Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

The role of cardiopulmonary exercise tests in pulmonary arterial hypertension

Stefania Farina, Michele Correale, Noemi Bruno, Stefania Paolillo, Elisabetta Salvioni, Roberto Badagliacca, Piergiuseppe Agostoni on behalf of the “Right and Left Heart Failure Study Group” of the Italian Society of Cardiology
European Respiratory Review 2018 27: 170134; DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0134-2017
Stefania Farina
1Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michele Correale
2Dept of Cardiology, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Noemi Bruno
1Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
3AOR S.Carlo, Dipartimento Cardiovascolare, Potenza, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stefania Paolillo
4IRCCS SDN, Istituto di ricerca diagnostica e nucleare, Naples, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elisabetta Salvioni
1Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roberto Badagliacca
5Dipartimento di Scienze Cardiovascolari, Respiratorie, Nefrologiche, Anestesiologiche e Geriatriche, “La Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Piergiuseppe Agostoni
1Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
6Dept of Clinical Sciences and Community Health (Cardiovascular Section), University of Milan, Milan, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Despite recent advances in the therapeutic management of patients affected by pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), survival remains poor. Prompt identification of the disease, especially in subjects at increased risk of developing PAH, and prognostic stratification of patients are a necessary target of clinical practice but remain challenging. Cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) parameters, particularly peak oxygen uptake, end-tidal carbon dioxide tension and the minute ventilation/carbon dioxide production relationship, emerged as new prognostic tools for PAH patients. Moreover, CPET provides a comprehensive pathophysiological evaluation of patients' exercise limitation and dyspnoea, which are the main and early symptoms of the disease. This review focuses on the role of CPET in the management of PAH patients, reporting guideline recommendations for CPET and discussing the pathophysiology of exercise limitation and the most recent use of CPET in the diagnosis, prognosis and therapeutic targeting of PAH.

Abstract

CPET provides valuable information on diagnosis, prognosis and therapy in PAH but it should be performed by experts http://ow.ly/q5O230j6hta

Introduction

The cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) is a noninvasive method to assess functional capacity and exercise limitation, providing information about the cardiovascular, respiratory, metabolic and muscular response to physical effort. It can be recommended for all patients suffering from pulmonary hypertension (PH) who are able to perform exercise testing and are clinically stable (New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional groups I–III). Indeed, CPET is a safe test even in patients with severe exercise limitation. As noted, it is a noninvasive method and is usually performed without assessment of arterial blood gases. However, a differential diagnosis between group 1 (pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH)) and group 3 (PH due to lung disease) might require an evaluation of changes in arterial carbon dioxide tension (PaCO2) during exercise and in cardiac output (CO)/oxygen uptake (V′O2) ratio [1]. Nowadays, CPET parameters, particularly peak V′O2, end-tidal carbon dioxide tension (PETCO2) and the minute ventilation (V′E)/carbon dioxide production (V′CO2) relationship (measured either as its ratio at the anaerobic threshold (AT) or as its relationship slope) are considered to be of the utmost importance in the diagnosis, prognosis and therapeutic management of PAH patients. However, all CPET-derived parameters are underused even in major PH centres. This is likely due to a lack of expertise in the carrying out of CPET and because, besides haemodynamic measurements, the functional class (which is based on symptoms during exercise) and the six-minute walk test (6MWT) were historically considered enough to stratify PAH risk and predict patients' prognosis.

In this review we address the strengths and limitations of the use of CPET in PAH, focusing on pioneering use, current and previous guidelines, physiological background and CPET use in PAH diagnosis and prognosis.

The CPET in PAH: from experience to guidelines

PH is a progressive disease that leads to increased pulmonary arterial pressure (PAP) and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) as well as to loss of pulmonary vasodilator response to exercise. The main and early symptoms in PH are exercise intolerance and dyspnoea.

The clinical interest in PH is relatively recent and has developed in the last 40 years, starting after a sudden increase in PH diagnosis in Switzerland, Germany and Austria in 1967 linked to the intake of appetite-reducing drugs. The First World Symposium on Pulmonary Hypertension [2], which took place in Switzerland in 1973, proposed the first definition of primary pulmonary hypertension (PPH; PH of unknown cause) and secondary PH (PH of known cause), focusing basically on the epidemiologic and pathophysiological features of the disease since no specific therapy was available. In the 1990s, epoprostenol was the first PH-specific drug that was demonstrated to prolong survival and improve functional capacity, assessed as distance walked, in PPH patients [3, 4]. Therefore, starting from World Symposium on Primary Pulmonary Hypertension in Evian (1998) and carrying on during the world symposia on PH held in Venice (2003), Dana Point (2009) and Nice (2013), the guidelines were revised and the PH classification system improved, identifying four different categories sharing similarities in pathophysiological mechanisms, clinical presentation and therapeutic options. Indeed, a few specific therapies were approved simultaneously in the 2000s for the first group of the classification system, namely PAH [5–8].

