Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Particulate matter and the airway epithelium: the special case of the underground?

Dawn M. Cooper, Matthew Loxham
European Respiratory Review 2019 28: 190066; DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0066-2019
Dawn M. Cooper
1School of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthew Loxham
1School of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
2NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK
3Southampton Marine and Maritime Institute, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
4Institute for Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Matthew Loxham
  • For correspondence: m.loxham@soton.ac.uk
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Airborne particulate matter (PM) is a leading driver of premature mortality and cardiopulmonary morbidity, associated with exacerbations of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, and lung cancer. The airway epithelium, as the principal site of PM deposition, is critical to the effects of, and initial response to, PM. A key mechanism by which PM exerts its effects is the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), inducing antioxidant and inflammatory responses in exposed epithelial cells. However, much of what is known about the effects of PM is based on research using particulates from urban air. PM from underground railways is compositionally highly distinct from urban PM, being rich in metals associated with wheel, rail and brake wear and electrical arcing and component wear, which endows underground PM with potent ROS-generating capacity. In addition, underground PM appears to be more inflammogenic than urban PM in epithelial cells, but there is a lack of research into effects on exposed individuals, especially those with underlying health conditions. This review summarises current knowledge about the effects of PM on the airway epithelium, how the effects of underground PM may be different to urban PM and the potential health consequences and mitigation strategies for commuters and workers in underground railways.

Abstract

Airborne particulate matter in underground railways is much more concentrated and metal-rich than that found above ground. The evidence surrounding what this might mean for effects on the airways of exposed commuters and staff is limited and inconsistent. http://bit.ly/2KtcorT

Introduction

Exposure to airborne particulate matter (PM), which encompasses solid particles or liquid droplets suspended in the air, is associated with almost 9 million deaths per annum worldwide [1, 2]. Adverse respiratory outcomes associated with PM exposure include exacerbations of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and lung cancer [3–6]. PM is normally classified according to its aerodynamic diameter, most commonly as PM10 with a diameter <10 µm (PM10–2.5, defined as coarse PM), PM2.5 (fine; diameter <2.5 µm) and PM0.1 (ultrafine; 0.1 µm). Particles at the larger end of this scale are generally derived from crustal and abrasion sources, such as soil erosion, weathering, sea spray and road wear, whereas the smallest particles generally derive from combustion or other high-temperature processes. Coarse PM predominantly deposits in the upper airways, trapped by hairs and mucus, whereas fine PM may reach as far as the terminal bronchioles and alveoli. Ultrafine PM can enter the alveoli, may translocate across the gas–blood barrier, and persist for several months post-inhalation [7]. Regulation of ambient PM is by mass concentration, but this fails to take into account the composition of PM. Much of the current understanding of the effects of PM, from the population level down to the cellular and molecular level, is based upon studies of ambient PM, as found in urban air. Extrapolation of these findings to PM from alternative sources assumes that source-related composition, which may vary considerably [8], does not play a role in the effects [9]. One such alternative source is underground railways.

Underground railways

Underground railways are heavily used mass transit systems in many of the world's major cities, with 53.8 billion underground railway journeys being made worldwide in 2017 [10]. In underground railway systems, the airborne concentration of PM is often many times greater than above ground (table 1). Studies of PM fluxes and composition have shown that the predominant sources of PM mass in the underground are trains, from shearing of the wheels and rails, wearing of electrical rail or overhead wire and current collector and electrical arcing. These processes generate predominantly coarse and fine PM rich in metallic elements including iron, manganese, chromium (from steel rails/wheels), barium (from brakes) and copper (from electrical components), among others [11, 18], although high-temperature processes such as friction and current arcing can also generate ultrafine PM [24, 25]. In addition, depending on station location, PM enters from outside, predominantly in the ultrafine fraction and probably from road vehicle exhaust, contributing to particle number more than particle mass [26]. PM deposited on surfaces in the underground is resuspended and circulated by the piston action of trains, especially where ventilation systems are lacking, with on-platform airborne PM concentrations generally being higher than those in carriages [19], and higher in stations which are deeper and further from the tunnel entrance [15, 27].

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Particulate matter with a 50% cut-off aerodynamic diameter of 10 µm (PM10) and 2.5 µm (PM2.5) concentrations in underground railway systems featured in this review

PM in the airways

The major site of deposition of inhaled PM is the bronchial epithelium, a pseudostratified epithelial layer which provides a chemically, immunologically and mechanically protective barrier against environmental insults [28, 29]. The epithelium is covered with a mucous layer, containing mucins, highly glycosylated proteins, in which particles are trapped before ciliary clearance. In contrast, particles reaching the lower airways tend to be cleared by macrophage-mediated phagocytosis [30]. Nonetheless, particles or their components may reach the underlying cells, and exert effects, key among which is thought to be oxidative stress.

PM-induced oxidative stress and oxidative damage in vitro

Oxidative stress occurs when there is an excess of potentially damaging oxidants, including free radicals and reactive oxygen species (ROS), over cellular antioxidant defences. As a consequence, there is oxidation of cellular components such as nucleic acids, proteins and lipids, leading to tissue injury and infiltration of inflammatory cells [31]. PM can exert oxidative stress through several mechanisms [32]. Certain surface or soluble components of PM, especially transition metals, can generate ROS on account of their ability to act as electron donors [33]. Transition metals are able to exist in multiple oxidation states, and thus donate electrons to molecular oxygen to generate ROS, facilitated by the oxygen-rich environment of the airways, forming superoxide, hydrogen peroxide and hydroxyl radicals, as well as potentially damaging reactive nitrogen and reactive sulphur species through downstream reactions [33, 34].

