cause reduced alveolar oxygen levels and severely hinders oxygenation in ARDS patients (figure 1a). In healthy lungs, redistribution of perfusion (Q) to areas with better ventilation (V) by hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction (HPV) results in optimal V/Q matching (V/Q=1) and thus maintains oxygenation (figure 1b) [7]. During ARDS, redistribution of blood flow is severely impaired, characterised by lung areas with high perfusion and low ventilation (V/Q<1, with V/Q=0 called intrapulmonary shunting), and lung areas with high ventilation and low perfusion (V/Q>1, with V/Q∼∞ called dead space ventilation) (figure 1c) [7, 8]. Intrapulmonary shunting (V/Q=0) is the major cause of hypoxaemia in ARDS, and probably to a lesser extent areas of a low V/Q ratio (V/Q<1) [9–11]. Hypoxaemia may be further aggravated by PH and low cardiac output, leading to decreased mixed venous oxygen content (PvO2) which severely impairs arterial PO2 in areas of intrapulmonary shunting (figure 1c) [8]. In contrast, diffusion limitation plays a minor role in ARDS and can be corrected by high FIO2 (table 1) [7, 8].

FIGURE 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1

Mechanism of ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) mismatch in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). a) ARDS is characterised by diffuse alveolar damage leading to oedema and atelectasis. The computed tomography scan performed in supine position of the patient demonstrates bilateral dense consolidations (*) in the most dependent region and normal attenuation in the non-dependent region of the lung. b) In healthy lungs alveolar hypoxia (e.g. due to hypoventilation) leads to hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction (HPV) of precapillary vessels matching the perfusion (Q) to regional ventilation (V) and thus optimising arterial oxygenation. c) In ARDS a disbalance of vasoconstriction in well ventilated areas and vasodilation in poorly ventilated areas (due to inhibition of HPV) results in blood flow redistribution from well to poorly ventilated alveoli and a V/Q mismatch leading to hypoxaemia. Further factors contributing to low perfusion of well-ventilated alveoli are vascular obstruction by oedema, infiltration, and (micro)thrombosis. In the schematic, the size of vessels indicates amount of blood flow. CO: cardiac output; PvO2: mixed venous partial pressure of O2.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Causes of hypoxaemia in ARDS, response to oxygen supplementation and differentiation from other diseases

A low V/Q ratio and/or intrapulmonary shunting is caused by hypoventilation due to altered lung mechanics, airway obliteration and alveolar infiltration, or by perfusion alterations. While ventilation strategies address hypoventilation, currently 6.6% of patients with severe ARDS develop refractory hypoxaemia and require veno–venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) [12], which is the only effective therapy for intrapulmonary shunting. Thus, new therapeutic approaches addressing the pulmonary vascular component of V/Q (mis)matching are required.

Relative hyperperfusion of poorly ventilated lung areas (low V/Q areas)

In healthy lungs, V/Q matching is optimised by HPV, a rapid, widely conserved physiological response by the precapillary pulmonary arteries to alveolar hypoxia [13]. Naturally, the efficiency of HPV for correcting the V/Q mismatch decreases with the extent of the hypoxic lung region [14].

Theoretical models and investigations in ARDS patients employing pulmonary vasodilators and the multiple inert gas elimination technique (MIGET) suggested that functional HPV can improve V/Q matching and thereby PO2 by approximately 20 mmHg in ARDS [15]. Moreover, studies applying an FIO2 of 1.0 suggested that HPV is present in ARDS patients [16].

Partially functional HPV may explain why low V/Q areas seem to contribute much less to hypoxaemia than shunting in atelectatic areas, where HPV may not be efficient enough to completely restrain blood flow [9–11]. Using MIGET, up to 50% of the cardiac output has been detected to be shunt flow in ARDS patients. Importantly, the amount of blood flow to consolidated areas determined by dynamic computed tomography correlated with the extent of hypoxaemia of the patients [11].

In addition to shunting due to impaired HPV, intrapulmonary shunting caused by pulmonary capillary distention or opening of intrapulmonary arteriovenous anastomoses was described in 26% of patients with ARDS and correlated with the hyperdynamic state of ARDS patients [17]. Thus, opening of intrapulmonary arteriovenous anastomosis may contribute to shunting in ARDS.

Data from animal models support that impaired HPV and V/Q mismatch cause hypoxaemia in ARDS. Systemic (i.v. or i.p.) or intratracheal (i.t.) administration of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) has been used frequently as a model for in vivo septic ARDS [18]. LPS, also known as endotoxin, is a toll-like receptor 4 agonist expressed by Gram-negative bacteria and is a major stimulus of the immune system. In vivo LPS administration increased basal pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) and attenuated HPV in various species, ranging from mice to horses [18]. Importantly, inhibition of HPV occurred even at concentrations 10× lower than the concentration that caused an elevation of baseline PAP, and attenuation of HPV was reported to last longer than baseline PAP elevation [19].

Hypoperfusion of well-ventilated lung areas (high V/Q areas)

Redistribution of perfusion from obstructed vessels located in well-ventilated areas to poorly ventilated areas promotes V/Q mismatch. Functional and structural factors contribute to low perfusion in well-oxygenated areas. These factors include intravascular occlusion by microthrombi, extravascular compression of vessels by oedema and atelectasis, and (in later stages) interstitial fibrosis and vascular wall remodelling [20, 21].

Primary sensing and signalling mechanism underlying HPV and alterations in ARDS

HPV is a unique and intrinsic mechanism of the precapillary pulmonary vessels which – in contrast to systemic vessels – constrict in response to hypoxia. Establishing a successful treatment specifically to enhance HPV in hypoxic alveoli requires an understanding of the sensor and signalling mechanisms that underlie HPV, as well as modulating factors and how they are affected by ARDS (figure 2). Acute hypoxia (lasting seconds to minutes) induces rapid vasoconstriction (acute phase of HPV) which is suggested to adapt blood flow to alveolar ventilation on a breath-to-breath basis and is fully reversible seconds after re-exposure to normoxia. In contrast, sustained HPV (lasting minutes to hours) initiates long-term adaptation of the pulmonary vasculature to chronic hypoxia, including pulmonary vascular remodelling. It has been shown that the underlying mechanisms responding to acute, prolonged and chronic hypoxia are different [22, 23].

FIGURE 2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2

Trigger mechanisms, modulation and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)-related dysregulation of hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction (HPV). a) Primary mechanisms underlying HPV include oxygen sensing by mitochondria with a subsequent change in cellular redox state and/or release of reactive oxygen species that interact with various plasma membrane ion channels to trigger a cytosolic calcium increase and HPV. Other mechanisms which may contribute to HPV include a change in intracellular AMP/ATP levels, activation of phospholipase C, increasing diacylglycerol levels and propagation of endothelial signals by gap junctions and sphingosine-1-phosphate signalling. During prolonged hypoxia, further mechanisms such as increased calcium sensitisation by Rho-kinase may come into play. Dashed lines/symbols indicate hypothetical pathways. b) HPV is modulated by the endothelium through factors involving nitric oxide (NO)–soluble guanylyl cyclase–cyclic guanosine monophosphate signalling, arachidonic acid-derived vasoactive factors (such as prostacyclin (PGI2), thromboxane A2 (TXA2) and epoxyeicosatrienoic acids (EETs)), angiotensin II (ATII) and endothelin-1 (ET-1), prompting vasodilation or vasoconstriction. Leukotrienes have direct effects on the smooth muscle cell but mainly act in ARDS via promoting inflammation. In ARDS, a locally high increase of NO, PGI2 and decrease of EET may inhibit HPV and cause low ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) areas. In contrast, an increase of the vasoconstrictive substances ATII, ET-1 and TXA2 in the pulmonary circulation causes vasoconstriction thereby promoting V/Q mismatch and pulmonary hypertension. Alterations in the levels of the different vasoactive substances in ARDS are given in red arrows, with the arrows in brackets when only data for animal studies are available. Therapeutic approaches that were/are tested in clinical trials are given in green. Please note that inhaled NO and prostacyclines enhance vasodilation only in ventilated lung areas. Thereby they improve V/Q matching in 1) high V/Q areas and 2) low V/Q areas by decreasing redistribution of blood flow. For detailed information please refer to text. AA: arachidonic acid; AGTR1: angiotensin receptor 1; ACE: angiotensin converting enzyme; AMP: adenosine monophosphate; AT: angiotensin; ATP: adenosine triphosphase; AMPK: 5′ AMP-activated protein kinase; BLT1: leukotriene B4 receptor 1; CFTR: cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator; COX: cyclooxygenase; Cox4i2: cytochrome C oxidase subunit 4I2; CYP450: cytochrome P450; CysLTs: cysteinyl leukotrienes; CysLTR1: cysteinyl leukotriene receptor 1; Cx40: connexin 40; DAG: diacylglycerol; ΔEm: membrane potential; EC: endothelial cell; IP: prostaglandin I2 receptor; GJ: gap junctions; (c)GMP: (cyclic) guanosine monophosphate; GSSG/GSH: redox state of glutathione; GTP: guanosine triphosphate; Kv: voltage-dependent potassium; 5-LOX: 5-lipoxygenase; LTB4: leukotriene B4; NAD/NADH: redox state of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide; (i)NO: (inhaled) nitric oxide; (i)NOS: (inducible) nitric oxide synthase; PASMC: pulmonary artery smooth muscle cell; PDE5: phosphodiesterase 5; PLA2: phospholipase A2; PLC: phospholipase C; rhACE2: recombinant human angiotensin converting enzyme 2; ROCK: rho-associated kinase; S1P: sphingosine-1-phosphate; sEH: soluble epoxide hydrolase; sGC: soluble guanylyl cyclase; SphK1: sphingosinekinase 1; TP: T prostanoid receptor; TRPC6: transient receptor potential canonical channel type 6; TRPV4: transient receptor potential vanilloid 4; VDCC: voltage-dependent calcium channel; V/Q: ratio of alveolar ventilation to perfusion.

While pulmonary arterial smooth muscle cells (PASMC) of the small resistance arteries were identified as the primary effector and sensor site for acute HPV, the exact role of the endothelium as a trigger for HPV, e.g. by transmitting signals via specific gap junctions containing connexin 40 (and involving epoxyeicosatrienoic acids (EETs) and sphingosine-1-phosphate) is under debate [24]. Undoubtedly, the endothelium modulates the strength of HPV, which is crucial for the fine-tuning of V/Q matching in vivo [24, 25]. During prolonged hypoxia, the endothelium and calcium sensitisation of the contractile apparatus via the Rho-kinase may be of particular importance [22].