The first trials mainly included patients with severe PAH and they demonstrated that haemodynamic data, functional class and the 6MWT were able to predict mortality and response to treatment [9–11]. For these reasons and thanks to the simplicity of execution for both patients and physicians, the 6MWT has been and remains until now the only exercise endpoint accepted by the Food and Drug Administration and the European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products for studies evaluating treatment effects in PAH, even if it has been demonstrated that the change in distance walked does not correlate with survival or clinical events such as hospitalisations or need for rescue therapy [12]. Results from the STRIDE-1 trial, the first and only trial that used both 6MWT and CPET as endpoints, were also against the use of CPET-derived parameters for PAH evaluation [13]. Indeed, the study drug, sitaxentan, significantly improved the 6MWT distance but not peak V′O2 [13]. Moreover, the 6MWT and CPET parameters were not correlated, with the lack of sufficient expertise and accepted standardisation methods in performing exercise tests in PH patients being suggested as the main reasons for this unexpected discrepancy [14]. Indeed, Oudiz et al. [14] showed that the correlation between the 6MWT and CPET measurements improved significantly as the study progressed, as did technical skills at less-experienced sites (where ability increased over time). A further important reason for discrepancy in the STRIDE study lies in considering the 6MWT unadjusted for body weight. Indeed, by taking into account patients' body size, Oudiz et al. [14] were able to show an increased correlation between 6MWT and CPET.

All these observations confirm the need for quality-controlled CPET, as reported in guidelines starting from 2009 [7]. However, in contrast to 6MWT that provides only limited clinical information, CPET has the power to reveal the underlying pathophysiological consequences of the disease process and, in recent years, several CPET variables have been recognised to be consistently altered in patients with PAH [15, 16]. Thus, 6MWT should be considered as complementary to CPET and not a replacement for it according to the American Thoracic Society (ATS) [17]. Specifically, Wensel et al. [18] found, in 70 patients affected by idiopathic PAH, that systolic blood pressure at peak exercise, peak V′O2, exercise duration, PETCO2 at rest, V′E/V′CO2 slope, diastolic blood pressure at peak exercise and heart rate (HR) at peak exercise predicted survival. Moreover, on multivariate analysis, peak V′O2 and systolic blood pressure were independent predictors of survival, while haemodynamic parameters were not independently predictive of mortality.

Starting from these data, the Dana Point guidelines reported the use of peak V′O2 as a prognostic tool in the follow-up of PAH patients, particularly younger patients who are likely able to walk more than 500 m despite the presence of severe PAH and right ventricular (RV) dysfunction [7]. In these patients, 6MWT is expected to be a submaximal test and, therefore, the additional exercise testing with CPET is particularly useful in order to obtain a more reliable assessment of functional status and RV function. In the most recent guidelines [19], a typical ventilatory pattern with low PETCO2 and high V′E/V′CO2 is also highlighted and V′E/V′CO2 slope is included in the risk assessment of PAH patients with cut-off values based on expert opinion (table 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) determinants of prognosis in risk assessment

Physiology of exercise in PAH

The origin of exercise intolerance and the occurrence of dyspnoea in PAH patients may be attributable to several pathophysiological mechanisms [20]. First, during exercise, CO should rise to meet the increased demand for oxygen by peripheral muscles. However, in patients with pulmonary vascular disease, CO fails to increase during exercise due to a further rise in mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) and RV failure, with consequent inadequate tissue oxygen delivery and thus the generation of early lactic acidosis [15, 21, 22]. In a recent pilot study on invasive exercise haemodynamics, Lador et al. [23] reported the CO kinetics at the onset of exercise in PAH patients. The cardiac adaptation to exercise appeared to be slower in PAH patients than in controls, with a decrease in CO at the onset of exercise due to a transitory decrease in stroke volume, probably related to increased venous return and consequent worsening RV function. Moreover, during effort, no significant increase in stroke volume was observed, indicating that the increase in CO during exercise was attributable to the increase in HR. In the setting of CO assessment in PH, both pre-capillary and post-capillary, Farina et al. [24] reported an overall agreement among CO determination by thermodilution, the direct Fick method and the inert gas rebreathing technique (Innocor Rebreathing System, Innovision A/S, Odense, Denmark) in patients with PH without significant arterial hypoxaemia, suggesting the possibility of a noninvasive and better-tolerated haemodynamic follow-up in these patients. Unfortunately, reliable data on noninvasive assessment of exercise CO are presently lacking.