FIGURE 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1

The effects on the bronchial epithelium of underground railway particulate matter (PM). PM in underground railways is derived principally from train-related sources, including wheel-on-rail and brake-on-wheel interactions, as well from wear and current arcing involving the current collector, with each source producing compositionally distinct metal-rich PM. Although there are likely to be element-specific effects on cells, a key mechanism through which PM exerts it effects is via generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which may occur extracellularly, or intracellularly following entry of PM into the cell. ROS may be generated directly by the particle or via mitochondrial dysregulation and activation of endogenous ROS-generating enzymes. Through oxidation of KEAP1, which sequesters it in the cytoplasm and targets it for degradation, the transcription factor Nrf2 is allowed to translocate to the nucleus, where it binds the antioxidant response element, activating transcription of a variety of antioxidant-related enzymes. Through ROS-dependent and ROS-independent mechanisms involving mitogen-activated protein kinase, nuclear factor (NF)-κB is released from its cytoplasmic anchor inhibitor of κB (IκB), translocating to the nucleus to activate inflammatory mediator expression, while concentrations of active forms of inflammatory mediators interleukin (IL)-1β and IL-18 are increased by ROS-mediated activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome via endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and the unfolded protein response (UPR), although a UPR-independent mechanism has been demonstrated, albeit not currently for PM. In addition, PM-derived ROS are able to upregulate expression of the mucin MUC5AC, resulting in increased mucus secretion to improve the physical epithelial barrier, while PM are able to impair the ionic and macromolecular tightness of the barrier by inducing dissociation of adherens and tight junction proteins away from the apical junction complex (AJC). Ba: barium; Sr: strontium; Sb: antimony; C: carbon; Cu: copper; Fe: iron; Mn: manganese; Cr: chromium.

As well as acting as a source of ROS, PM can elicit increased ROS generation by exposed cells. Exposure to wildfire PM2.5 has been seen to increase expression of dual oxidase 1 (DUOX1) in human bronchial epithelial cells [35], with bronchial and alveolar DUOX and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase activity potentially being a key mediator of the inflammatory effects of PM [36, 37]. Furthermore, PM can induce mitochondrial toxicity with consequent overproduction of ROS by mitochondria, dysregulation of the electron transport chain, loss of mitochondrial membrane potential and impaired oxidative phosphorylation [38, 39]. Further effects on the mitochondria and ATP generation may manifest directly or indirectly through different mechanisms for water-soluble metallic and water-insoluble organic PM components [40, 41], with nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) potentially playing an important role in the maintenance of mitochondrial function, as well as more canonically through induction of phase II enzymes [41]. ROS can trigger release of the Nrf2 transcription factor from its cytoplasmic anchor kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (KEAP1) through mechanisms which may include direct oxidative attack or non-oxidative mechanisms, followed by binding of Nrf2 to the antioxidant response element, under the control of which are multiple antioxidant and detoxification enzymes including those relating to antioxidant activity (haemoxygenase-1 (HO-1), glutathione peroxidase), glutathione synthesis and (re)cycling (e.g. glutathione reductase, glutathione-S-transferase), NADPH regeneration (e.g. glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase) and xenobiotic metabolism (e.g. transaldolase, NAD(P)H-quinone oxidoreductase-1) [42–44].

A consequence of the richness in transition metals of underground PM is its ability to potently deplete antioxidants such as ascorbate or reduced glutathione, and generate free radicals independently of cells [45, 46]. This generation of ROS has been seen in primary bronchial epithelial cells exposed to underground PM, in a manner suggesting that ROS-generating potency increases as PM size decreases [24]. Comparison of underground PM with other PM types suggests that it is a more potent generator of ROS than PM from other sources, including urban PM, road wear, diesel and wood burning in A549 type 2 alveolar epithelial cells [47], and compared to similar PM sources in RAW264.7 murine macrophages, accompanied by increased lipid peroxidation [48]. Similarly, increased concentrations of oxidised biomolecules have been observed with underground PM appearing more potent than other PM types in inducing oxidative plasmid scission in a cell-free assay [12] and DNA damage in A549 cells [47, 49]. This oxidative damage to DNA exerted by underground PM can be mitigated by the iron chelator/redox inactivator desferrioxamine [50], while induction of the antioxidant enzyme HO-1 stimulated by underground PM is susceptible to desferrioxamine and the ROS scavenger N-acetylcysteine [51]. These data suggest that underground PM is able to generate ROS by itself, and in exposed cells, more potently than PM from above-ground sources on a PM mass basis, in a metal content-related manner, although conclusions are mixed as to whether this is a property principally of iron, the most abundant metal in underground PM, or other metals, especially those originating from the braking system.

Inflammatory and barrier responses to PM in vitro

When exposed cells are unable to rectify oxidative stress through clearance of particles or increased antioxidant generation, inflammation ensues [52]. This is primarily coordinated through activation of mitogen activated protein kinases (MAPKs) with downstream phosphorylation of inhibitor of κB (IκB) and thus activation of nuclear factor κ-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB) signalling, with increased expression of a battery of inflammatory mediators including interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6 and IL-8 as well as matrix metallopeptidase-9 and cyclooxygenase-2 [53]. Involvement of microRNAs in the effects of PM has been demonstrated, with PM inducing sustained activation of NF-κB via phosphoinositide 3-kinase/Akt-mediated suppression of miR-331 [54], disinhibiting expression of inhibitor of κβ kinase-β (IκK-β), consequently increasing phosphorylation of IκB [54].

Additionally, there may be involvement of toll-like receptors (TLRs), principally TLR4 and TLR2, in the cytokine response to PM in multiple cell types [55–57], signalling through the myeloid differentiation primary response protein MyD88 resulting in NF-κB translocation to the nucleus and induction of cytokines such as IL-6 and IL-8 [28, 58]. PM-associated lipopolysaccharide, a component of Gram-negative bacterial cell walls, may activate TLR4 [59], while TLR2 recognises other PM-associated microbial components including lipoteichoic acid and proteoglycans, but may also be responsive to metals or endogenous damage-associated molecular patterns [60]. ROS may induce endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and activate the unfolded protein response (UPR) [61, 62]. This may result in outcomes including arrest of protein translation, increased inflammatory mediator production through NF-κB, and apoptosis, which are co-ordinated through different arms of the UPR and may vary depending on the stimulus and cell type [63]. For example, there is evidence for UPR activating the intracellular danger-sensing nucleotide-binding domain and leucine-rich repeat protein-3 (NLRP3) inflammasome in PM-mediated neutrophilic airway inflammation [64], which appears to be principally involved with the innate immune response to PM and which increases activation of the cytokines IL-1β and IL-18 [65, 66]. However, it has also been demonstrated that ER stress-induced NLRP3 activation, while still requiring ROS, may occur independently of UPR, and proceed instead via a mitochondria-dependent pathway [67]. Given the aforementioned effects of PM on mitochondrial metabolism, it would be of interest to determine whether these effects on the NLRP3 inflammasome occur through common mechanisms.