While the physiological significance of HPV is unquestioned, the exact oxygen sensing and signalling mechanisms underlying HPV are not yet fully elucidated [13, 23, 25] (figure 2a). Although there is a broad consensus that mitochondria are the essential oxygen sensors underlying HPV, and that an intracellular calcium increase via plasmalemmal ion channels in PASMC triggers HPV, various hypotheses on the primary mitochondrial sensing mechanisms and the connection between the sensor and effector mechanisms have been proposed. Recent studies suggest that hypoxia-induced changes in the mitochondrial redox state cause a release of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS) from complex III of the mitochondrial respiratory chain, triggering HPV [26, 27]. Lung-specific modulation of cytochrome C oxidase (complex IV, CIV) through the expression of a specific isoform of subunit 4 within CIV promotes ROS release and is probably responsible for the unique reaction of PASMC to acute hypoxia [28]. Another hypothesis suggests that a more reduced cellular redox state mediates the hypoxia-induced intracellular calcium increase [29]. Moreover, changes in the AMP/ATP ratio may play a role [30]. It is probable that multiple localised signals – dependent on oxygen levels and time – accumulate until they reach a threshold for triggering HPV [13, 26, 28]. Regardless of the initial signal, downstream inhibition of different potassium channels induces membrane depolarisation and subsequent extracellular calcium entry via voltage-dependent L-type calcium channels, resulting in contraction [13, 23].

Additional types of ion channels are involved in HPV, including store-operated and receptor-operated calcium channels such as the transient receptor potential canonical channel type 6 (TRPC6), the transient receptor potential vanilloid 4 channel and the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR), which both could form a complex with TRPC6 during hypoxia [24, 25].

Currently, the role of primary oxygen-sensing mechanisms and most of the channels for regulation of HPV in ARDS remains unclear. In particular, downregulation of gap junctions or CFTR during inflammation may contribute to disturbance of HPV [24]. Moreover, potassium channels may qualify as targets for enhancing HPV signalling. Inhibitors of voltage-dependent potassium (Kv) channels, such as 4-aminopyridine, are possible sensitisers of hypoxic Kv-channel inhibition and restored HPV in isolated lungs in LPS-preconditioned mice [31]. Inhibition of the vasodilatory KATP channels with PNU-37883A was found to restore HPV in isolated lungs from endotoxaemic mice, while HPV among non-endotoxaemic controls was not altered [32]. However, a previous clinical trial with the KATP channel inhibitor glibenclamide, focussing on systemic hypotension, failed [33]. Almitrine, which was suggested to inhibit calcium-dependent potassium channels or act on mitochondrial oxygen sensing [34], was shown to enhance HPV and the ventilatory response to hypoxia. Several clinical trials in ARDS have been performed with almitrine (see below).

Endothelial modulators of HPV and pulmonary vascular pressure in ARDS

HPV in ARDS is largely (dis)regulated by inflammatory mediators affecting the pulmonary endothelium. The primary endothelial factors modulating HPV include nitric oxide (NO), endothelin-1 (ET-1), and the arachidonic acid (AA) metabolite prostacyclin (PGI2) (figure 2b). For therapeutic use it is important to consider that the systemic use of most pulmonary vasoactive substances affects basal pulmonary pressure and HPV, which may have opposing effects on the desired therapeutic aims, enhancement of HPV or alleviation of PH (see table 2 [35–56]). Importantly, because the healthy pulmonary circulation is a low-resistance circuit, pulmonary vasodilators may have only limited effects in healthy volunteers, in contrast to patients with increased pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2

Pharmacological factors that may affect hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction (HPV)

Increased release of vasodilators: NO

NO signalling as a target in sepsis and ARDS has a long history, as excessive NO production is the cause of systemic hypotension. Patients with ARDS exhale higher concentrations of NO than healthy controls [57], suggesting a pulmonary source of NO in ARDS. NO originating primarily from endothelial NO synthase (eNOS) attenuates HPV [58]. Consequently, NOS inhibition augmented HPV in animals [58–60] and healthy volunteers [61].

In models of ALI inhibition of downstream NO signalling and NO release from eNOS or inducible NOS (iNOS) restored HPV [62] and protected against ALI and/or hypoxaemia [63, 64], respectively. In humans, iNOS expression was increased in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) cells in healthy volunteers after instillation of LPS [65] and in BAL macrophages from (septic) ARDS patients [66].

Despite these promising results on NOS inhibition from preclinical models, clinical trials with different unselective NOS inhibitors, like 546C88, in ARDS failed due to increased mortality. Study design and the lack of selectivity may have contributed to the failure of the study [67].

Other therapeutic approaches employing NO scavengers or addressing uncoupling of NOS and related superoxide production were not able to show beneficial effects in septic shock and intensive care unit patients [68, 69].

In summary, attempts thus far to modulate NO signalling with the purpose of improving HPV and attenuating inflammation in ARDS have failed in clinical trials.

Imbalance of AA-derived vasodilative and vasoconstrictive mediators: PGI2 and thromboxane

AA metabolites are generated mostly from phospholipids by phospholipase A2 and are paracrine inflammatory intermediates released by various cell types. AA can be metabolised to different vasoactive mediators by cyclooxygenase (COX), lipoxygenase (LOX) and cytochrome P450 enzymes. Notably, the effects of AA metabolites on HPV are highly variable and species- and age-dependent (for an extended review, see [70]). This review focusses on the clinically most relevant AA derivatives.

In this regard, balanced levels of vasoconstrictor thromboxane A2 (TXA2) and vasodilator PGI2 (both downstream of COX) are most important for regulating pulmonary vascular tone. TXA2 is generated by platelets via the TXA2 synthase, acts via the T prostanoid receptor and induces vasoconstriction in PASMC. In contrast, PGI2 is produced mainly in endothelial cells via the prostacyclin synthase, acts via prostaglandin I2 receptors and induces vasodilation, anti-inflammatory effects, and decreased platelet aggregation [71]. The strong vasodilatory effect of PGI2 is exploited for treatment of PH; however, this is at the expense of increased shunting and decreased systemic pressure when applied systemically in patients [72]. Interestingly, in sepsis and ARDS patients, TXA2 as well as PGI2 are increased [73, 74]. Animal experiments indicate that a high, fast peak of TXA2 may cause the increase in basal PAP after LPS application, but that the later peak of PGI2 may cause impairment of HPV [19]. However, neither COX nor TXA2 synthase inhibition affected acute HPV in healthy volunteers [75], or improved outcome in septic patients [76, 77].

In contrast, the vasodilatory effects of PGI2 are used for treatment of PH and V/Q mismatch when applied via the inhalative route, thereby only reaching well-ventilated lung areas and enhancing perfusion to lung regions with high V/Q values (see section “Pharmacological approach for treatment of V/Q mismatch and PH”).

Decreased release of vasoconstrictive AA-derived mediators downstream of cytochrome P450: EETs

EETs are generated in various cell types, including endothelial and smooth muscle cells, by Cyp450 epoxygenases (especially CYP2C and CYP2J) from AA, and are degraded by soluble epoxide hydrolase (sEH) [24]. EETs are short-lived mediators that have gained attention as they promote vasorelaxation of systemic vessels but induce vasoconstriction of pulmonary vessels ex vivo [78] and in vivo in hypoxia in animal models [79], and thus may account for the specific vasoconstrictive effect of hypoxia in the pulmonary vasculature [24]. However, the effects of EETs may depend on the experimental setup and the presence of sensitising factors [80]. Genetical approaches to reduce EET generation significantly reduced HPV in mice [81], while enhanced EET levels by deletion of EET-degrading sEH resulted in potentiation of HPV [79], with unaltered basal pulmonary pressures. Of note, contrary results exist: in left main-stem bronchial occlusion experiments healthy control mice with deletion or inhibition of sEH had no alterations in hypoxic blood redistribution [82]. In ALI, EET levels in lung tissue of rodents were decreased, and deletion or inhibition of sEH was found to protect mice from LPS-induced impairment of HPV and hypoxaemia [82], as well as pulmonary oedema [83]. Currently, sEH inhibitors are tested in healthy volunteers and smokers in an initial phase 1 study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01762774). Here sEH inhibition with GSK2256294 resulted in restored systemic vasodilation in vivo [84], although clinical data on HPV remain untested.

Increased release of vasoconstrictors/inflammatory mediators: endothelin

Endothelin (ET-1) is a highly potent vasoconstrictor released by the endothelium. Its production and release are stimulated by inflammatory mediators and hypoxia and decreased by the vasodilatory mediators NO and PGI2 [71]. While endothelial cells express ETB1 receptors, leading to vasorelaxation, ETA and ETB2 receptors on PASMC induce vasoconstriction, as well as proinflammatory and proliferative effects [71]. ET-receptor inhibitors are frequently used for treatment of PH in humans.

With regard to HPV, both selective ETA-receptor or unselective ETA/ETB-receptor blockade inhibited HPV in animals [85, 86] and humans [87]. In ARDS patients, elevated circulating ET-1 levels are probably caused by pulmonary release [88]. Similar results exist from septic animal models [89], showing additional ETA-receptor upregulation and ETB-receptor downregulation in lung tissue [90]. ET-receptor blockers disturbed V/Q matching after systemic application in a study on sepsis in piglets [89] but improved right-to-left-shunting and arterial oxygenation after inhalation in an ALI model [91]. In humans, the relevance of ET-receptor blockade for causing a V/Q mismatch is unclear. In healthy volunteers, bosentan, a dual ET-receptor antagonist, attenuated the increase in PAP during hypoxia but did not affect blood gases [87]. So far, a single case report describes the use of bosentan as a rescue treatment for refractory hypoxaemia and PH in a patient with ARDS. In this patient, bosentan rapidly lowered the right ventricular (RV) systolic pressure and subsequently improved oxygenation [92]. In such cases, vasodilation of well-ventilated areas and increased cardiac output may outweigh the negative effects of inhibition of HPV.

AA-derived inflammatory mediators downstream of lipoxygenase: leukotrienes

Recently, the AA metabolite leukotriene B4 (LTB4) has gained attention for treating PH [93]. Importantly, leukotrienes are not classical “endothelial” modulators of HPV, as their expression is normally restricted to immune cells like macrophages, but – at least under pathophysiological conditions – the endothelium can be a source of leukotrienes [94]. LTB4 and the group of cysteinyl leukotrienes (cysLTs: LTC4, LTD4 and LTE4), are generated by 5-LOX. While LTB4 acts primarily via LTB4 receptor 1, cysLTs act via cysLT-receptor 1 (cysLTR1) causing oedema formation, but also smooth muscle contraction and cell proliferation [95]. Leukotriene levels were elevated in BAL fluid and/or lung tissue from rodents with ALI [95] and patients with ARDS [96].