Secondly, abnormalities in arterial blood gases also play a role in exercise intolerance. In PAH, mild-to-moderate arterial hypoxaemia and arterial hypocapnia are due to a combination of low mixed venous oxygen saturation, high physiologic dead space, low alveolar–arterial diffusion and right-to-left shunt through either a patent foramen ovale or intrapulmonary shunt. Hypoxaemia exacerbates the early occurrence of lactic acidosis and stimulates the carotid bodies to augment the ventilatory drive, contributing to an excessive increase in V′E during exercise [25]. In any case, the increased ventilatory response to physical activity is associated with a reduced perfusion of well-ventilated alveoli. This ventilation–perfusion mismatch causes high physiologic dead space (VD) to tidal volume (VT) ratio, or inefficient ventilation, reflected in a high V′E/V′CO2 ratio measurable both as V′E/V′CO2 at a given exercise level or as the slope of the V′E/V′CO2 relationship [26]. The two possible behaviours of the V′E/V′CO2 relationship are reported in figure 1. In figure 1a, hyperventilation did not influence the physiological domains of V′E during exercise and these are thus maintained such that the characteristic slopes of the V′E versus V′CO2 relationship can be appreciated. In figure 1b, the ventilatory stimuli are so strong as to overwhelm normal physiology, such that a single slope characterises the V′E/V′CO2 relationship. The increase in V′E/V′CO2 slope is paralleled by an increase in dead space ventilation during exercise. This is approximately one third of V′E, a value much higher when compared to healthy subjects, in whom dead space V′E physiologically declines during exercise [27, 28]. The increase of functional VD/VT and of ventilation also leads to a reduction of PETCO2 at rest and to a further decrease during exercise. Low PETCO2 is related to ventilatory inefficiency, which causes the dilution of PETCO2 relative to PaCO2. Furthermore, PETCO2 reduction is proportional to peak V′O2 impairment and inversely correlated with the elevation in mPAP [29]. The arterial to end-tidal carbon dioxide tension difference (Pa-ETCO2), a reflection of ventilation–perfusion inequality, is positive at rest and increases in patients with PAH, whereas, in healthy people, Pa-ETCO2 is reduced and often negative at peak exercise [30]. Another feature is the dynamic hyperinflation observed in 60% of PH patients studied by Laveneziana et al. [31]. This paper is interesting not only because of the Pa-ETCO2 concept but also because of the respiratory mechanic abnormalities assessment by inspiratory capacity manoeuvres. In this respect, the visual inspection of the V′E/V′CO2 relationship gives a lot of information (figure 2). Indeed, the slope is high and the V′E-axis intercept (i.e. when V′CO2=0) is often close to zero or negative. This means that dead space V′E increases progressively during exercise. Notably, when two linear segments are identified on the V′E/V′CO2 relationship plot, the second has a very high slope and a severely negative V′E-axis intercept, showing that the increase of dead space V′E pertains specifically to the last part of exercise.

FIGURE 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1

The minute ventilation (V′E)/carbon dioxide production (V′CO2) relationship slope in two pulmonary arterial hypertension patients. In (a) the physiological behaviour of ventilation during exercise is preserved in spite of hyperventilation, such that two slopes can be recognised around the respiratory compensation (RC) point (slope 1 (S1)=40.4 and slope 2 (S2)=55.1). In (b) a single slope characterises the V′E/V′CO2 relationship.

FIGURE 2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2

The minute ventilation (V′E)/carbon dioxide production (V′CO2) relationship slope in a patient with pulmonary arterial hypertension and preserved physiological behaviour of the V′E/V′CO2 relationship during exercise. In the first part of exercise, the V′E/V′CO2 slope is high and the V′E-axis intercept is close to zero. This means that dead space ventilation progressively increases during exercise. After the end of isocapnic buffering, i.e. at the respiratory compensation (RC) point, the slope becomes steeper and the V′E-axis intercept becomes severely negative showing that dead space ventilation severely increases toward the end of exercise. Reproduced from [32] with permission.

Thirdly, an increase in chemosensitivity could also play a role in PAH hyperventilation. Indeed, severe PAH leads to RV failure and consequently to low CO, which could activate a sympathetic response similar to that described in left-ventricular failure. Additionally, the further augmentation of catecholamines, arterial potassium level elevation, progressive lactacidemia, enhanced RV distension, higher pulmonary intra-vascular pressures, hypoxaemia and increased oscillations in pH may also contribute to increased chemoreflex activity during exercise [33]. Indeed, only very recently Farina et al. [28] demonstrated an increase in chemosensitivity for oxygen and carbon dioxide. Specifically, the central carbon dioxide chemoreceptor presented a direct correlation with alveolar V′E, suggesting a preserved role for central chemoreceptor activity and alveolar V′E increase during exercise. Notably, functional hypercapnic chemosensitivity is predominantly mediated by the central chemoreceptors, while peripheral hypercapnic chemosensitivity accounts for only one tenth of the overall carbon dioxide chemosensitivity [34]. However, the mechanisms which cause altered chemosensitivity are unclear. Indeed, besides the traditionally recognised stimuli such as low partial pressure of oxygen (PO2), high partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PCO2) and unbuffered acidosis, a direct role for lactic acid on peripheral chemoreflex activity and chemoreflex stimulation has been suggested [35, 36].

Finally, respiratory and peripheral muscle impairment and fatigue could also contribute to exercise intolerance. Peripheral muscle dysfunction in PAH is related to low CO, vasoconstriction and deconditioning, but it may also be due to altered skeletal muscle microcirculation [37]. Laveneziana et al. [31] showed that PAH patients have preserved inspiratory muscle function regardless of changes in dynamic inspiratory capacity during cycle exercise and that the inspiratory capacity manoeuvre is reliable in evaluating dynamic hyperinflation during CPET in PAH. Metabo-reflexes likely contribute to exercise-induced hyperventilation in PAH, as is the case in patients with left-heart failure [38]; however, this has only very recently been shown in PAH [24].