PM can affect the integrity of the airway epithelial barrier. Mice exposed to ambient PM2.5 collected during haze episodes in Hong Kong and China showed suppressed levels of E-cadherin alongside increased concentrations of interferon (IFN)-γ, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6 and IL-10 in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) [68], while combustion-generated PM induced epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in bronchial epithelial cells in vitro and in a murine model, including decreased E-cadherin expression and loss of epithelial cell morphology [69]. Similarly, human and rat alveolar epithelial cells exposed to PM10 and diesel exhaust particles exhibit reduced membrane occludin and dissociation from the cytoskeletal linker zonula occludens-1 [70]. In addition, ultrafine PM may enter human bronchial epithelial cells [50, 65, 71], potentially triggering autophagy [71].

Increased susceptibility of the asthmatic airways to PM may arise from impaired barrier function of the asthmatic airway epithelium, such as impaired junction formation with decreased tightness against ionic and macromolecular passage [72, 73], and increased PM-stimulated release of proinflammatory cytokines and airway remodelling factors [73, 74]. In addition, PM may exacerbate mucus hypersecretion, through upregulation of bronchial epithelial expression of MUC5AC and the epidermal growth factor receptor ligand amphiregulin [76]. Furthermore, asthma is associated with a background of pre-existing oxidative stress as well as increased susceptibility to ROS-associated damage [77, 78]. Indeed, genetic polymorphisms in enzymes involved in cycling of the antioxidant glutathione have been associated with asthma [79], as have decreased levels of airway superoxide dismutase and catalase [80, 81].

Studies have noted underground PM concentration-dependent increases in release of proinflammatory cytokines from A549 and primary bronchial epithelial cells, with underground PM generally being shown to be more potent than urban PM and other PM types in epithelial cells [50]. However, this is notably not the case for macrophage exposure, where underground PM tends to elicit less of an inflammatory cytokine response than urban PM [49, 82, 83]. This disparity may be due to the relatively high concentration of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in urban PM compared to underground PM [82], to which macrophages are relatively more responsive than epithelial cells since the latter poorly/do not express CD14 or MD-2 involved in LPS-TLR4 signalling [83–85]. It may also be due to liberation of urban PM-specific PM components in the acidic phagosome, which has been observed with gold nanoparticles [87]. Unlike urban PM, the proinflammatory activity of underground PM seems to be predominantly confined to the insoluble fraction of the particulate [50], probably in the metal fraction, given that this inflammogenicity is abrogated by iron chelation. Furthermore, this activity is less pronounced for underground PM with a much lower metal content, such as may be found in underground systems where rubber pneumatic tyres are in use [17]. Indeed, the iron content of underground PM has been shown to be mainly in the form of insoluble iron oxide [88]. A recent report by the UK Committee on the Medical Effects of Air Pollution (COMEAP) on inhalable dust in the London Underground suggested that the insoluble nature of iron in underground PM at normal physiological pH may result in overestimation of the risk of exposure to underground PM given the diminished bioavailability of insoluble metal compared to soluble metal [89], although metal solubility may increase in the acidic environment of the lysosome, with implications for toxicity [90]. However, conversely, insoluble metallic PM may have a prolonged persistence and be more likely to enter distal organs intact [7, 91]. Similarly, the relatively less inflammogenic nature of underground PM compared to urban PM suggests that, mass-for-mass, underground PM may represent less of a health risk, although this conflicts with the increased level of oxidative stress exerted by underground PM. The contribution of underground sources to overall PM concentration is weighted towards the coarse and fine fractions, meaning that the portion of the toxic burden carried by the ultrafine fraction may be relatively less than above ground [13, 26], although this is not a uniform finding and may depend on underground network-specific factors [25].

In vivo exposure studies

Studies evaluating the composition of underground PM compared to PM found in overground light rail and road journeys suggest that, while underground PM may have relatively low concentrations of the carcinogenic polyaromatic hydrocarbons associated with diesel combustion, this may be outweighed by the presence of metals in underground PM, and the sheer airborne concentration of underground PM [14, 92]. Indeed, even a relatively short commute in an underground railway may contribute a large proportion of an individual's daily exposure to PM and airborne metals [16]. Therefore, it is perhaps surprising that studies of the effects of acute and chronic exposure to underground railway air have found little evidence of excess risk [93]. Exposure of volunteers in the Stockholm underground for 2 h found no change in lung function parameters, BALF cell counts or cytokine concentrations in healthy or mildly asthmatic volunteers, although there was increased self-reporting of lower and upper airways symptoms in the different groups [20, 94]. In addition, the study found increased concentration of circulating coagulation markers and BALF oxylipins in the healthy group only, suggesting that disease-specific differences may not necessarily manifest at the site of the pathology, although the clinical significance of this is unclear [20, 94]. A similar lack of obvious effect has been noted in Stockholm underground workers over the course of an 8-h shift, albeit with an increase in circulating coagulation markers, as with the aforementioned study [95, 96]. Similarly, 5-h exposure of volunteers at multiple sites across the Netherlands, including an underground railway station, found that exhaled nitric oxide fraction was not obviously associated with underground exposure [97], nor was nasal lavage inflammatory cytokine concentration [98] or coagulation markers in contrast to the Stockholm studies [99, 100], although nasal lactoferrin expression was associated with underground railway PM metals [98], as were circulating white blood cell, neutrophil and monocyte counts [101]. Studies of chronic workplace exposure have shown a similar lack of effect: Stockholm underground drivers were not noted to be at increased risk of lung cancer [102] or myocardial infarction [103]. However, these studies were performed in only two underground systems, using generally healthy young adult and middle-aged volunteers. Much more work is required before conclusions can be drawn about the effects of underground railway PM on incidence and exacerbation of respiratory diseases, differential effects on those with pre-existing respiratory disease and chronic effects.