In different murine ALI models, inhibition of 5-LOX or cysLTR1 inhibited HPV impairment [95] and V/Q mismatch [97]. In contrast, inhibition of cysLTR1 strongly attenuated HPV in isolated lungs, most probably via direct inhibition of smooth muscle contraction [98]. Thus, in ARDS general anti-inflammatory effects of cysLTR1 blockade probably outweigh their effects on smooth muscle contraction. In this regard, montelukast, a cysLTR1 receptor inhibitor used to treat asthma, showed beneficial effects in an animal model of ALI [99]. Currently, a clinical trial is planned to investigate the effects of montelukast on reducing the risk of acute care visits and hospital admissions among patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 (NCT04389411).

The role of further inflammatory cytokines

Inflammatory cytokines may affect the pulmonary vascular tone indirectly via release of endothelial mediators such as NO, PGI2, ET-1 and angiotensin II (ATII) [100] or directly via interaction of vasoconstrictive signalling pathways in PASMC [101]. Some data exist regarding cytokine-induced gene regulation in PASMC which may result in changes of the vascular tone or reactivity [102]. However, investigations of direct effects of cytokines specifically on pulmonary vessels in HPV are limited. For one of the most relevant cytokines, interleukin-6 (IL-6), it was shown that incubation of isolated pulmonary arterial rings with IL-6 resulted in inhibition of HPV, albeit the mechanism remains unclear [103]. Definitely, improvement of inflammation should have beneficial effects on V/Q matching irrespectively of direct or indirect effects on the pulmonary vasculature. Emerging therapeutic approaches to limit inflammation in ARDS are summarised elsewhere [104].

Systemic, humoral and pharmacological factors affecting HPV

Several systemic and therapeutic factors can modulate HPV, thereby possibly affecting oxygenation in ARDS.

Physical and physiological factors

Hypercapnia and hyperoxia are probably the clinically most relevant factors that may affect HPV. Hypercapnia increased HPV and improved V/Q matching in animal models [23, 60], and enhanced normoxic PAP [105] and HPV [106] in humans, contributing to V/Q matching [107]. Hyperoxia in healthy volunteers did not change HPV after 8 h of exposure [108] nor did acute hyperoxic ventilation affect the PVR [109]. Interestingly, in ALI, hyperoxic ventilation enhanced intrapulmonary shunting due to alveolar collapse [110].

Drugs interfering with HPV

The vast majority of frequently used vasoactive drugs in clinical use have the potential to interfere with HPV (see table 2).

For the detailed effects of anaesthesia, please refer to recent reviews [38, 54]. An overview of the effects of inotropic, inodilator and vasopressor drugs on pulmonary and systemic circulation is given elsewhere (for a review, see [111]). Numerous substances also affect HPV in animal models [23, 70].

Hormonal modulators: ATII

ATII is synthesised by the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) located in pulmonary endothelial cells and exhibits vasoconstrictive and inflammatory effects via the angiotensin-receptor 1 (ATR1). ACE2 (mainly expressed on alveolar epithelial cells, endothelial cells and PASMCs) metabolises ATII to AT1-7, which activates vasodilatory and anti-inflammatory signalling [112]. In animals with ALI, vasoconstrictive ATII signalling was upregulated due to increased ACE activity, and impaired ACE2 activity [113, 114]. Along these lines, BAL levels of ACE were elevated in ARDS patients [115]. Preclinical studies have used ACE inhibitors, ATR1 blockers or the application of AT1-7 to reduce inflammation and ALI and improve oxygenation [113, 116, 117]. Recombinant ACE2-attenuated perfusion heterogeneity, arterial hypoxaemia and PH in LPS challenged pigs [114]. However, in ARDS patients a trial with recombinant human ACE2 (rhACE2) did not show beneficial effects on haemodynamics or the PaO2/FIO2 ratio in ARDS patients [118]. A very small clinical trial with enalapril, an ACE inhibitor, also failed [119].

Dysregulation of HPV in SARS-CoV-2 infection

Low V/Q areas and shunting both seem to be a particular problem in COVID-19 patients. In ARDS due to SARS-CoV-2, typical histological features of ARDS are found, including injury of the alveolar epithelium, hyaline membrane formation and hyperplasia of alveolar type II cells [118]. However, additional specific features such as severe endothelial injury and increased prevalence of alveolar capillary microthrombi in pathological samples of COVID-19 patients may explain the pronounced effect of SARS-CoV-2 on the pulmonary circulation [119].

Early in the pandemic, severe intrapulmonary shunting in COVID-19 ARDS was described in a small Italian cohort [120]. Later, two phenotypes of COVID-19 patients have been proposed: one in a probably early stage of the disease with high compliance of the lung, low amount of non-aerated tissue and low V/Q matching, the other with a more classical ARDS presentation and right-to-left shunting in non-aerated tissue [121]. Recently, a mathematical model illustrated that severe hypoxaemia in early COVID-19 can be explained by a combination of perfusion defects (due to pulmonary embolism), severe V/Q mismatch in the non-injured lung and hyperperfusion of the small injured fraction of non-oxygenated lung regions [122]. Additionally, signs of intrapulmonary arteriovenous anastomoses opening were described in 20% of patients with COVID-19 [123].

Interestingly, specific subtypes of COVID-19 patients are reported that do not feel breathless despite low arterial oxygenation (referred to as “happy or silent hypoxaemia”). In a large cohort of hospitalised COVID-19 patients with pneumonia, shortness of breath was found in about 15% of the patients with non-severe and 38% of the patients with severe disease [124]. Although it is tempting to speculate that a lack of oxygen sensing in the carotid body, which regulates the respiratory drive in response to hypoxaemia, causes this phenomenon, other more obvious reasons may contribute to the lack of dyspnoea. Dyspnoea is a subjective perception that is less related to hypoxaemia than to breathing effort and hypercapnia [125]. As early stages of COVID-19 patients may present with high lung compliance and normocapnia [121]; the breathing effort and perception of dyspnoea may be low as has also been reported in other diseases of intrapulmonary shunting [125]. In this regard, pulmonary vascular endothelial dysfunction and low V/Q at stages before changes in compliance and breathing effort occur may be a specific feature of SARS-CoV-2-induced lung damage [126, 127]. Furthermore, comorbidities such as obesity may contribute to V/Q mismatch in SARS-CoV-2 patients due to tissue compression and local alveolar hypoventilation [128].

Going beyond mechanisms of inflammation, HPV may also be affected by viral infection of endothelial and smooth muscle cells (for an overview of viruses interacting with the endothelium, please refer to [129]). However, detailed studies of how viral infections affect HPV are lacking. Interestingly, the functional receptor for coronaviruses such as severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) was identified in 2007 to be ACE2 [130]. In this regard, it has been suggested that SARS-CoV-2 causes ACE2 downregulation by internalisation and thus may enhance the availability of ATII [112]. Subsequent viral-induced vasoconstriction may not only induce PH but also divert blood flow to vessels with lower resistance, thus interfering with physiological V/Q matching, as outlined above. Recent reviews have summarised the current knowledge of SARS-CoV-2 on the pulmonary vasculature [131, 132]. Several ongoing clinical studies are investigating whether drugs targeting angiotensin signalling affect SARS-CoV-2 infection outcomes (e.g. NCT04408326, NCT04337190, NCT04335786 and NCT04340557). Specifically, rhACE2 is discussed as a potential therapeutic for patients with early SARS-CoV-2 infection as in these patients it may additionally block viral entry into cells [133].

The role of PH in ARDS

Despite a decrease of HPV, dysregulation of vasoactive factors (see above) and mechanical vascular obstruction can cause the development of PH and, subsequently, RV dysfunction; these well-known complications of ARDS can limit oxygen delivery and contribute to organ dysfunction [24, 70, 134]. In later stages of ARDS, fibrous intimal proliferative lesions [135], as well as smooth muscle hypertrophy and neomuscularisation of formerly non-muscularised vessels, have been reported [135, 136]. The mechanisms that drive vascular remodelling are most probably similar to other chronic lung diseases associated with PH, with a major role of proliferative/mitogenic endothelial mediators such as ET-1 and inflammatory mediators [20, 101]. Here various cytokines, e.g. IL-6, have been shown to be a major contributor to PH development [2, 20, 102]. Additionally, therapeutic factors may promote PH. Positive pressure ventilation can impair RV dysfunction by decreasing RV preload and increasing afterload by augmented extrinsic vascular compression [2, 20]. Accordingly, even during lung-protective ventilation, a prevalence of cor pulmonale of approximately 20–25% has been described in ARDS patients. PH is of specific relevance in the context of V/Q mismatch, as therapeutic approaches that alleviate PH may severely disturb V/Q mismatch and vice versa enhancement of HPV disturbs pulmonary haemodynamics and may augment PH. Thus, the development of therapeutic approaches to improve HPV and simultaneously alleviate PH is crucial.

Non-pharmacological approach for treatment of V/Q mismatch

Currently, ARDS treatment focusses on lung-protective ventilation using low tidal volumes and airway pressures to avoid respirator-associated lung injury and decrease atelectasis. With severe ARDS, prone positioning has been accepted as the best standard of care [8, 137, 138]. Both strategies exert beneficial effects on V/Q matching and RV dysfunction [139]. The beneficial effects of prone positioning are related to recruitment of dorsal (larger) lung areas for ventilation and abandoning the (smaller) ventral lung areas, thereby improving oxygenation (figure 3a). However, the improvement of survival was suggested to be caused by a decrease of ventilator-induced lung injury and not better oxygenation [140]. Furthermore, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) ventilation is used to improve lung recruitment by opening atelectasis, which can improve V/Q matching in these areas. However, PEEP ventilation may disturb V/Q matching [141], as it can cause hyperinflation of previously well-aerated alveoli and restrict perfusion in these areas, thereby causing an area of high V/Q ratio and redistribution of perfusion to non-aerated tissue or toward dependent lung regions with higher perfusion pressure due to gravity (figure 3b). In a recent study using lung protective ventilation with PEEP, a heterogeneous response in a small patient population has been shown with individual different benefit during PEEP [8].

FIGURE 3
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3

Schematic overview of therapeutic interventions addressing ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) mismatch. a) Prone positioning: in contrast to supine positioning (ai), prone positioning (aii) leads to recruitment of previously atelectatic dorsal lung areas for ventilation while the ventral lung areas become less ventilated. Promoted by gravitational distribution of blood flow, the large dorsal lung areas will show improved V/Q matching with V/Q ratios up to one, while V/Q matching in the smaller ventral lung will be impaired. b) Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) ventilation: beside gravitation, vascular obstruction, redistribution of blood flow to poorly ventilated areas, and impaired hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction can lead to V/Q mismatch in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (bi). PEEP ventilation (bii) can improve V/Q mismatch by opening atelectasis. However, at the same time it may cause hyperinflation of previously well-ventilated alveoli, and thereby 1) restrict perfusion in these areas causing areas of a high V/Q ratio and 2) cause redistribution of perfusion to less ventilated dependent lung regions. In the schematic, the size of vessels indicates amount of blood flow. For detailed information please refer to main text. CO: cardiac output; PVO2: mixed venous partial pressure of O2.