The use of the CPET in the diagnosis of PAH

CPET is useful to support the diagnosis of PAH both in patients with dyspnoea of unknown aetiology and in patients with symptoms, signs, history and echocardiographic findings suggestive of PH, allowing the identification of typical cardiac and ventilatory patterns during exercise. Moreover, in the diagnostic process, CPET is suitable for establishing and guiding therapeutic management [19, 39] and it has recently been demonstrated to be predictive of haemodynamic findings [40]. The CPET parameters associated with PAH are reported in table 2.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2

Common cardiopulmonary exercise test findings in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension

CPET parameters become progressively more impaired as pulmonary pressure increases and PAH worsens from mild to severe [41]. In a retrospective analysis of 53 patients, Sun et al. [20] described the exercise pathophysiology of PAH, showing that the typical CPET pattern is characterised by a moderate to severe reduction in peak V′O2 and work rate (WR), accompanied by a cardiovascular impairment, a respiratory impairment and a pulmonary vascular impairment. In fact, in these patients, a reduction of oxygen pulse, AT and the V′O2/WR relationship, as well as a marked increase of the V′E/V′CO2 slope and of the VD/VT ratio are commonly observed (table 3). For this last setting in particular, blood gas analysis should be performed during exercise to allow an accurate assessment of oxygen saturation and correct calculation of VD/VT. In fact, the noninvasive estimation of PaCO2 (and hence of VD/VT) from PETCO2, using the equations from Jones et al. [30], does not work in patients with PAH. Thus, real blood gas measurements at exercise are necessary to calculate VD/VT [42]. A VD/VT increase of >30% during exercise indicates the presence of pulmonary vascular limitation and is associated with an increase in alveolar–arterial gradient (to 45 mmHg or more) caused by V′E/perfusion mismatch and by low alveolar–capillary gas diffusion. In a different fashion to heart failure there are multiple causes of oxygen pulse reduction in PAH. Indeed, besides a low stroke volume, a low arterial–venous oxygen difference (due to hypoxia-related low arterial oxygen content) also plays a major role. However, inert gas studies suggest that hypoxaemia during exercise in PAH is explained by low mixed venous oxygen and high mean V′E/perfusion even without impaired gas diffusion [43].

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 3

Resting and exercise values in normal subjects and primary pulmonary hypertension (PPH) patients categorised according to severity of reduction in cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) aerobic capacity

Peak V′O2 describes the presence of a functional impairment and its absolute or % predicted value is used to grade the severity of exercise limitation in patients affected by cardiac diseases. Peak V′O2 correlates well with NYHA class in PAH patients. The kinetics of V′O2 increase during unloaded cycling exercise are impaired in this population, as demonstrated by an increase in mean response time (MRT), indicating a less efficient coupling of oxygen delivery and uptake [20]. Low peak V′O2 alone is not sufficient to suggest the diagnosis of PAH; however, the combination of an increase in V′E/V′CO2 slope with reduced values of PETCO2 has high diagnostic accuracy, identifying the likelihood of pulmonary vasculopathy in patients with exertional dyspnoea of unknown origin and in those with echocardiographic findings of suspected PAH (as demonstrated by the groups of Wasserman and Palange using a cycle ergometer and a treadmill, respectively [20, 26]). Yasunobu et al. [29] have described specific PETCO2 kinetics (in 52 PAH patients) with reduced PETCO2 at rest, a further decrease during exercise up to the peak and abnormally low PETCO2 values in any given exercise phase. Moreover, the authors demonstrated that the combined analysis of PETCO2 and V′E/V′CO2 ratio at AT can classify the suspicion of PAH in unlikely, suspect, likely, or very likely subjects and is able to guide physicians to further evaluations to confirm the diagnosis. If PETCO2 at AT is <30 mmHg, PAH should be considered as a possible diagnosis; however, if it is <20 mmHg, the likelihood of PAH is even higher since these values are unusual in other clinical conditions [29]. More recently, Zhao et al. [44] demonstrated that by combining V′E/V′CO2 slope and AT with an echocardiographic evaluation, an increase in the diagnostic specificity for PAH can be reached. In this study, 88 patients with a Doppler-estimated systolic PAP of 37–50 mmHg by echocardiography (or <36 mmHg in the presence of additional echocardiographic variables suggestive of PAH) were evaluated retrospectively. Compared to non-PAH patients, PAH subjects showed lower peak V′O2 and anticipated AT, higher V′E/V′CO2 slope and lower PETCO2 values. Moreover, they found that the combination of V′E/V′CO2 slope and AT led to a specificity of 95% and a sensitivity of 92.6% for the identification of PAH.

In addition to these parameters, PAH patients usually experience a decrease in oxygen saturation from rest to peak exercise of >3% without a rise in PaCO2, which has been recognised for many years as a major criterion of pulmonary vascular exercise limitation [45]. This behaviour is commonly found in subjects with moderate, severe and very severe impaired PAH, and this reduction is proportional to the severity of the disease. The presence of desaturation is also related to the opening of a right-to-left exercise-induced shunt. PAH patients with shunt show the lowest values of PETCO2 at rest. In this regard, it is of note that when an abrupt decrease of PETCO2 and an abrupt increase of end-tidal oxygen tension (PETO2), V′E/V′O2 and respiratory exchange ratio are observed during exercise, followed by a reduction in oxygen saturation, the beginning of a right-to-left shunt possibly due to the opening of a patent foramen ovale must be suspected [46].

Regarding emerging CPET variables, PAH patients exhibit low values of the oxygen uptake efficiency (OUE) plateau (calculated as the 90 s average of the highest consecutive measurements of V′O2/V′E near AT) and the OUE slope (calculated as the regression slope “a” in V′O2 = a×log10V′E+b), indicating ventilatory inefficiency during exercise [47] (figure 3). Tan et al. [48] compared 32 patients with idiopathic PAH to 16 controls and showed that OUE slope and OUE plateau were significantly lower and the V′E/V′CO2 slope was significantly higher in the former. Similarly, the study by Zhao et al. [44] mentioned above showed a reduction of OUE slope and OUE plateau in patients with a suspicion of PH that accompanies the already mentioned typical CPET pattern observed in this population. These parameters are promising variables in the diagnostic management of PAH patients; however, more data are needed to confirm these initial findings.