Protection against PM

Given the clearly elevated PM mass concentrations in underground stations, there have been several proposals for their reduction [104]. Those focusing on reducing PM generation include the use of pneumatic tyres rather than metal wheels [17, 22], and the use of nonferrous materials to decrease the potential ROS-generating capacity of PM [105], although the use of pneumatic tyres may pose a different risk, acting as a source of inhalable microplastics [106, 107]. Those focusing on reducing exposure to PM include the installation of filters to attract and sequester magnetic PM [88, 108], and the washing of tunnel walls to diminish resuspension of PM by train passage [21]. Full-height platform edge doors, originally intended to prevent passenger access to the tracks when there is no stationary train in the station, have been suggested as being perhaps the most effective mechanism to decrease PM exposure for passengers on platforms [109], while there is some evidence that PM concentration varies along the platform, implying that exposure might be modified by passenger location [19, 110]. Face masks may reduce inhalation of PM, and have been shown to have beneficial effects in highly polluted urban settings [111, 112], but “real-life” filtration of PM may be less than expected, with poor facial fit a particular problem [113], and there are significant ethical questions regarding the use of masks by the public and public-facing staff.

Conclusions

There is an expanding body of evidence for the effects of PM on the airways (figure 1), and the mechanisms by which such outcomes occur, but there is a need to consider PM as a class of chemically and toxicologically heterogeneous toxicants, rather than simply as a single homogeneous entity. Given that underground railways generally have concentrations of airborne PM several times higher than above ground, and that physicochemical and in vitro data suggest that underground PM is a potent inducer of oxidative stress in airway epithelial cells, it is noteworthy that there is a lack of evidence for effect in vivo. There is a clear need for further studies of the effects of underground PM in vivo, especially focusing on demographic groups other than those predominantly represented in underground staff, such as severe asthmatics and the elderly, and in vitro and in vivo studies to determine effects of PM beyond the range of antioxidant and inflammatory markers usually evaluated in such studies.

Footnotes

  • Provenance: Commissioned article, peer reviewed

  • Conflict of interest: D.M. Cooper has nothing to disclose.

  • Conflict of interest: M. Loxham has nothing to disclose.

  • Support statement: D.M. Cooper is supported by a PhD Studentship from the Gerald Kerkut Charitable Trust, and a University of Southampton Presidential Scholarship. M. Loxham is supported by a Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) Future Leader Fellowship (BB/P011365/1) and a Senior Research Fellowship from the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Southampton Biomedical Research Centre. Funding information for this article has been deposited with the Crossref Funder Registry.