Further options for improving gas exchange in very severe ARDS cases are ECMO and extracorporeal CO2 removal; both techniques are used by experienced multidisciplinary teams in trained centres [2, 142].

Pharmacological approach for treatment of V/Q mismatch and PH

Most pharmacological treatment approaches to improve clinical outcome or prevent ARDS have failed in clinical trials (for a review, see [2]). Discouraging results from anti-inflammatory drugs such as glucocorticoids, which increased mortality in early studies, have prevented further large-scale trials for a long time [2]. Recently, a multicentre randomised trial enrolling 277 patients with established moderate-to-severe ARDS showed that early administration of dexamethasone reduced duration of mechanical ventilation and overall mortality [143]. Accordingly, studies using corticoids for treatment in the current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic have been initiated, with the first promising results being published [144]. Prospective meta-analysis of seven randomised trials enrolling 1703 critically ill COVID-19 patients showed that administration of systemic corticoids resulted in lower 28-day all-cause mortality [145].

Another approach to improve V/Q matching and simultaneously decrease PH in ARDS consists of increasing perfusion in well-ventilated areas through inhaled vasodilators such as NO or PGI2. Inhaled NO (iNO) improved blood flow redistribution, shunting and oxygenation in preclinical studies [146, 147] and in clinical trials and additionally reduced PVR in patients [41, 42]. However, later studies have indicated no beneficial effect on mortality in adult and paediatric ARDS patients but a potentially harmful effect on renal function, especially among elderly patients [148]. Notably, study design and heterogeneous patient population in some of these studies were criticised.

Currently, iNO is recommended only for selected patient populations, such as those with acute cor pulmonale [142]. Nevertheless, iNO remains a commonly used rescue therapy for ARDS patients [142]. In COVID-19 patients, several small retrospective studies report the use of iNO; however, with limited success in improving oxygenation or the PaO2/FIO2 ratio [149–151]. Pulmonary vascular endothelial dysfunction and microthrombi, both hallmarks of SARS-CoV-2-induced lung damage, may impair iNO-induced pulmonary vasodilation [151]. The application of iNO may be favourable under specific conditions, as illustrated in a case series of five patients with PH or in patients with severe hypoxaemia and signs of RV strain [152]. Large-scale clinical trials are currently being performed; however, no outcomes have been yet released [153]. Beneficial effects similar to iNO were reported for inhaled aerosolised PGI2, although it was only tested in small cohorts of ARDS [42]. General use of inhaled PGI2 is currently not recommended; however, the ThIlo study (NCT03111212), a prospective, randomised, multicentre trial, is currently recruiting patients to evaluate the effects of PGI2 in a larger cohort [154].

An optimal treatment for improving V/Q matching requires sufficient specificity to enhance HPV without promoting PH. A small clinical trial with almitrine (a drug formerly approved for treating COPD that has been shown to enhance the central ventilator response and HPV in animal models of ALI [155, 156]) found that almitrine with or without iNO increased PaO2 and improved perfusion redistribution in ARDS patients at low doses but increased PAP at higher doses [157, 158]. Furthermore, in combination with inhalative anaesthesia, almitrine may fail to improve PaO2 [159]. Oral almitrine was withdrawn from the market in 2013 because of its potential to cause peripheral neuropathy and weight loss (>15%) in patients after long-term use [160]. Nevertheless, a recent single-centre case series enrolled 25 patients with severe ARDS on ECMO treatment. Almitrine improved PaO2/FIO2 in 18 patients and no adverse events were observed [12]. In a recent small case series of 17 patients with early hypoxaemic SARS-CoV-2 induced pneumonia, almitrine improved PaO2 in 80% of prone and supine-positioned patients [161]. In a recent larger trial, almitrine was used in most cases in combination with iNO and improved oxygenation in SARS-CoV-2 ARDS without adverse effects. Interestingly, this trial defined specific responders to the treatment (about 2/3 of the patients) which showed an improvement of the PaO2/FIO2 ratio of at least 20%; however, no statistical significant difference in 28-day mortality rates between responders and non-responders was detected [162]. Thus the value of almitrine for use of ARDS treatment needs to be carefully evaluated, in particular in the face of the severe adverse effects in the past and the lack of effect on mortality.

Currently, no specific therapy for RV dysfunction in ARDS exists. Prone positioning, lung-protective ventilation, individually optimised PEEP settings, and limiting hypercapnia have been suggested as essentials for treating PH and RV dysfunction [163, 164]. The role of specific pulmonary vasodilators such as phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors or endothelin receptor antagonists in the treatment of PH in ARDS remains unclear; however, their use may be limited by worsening oxygenation due to impaired HPV [165, 166].

Conclusion: treatment of V/Q mismatch in ARDS – rebalancing vascular function

Vascular dysfunction in ARDS is caused by inflammatory and mechanical factors disrupting pulmonary blood flow distribution, thereby impairing pulmonary gas exchange and RV function. Tropism of certain viruses such as SARS-CoV-2 towards the pulmonary vasculature may enhance pulmonary vascular dysfunction. Currently, no approved pharmacological therapy to specifically address blood flow distribution in ARDS is available. A simple strategy to improve V/Q matching and decrease PVR is the use of iNO or inhaled aerosolised PGI2. Unfortunately, larger clinical trials remain ongoing or have shown improved oxygenation without any benefit on mortality. Advanced study design may answer the question of whether treatment of hypoxaemia also can improve mortality under specific conditions. Patients with a good chance to recover under a causative treatment of the ARDS (e.g. by antibiotics) should be preferentially included. In these patients, treatment of hypoxaemia could serve as a bridge to recovery and may avoid the necessity of ECMO treatment and/or may decrease mortality. Furthermore, alternative endpoints that may be affected by prolonged hypoxaemia, such as neurological outcome, could be defined. Most importantly, specific subpopulations such as patients with RV dysfunction may benefit more greatly from inhaled vasodilators as they improve V/Q matching and attenuate RV afterload.

Although treatment of V/Q mismatch and PH merely alleviates symptoms and does not cure ARDS, treating life-threatening hypoxaemia as a bridge to recovery will remain a promising therapeutic aim until specific treatments for ARDS are established. Thus, further basic research and clinical trials on treating V/Q mismatch and PH in ARDS are warranted. In this regard, application of inhaled vasoactive substance (e.g. iNO) in combination with substances that enhance HPV may be most promising to effectively address V/Q matching and minimise the risk of causing PH. However, currently there is a lack of well-tolerated clinically available substances that specifically enhance HPV. It needs to be further investigated if novel targets including epoxyeicosatrienoic acids and specific leukotriene receptors can improve V/Q matching without deleterious effects on pulmonary haemodynamics. Preclinical investigations should focus on specific oxygen sensing mechanisms, such as ion channels (e.g. TRPC channels) and clearly delineate effects on HPV and general pulmonary hemodynamics in ARDS.

Footnotes

  • Provenance: Submitted article, peer reviewed.

  • Conflict of interest: M. Gierhardt has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: O. Pak has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: D. Walmrath has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: W. Seeger reports personal fees from Actelion, Bayer AG, Abivax, Vectura, Medspray, United Therapeutics and Liquidia, outside the submitted work.

  • Conflict of interest: F. Grimminger has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: H.A. Ghofrani has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: N. Weissmann has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: M. Hecker has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: N. Sommer has nothing to disclose.

  • Received March 19, 2021.
  • Accepted June 5, 2021.
  • Copyright ©The authors 2021
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This version is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0. For commercial reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions{at}ersnet.org