FIGURE 3
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3

Difference of oxygen uptake efficiency (OUE; oxygen uptake (V′O2)/minute ventilation (V′E)) plateau between a typical pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) patient and a “normal” control subject. In normal subjects, OUE typically increases during exercise from rest to plateau and then gradually decreases until the end of exercise. It then further decreases in the immediate recovery period and begins stabilising after about 2 min. In PAH patients, OUE changes in a similar way to control subjects but is always lower than in controls in the transition from rest to the end of exercise. Reproduced from [48] with permission.

The use of the CPET for prognostication in PAH

Right-heart catheterisation remains the gold standard to confirm a diagnosis of PAH. Some CPET parameters can predict or sometimes confirm the vascular disease pattern but they cannot confirm a diagnosis of PAH. In fact, CPET sometimes provides an indication for right-heart catheterisation. However, CPET can provide important prognostic information regarding patients with pulmonary diseases [26]. Exercise variables, such as peak V′O2, V′E/V′CO2 and arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) are able to better predict prognosis than resting lung function measurements. A number of CPET variables have been shown to be consistently altered in patients with PAH and they play a role in prognostic stratification in both PAH and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) [49]. However, although most of these variables provide prognostic information, peak V′O2 is most widely used for therapeutic decision making [18, 41, 50, 51].

It should be noticed that, although treatment advances in the last two decades have improved symptoms and survival of patients with PAH, prognosis remains poor and individual risk stratification is still of major importance. Therefore, it is mandatory to establish the appropriate treatment strategy and a mild approach with oral drugs or a more aggressive approach including parenteral prostanoids are both considered in international guidelines based on risk assessment [19]. However, how to translate into clinical practice the multiparametric approach to risk stratification proposed by current guidelines is still unclear. Further studies on PAH are needed to allow for a more comprehensive, definite and documented integration of CPET into the guidelines list of “variables to consider for severity assessment”, which, at present, only mentions expert opinion values for peak V′O2 and V′E/V′CO2 [19]. Indeed, more robust prognostic evidence for peak V′O2 and V′E/V′CO2 arises from the studies by Wensel et al. [50] and Deboeck et al. [52], both powered for multivariate analysis in a modern treatment context, although the added value of CPET on top of common clinical and haemodynamic variables remains unexplored. Recently, however, Badagliacca et al. [53] documented the increased power of a risk prediction model considering oxygen pulse and echocardiographically-determined RV systolic function compared to the traditional model including clinical, invasive haemodynamic and 6MWT variables. Indeed, a combination of low RV fractional area change and low oxygen pulse might identify patients at a particularly high risk of clinical deterioration.

The 6MWT is the most used test to predict survival in PAH patients and, in order to assess whether CPET adds prognostic value to the information derived from 6MWT, it has been demonstrated that CPET parameters predict survival in PAH patients and add information to the prognostic value of 6MWT [54]. For example, after multivariable Cox regression, reduction in SaO2 during exercise significantly improved the univariate 6MWT prediction model. Schwaiblmair et al. [49] determined ventilatory efficiency in PAH and chronic thromboembolic PAH patients through CPET, identifying PAH patients with increased risk of death within 24 months from evaluation. The authors showed significant differences between survivors and non-survivors in ventilatory equivalents for oxygen (42.1±2.1 versus 56.9±2.6; p<0.005) and for carbon dioxide (47.5±2.2 versus 64.4±2.3; p<0.005). Patients with peak oxygen uptake ≤10.4 mL·min−1·kg−1 had a 1.5-fold higher risk of mortality in the following 24 months. The risk was 7.8-fold higher with a V′E/V′CO2 ratio at AT ≥55, 2.9-fold higher with an alveolar–arterial oxygen difference ≥55 mmHg and 5.8-fold higher with a V′E/V′CO2 slope ≥60.

There are different considerations about the prognostic role of CPET in the treatment of PAH. Groepenhoff et al. [55] showed that survivors had a significantly greater change in peak V′O2 than nonsurvivors and this change in aerobic capacity was significantly related to changes in right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF). Notably, treatment-associated changes in V′O2 and oxygen pulse predicted survival, whereas changes in V′E/V′CO2 slope did not.

In addition, the combined use of peak V′O2 and PVR provides accurate risk stratification underlining the important and complementary prognostic information from cardiopulmonary exercise testing and resting invasive haemodynamic data [50]. These different approaches may be complementary in the risk stratification of PAH patients and exercise haemodynamic data has been correlated with peak V′O2 [56] to determine their prognostic significance. This has shown that exercise cardiac index correlates with peak V′O2 and is the only independent predictor of peak V′O2 on multivariate stepwise linear regression analyses. Furthermore, peak V′O2 is the strongest predictor of survival in this analysis.