  • Received June 10, 2019.
  • Accepted August 23, 2019.
  • Copyright ©ERS 2019.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This article is open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Burnett R,
    2. Chen H,
    3. Szyszkowicz M, et al.
    Global estimates of mortality associated with long-term exposure to outdoor fine particulate matter. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2018; 115: 9592–9597.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Lelieveld J,
    2. Klingmüller K,
    3. Pozzer A, et al.
    Cardiovascular disease burden from ambient air pollution in Europe reassessed using novel hazard ratio functions. Eur Heart J 2019; 40: 1590–1596.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Guarnieri M,
    2. Balmes JR
    . Outdoor air pollution and asthma. Lancet 2014; 383: 1581–1592.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Liu S,
    2. Zhou YM,
    3. Liu SX, et al.
    Association between exposure to ambient particulate matter and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: results from a cross-sectional study in China. Thorax 2017; 72: 788–795.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Winterbottom CJ,
    2. Shah RJ,
    3. Patterson KC, et al.
    Exposure to ambient particulate matter is associated with accelerated functional decline in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Chest 2018; 153: 1221–1228.
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. Hamra GB,
    2. Guha N,
    3. Cohen A, et al.
    Outdoor particulate matter exposure and lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ Health Perspect 2014; 122: 906–911.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Miller MR,
    2. Raftis JB,
    3. Langrish JP, et al.
    Inhaled nanoparticles accumulate at sites of vascular disease. ACS Nano 2017; 11: 4542–4552.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Strak M,
    2. Steenhof M,
    3. Godri KJ, et al.
    Variation in characteristics of ambient particulate matter at eight locations in the Netherlands – the RAPTES project. Atmos Environ 2011; 45: 4442–4453.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. ↵
    1. Loxham M
    . Harmful effects of particulate air pollution: identifying the culprits. Respirology 2015; 20: 7–8.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    UITP. UITP World Metro Figures 2018. www.uitp.org/sites/default/files/cck-focus-papers-files/Statistics%20Brief%20-%20World%20metro%20figures%202018V4_WEB.pdf
  9. ↵
    1. Martins V,
    2. Moreno T,
    3. Mendes L, et al.
    Factors controlling air quality in different European subway systems. Environ Res 2016; 146: 35–46.
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    1. Seaton A,
    2. Cherrie J,
    3. Dennekamp M, et al.
    The London Underground: dust and hazards to health. Occup Environ Med 2005; 62: 355–362.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Rivas B,
    2. Kumar P,
    3. Hagen-Zanker A
    . Exposure to air pollutants during commuting in London: are there inequalities among different socio-economic groups? Environ Int 2017; 101: 143–157.
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. Kam W,
    2. Delfino RJ,
    3. Schauer JJ, et al.
    A comparative assessment of PM2.5 exposures in light-rail, subway, freeway, and surface street environments in Los Angeles and estimated lung cancer risk. Environ Sci Process Impacts 2013; 15: 234–243.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. Colombi C,
    2. Angius S,
    3. Gianelle V, et al.
    Particulate matter concentrations, physical characteristics and elemental composition in the Milan underground transport system. Atmos Environ 2013; 70: 166–178.
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    1. Van Ryswyk K,
    2. Anastasopolos AT,
    3. Evans G, et al.
    Metro commuter exposures to particulate air pollution and PM2.5-associated elements in three Canadian cities: the Urban Transportation Exposure Study. Environ Sci Technol 2017; 51: 5713–5720.
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. Bachoual R,
    2. Boczkowski J,
    3. Goven D, et al.
    Biological effects of particles from the Paris subway system. Chem Res Toxicol 2007; 20: 1426–1433.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Cusack M,
    2. Talbot N,
    3. Ondráček J, et al.
    Variability of aerosols and chemical composition of PM10, PM2.5 and PM1 on a platform of the Prague underground metro. Atmos Environ 2015; 118: 176–183.
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    1. Wang JJ,
    2. Zhao LJ,
    3. Zhu DL, et al.
    Characteristics of particulate matter (PM) concentrations influenced by piston wind and train door opening in the Shanghai subway system. Transport Res D-Tr E 2016; 47: 77–88.
    OpenUrl
  18. ↵
    1. Klepczyńska-Nyström A,
    2. Larsson BM,
    3. Grunewald J, et al.
    Health effects of a subway environment in mild asthmatic volunteers. Respir Med 2012; 106: 25–33.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Chen YY,
    2. Lu CY,
    3. Chen PC, et al.
    Analysis of aerosol composition and assessment of tunnel washing performance within a mass rapid transit system in Taiwan. Aerosol Air Qual Res 2017; 17: 1527–1537.
    OpenUrl
  20. ↵
    1. Carteni A,
    2. Cascetta F
    . Particulate matter concentrations in a high-quality rubber-tyred metro system: the case study of Turin in Italy. Int J Environ Sci Technol 2018; 15: 1921–1930.
    OpenUrl
  21. World [A3] Health Organization (WHO). WHO Global Ambient Air Quality Database (update 2018). 2018. www.who.int/airpollution/data/cities/en/
  22. ↵
    1. Sundh J,
    2. Olofsson U,
    3. Olander L, et al.
    Wear rate testing in relation to airborne particles generated in a wheel–rail contact. Lubr Sci 2009; 21: 135–150.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  23. ↵
    1. Loxham M,
    2. Cooper MJ,
    3. Gerlofs-Nijland ME, et al.
    Physicochemical characterization of airborne particulate matter at a mainline underground railway station. Environ Sci Technol 2013; 47: 3614–3622.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  24. ↵
    1. Reche C,
    2. Moreno T,
    3. Martins V, et al.
    Factors controlling particle number concentration and size at metro stations. Atmos Environ 2017; 156: 169–181.
    OpenUrl
  25. ↵
    1. Murruni LG,
    2. Solanes V,
    3. Debray M, et al.
    Concentrations and elemental composition of particulate matter in the Buenos Aires underground system. Atmos Environ 2009; 43: 4577–4583.
    OpenUrl
  26. ↵
    1. Loxham M,
    2. Davies DE,
    3. Blume C
    . Epithelial function and dysfunction in asthma. Clin Exp Allergy 2014; 44: 1299–1313.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. De Grove KC,
    2. Provoost S,
    3. Brusselle GG, et al.
    Insights in particulate matter-induced allergic airway inflammation: focus on the epithelium. Clin Exp Allergy 2018; 48: 773–786.
    OpenUrl
  28. ↵
    1. Oberdörster G
    . Lung dosimetry: pulmonary clearance of inhaled particles. Aerosol Sci Tech 1993; 18: 279–289.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  29. ↵
    1. Kelly FJ
    . Oxidative stress: its role in air pollution and adverse health effects. Occup Environ Med 2003; 60: 612–616.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    1. Øvrevik J,
    2. Refsnes M,
    3. Låg M, et al.