References

  1. ↵
    1. Ashbaugh DG,
    2. Bigelow DB,
    3. Petty TL, et al.
    Acute respiratory distress in adults. Lancet 1967; 2: 319–323. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(67)90168-7
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Matthay MA,
    2. Zemans RL,
    3. Zimmerman GA, et al.
    Acute respiratory distress syndrome. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2019; 5: 18. doi:10.1038/s41572-019-0069-0
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Ryan D,
    2. Frohlich S,
    3. McLoughlin P
    . Pulmonary vascular dysfunction in ARDS. Ann Intensive Care 2014; 4: 28. doi:10.1186/s13613-014-0028-6
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Ranieri VM,
    2. Rubenfeld GD, et al.
    1. ARDS Definition Task Force
    , Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, et al. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin definition. JAMA 2012; 307: 2526–2533. doi:10.1001/jama.2012.5669
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Hecker M,
    2. Weigand MA,
    3. Mayer K
    . Adjunctive pharmacotherapy for acute respiratory distress syndrome. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2017; 142: 96–101. doi:10.1055/s-0042-105943
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Hagau N,
    2. Slavcovici A,
    3. Gonganau DN, et al.
    Clinical aspects and cytokine response in severe H1N1 influenza A virus infection. Crit Care 2010; 14: R203. doi:10.1186/cc9324
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Petersson J,
    2. Glenny RW
    . Gas exchange and ventilation-perfusion relationships in the lung. Eur Respir J 2014; 44: 1023–1041. doi:10.1183/09031936.00037014
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Radermacher P,
    2. Maggiore SM,
    3. Mercat A
    . Fifty years of research in ARDS. Gas exchange in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2017; 196: 964–984. doi:10.1164/rccm.201610-2156SO
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. ↵
    1. Dantzker DR,
    2. Brook CJ,
    3. Dehart P, et al.
    Ventilation-perfusion distributions in the adult respiratory distress syndrome. Am Rev Respir Dis 1979; 120: 1039–1052. doi:10.1164/arrd.1979.120.5.1039
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Ralph DD,
    2. Robertson HT,
    3. Weaver LJ, et al.
    Distribution of ventilation and perfusion during positive end-expiratory pressure in the adult respiratory distress syndrome. Am Rev Respir Dis 1985; 131: 54–60. doi:10.1164/arrd.1985.131.1.54
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Dakin J,
    2. Jones AT,
    3. Hansell DM, et al.
    Changes in lung composition and regional perfusion and tissue distribution in patients with ARDS. Respirology 2011; 16: 1265–1272. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1843.2011.02048.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Esnault P,
    2. Hraiech S,
    3. Bordes J, et al.
    Evaluation of almitrine infusion during veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome in adults. Anesth Analg 2019; 129: e48–e51. doi:10.1213/ANE.0000000000002786
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. Sommer N,
    2. Strielkov I,
    3. Pak O, et al.
    Oxygen sensing and signal transduction in hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction. Eur Respir J 2016; 47: 288–303. doi:10.1183/13993003.00945-2015
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Marshall BE,
    2. Marshall C,
    3. Benumof J, et al.
    Hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction in dogs: effects of lung segment size and oxygen tension. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol 1981; 51: 1543–1551.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Naeije R,
    2. Brimioulle S
    . Physiology in medicine: importance of hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction in maintaining arterial oxygenation during acute respiratory failure. Crit Care 2001; 5: 67–71. doi:10.1186/cc989
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Marshall BE,
    2. Hanson CW,
    3. Frasch F, et al.
    Role of hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction in pulmonary gas exchange and blood flow distribution. 2. Pathophysiology. Intensive Care Med 1994; 20: 379–389. doi:10.1007/BF01720916
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Boissier F,
    2. Razazi K,
    3. Thille AW, et al.
    Echocardiographic detection of transpulmonary bubble transit during acute respiratory distress syndrome. Ann Intensive Care 2015; 5: 5. doi:10.1186/s13613-015-0046-z
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    1. Aeffner F,
    2. Bolon B,
    3. Davis IC
    . Mouse models of acute respiratory distress syndrome: a review of analytical approaches, pathologic features, and common measurements. Toxicol Pathol 2015; 43: 1074–1092. doi:10.1177/0192623315598399
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Hales CA,
    2. Sonne L,
    3. Peterson M, et al.
    Role of thromboxane and prostacyclin in pulmonary vasomotor changes after endotoxin in dogs. J Clin Invest 1981; 68: 497–505. doi:10.1172/JCI110281
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Price LC,
    2. McAuley DF,
    3. Marino PS, et al.
    Pathophysiology of pulmonary hypertension in acute lung injury. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2012; 302: L803–L815. doi:10.1152/ajplung.00355.2011
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Moloney ED,
    2. Evans TW
    . Pathophysiology and pharmacological treatment of pulmonary hypertension in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Eur Respir J 2003; 21: 720–727. doi:10.1183/09031936.03.00120102
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Wilkins MR,
    2. Ghofrani HA,
    3. Weissmann N, et al.
    Pathophysiology and treatment of high-altitude pulmonary vascular disease. Circulation 2015; 131: 582–590. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.006977
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Sylvester JT
    . Hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction. Physiol Rev 2012; 92: 367–520. doi:10.1152/physrev.00041.2010
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Grimmer B,
    2. Kuebler WM
    . The endothelium in hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction. J Appl Physiol 2017; 123: 1635–1646. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00120.2017
    OpenUrl
  24. ↵
    1. Strielkov I,
    2. Pak O,
    3. Sommer N, et al.
    Recent advances in oxygen sensing and signal transduction in hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction. J Appl Physiol 2017; 123: 1647–1656. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00103.2017
    OpenUrl
  25. ↵
    1. Sommer N,
    2. Alebrahimdehkordi N,
    3. Pak O, et al.
    Bypassing mitochondrial complex III using alternative oxidase inhibits acute pulmonary oxygen sensing. Sci Adv 2020; 6: eaba0694. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aba0694
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Waypa GB,
    2. Marks JD,
    3. Guzy RD, et al.
    Superoxide generated at mitochondrial complex III triggers acute responses to hypoxia in the pulmonary circulation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013; 187: 424–432. doi:10.1164/rccm.201207-1294OC
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Sommer N,
    2. Huttemann M,
    3. Pak O, et al.
    Mitochondrial complex IV subunit 4 isoform 2 is essential for acute pulmonary oxygen sensing. Circ Res 2017; 121: 424–438. doi:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.310482
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Michelakis ED
    . Hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction: redox regulation of O2-sensitive K+ channels by a mitochondrial O2-sensor in resistance artery smooth muscle cells. J Mol Cell Cardiol 2004; 37: 1119–1136.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Robertson TP,
    2. Mustard KJ,
    3. Lewis TH, et al.
    AMP-activated protein kinase and hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction. Eur J Pharmacol 2008; 595: 39–43. doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2008.07.035
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Spohr F,
    2. Busch CJ,
    3. Reich C, et al.
    4-Aminopyridine restores impaired hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction in endotoxemic mice. Anesthesiology 2007; 107: 597–604. doi:10.1097/01.anes.0000281897.13703.fd
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Turzo M,
    2. Vaith J,
    3. Lasitschka F, et al.
    Role of ATP-sensitive potassium channels on hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction in endotoxemia. Respir Res 2018; 19: 29. doi:10.1186/s12931-018-0735-x
    OpenUrl
  32. ↵
    1. Warrillow S,
    2. Egi M,
    3. Bellomo R
    . Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover pilot study of a potassium channel blocker in patients with septic shock. Crit Care Med 2006; 34: 980–985. doi:10.1097/01.CCM.0000206114.19707.7C
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Rigoulet M,
    2. Ouhabi R,
    3. Leverve X, et al.
    Almitrine, a new kind of energy-transduction inhibitor acting on mitochondrial ATP synthase. Biochim Biophys Acta 1989; 975: 325–329. doi:10.1016/S0005-2728(89)80339-1
    OpenUrlPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Ghofrani HA,
    2. Wiedemann R,
    3. Rose F, et al.
    Sildenafil for treatment of lung fibrosis and pulmonary hypertension: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2002; 360: 895–900. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11024-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Zhao L,
    2. Mason NA,
    3. Morrell NW, et al.
    Sildenafil inhibits hypoxia-induced pulmonary hypertension. Circulation 2001; 104: 424–428. doi:10.1161/hc2901.093117
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Blanco I,
    2. Gimeno E,
    3. Munoz PA, et al.
    Hemodynamic and gas exchange effects of sildenafil in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and pulmonary hypertension. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2010; 181: 270–278. doi:10.1164/rccm.200907-0988OC
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Tarry D,
    2. Powell M
    . Hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction. BJA Educ 2017; 17: 208–213. doi:10.1093/bjaed/mkw076
    OpenUrl
    1. Naeije R,
    2. Melot C,
    3. Mols P, et al.
    Effects of vasodilators on hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction in normal man. Chest 1982; 82: 404–410. doi:10.1378/chest.82.4.404
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Radermacher P,
    2. Huet Y,
    3. Pluskwa F, et al.
    Comparison of ketanserin and sodium nitroprusside in patients with severe ARDS. Anesthesiology 1988; 68: 152–157. doi:10.1097/00000542-198801000-00030
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Rossaint R,
    2. Falke KJ,
    3. Lopez F, et al.
    Inhaled nitric oxide for the adult respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 1993; 328: 399–405. doi:10.1056/NEJM199302113280605
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Walmrath D,
    2. Schneider T,
    3. Schermuly R, et al.
    Direct comparison of inhaled nitric oxide and aerosolized prostacyclin in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996; 153: 991–996. doi:10.1164/ajrccm.153.3.8630585
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Radermacher P,
    2. Santak B,
    3. Becker H, et al.
    Prostaglandin E1 and nitroglycerin reduce pulmonary capillary pressure but worsen ventilation-perfusion distributions in patients with adult respiratory distress syndrome. Anesthesiology 1989; 70: 601–606. doi:10.1097/00000542-198904000-00008
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Price LC,
    2. Wort SJ,
    3. Finney SJ, et al.
    Pulmonary vascular and right ventricular dysfunction in adult critical care: current and emerging options for management: a systematic literature review. Crit Care 2010; 14: R169. doi:10.1186/cc9264
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Stolz D,
    2. Rasch H,
    3. Linka A, et al.
    A randomised, controlled trial of bosentan in severe COPD. Eur Respir J 2008; 32: 619–628. doi:10.1183/09031936.00011308
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Melot C,
    2. Naeije R,
    3. Hallemans R, et al.
    Hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction and pulmonary gas exchange in normal man. Respir Physiol 1987; 68: 11–27. doi:10.1016/0034-5687(87)90073-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Melot C,
    2. Hallemans R,
    3. Naeije R, et al.
    Deleterious effect of nifedipine on pulmonary gas exchange in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am Rev Respir Dis 1984; 130: 612–616. doi:10.1164/arrd.1984.130.4.612
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Melot C,
    2. Naeije R,
    3. Mols P, et al.
    Pulmonary vascular tone improves pulmonary gas exchange in the adult respiratory distress syndrome. Am Rev Respir Dis 1987; 136: 1232–1236. doi:10.1164/ajrccm/136.5.1232
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Kiely DG,
    2. Cargill RI,
    3. Lipworth BJ
    . Angiotensin II receptor blockade and effects on pulmonary hemodynamics and hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction in humans. Chest 1996; 110: 698–703. doi:10.1378/chest.110.3.698
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Cargill RI,
    2. Lipworth BJ
    . Lisinopril attenuates acute hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction in humans. Chest 1996; 109: 424–429. doi:10.1378/chest.109.2.424
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Kiely DG,
    2. Cargill RI,
    3. Lipworth BJ
    . Acute hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction in man is attenuated by type I angiotensin II receptor blockade. Cardiovasc Res 1995; 30: 875–880. doi:10.1016/S0008-6363(95)00129-8
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Konstam MA,
    2. Kiernan MS,
    3. Bernstein D, et al.
    Evaluation and management of right-sided heart failure: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2018; 137: e578–e622. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000560
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Sarkar M,
    2. Niranjan N,
    3. Banyal PK
    . Mechanisms of hypoxemia. Lung India 2017; 34: 47–60. doi:10.4103/0970-2113.197116
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Lumb AB,
    2. Slinger P
    . Hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction: physiology and anesthetic implications. Anesthesiology 2015; 122: 932–946. doi:10.1097/ALN.0000000000000569
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Lopez-Lopez JR,
    2. Perez-Garcia MT,
    3. Canet E, et al.
    Effects of almitrine bismesylate on the ionic currents of chemoreceptor cells from the carotid body. Mol Pharmacol 1998; 53: 330–339. doi:10.1124/mol.53.2.330
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. ↵
    1. Teppema LJ,
    2. Balanos GM,
    3. Steinback CD, et al.
    Effects of acetazolamide on ventilatory, cerebrovascular, and pulmonary vascular responses to hypoxia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2007; 175: 277–281. doi:10.1164/rccm.200608-1199OC
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Brett SJ,
    2. Evans TW
    . Measurement of endogenous nitric oxide in the lungs of patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998; 157: 993–997. doi:10.1164/ajrccm.157.3.9705060
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Ketabchi F,
    2. Ghofrani HA,
    3. Schermuly RT, et al.
    Effects of hypercapnia and NO synthase inhibition in sustained hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction. Respir Res 2012; 13: 7. doi:10.1186/1465-9921-13-7
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Bakr A,
    2. Pak O,
    3. Taye A, et al.