Ferreira et al. [57] have demonstrated that, considering all data points, measurements of excessive exercise V′E might improve the usefulness of incremental CPET in the prognostic evaluation of PAH. OUE slope may also be a useful noninvasive marker of disease severity and outcome in paediatric patients [58]. Indeed, it has been demonstrated that ventilatory efficiency slope in children and young adults with a diagnosis of PAH and poor outcomes (nine deaths, three lung transplants) is significantly elevated compared to patients with better outcomes (51.1 versus 37.9; p<0.001). Moreover, the persistence or development of an exercise-induced right-to-left shunt strongly predicts death or transplantation in PAH patients, irrespectively of the haemodynamics and all other exercise measures including peak V′O2 and OUE slope. Furthermore, a poorer OUE slope appears to be associated with a poor outcome in patients without a shunt. So, a persistent exercise-induced right-to-left shunt and poor ventilatory efficiency are highly predictive of poor outcomes in patients with PAH [59].

Another possible prognostic CPET-derived variable is the delayed post-exercise HR recovery (1 min) response [60], which is reportedly much lower in PH patients than in controls. The best cut-off for HR recovery in 1 min to discriminate between patients and controls is 18 beats. Patients with HR recovery (1 min) >18 had better NYHA scores, resting haemodynamics and 6MWT distance. On a multiple regression analysis that only considered CPET-independent variables, HR recovery (1 min) ≤18 was the only predictor of mortality [60].

Conclusions

Today CPET is utilised for PH evaluation in only a few centres with expertise in the technique and there are currently very few data on the prognostic importance of treatment-induced changes in CPET variables. These preliminary results need to be confirmed in larger cohorts of patients and in a properly powered multicentric study. Furthermore, only an extensive use of CPET can confirm its role in the clinical assessment of PAH and provide a cost/effectiveness evaluation. The utility of CPET data from centres that seldom perform the technique or that are not specialised in the evaluation of PAH cases remains controversial.

Footnotes

  • Provenance: Submitted article, peer reviewed.

  • Conflict of interest: P. Agostoni reports personal fees from Menarini, Novartis and Boeringer, and grants from Daiichi Sankyo, outside the submitted work.

  • Received December 13, 2017.
  • Accepted February 19, 2018.
  • Copyright ©ERS 2018.