    Activation of proinflammatory responses in cells of the airway mucosa by particulate matter: oxidant- and non-oxidant-mediated triggering mechanisms. Biomolecules 2015; 5: 1399–1440.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. van Klaveren RJ,
    2. Nemery B
    . Role of reactive oxygen species in occupational and environmental obstructive pulmonary diseases. Curr Opin Pulm Med 1999; 5: 118–123.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Kelly FJ,
    2. Fussell JC
    . Size, source and chemical composition as determinants of toxicity attributable to ambient particulate matter. Atmos Environ 2012; 60: 504–526.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  33. ↵
    1. Nakayama Wong LS,
    2. Aung HH,
    3. Lamé MW, et al.
    Fine particulate matter from urban ambient and wildfire sources from California's San Joaquin Valley initiate differential inflammatory, oxidative stress, and xenobiotic responses in human bronchial epithelial cells. Toxicol In Vitro 2011; 25: 1895–1905.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Becher R,
    2. Bucht A,
    3. Øvrevik J, et al.
    Involvement of NADPH oxidase and iNOS in rodent pulmonary cytokine responses to urban air and mineral particles. Inhal Toxicol 2007; 19: 645–655.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Ovrevik J,
    2. Refsnes M,
    3. Totlandsdal AI, et al.
    TACE/TGF-α /EGFR regulates CXCL8 in bronchial epithelial cells exposed to particulate matter components. Eur Respir J 2011; 38: 1189–1199.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    1. Wang Y,
    2. Zhang M,
    3. Li ZP, et al.
    Fine particulate matter induces mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress in human SH-SY5Y cells. Chemosphere 2019; 218: 577–588.
    OpenUrl
  37. ↵
    1. Leclercq B,
    2. Kluza J,
    3. Antherieu S, et al.
    Air pollution-derived PM2.5 impairs mitochondrial function in healthy and chronic obstructive pulmonary diseased human bronchial epithelial cells. Environ Pollut 2018; 243: 1434–1449.
    OpenUrl
  38. ↵
    1. Lavrich KS,
    2. Corteselli EM,
    3. Wages PA, et al.
    Investigating mitochondrial dysfunction in human lung cells exposed to redox-active PM components. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2018; 342: 99–107.
    OpenUrl
  39. ↵
    1. Pardo M,
    2. Xu FF,
    3. Shemesh M, et al.
    Nrf2 protects against diverse PM2.5 components-induced mitochondrial oxidative damage in lung cells. Sci Total Environ 2019; 669: 303–313.
    OpenUrl
  40. ↵
    1. Li N,
    2. Xia T,
    3. Nel AE
    . The role of oxidative stress in ambient particulate matter-induced lung diseases and its implications in the toxicity of engineered nanoparticles. Free Radic Biol Med 2008; 44: 1689–1699.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Suzuki T,
    2. Yamamoto M
    . Molecular basis of the Keap1-Nrf2 system. Free Radic Biol Med 2015; 88: 93–100.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Thimmulappa RK,
    2. Mai KH,
    3. Srisuma S, et al.
    Identification of Nrf2-regulated genes induced by the chemopreventive agent sulforaphane by oligonucleotide microarray. Cancer Res 2002; 62: 5196–5203.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. ↵
    1. Moreno T,
    2. Kelly FJ,
    3. Dunster C, et al.
    Oxidative potential of subway PM2.5. Atmos Environ 2017; 148: 230–238.
    OpenUrl
  43. ↵
    1. Janssen NA,
    2. Yang A,
    3. Strak M, et al.
    Oxidative potential of particulate matter collected at sites with different source characteristics. Sci Total Environ 2014; 472: 572–581.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    1. Karlsson HL,
    2. Holgersson A,
    3. Möller L
    . Mechanisms related to the genotoxicity of particles in the subway and from other sources. Chem Res Toxicol 2008; 21: 726–731.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. Lindbom J,
    2. Gustafsson M,
    3. Blomqvist G, et al.
    Wear particles generated from studded tires and pavement induces inflammatory reactions in mouse macrophage cells. Chem Res Toxicol 2007; 20: 937–946.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. Karlsson HL,
    2. Ljungman AG,
    3. Lindbom J, et al.
    Comparison of genotoxic and inflammatory effects of particles generated by wood combustion, a road simulator and collected from street and subway. Toxicol Lett 2006; 165: 203–211.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    1. Karlsson HL,
    2. Nilsson L,
    3. Möller L
    . Subway particles are more genotoxic than street particles and induce oxidative stress in cultured human lung cells. Chem Res Toxicol 2005; 18: 19–23.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. Loxham M,
    2. Morgan-Walsh RJ,
    3. Cooper MJ, et al.
    The effects on bronchial epithelial mucociliary cultures of coarse, fine, and ultrafine particulate matter from an underground railway station. Toxicol Sci 2015; 145: 98–107.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    1. Xia T,
    2. Zhu YF,
    3. Mu LN, et al.
    Pulmonary diseases induced by ambient ultrafine and engineered nanoparticles in twenty-first century. Natl Sci Rev 2016; 3: 416–429.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  50. ↵
    1. Wang J,
    2. Huang JA,
    3. Wang LL, et al.
    Urban particulate matter triggers lung inflammation via the ROS-MAPK-NF-κB signaling pathway. J Thorac Dis 2017; 9: 4398–4412.
    OpenUrl
  51. ↵
    1. Song L,
    2. Li DA,
    3. Li XP, et al.
    Exposure to PM2.5 induces aberrant activation of NF-κB in human airway epithelial cells by downregulating miR-331 expression. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 2017; 50: 192–199.
    OpenUrl
  52. ↵
    1. Berman R,
    2. Downey GP,
    3. Dakhama A, et al.
    Afghanistan particulate matter enhances pro-inflammatory responses in IL-13-exposed human airway epithelium via TLR2 signaling. Toxicol Sci 2018; 166: 345–353.
    OpenUrl
    1. He M,
    2. Ichinose T,
    3. Yoshida Y, et al.
    Urban PM2.5 exacerbates allergic inflammation in the murine lung via a TLR2/TLR4/MyD88-signaling pathway. Sci Rep 2017; 7: 11027.
    OpenUrl
  53. ↵
    1. Shoenfelt J,
    2. Mitkus RJ,
    3. Zeisler R, et al.
    Involvement of TLR2 and TLR4 in inflammatory immune responses induced by fine and coarse ambient air particulate matter. J Leukoc Biol 2009; 86: 303–312.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. ↵
    1. Ortiz-Martinez MG,
    2. Rodríguez-Cotto RI,
    3. Ortiz-Rivera MA, et al.
    Linking endotoxins, African dust PM10 and asthma in an urban and rural environment of Puerto Rico. Mediators Inflamm 2015; 2015: 784212.
    OpenUrl
  55. ↵
    1. Kim N,
    2. Han DH,
    3. Suh MW, et al.
    Effect of lipopolysaccharide on diesel exhaust particle-induced junctional dysfunction in primary human nasal epithelial cells. Environ Pollut 2019; 248: 736–742.
    OpenUrl
  56. ↵
    1. Becker S,
    2. Dailey L,
    3. Soukup JM, et al.
    TLR-2 is involved in airway epithelial cell response to air pollution particles. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2005; 203: 45–52.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  57. ↵
    1. Laing S,
    2. Wang GH,
    3. Briazova T, et al.
    Airborne particulate matter selectively activates endoplasmic reticulum stress response in the lung and liver tissues. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2010; 299: C736–C749.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. ↵
    1. Bronner DN,
    2. Abuaita BH,
    3. Chen XY, et al.