    Effects of dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase-1 overexpression on the response of the pulmonary vasculature to hypoxia. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2013; 49: 491–500. doi:10.1165/rcmb.2012-0330OC
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Ketabchi F,
    2. Egemnazarov B,
    3. Schermuly RT, et al.
    Effects of hypercapnia with and without acidosis on hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2009; 297: L977–L983. doi:10.1152/ajplung.00074.2009
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Blitzer ML,
    2. Loh E,
    3. Roddy MA, et al.
    Endothelium-derived nitric oxide regulates systemic and pulmonary vascular resistance during acute hypoxia in humans. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 28: 591–596. doi:10.1016/0735-1097(96)00218-5
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  44. ↵
    1. Spohr F,
    2. Busch CJ,
    3. Teschendorf P, et al.
    Selective inhibition of guanylate cyclase prevents impairment of hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction in endotoxemic mice. J Physiol Pharmacol 2009; 60: 107–112.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. Gross CM,
    2. Rafikov R,
    3. Kumar S, et al.
    Endothelial nitric oxide synthase deficient mice are protected from lipopolysaccharide induced acute lung injury. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0119918. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0119918
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. Ullrich R,
    2. Bloch KD,
    3. Ichinose F, et al.
    Hypoxic pulmonary blood flow redistribution and arterial oxygenation in endotoxin-challenged NOS2-deficient mice. J Clin Invest 1999; 104: 1421–1429. doi:10.1172/JCI6590
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    1. Huang HJ,
    2. Isakow W,
    3. Byers DE, et al.
    Imaging pulmonary inducible nitric oxide synthase expression with PET. J Nucl Med 2015; 56: 76–81. doi:10.2967/jnumed.114.146381
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. ↵
    1. Kobayashi A,
    2. Hashimoto S,
    3. Kooguchi K, et al.
    Expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase and inflammatory cytokines in alveolar macrophages of ARDS following sepsis. Chest 1998; 113: 1632–1639. doi:10.1378/chest.113.6.1632
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    1. Phillip Dellinger R,
    2. Parrillo JE
    . Mediator modulation therapy of severe sepsis and septic shock: does it work? Crit Care Med 2004; 32: 282–286. doi:10.1097/01.CCM.0000105423.06091.8E
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    1. Kieft H,
    2. Roos AN,
    3. van Drunen JD, et al.
    Clinical outcome of immunonutrition in a heterogeneous intensive care population. Intensive Care Med 2005; 31: 524–532. doi:10.1007/s00134-005-2564-x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. ↵
    1. Vincent JL,
    2. Privalle CT,
    3. Singer M, et al.
    Multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled phase III study of pyridoxalated hemoglobin polyoxyethylene in distributive shock (PHOENIX). Crit Care Med 2015; 43: 57–64. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000000554
    OpenUrl
  52. ↵
    1. Kylhammar D,
    2. Radegran G
    . The principal pathways involved in the in vivo modulation of hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction, pulmonary arterial remodelling and pulmonary hypertension. Acta Physiol 2017; 219: 728–756. doi:10.1111/apha.12749
    OpenUrl
  53. ↵
    1. Sandoo A,
    2. van Zanten JJ,
    3. Metsios GS, et al.
    The endothelium and its role in regulating vascular tone. Open Cardiovasc Med J 2010; 4: 302–312. doi:10.2174/1874192401004010302
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. ↵
    1. Jolliet P,
    2. Bulpa P,
    3. Thorens JB, et al.
    Nitric oxide and prostacyclin as test agents of vasoreactivity in severe precapillary pulmonary hypertension: predictive ability and consequences on haemodynamics and gas exchange. Thorax 1997; 52: 369–372. doi:10.1136/thx.52.4.369
    OpenUrlAbstract
  55. ↵
    1. Schilling MK,
    2. Gassmann N,
    3. Sigurdsson GH, et al.
    Role of thromboxane and leukotriene B4 in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome after oesophagectomy. Br J Anaesth 1998; 80: 36–40. doi:10.1093/bja/80.1.36
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. ↵
    1. Deby-Dupont G,
    2. Braun M,
    3. Lamy M, et al.
    Thromboxane and prostacyclin release in adult respiratory distress syndrome. Intensive Care Med 1987; 13: 167–174. doi:10.1007/BF00254700
    OpenUrlPubMed
  57. ↵
    1. Naeije R,
    2. Hallemans R,
    3. Melot C, et al.
    Eicosanoids and hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction in normal man. Bull Eur Physiopathol Respir 1987; 23: 613–617.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  58. ↵
    1. Bernard GR,
    2. Wheeler AP,
    3. Russell JA, et al.
    The effects of ibuprofen on the physiology and survival of patients with sepsis. The Ibuprofen in Sepsis Study Group. N Engl J Med 1997; 336: 912–918. doi:10.1056/NEJM199703273361303
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  59. ↵
    1. Yu H,
    2. Ni YN,
    3. Liang ZA, et al.
    The effect of aspirin in preventing the acute respiratory distress syndrome/acute lung injury: a meta-analysis. Am J Emerg Med 2018; 36: 1486–1491. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2018.05.017
    OpenUrl
  60. ↵
    1. Keseru B,
    2. Barbosa-Sicard E,
    3. Popp R, et al.
    Epoxyeicosatrienoic acids and the soluble epoxide hydrolase are determinants of pulmonary artery pressure and the acute hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstrictor response. FASEB J 2008; 22: 4306–4315. doi:10.1096/fj.08-112821
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  61. ↵
    1. Kandhi S,
    2. Zhang B,
    3. Froogh G, et al.
    EETs promote hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction via constrictor prostanoids. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2017; 313: L350–L359. doi:10.1152/ajplung.00038.2017
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  62. ↵
    1. Strielkov I,
    2. Krause NC,
    3. Knoepp F, et al.
    Cytochrome P450 epoxygenase-derived 5,6-epoxyeicosatrienoic acid relaxes pulmonary arteries in normoxia but promotes sustained pulmonary vasoconstriction in hypoxia. Acta Physiol 2020; 230: e13521. doi:10.1111/apha.13521
    OpenUrl
  63. ↵
    1. Zhou GL,
    2. Beloiartsev A,
    3. Yu B, et al.
    Deletion of the murine cytochrome P450 Cyp2j locus by fused BAC-mediated recombination identifies a role for Cyp2j in the pulmonary vascular response to hypoxia. PLoS Genet 2013; 9: e1003950. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003950
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  64. ↵
    1. Wepler M,
    2. Beloiartsev A,
    3. Buswell MD, et al.
    Soluble epoxide hydrolase deficiency or inhibition enhances murine hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction after lipopolysaccharide challenge. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2016; 311: L1213–L1221. doi:10.1152/ajplung.00394.2016
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  65. ↵
    1. Tao W,
    2. Li PS,
    3. Yang LQ, et al.
    Effects of a soluble epoxide hydrolase inhibitor on lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury in mice. PLoS One 2016; 11: e0160359. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0160359
    OpenUrl
  66. ↵
    1. Yang L,
    2. Cheriyan J,
    3. Gutterman DD, et al.
    Mechanisms of vascular dysfunction in COPD and effects of a novel soluble epoxide hydrolase inhibitor in smokers. Chest 2017; 151: 555–563. doi:10.1016/j.chest.2016.10.058
    OpenUrl
  67. ↵
    1. Sato K,
    2. Morio Y,
    3. Morris KG, et al.
    Mechanism of hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction involves ET(A) receptor-mediated inhibition of K(ATP) channel. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2000; 278: L434–L442. doi:10.1152/ajplung.2000.278.3.L434
    OpenUrlPubMed
  68. ↵
    1. Petersen B,
    2. Deja M,
    3. Bartholdy R, et al.
    Inhalation of the ETA receptor antagonist LU-135252 selectively attenuates hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2008; 294: R601–R605. doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00739.2007
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  69. ↵
    1. Pham I,
    2. Wuerzner G,
    3. Richalet JP, et al.
    Endothelin receptors blockade blunts hypoxia-induced increase in PAP in humans. Eur J Clin Invest 2010; 40: 195–202. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2362.2010.02254.x
    OpenUrlPubMed
  70. ↵
    1. Druml W,
    2. Steltzer H,
    3. Waldhausl W, et al.
    Endothelin-1 in adult respiratory distress syndrome. Am Rev Respir Dis 1993; 148: 1169–1173. doi:10.1164/ajrccm/148.5.1169
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  71. ↵
    1. Trachsel S,
    2. Hambraeus-Jonzon K,
    3. Bergquist M, et al.
    No redistribution of lung blood flow by inhaled nitric oxide in endotoxemic piglets pretreated with an endothelin receptor antagonist. J Appl Physiol 2015; 118: 768–775. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00591.2014
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  72. ↵
    1. Jesmin S,
    2. Yamaguchi N,
    3. Zaedi S, et al.
    Time-dependent expression of endothelin-1 in lungs and the effects of TNF-alpha blocking peptide on acute lung injury in an endotoxemic rat model. Biomed Res 2011; 32: 9–17. doi:10.2220/biomedres.32.9
    OpenUrlPubMed
  73. ↵
    1. Kaisers U,
    2. Busch T,
    3. Wolf S, et al.
    Inhaled endothelin A antagonist improves arterial oxygenation in experimental acute lung injury. Intensive Care Med 2000; 26: 1334–1342. doi:10.1007/s001340000608
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  74. ↵
    1. Guo Q,
    2. Huang JA,
    3. Fraidenburg DR
    . Bosentan as rescue treatment in refractory hypoxemia and pulmonary hypertension in a patient with ARDS and H7N9 influenza virus infection. Lung 2014; 192: 635–636. doi:10.1007/s00408-014-9602-9
    OpenUrl
  75. ↵
    1. Tian W,
    2. Jiang X,
    3. Tamosiuniene R, et al.
    Blocking macrophage leukotriene b4 prevents endothelial injury and reverses pulmonary hypertension. Sci Transl Med 2013; 5: 200ra117. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3006674
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  76. ↵
    1. Wright L,
    2. Tuder RM,
    3. Wang J, et al.
    5-Lipoxygenase and 5-lipoxygenase activating protein (FLAP) immunoreactivity in lungs from patients with primary pulmonary hypertension. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998; 157: 219–229. doi:10.1164/ajrccm.157.1.9704003
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  77. ↵
    1. Ichinose F,
    2. Zapol WM,
    3. Sapirstein A, et al.
    Attenuation of hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction by endotoxemia requires 5-lipoxygenase in mice. Circ Res 2001; 88: 832–838. doi:10.1161/hh0801.089177
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  78. ↵
    1. Stephenson AH,
    2. Lonigro AJ,
    3. Hyers TM, et al.
    Increased concentrations of leukotrienes in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of patients with ARDS or at risk for ARDS. Am Rev Respir Dis 1988; 138: 714–719. doi:10.1164/ajrccm/138.3.714
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  79. ↵
    1. Caironi P,
    2. Ichinose F,
    3. Liu R, et al.
    5-Lipoxygenase deficiency prevents respiratory failure during ventilator-induced lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005; 172: 334–343. doi:10.1164/rccm.200501-034OC
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  80. ↵
    1. Wenzel D,
    2. Matthey M,
    3. Bindila L, et al.
    Endocannabinoid anandamide mediates hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2013; 110: 18710–18715. doi:10.1073/pnas.1308130110
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  81. ↵
    1. Khodir AE,
    2. Ghoneim HA,
    3. Rahim MA, et al.
    Montelukast reduces sepsis-induced lung and renal injury in rats. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 2014; 92: 839–847. doi:10.1139/cjpp-2014-0191
    OpenUrl
  82. ↵
    1. Sprague AH,
    2. Khalil RA
    . Inflammatory cytokines in vascular dysfunction and vascular disease. Biochem Pharmacol 2009; 78: 539–552. doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2009.04.029
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  83. ↵
    1. Rabinovitch M,
    2. Guignabert C,
    3. Humbert M, et al.
    Inflammation and immunity in the pathogenesis of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Circ Res 2014; 115: 165–175. doi:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.113.301141
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  84. ↵
    1. Groth A,
    2. Vrugt B,
    3. Brock M, et al.
    Inflammatory cytokines in pulmonary hypertension. Respir Res 2014; 15: 47. doi:10.1186/1465-9921-15-47
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  85. ↵
    1. Pandolfi R,
    2. Barreira B,
    3. Moreno E, et al.
    Role of acid sphingomyelinase and IL-6 as mediators of endotoxin-induced pulmonary vascular dysfunction. Thorax 2017; 72: 460–471. doi:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-208067
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  86. ↵
    1. Horie S,
    2. McNicholas B,
    3. Rezoagli E, et al.
    Emerging pharmacological therapies for ARDS: COVID-19 and beyond. Intensive Care Med 2020; 46: 2265–2283. doi:10.1007/s00134-020-06141-z
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  87. ↵
    1. Balanos GM,
    2. Talbot NP,
    3. Dorrington KL, et al.
    Human pulmonary vascular response to 4 h of hypercapnia and hypocapnia measured using Doppler echocardiography. J Appl Physiol 2003; 94: 1543–1551. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00890.2002
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  88. ↵
    1. Croft QP,
    2. Formenti F,
    3. Talbot NP, et al.
    Variations in alveolar partial pressure for carbon dioxide and oxygen have additive not synergistic acute effects on human pulmonary vasoconstriction. PLoS One 2013; 8: e67886. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0067886
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  89. ↵
    1. Dorrington KL,
    2. Balanos GM,
    3. Talbot NP, et al.
    Extent to which pulmonary vascular responses to PCO2 and PO2 play a functional role within the healthy human lung. J Appl Physiol 2010; 108: 1084–1096. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.90963.2008
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  90. ↵
    1. Cheng HY,
    2. Croft QPP,
    3. Frise MC, et al.
    Human hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction is unaltered by 8 h of preceding isocapnic hyperoxia. Physiol Rep 2017; 5: e13396. doi:10.14814/phy2.13396
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  91. ↵
    1. Hambraeus-Jonzon K,
    2. Bindslev L,
    3. Mellgard AJ, et al.
    Hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction in human lungs. A stimulus-response study. Anesthesiology 1997; 86: 308–315. doi:10.1097/00000542-199702000-00006
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  92. ↵
    1. Santos C,
    2. Ferrer M,
    3. Roca J, et al.
    Pulmonary gas exchange response to oxygen breathing in acute lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 161: 26–31. doi:10.1164/ajrccm.161.1.9902084
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  93. ↵
    1. Olsson KM,
    2. Halank M,
    3. Egenlauf B, et al.
    Decompensated right heart failure, intensive care and perioperative management in patients with pulmonary hypertension: Updated recommendations from the Cologne Consensus Conference 2018. Int J Cardiol 2018; 272S: 46–52. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.08.081