ERR articles are open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Seeger W,
    2. Adir Y,
    3. Barbera JA, et al.
    Pulmonary hypertension in chronic lung diseases. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 62: D109–D116.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Hatano S,
    2. Strasser T
    , eds. Primary pulmonary hypertension: report on a WHO meeting. Geneva, World Health Organization, 1975. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/39094/9241560444_eng.pdf;jsessionid= 4DEFB2B71BEDF5870191F1AE420B7EDF?sequence=1
  3. ↵
    1. Barst RJ,
    2. Rubin LJ,
    3. Long WA, et al.
    A comparison of continuous intravenous epoprostenol (prostacyclin) with conventional therapy for primary pulmonary hypertension. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 296–301.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Rubin LJ,
    2. Mendoza J,
    3. Hood M, et al.
    Treatment of primary pulmonary hypertension with continuous intravenous prostacyclin (epoprostenol). Results of a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 1990; 112: 485–491.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Rich S
    , ed. Executive summary from the World Symposium on Primary Pulmonary Hypertension, 1998, World Symposium on Primary Pulmonary Hypertension, 1998, September 6–10, 1998, Evian, France, cosponsored by the World Health Organization.
    1. Simonneau G,
    2. Galie N,
    3. Rubin LJ, et al.
    Clinical classification of pulmonary hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 43: 5S–12S.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Galie N,
    2. Hoeper MM,
    3. Humbert M, et al.
    Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension. Eur Heart J 2009; 30: 2493–2537.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Galie N,
    2. Humbert M,
    3. Vachiery JL, et al.
    2015 ESC/ERS Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension. Eur Respir J 2015; 46: 903–975.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Sitbon O,
    2. Humbert M,
    3. Nunes H, et al.
    Long-term intravenous epoprostenol infusion in primary pulmonary hypertension: prognostic factors and survival. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 40: 780–788.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    1. Miyamoto S,
    2. Nagaya N,
    3. Satoh T, et al.
    Clinical correlates and prognostic significance of six-minute walk test in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension. Comparison with cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 161: 487–492.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Benza RL,
    2. Miller DP,
    3. Gomberg-Maitland M, et al.
    Predicting survival in pulmonary arterial hypertension: insights from the Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-Term Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Disease Management (REVEAL). Circulation 2010; 122: 164–172.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Savarese G,
    2. Paolillo S,
    3. Costanzo P, et al.
    Do changes of 6-minute walk distance predict clinical events in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension? A meta-analysis of 22 randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 60: 1192–1201.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Barst RJ,
    2. Langleben D,
    3. Frost A, et al.
    Sitaxsentan therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2004; 169: 441–447.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Oudiz RJ,
    2. Barst RJ,
    3. Hansen JE, et al.
    Cardiopulmonary exercise testing and six-minute walk correlations in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Am J Cardiol 2006; 97: 123–126.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Weatherald J,
    2. Farina S,
    3. Bruno N, et al.
    Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in pulmonary hypertension. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2017; 14: S84–S92.
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    1. Paolillo S,
    2. Farina S,
    3. Bussotti M, et al.
    Exercise testing in the clinical management of patients affected by pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2012; 19: 960–971.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    ATS Committee on Proficiency Standards for Clinical Pulmonary Function Laboratories. ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002; 166: 111–117.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Wensel R,
    2. Opitz CF,
    3. Anker SD, et al.
    Assessment of survival in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension: importance of cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Circulation 2002; 106: 319–324.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Galie N,
    2. Humbert M,
    3. Vachiery JL, et al.
    2015 ESC/ERS Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension. Eur Heart J 2016; 37: 67–119.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Sun XG,
    2. Hansen JE,
    3. Oudiz RJ, et al.
    Exercise pathophysiology in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension. Circulation 2001; 104: 429–435.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Groepenhoff H,
    2. Westerhof N,
    3. Jacobs W, et al.
    Exercise stroke volume and heart rate response differ in right and left heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail 2010; 12: 716–720.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Holverda S,
    2. Gan CT,
    3. Marcus JT, et al.
    Impaired stroke volume response to exercise in pulmonary arterial hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 47: 1732–1733.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Lador F,
    2. Bringard A,
    3. Bengueddache S, et al.
    Kinetics of cardiac output at the onset of exercise in precapillary pulmonary hypertension. Biomed Res Int 2016; 2016: 6050193.
    OpenUrl
  22. ↵
    1. Farina S,
    2. Teruzzi G,
    3. Cattadori G, et al.
    Noninvasive cardiac output measurement by inert gas rebreathing in suspected pulmonary hypertension. Am J Cardiol 2014; 113: 546–551.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Wasserman K,
    2. Hansen JE,
    3. Sue DY, et al.
    Principles of exercise testing and interpretation. 3rd Edn. Baltimore, Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 1999.
  24. ↵
    1. Ferrazza AM,
    2. Martolini D,
    3. Valli G, et al.
    Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in the functional and prognostic evaluation of patients with pulmonary diseases. Respiration 2009; 77: 3–17.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Robertson HT
    . Dead space: the physiology of wasted ventilation. Eur Respir J 2015; 45: 1704–1716.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Farina S,
    2. Bruno N,
    3. Agalbato C, et al.
    Physiological insights of exercise hyperventilation in arterial and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Int J Cardiol 2018; 259: 178–182.
    OpenUrl
  27. ↵
    1. Yasunobu Y,
    2. Oudiz RJ,
    3. Sun XG, et al.
    End-tidal PCO2 abnormality and exercise limitation in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension. Chest 2005; 127: 1637–1646.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Jones NL,
    2. Robertson DG,
    3. Kane JW
    . Difference between end-tidal and arterial PCO2 in exercise. J Appl Physiol 1979; 47: 954–960.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Laveneziana P,
    2. Garcia G,
    3. Joureau B, et al.
    Dynamic respiratory mechanics and exertional dyspnoea in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur Respir J 2013; 41: 578–587.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    1. Agostoni P,
    2. Farina S,
    3. Apostolo A, et al.
    Inside ventilatory regulation in pulmonary hypertension: several hidden data are still undiscovered. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2014; 21: 268–271.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Velez-Roa S,
    2. Ciarka A,
    3. Najem B, et al.
    Increased sympathetic nerve activity in pulmonary artery hypertension. Circulation 2004; 110: 1308–1312.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    1. Dempsey JA,
    2. Smith CA
    . Pathophysiology of human ventilatory control. Eur Respir J 2014; 44: 495–512.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    1. Parati G,