    Endoplasmic reticulum stress activates the inflammasome via NLRP3-and caspase-2-driven mitochondrial damage. Immunity 2015; 43: 451–462.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  59. ↵
    1. Pathinayake PS,
    2. Hsu ACY,
    3. Waters DW, et al.
    Understanding the unfolded protein response in the pathogenesis of asthma. Front Immunol 2018; 9: 175.
    OpenUrl
  60. ↵
    1. Sayan M,
    2. Mossman BT
    . The NLRP3 inflammasome in pathogenic particle and fibre-associated lung inflammation and diseases. Part Fibre Toxicol 2016; 13: 51.
    OpenUrl
  61. ↵
    1. Hirota JA,
    2. Hirota SA,
    3. Warner SM, et al.
    The airway epithelium nucleotide-binding domain and leucine-rich repeat protein 3 inflammasome is activated by urban particulate matter. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2012; 129: 1116–1125.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  62. ↵
    1. Hirota JA,
    2. Gold MJ,
    3. Hiebert PR, et al.
    The nucleotide-binding domain, leucine-rich repeat protein 3 inflammasome/IL-1 receptor I axis mediates innate, but not adaptive, immune responses after exposure to particulate matter under 10 μm. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2015; 52: 96–105.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  63. ↵
    1. Menu P,
    2. Mayor A,
    3. Zhou R, et al.
    ER stress activates the NLRP3 inflammasome via an UPR-independent pathway. Cell Death Dis 2012; 3: e261.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  64. ↵
    1. Chuang HC,
    2. Ho KF,
    3. Cao JJ, et al.
    Effects of non-protein-type amino acids of fine particulate matter on E-cadherin and inflammatory responses in mice. Toxicol Lett 2015; 237: 174–180.
    OpenUrl
  65. ↵
    1. Thevenot PT,
    2. Saravia J,
    3. Jin NL, et al.
    Radical-containing ultrafine particulate matter initiates epithelial-to-mesenchymal transitions in airway epithelial cells. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2013; 48: 188–197.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  66. ↵
    1. Caraballo JC,
    2. Yshii C,
    3. Westphal W, et al.
    Ambient particulate matter affects occludin distribution and increases alveolar transepithelial electrical conductance. Respirology 2011; 16: 340–349.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  67. ↵
    1. Chen ZH,
    2. Wu YF,
    3. Wang PL, et al.
    Autophagy is essential for ultrafine particle-induced inflammation and mucus hyperproduction in airway epithelium. Autophagy 2016; 12: 297–311.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  68. ↵
    1. Xiao C,
    2. Puddicombe SM,
    3. Field S, et al.
    Defective epithelial barrier function in asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2011; 128: 549–556.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  69. ↵
    1. Hackett TL,
    2. de Bruin HG,
    3. Shaheen F, et al.
    Caveolin-1 controls airway epithelial barrier function. Implications for asthma. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2013; 49: 662–671.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  70. ↵
    1. Hackett TL,
    2. Singhera GK,
    3. Shaheen F, et al.
    Intrinsic phenotypic differences of asthmatic epithelium and its inflammatory responses to respiratory syncytial virus and air pollution. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2011; 45: 1090–1100.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Iwanaga K,
    2. Elliott MS,
    3. Vedal S, et al.
    Urban particulate matter induces pro-remodeling factors by airway epithelial cells from healthy and asthmatic children. Inhal Toxicol 2013; 25: 653–660.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  71. ↵
    1. Wang J,
    2. Zhu M,
    3. Wang L, et al.
    Amphiregulin potentiates airway inflammation and mucus hypersecretion induced by urban particulate matter via the EGFR-PI3Kα-AKT/ERK pathway. Cell Signal 2019; 53: 122–131.
    OpenUrl
  72. ↵
    1. Bucchieri F,
    2. Puddicombe SM,
    3. Lordan JL, et al.
    Asthmatic bronchial epithelium is more susceptible to oxidant-induced apoptosis. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2002; 27: 179–185.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  73. ↵
    1. Teng Y,
    2. Sun PL,
    3. Zhang JY, et al.
    Hydrogen peroxide in exhaled breath condensate in patients with asthma a promising biomarker? Chest 2011; 140: 108–116.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  74. ↵
    1. Tamer L,
    2. Calikoğlu M,
    3. Ates NA, et al.
    Glutathione-S-transferase gene polymorphisms (GSTT1, GSTM1, GSTP1) as increased risk factors for asthma. Respirology 2004; 9: 493–498.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  75. ↵
    1. Zhang YM,
    2. Moffatt MF,
    3. Cookson WOC
    . Genetic and genomic approaches to asthma: new insights for the origins. Curr Opin Pulm Med 2012; 18: 6–13.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  76. ↵
    1. Tsai YH,
    2. Parker JS,
    3. Yang IV, et al.
    Meta-analysis of airway epithelium gene expression in asthma. Eur Respir J 2018; 51: 1701962.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  77. ↵
    1. Lindbom J,
    2. Gustafsson M,
    3. Blomqvist G, et al.
    Exposure to wear particles generated from studded tires and pavement induces inflammatory cytokine release from human macrophages. Chem Res Toxicol 2006; 19: 521–530.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  78. ↵
    1. Steenhof M,
    2. Gosens I,
    3. Strak M, et al.
    In vitro toxicity of particulate matter (PM) collected at different sites in the Netherlands is associated with PM composition, size fraction and oxidative potential – the RAPTES project. Part Fibre Toxicol 2011; 8: 26.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Pugin J,
    2. Schürer-Maly CC,
    3. Leturcq D, et al.
    Lipopolysaccharide activation of human endothelial and epithelial cells is mediated by lipopolysaccharide-binding protein and soluble CD14. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993; 90: 2744–2748.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  79. ↵
    1. Cario E,
    2. Rosenberg IM,
    3. Brandwein SL, et al.
    Lipopolysaccharide activates distinct signaling pathways in intestinal epithelial cell lines expressing toll-like receptors. J Immunol 2000; 164: 966–972.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Jia HP,
    2. Kline JN,
    3. Penisten A, et al.
    Endotoxin responsiveness of human airway epithelia is limited by low expression of MD-2. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2004; 287: L428–L437.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  80. ↵
    1. Carlander U,
    2. Midander K,
    3. Hedberg YS, et al.
    Macrophage-assisted dissolution of gold nanoparticles. ACS Appl Bio Mater 2019; 2: 1006–1016.
    OpenUrl
  81. ↵
    1. Eom HJ,
    2. Jung HJ,
    3. Sobanska S, et al.
    Iron speciation of airborne subway particles by the combined use of energy dispersive electron probe X-ray microanalysis and Raman microspectrometry. Anal Chem 2013; 85: 10424–10431.
    OpenUrl
  82. ↵
    Commitee on the Medical Effects of Air Pollution (COMEAP). Statement on the Evidence for Health Effects in the Travelling Public Associated with Exposure to Particulate Matter in the London Underground. 2019. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/769884/COMEAP_TfL_Statement.pdf
  83. ↵
    1. Cho WS,
    2. Duffin R,
    3. Thielbeer F, et al.