    OpenUrl
  94. ↵
    1. Bourgonje AR,
    2. Abdulle AE,
    3. Timens W, et al.
    Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), SARS-CoV-2 and the pathophysiology of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). J Pathol 2020; 251: 228–248. doi:10.1002/path.5471
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  95. ↵
    1. Wosten-van Asperen RM,
    2. Lutter R,
    3. Specht PA, et al.
    Acute respiratory distress syndrome leads to reduced ratio of ACE/ACE2 activities and is prevented by angiotensin-(1-7) or an angiotensin II receptor antagonist. J Pathol 2011; 225: 618–627. doi:10.1002/path.2987
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  96. ↵
    1. Treml B,
    2. Neu N,
    3. Kleinsasser A, et al.
    Recombinant angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 improves pulmonary blood flow and oxygenation in lipopolysaccharide-induced lung injury in piglets. Crit Care Med 2010; 38: 596–601. doi:10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181c03009
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  97. ↵
    1. Idell S,
    2. Kueppers F,
    3. Lippmann M, et al.
    Angiotensin converting enzyme in bronchoalveolar lavage in ARDS. Chest 1987; 91: 52–56. doi:10.1378/chest.91.1.52
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  98. ↵
    1. Chen CM,
    2. Chou HC,
    3. Wang LF, et al.
    Captopril decreases plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 in rats with ventilator-induced lung injury. Crit Care Med 2008; 36: 1880–1885. doi:10.1097/CCM.0b013e31817c911d
    OpenUrlPubMed
  99. ↵
    1. Shen L,
    2. Mo H,
    3. Cai L, et al.
    Losartan prevents sepsis-induced acute lung injury and decreases activation of nuclear factor kappaB and mitogen-activated protein kinases. Shock 2009; 31: 500–506. doi:10.1097/SHK.0b013e318189017a
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  100. ↵
    1. Khan A,
    2. Benthin C,
    3. Zeno B, et al.
    A pilot clinical trial of recombinant human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care 2017; 21: 234. doi:10.1186/s13054-017-1823-x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  101. ↵
    1. Wirtz H,
    2. Hasenclever D,
    3. Schwabe K, et al.
    ACE inhibitor for lung protection during mechanical ventilation for acute lung injury – results of the double-blind, placebo controlled, randomised ACEmeVENT pilot study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2017; 195: A2895.
    OpenUrl
  102. ↵
    1. Gattinoni L,
    2. Coppola S,
    3. Cressoni M, et al.
    COVID-19 does not lead to a “typical” acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2020; 201: 1299–1300. doi:10.1164/rccm.202003-0817LE
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  103. ↵
    1. Gattinoni L,
    2. Chiumello D,
    3. Caironi P, et al.
    COVID-19 pneumonia: different respiratory treatments for different phenotypes? Intensive Care Med 2020; 46: 1099–1102. doi:10.1007/s00134-020-06033-2
    OpenUrlPubMed
  104. ↵
    1. Herrmann J,
    2. Mori V,
    3. Bates JHT, et al.
    Modeling lung perfusion abnormalities to explain early COVID-19 hypoxemia. Nat Commun 2020; 11: 4883. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-18672-6
    OpenUrl
  105. ↵
    1. Masi P,
    2. Bagate F,
    3. d'Humieres T, et al.
    Is hypoxemia explained by intracardiac or intrapulmonary shunt in COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome? Ann Intensive Care 2020; 10: 108. doi:10.1186/s13613-020-00726-z
    OpenUrl
  106. ↵
    1. Guan WJ,
    2. Ni ZY,
    3. Hu Y, et al.
    Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med 2020; 382: 1708–1720. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2002032
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  107. ↵
    1. Dhont S,
    2. Derom E,
    3. Van Braeckel E, et al.
    The pathophysiology of ‘happy' hypoxemia in COVID-19. Respir Res 2020; 21: 198. doi:10.1186/s12931-020-01462-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  108. ↵
    1. Menter T,
    2. Haslbauer JD,
    3. Nienhold R, et al.
    Postmortem examination of COVID-19 patients reveals diffuse alveolar damage with severe capillary congestion and variegated findings in lungs and other organs suggesting vascular dysfunction. Histopathol 2020; 77: 198–209. doi:10.1111/his.14134
    OpenUrlPubMed
  109. ↵
    1. Patel BV,
    2. Arachchillage DJ,
    3. Ridge CA, et al.
    Pulmonary angiopathy in severe COVID-19: physiologic, imaging, and hematologic observations. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2020; 202: 690–699. doi:10.1164/rccm.202004-1412OC
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  110. ↵
    1. Rebello CJ,
    2. Kirwan JP,
    3. Greenway FL
    . Obesity, the most common comorbidity in SARS-CoV-2: is leptin the link? Int J Obes 2020; 44: 1810–1817. doi:10.1038/s41366-020-0640-5
    OpenUrl
  111. ↵
    1. Singh SK
    . Human Respiratory Viral Infections. Boca Raton, CRC Press, 2014.
  112. ↵
    1. Imai Y,
    2. Kuba K,
    3. Penninger JM
    . Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Cell Mol Life Sci 2007; 64: 2006–2012. doi:10.1007/s00018-007-6228-6
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  113. ↵
    1. Potus F,
    2. Mai V,
    3. Lebret M, et al.
    Novel insights on the pulmonary vascular consequences of COVID-19. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2020; 319: L277–L288. doi:10.1152/ajplung.00195.2020
    OpenUrl
  114. ↵
    1. Karmouty-Quintana H,
    2. Thandavarayan RA,
    3. Keller SP, et al.
    Emerging mechanisms of pulmonary vasoconstriction in SARS-CoV-2-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and potential therapeutic targets. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21: 8081. doi:10.3390/ijms21218081
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  115. ↵
    1. Pang X,
    2. Cui Y,
    3. Zhu Y
    . Recombinant human ACE2: potential therapeutics of SARS-CoV-2 infection and its complication. Acta Pharmacol Sin 2020; 41: 1255–1257. doi:10.1038/s41401-020-0430-6
    OpenUrl
  116. ↵
    1. Sipmann FS,
    2. Santos A,
    3. Tusman G
    . Heart-lung interactions in acute respiratory distress syndrome: pathophysiology, detection and management strategies. Ann Transl Med 2018; 6: 27. doi:10.21037/atm.2017.12.07
    OpenUrl
  117. ↵
    1. Tomashefski JF Jr,
    2. Davies P,
    3. Boggis C, et al.
    The pulmonary vascular lesions of the adult respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Pathol 1983; 112: 112–126.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  118. ↵
    1. Snow RL,
    2. Davies P,
    3. Pontoppidan H, et al.
    Pulmonary vascular remodeling in adult respiratory distress syndrome. Am Rev Respir Dis 1982; 126: 887–892.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  119. ↵
    1. Madahar P,
    2. Beitler JR
    . Emerging concepts in ventilation-induced lung injury. F1000Res 2020; 9: F1000 Faculty Rev-222. doi:10.12688/f1000research.20576.1
    OpenUrl
  120. ↵
    1. Guerin C,
    2. Reignier J,
    3. Richard JC, et al.
    Prone positioning in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 2013; 368: 2159–2168. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1214103
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  121. ↵
    1. Vieillard-Baron A,
    2. Charron C,
    3. Caille V, et al.
    Prone positioning unloads the right ventricle in severe ARDS. Chest 2007; 132: 1440–1446. doi:10.1378/chest.07-1013
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  122. ↵
    1. Galiatsou E,
    2. Kostanti E,
    3. Svarna E, et al.
    Prone position augments recruitment and prevents alveolar overinflation in acute lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006; 174: 187–197. doi:10.1164/rccm.200506-899OC
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  123. ↵
    1. Karbing DS,
    2. Panigada M,
    3. Bottino N, et al.
    Changes in shunt, ventilation/perfusion mismatch, and lung aeration with PEEP in patients with ARDS: a prospective single-arm interventional study. Crit Care 2020; 24: 111. doi:10.1186/s13054-020-2834-6
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  124. ↵
    1. Bourenne J,
    2. Hraiech S,
    3. Rambaud R, et al.
    Non-ventilatory therapies for acute respiratory distress syndrome. Minerva Anestesiol 2018; 84: 1093–1101. doi:10.23736/S0375-9393.18.12328-5
    OpenUrl
  125. ↵
    1. Villar J,
    2. Ferrando C,
    3. Martinez D, et al.
    Dexamethasone treatment for the acute respiratory distress syndrome: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Respir Med 2020; 8: 267–276. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(19)30417-5
    OpenUrl
  126. ↵
    1. Horby P,
    2. Lim WS, et al.
    1. RECOVERY Collaborative Group
    , Horby P, Lim WS, et al. Dexamethasone in hospitalized patients with Covid-19. N Engl J Med 2021; 384: 693–704. [doi:10.1101/2020.06.22.20137273]
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  127. ↵
    1. Sterne JAC,
    2. Murthy S, et al.
    1. WHO Rapid Evidence Appraisal for COVID-19 Therapies (REACT) Working Group
    , Sterne JAC, Murthy S, et al. Association between administration of systemic corticosteroids and mortality among critically ill patients with COVID-19: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2020; 324: 1330–1341. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.17023
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  128. ↵
    1. Gust R,
    2. McCarthy TJ,
    3. Kozlowski J, et al.
    Response to inhaled nitric oxide in acute lung injury depends on distribution of pulmonary blood flow prior to its administration. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999; 159: 563–570. doi:10.1164/ajrccm.159.2.9806133
    OpenUrlPubMed
  129. ↵
    1. Rovira I,
    2. Chen TY,
    3. Winkler M, et al.
    Effects of inhaled nitric oxide on pulmonary hemodynamics and gas exchange in an ovine model of ARDS. J Appl Physiol 1994; 76: 345–355. doi:10.1152/jappl.1994.76.1.345
    OpenUrlPubMed
  130. ↵
    1. Ruan SY,
    2. Wu HY,
    3. Lin HH, et al.
    Inhaled nitric oxide and the risk of renal dysfunction in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a propensity-matched cohort study. Crit Care 2016; 20: 389. doi:10.1186/s13054-016-1566-0
    OpenUrl
  131. ↵
    1. Ferrari M,
    2. Santini A,
    3. Protti A, et al.
    Inhaled nitric oxide in mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19. J Crit Care 2020; 60: 159–160. doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.08.007
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. DeGrado JR,
    2. Szumita PM,
    3. Schuler BR, et al.
    Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of inhaled epoprostenol and inhaled nitric oxide for refractory hypoxemia in patients with coronavirus disease 2019. Crit Care Explor 2020; 2: e0259. doi:10.1097/CCE.0000000000000259
    OpenUrl
  132. ↵
    1. Longobardo A,
    2. Montanari C,
    3. Shulman R, et al.
    Inhaled nitric oxide minimally improves oxygenation in COVID-19 related acute respiratory distress syndrome. Br J Anaesth 2021; 126: e44–e46. doi:10.1016/j.bja.2020.10.011
    OpenUrl
  133. ↵
    1. Garfield B,
    2. McFadyen C,
    3. Briar C, et al.
    Potential for personalised application of inhaled nitric oxide in COVID-19 pneumonia. Br J Anaesth 2021; 126: e72–e75. doi:10.1016/j.bja.2020.11.006
    OpenUrl
  134. ↵
    1. Fang W,
    2. Jiang J,
    3. Su L, et al.
    The role of NO in COVID-19 and potential therapeutic strategies. Free Radic Biol Med 2020; 163: 153–162. doi:10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2020.12.008
    OpenUrl
  135. ↵
    1. Haeberle H,
    2. Prohaska S,
    3. Martus P, et al.
    Therapeutic iloprost for the treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (the ThIlo trial): a prospective, randomized, multicenter phase II study. Trials 2020; 21: 242. doi:10.1186/s13063-020-4163-0
    OpenUrl
  136. ↵
    1. Romaldini H,
    2. Rodriguez-Roisin R,
    3. Wagner PD, et al.
    Enhancement of hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction by almitrine in the dog. Am Rev Respir Dis 1983; 128: 288–293. doi:10.1164/arrd.1983.128.2.288
    OpenUrlPubMed
  137. ↵
    1. Dembinski R,
    2. Max M,
    3. Lopez F, et al.
    Effect of inhaled nitric oxide in combination with almitrine on ventilation-perfusion distributions in experimental lung injury. Intensive Care Med 2000; 26: 221–228. doi:10.1007/s001340050051
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  138. ↵
    1. Reyes A,
    2. Roca J,
    3. Rodriguez-Roisin R, et al.
    Effect of almitrine on ventilation-perfusion distribution in adult respiratory distress syndrome. Am Rev Respir Dis 1988; 137: 1062–1067. doi:10.1164/ajrccm/137.5.1062
    OpenUrlPubMed
  139. ↵
    1. Gallart L,
    2. Lu Q,
    3. Puybasset L, et al.
    Intravenous almitrine combined with inhaled nitric oxide for acute respiratory distress syndrome. The NO Almitrine Study Group. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998; 158: 1770–1777. doi:10.1164/ajrccm.158.6.9804066
    OpenUrlPubMed
  140. ↵
    1. Bermejo S,
    2. Gallart L,
    3. Silva-Costa-Gomes T, et al.
    Almitrine fails to improve oxygenation during one-lung ventilation with sevoflurane anesthesia. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2014; 28: 919–924. doi:10.1053/j.jvca.2013.03.019
    OpenUrl
  141. ↵
    1. Golder FJ,
    2. Hewitt MM,
    3. McLeod JF
    . Respiratory stimulant drugs in the post-operative setting. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 2013; 189: 395–402. doi:10.1016/j.resp.2013.06.010
    OpenUrl
  142. ↵
    1. Losser MR,
    2. Lapoix C,
    3. Delannoy M, et al.
    Almitrine as a non-ventilatory strategy to improve intrapulmonary shunt in COVID-19 patients. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med 2020; 39: 467–469. doi:10.1016/j.accpm.2020.05.013
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  143. ↵
    1. Caplan M,
    2. Goutay J,
    3. Bignon A, et al.
    Almitrine infusion in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome: a single-center observational study. Crit Care Med 2021; 49: e191–e198. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000004711
    OpenUrl
  144. ↵
    1. Repesse X,
    2. Charron C,
    3. Vieillard-Baron A
    . Acute cor pulmonale in ARDS: rationale for protecting the right ventricle. Chest 2015; 147: 259–265. doi:10.1378/chest.14-0877
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  145. ↵
    1. Repesse X,
    2. Vieillard-Baron A
    . Right heart function during acute respiratory distress syndrome. Ann Transl Med 2017; 5: 295. doi:10.21037/atm.2017.06.66
    OpenUrl
  146. ↵
    1. Cornet AD,
    2. Hofstra JJ,
    3. Swart EL, et al.
    Sildenafil attenuates pulmonary arterial pressure but does not improve oxygenation during ARDS. Intensive Care Med 2010; 36: 758–764. doi:10.1007/s00134-010-1754-3
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  147. ↵
    1. Radermacher P,
    2. Santak B,
    3. Wust HJ, et al.
    Prostacyclin and right ventricular function in patients with pulmonary hypertension associated with ARDS. Intensive Care Med 1990; 16: 227–232. doi:10.1007/BF01705156
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
View this article with LENS
Vol 30 Issue 161 Table of Contents
European Respiratory Review: 30 (161)
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Impairment of hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction in acute respiratory distress syndrome
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
Impairment of hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction in acute respiratory distress syndrome
Mareike Gierhardt, Oleg Pak, Dieter Walmrath, Werner Seeger, Friedrich Grimminger, Hossein A. Ghofrani, Norbert Weissmann, Matthias Hecker, Natascha Sommer
European Respiratory Review Sep 2021, 30 (161) 210059; DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0059-2021