    2. Lombardi C,
    3. Castagna F, et al.
    Heart failure and sleep disorders. Nat Rev Cardiol 2016; 13: 389–403.
    OpenUrl
  34. ↵
    1. Chang AJ,
    2. Ortega FE,
    3. Riegler J, et al.
    Oxygen regulation of breathing through an olfactory receptor activated by lactate. Nature 2015; 527: 240–244.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Potus F,
    2. Malenfant S,
    3. Graydon C, et al.
    Impaired angiogenesis and peripheral muscle microcirculation loss contribute to exercise intolerance in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2014; 190: 318–328.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Ponikowski PP,
    2. Chua TP,
    3. Francis DP, et al.
    Muscle ergoreceptor overactivity reflects deterioration in clinical status and cardiorespiratory reflex control in chronic heart failure. Circulation 2001; 104: 2324–2330.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    1. McLaughlin VV,
    2. Archer SL,
    3. Badesch DB, et al.
    ACCF/AHA 2009 expert consensus document on pulmonary hypertension. Circulation 2009; 119: 2250–2294.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    1. Correale M,
    2. Tricarico L,
    3. Ferraretti A, et al.
    Cardiopulmonary exercise test predicts right heart catheterization. Eur J Clin Invest 2017; 47: e12851.
    OpenUrl
  39. ↵
    1. Arena R,
    2. Lavie CJ,
    3. Milani RV, et al.
    Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension: an evidence-based review. J Heart Lung Transplant 2010; 29: 159–173.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Guazzi M,
    2. Marenzi G,
    3. Assanelli E, et al.
    Evaluation of the dead space/tidal volume ratio in patients with chronic congestive heart failure. J Card Fail 1995; 1: 401–408.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Dantzker DR,
    2. D'Alonzo GE,
    3. Bower JS, et al.
    Pulmonary gas exchange during exercise in patients with chronic obliterative pulmonary hypertension. Am Rev Respir Dis 1984; 130: 412–416.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Zhao QH,
    2. Wang L,
    3. Pudasaini B, et al.
    Cardiopulmonary exercise testing improves diagnostic specificity in patients with echocardiography-suspected pulmonary hypertension. Clin Cardiol 2017; 40: 95–101.
    OpenUrl
  43. ↵
    1. Murray JFE,
    2. Nadel JA
    1. Agostoni P,
    2. Butler J
    . Cardiac evaluation. In: Murray JFE, Nadel JA, eds. Textbook of respiratory medicine. Boston, Saunders Company, 1994; pp. 943–962.
  44. ↵
    1. Sun XG,
    2. Hansen JE,
    3. Oudiz RJ, et al.
    Gas exchange detection of exercise-induced right-to-left shunt in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension. Circulation 2002; 105: 54–60.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. ↵
    1. Sun XG,
    2. Hansen JE,
    3. Stringer WW
    . Oxygen uptake efficiency plateau: physiology and reference values. Eur J Appl Physiol 2012; 112: 919–928.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. Tan X,
    2. Yang W,
    3. Guo J, et al.
    Usefulness of decrease in oxygen uptake efficiency to identify gas exchange abnormality in patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension. PloS One 2014; 9: e98889.
    OpenUrl
  47. ↵
    1. Schwaiblmair M,
    2. Faul C,
    3. von Scheidt W, et al.
    Ventilatory efficiency testing as prognostic value in patients with pulmonary hypertension. BMC Pulm Med 2012; 12: 23.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. Wensel R,
    2. Francis DP,
    3. Meyer FJ, et al.
    Incremental prognostic value of cardiopulmonary exercise testing and resting haemodynamics in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Int J Cardiol 2013; 167: 1193–1198.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    1. Diller GP,
    2. Dimopoulos K,
    3. Okonko D, et al.
    Exercise intolerance in adult congenital heart disease: comparative severity, correlates, and prognostic implication. Circulation 2005; 112: 828–835.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. ↵
    1. Deboeck G,
    2. Scoditti C,
    3. Huez S, et al.
    Exercise testing to predict outcome in idiopathic versus associated pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur Respir J 2012; 40: 1410–1419.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  51. ↵
    1. Badagliacca R,
    2. Papa S,
    3. Valli G, et al.
    Echocardiography combined with cardiopulmonary exercise testing for the prediction of outcome in idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension. Chest 2016; 150: 1313–1322.
    OpenUrl
  52. ↵
    1. Groepenhoff H,
    2. Vonk-Noordegraaf A,
    3. Boonstra A, et al.
    Exercise testing to estimate survival in pulmonary hypertension. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2008; 40: 1725–1732.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. ↵
    1. Groepenhoff H,
    2. Vonk-Noordegraaf A,
    3. van de Veerdonk MC, et al.
    Prognostic relevance of changes in exercise test variables in pulmonary arterial hypertension. PloS One 2013; 8: e72013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. ↵
    1. Blumberg FC,
    2. Arzt M,
    3. Lange T, et al.
    Impact of right ventricular reserve on exercise capacity and survival in patients with pulmonary hypertension. Eur J Heart Fail 2013; 15: 771–775.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. ↵
    1. Ferreira EV,
    2. Ota-Arakaki JS,
    3. Ramos RP, et al.
    Optimizing the evaluation of excess exercise ventilation for prognosis assessment in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2014; 21: 1409–1419.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. ↵
    1. Rausch CM,
    2. Taylor AL,
    3. Ross H, et al.
    Ventilatory efficiency slope correlates with functional capacity, outcomes, and disease severity in pediatric patients with pulmonary hypertension. Int J Cardiol 2013; 169: 445–448.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  57. ↵
    1. Oudiz RJ,
    2. Midde R,
    3. Hovenesyan A, et al.
    Usefulness of right-to-left shunting and poor exercise gas exchange for predicting prognosis in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Am J Cardiol 2010; 105: 1186–1191.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. ↵
    1. Ramos RP,
    2. Arakaki JS,
    3. Barbosa P, et al.
    Heart rate recovery in pulmonary arterial hypertension: relationship with exercise capacity and prognosis. Am Heart J 2012; 163: 580–588.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
View this article with LENS
Vol 27 Issue 148 Table of Contents
European Respiratory Review: 27 (148)
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The role of cardiopulmonary exercise tests in pulmonary arterial hypertension
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
The role of cardiopulmonary exercise tests in pulmonary arterial hypertension
Stefania Farina, Michele Correale, Noemi Bruno, Stefania Paolillo, Elisabetta Salvioni, Roberto Badagliacca, Piergiuseppe Agostoni
European Respiratory Review Jun 2018, 27 (148) 170134; DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0134-2017

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
The role of cardiopulmonary exercise tests in pulmonary arterial hypertension
Stefania Farina, Michele Correale, Noemi Bruno, Stefania Paolillo, Elisabetta Salvioni, Roberto Badagliacca, Piergiuseppe Agostoni
European Respiratory Review Jun 2018, 27 (148) 170134; DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0134-2017
Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • The CPET in PAH: from experience to guidelines
    • Physiology of exercise in PAH
    • The use of the CPET in the diagnosis of PAH
    • The use of the CPET for prognostication in PAH
    • Conclusions
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Subjects

  • Pulmonary vascular disease
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Lung imaging in cystic fibrosis
  • Disease burden associated with alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency
  • Role of air pollutants in airway epithelial barrier dysfunction
Show more Review

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERR

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising
  • Sponsorship

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN: 0905-9180
Online ISSN: 1600-0617

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society