    Zeta potential and solubility to toxic ions as mechanisms of lung inflammation caused by metal/metal oxide nanoparticles. Toxicol Sci 2012; 126: 469–477.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  84. ↵
    1. Maher BA,
    2. Ahmed IA,
    3. Karloukovski V, et al.
    Magnetite pollution nanoparticles in the human brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2016; 113: 10797–10801.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  85. ↵
    1. Lovett C,
    2. Shirmohammadi F,
    3. Sowlat MH, et al.
    Commuting in Los Angeles: cancer and non-cancer health risks of roadway, light-rail and subway transit routes. Aerosol Air Qual Res 2018; 18: 2363–2374.
    OpenUrl
  86. ↵
    1. Loxham M,
    2. Nieuwenhuijsen MJ
    . Health effects of particulate matter air pollution in underground railway systems – a critical review of the evidence. Part Fibre Toxicol 2019; 16: 12.
    OpenUrl
  87. ↵
    1. Klepczyńska-Nyström A,
    2. Svartengren M,
    3. Grunewald J, et al.
    Health effects of a subway environment in healthy volunteers. Eur Respir J 2010; 36: 240–248.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  88. ↵
    1. Bigert C,
    2. Alderling M,
    3. Svartengren M, et al.
    No short-term respiratory effects among particle-exposed employees in the Stockholm subway. Scand J Work Environ Health 2011; 37: 129–135.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  89. ↵
    1. Bigert C,
    2. Alderling M,
    3. Svartengren M, et al.
    Blood markers of inflammation and coagulation and exposure to airborne particles in employees in the Stockholm underground. Occup Environ Med 2008; 65: 655–658.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  90. ↵
    1. Strak M,
    2. Janssen NA,
    3. Godri KJ, et al.
    Respiratory health effects of airborne particulate matter: the role of particle size, composition, and oxidative potential – the RAPTES project. Environ Health Perspect 2012; 120: 1183–1189.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  91. ↵
    1. Steenhof M,
    2. Mudway IS,
    3. Gosens I, et al.
    Acute nasal pro-inflammatory response to air pollution depends on characteristics other than particle mass concentration or oxidative potential: the RAPTES project. Occup Environ Med 2013; 70: 341–348.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  92. ↵
    1. Strak M,
    2. Hoek G,
    3. Godri KJ, et al.
    Composition of PM affects acute vascular inflammatory and coagulative markers – the RAPTES project. PLoS One 2013; 8: e58944.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  93. ↵
    1. Strak M,
    2. Hoek G,
    3. Steenhof M, et al.
    Components of ambient air pollution affect thrombin generation in healthy humans: the RAPTES project. Occup Environ Med 2013; 70: 332–340.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  94. ↵
    1. Steenhof M,
    2. Janssen NA,
    3. Strak M, et al.
    Air pollution exposure affects circulating white blood cell counts in healthy subjects: the role of particle composition, oxidative potential and gaseous pollutants – the RAPTES project. Inhal Toxicol 2014; 26: 141–165.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  95. ↵
    1. Gustavsson P,
    2. Bigert C,
    3. Pollán M
    . Incidence of lung cancer among subway drivers in Stockholm. Am J Ind Med 2008; 51: 545–547.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  96. ↵
    1. Bigert C,
    2. Klerdal K,
    3. Hammar N, et al.
    Myocardial infarction in Swedish subway drivers. Scand J Work Environ Health 2007; 33: 267–271.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  97. ↵
    1. Moreno T,
    2. de Miguel E
    . Improving air quality in subway systems: an overview. Environ Pollut 2018; 239: 829–831.
    OpenUrl
  98. ↵
    1. Font O,
    2. Moreno T,
    3. Querol X, et al.
    Origin and speciation of major and trace PM elements in the barcelona subway system. Transport Res D-Tr E 2019; 72: 17–35.
    OpenUrl
  99. ↵
    1. Kole PJ,
    2. Löhr AJ,
    3. Van Belleghem FGAJ, et al.
    Wear and tear of tyres: a stealthy source of microplastics in the environment. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2017; 14: E1265.
    OpenUrl
  100. ↵
    1. Gasperi J,
    2. Wright SL,
    3. Dris R, et al.
    Microplastics in air: are we breathing it in? Curr Opin Environ Sci Health 2018; 1: 1–5.
    OpenUrl
  101. ↵
    1. Son YS,
    2. Dinh TV,
    3. Chung SG, et al.
    Removal of particulate matter emitted from a subway tunnel using magnetic filters. Environ Sci Technol 2014; 48: 2870–2876.
    OpenUrl
  102. ↵
    1. Minguillón MC,
    2. Reche C,
    3. Martins V, et al.
    Aerosol sources in subway environments. Environ Res 2018; 167: 314–328.
    OpenUrl
  103. ↵
    1. Moreno T,
    2. Pérez N,
    3. Reche C, et al.
    Subway platform air quality: assessing the influences of tunnel ventilation, train piston effect and station design. Atmos Environ 2014; 92: 461–468.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  104. ↵
    1. Langrish JP,
    2. Mills NL,
    3. Chan JKK, et al.
    Beneficial cardiovascular effects of reducing exposure to particulate air pollution with a simple facemask. Part Fibre Toxicol 2009; 6: 8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  105. ↵
    1. Langrish JP,
    2. Li X,
    3. Wang SF, et al.
    Reducing personal exposure to particulate air pollution improves cardiovascular health in patients with coronary heart disease. Environ Health Perspect 2012; 120: 367–372.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  106. ↵
    1. Cherrie JW,
    2. Apsley A,
    3. Cowie H, et al.
    Effectiveness of face masks used to protect Beijing residents against particulate air pollution. Occup Environ Med 2018; 75: 446–452.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
View this article with LENS
Vol 28 Issue 153 Table of Contents
European Respiratory Review: 28 (153)
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Particulate matter and the airway epithelium: the special case of the underground?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
Particulate matter and the airway epithelium: the special case of the underground?
Dawn M. Cooper, Matthew Loxham
European Respiratory Review Sep 2019, 28 (153) 190066; DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0066-2019

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Particulate matter and the airway epithelium: the special case of the underground?
Dawn M. Cooper, Matthew Loxham
European Respiratory Review Sep 2019, 28 (153) 190066; DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0066-2019
Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Underground railways
    • PM in the airways
    • PM-induced oxidative stress and oxidative damage in vitro
    • Inflammatory and barrier responses to PM in vitro
    • In vivo exposure studies
    • Protection against PM
    • Conclusions
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Subjects

  • Epidemiology, occupational and environmental lung disease
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Cellular mechanisms underlying steroid-resistant asthma
  • The microbiome in bronchiectasis
Show more Lung Science Conference Review

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERR

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising
  • Sponsorship

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN: 0905-9180
Online ISSN: 1600-0617

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society