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Impairment of hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction in acute respiratory distress syndrome
Mareike Gierhardt, Oleg Pak, Dieter Walmrath, Werner Seeger, Friedrich Grimminger, Hossein A. Ghofrani, Norbert Weissmann, Matthias Hecker, Natascha Sommer
European Respiratory Review Sep 2021, 30 (161) 210059; DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0059-2021
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Abstract
    • Clinical definition and current therapeutic options for ARDS
    • General pathomechanisms underlying ARDS
    • V/Q mismatch in ARDS
    • Primary sensing and signalling mechanism underlying HPV and alterations in ARDS
    • Endothelial modulators of HPV and pulmonary vascular pressure in ARDS
    • Systemic, humoral and pharmacological factors affecting HPV
    • Dysregulation of HPV in SARS-CoV-2 infection
    • The role of PH in ARDS
    • Non-pharmacological approach for treatment of V/Q mismatch
    • Pharmacological approach for treatment of V/Q mismatch and PH
    • Conclusion: treatment of V/Q mismatch in ARDS – rebalancing vascular function
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Subjects

  • Acute lung injury and critical care
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Role of air pollutants in airway epithelial barrier dysfunction
  • E-cigarettes and nicotine abstinence
  • Lung imaging in cystic fibrosis
Show more Review

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERR

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising
  • Sponsorship

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN: 0905-9180
Online ISSN: 1600-0617

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society