Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Pharmacological therapy for patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

Marius M. Hoeper
European Respiratory Review 2015 24: 272-282; DOI: 10.1183/16000617.00001015
Marius M. Hoeper
Dept of Respiratory Medicine, Hannover Medical School and German Centre for Lung Research (DZL), Hannover, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Hoeper.Marius@mh-hannover.de
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • FIGURE 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1

    Mean change from baseline in 6-min walking distance (6MWD) in the Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension Soluble Guanylate Cyclase–Stimulator Trial (CHEST)-1 and CHEST-2 studies. Data are observed values; error bars represent sem. Reproduced from [44] with permission from the publisher.

  • FIGURE 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2

    Kaplan–Meier plots for a) clinical worsening and b) survival in the overall population during the Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension Soluble Guanylate Cyclase–Stimulator Trial (CHEST)-2 study. At 1 year, the estimated rate of clinical worsening-free survival was 88% and the estimated rate of survival was 97%. Reproduced from [44] with permission from the publisher.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
  • TABLE 1

    Change from baseline in primary and selected secondary end-points with riociguat and placebo in the Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension Soluble Guanylate Cyclase–Stimulator Trial (CHEST)-1 study

    End-pointPlaceboRiociguatp-value#
    PatientsBaselineChangePatientsBaselineChange
    Primary end-point
     6MWD m88356±75–6±84173342±8239±79<0.001
    Selected secondary end-points
     PVR dyn·s·cm–582779±40123±274151791±432–226±248<0.001
     NT-proBNP pg·mL−1731706±256776±14471501508±2338–291±1717<0.001
     WHO-FC87Class I: 0 Class II: 25 (29%) Class III: 60 (69%) Class IV: 2 (2%)13 (15%) moved to lower class; 68 (78%) stayed the same; 6 (7%) moved to higher class173Class I: 3 (2%) Class II: 55 (32%) Class III: 107 (62%) Class IV: 8 (5%)57 (33%) moved to lower class; 107 (62%) stayed the same; 9 (5%) moved to higher class0.003
    • Data are presented as n or mean±sd, unless otherwise stated. 6MWD: 6-min walking distance; PVR: pulmonary vascular resistance; NT-proBNP: N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide; WHO-FC: World Health Organization functional class. #: calculated with the use of stratified Wilcoxon test for the change from baseline to last visit. Reproduced and modified from [26] with permission from the publisher.

  • TABLE 2

    Change from baseline in primary and selected secondary end-points with bosentan and placebo in the Bosentan Effects in Inoperable Forms of Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension (BENEFiT) study

    End-pointPlaceboBosentanp-value#
    PatientsBaselineChangePatientsBaselineChange
    Co-primary end-points
     6MWD m73344.5 (325.2–363.8)0.8 (–18.1–19.7)67340.0 (319.2–360.8)2.9 (–12.9–18.8)0.5449
     PVR dyn·s·cm–571787 (708–866)30 (–25–85)66778 (698–857)–146 (–207– –85)<0.0001
    Selected secondary end-points
     NT-proBNP ng·L−1761405721481–622 (–1018– –225)¶0.0034
     WHO-FC II/III/IV8022/56/211.3% moved to lower class; 8.8% moved to higher class7622/51/314.5% moved to lower class; 2.6% moved to higher classns
    • Data are presented as n or mean (95% confidence interval), unless otherwise stated. 6MWD: 6-min walking distance; PVR: pulmonary vascular resistance; NT-proBNP: N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide; WHO-FC: World Health Organization functional class; ns: nonsignificant. #: calculated with the use of stratified Wilcoxon test for the change from baseline and the Wilcoxon rank sum test for treatment effect; ¶: data for treatment effect, not change from baseline. Data from [41].

  • TABLE 3

    Findings from smaller clinical studies of pharmacological therapies in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH)

    AgentFirst author [ref.]YearStudy typeDurationPatientsMean±sd age yearsOutcomes versus baseline
    Bosentan (oral)Hoeper [48]2005Open-label3 monthsInoperable CTEPH (n=19)60±8Increase in 6MWD (p=0.009); decrease in PVR (p<0.001); no change in WHO-FC
    Bonderman [49]2005Open-label6 monthsInoperable CTEPH (n=16)70±3Increase in 6MWD (p=0.01); decrease in NT-proBNP (p=0.01); NYHA-FC improved for 69% of patients
    Hughes [50]2006Retrospective12 monthsInoperable and persistent CTEPH (n=47)60 (27–82)#Increase in 6MWD (p<0.001); no change in PVR (p=0.171); WHO-FC improved for 24% of patients
    Seyfarth [51]2007Open-label24 monthsInoperable and persistent CTEPH (n=12)57±15Increase in 6MWD (p<0.005) at 6 months, maintained over 24 months; decrease in Tei index (p<0.005) at 6 months, maintained over 24 months; WHO-FC improved for 50% of patients over 18 months
    Post [52]2009Retrospective>24 monthsInoperable CTEPH (n=18)63±14Increase in 6MWD (p=0.01) at 12–24 months but this decreased with longer treatment; nonsignificant decrease in NT-proBNP (p=0.31) at 12–24 months that increased with longer treatment; NYHA-FC improved (p=0.03) with long-term treatment (>24 months)
    Nishikawa-Takahashi [53]2014Retrospective>24 monthsInoperable CTEPH (n=7)63±7No change in 6MWD (p=0.11); decrease in PVR (p<0.05) and NT-proBNP (p<0.05); WHO-FC improved in all patients (p=0.005)
    Epoprostenol (i.v.)Scelsi [54]2004Retrospective12 monthsInoperable CTEPH (n=11)50±11 (CTEPH only)Increase in exercise tolerance (p=0.0006); increase in clinical status; NYHA-FC improvement (p=0.0001)
    Cabrol [55]2007RetrospectiveMean 20 monthsInoperable CTEPH (n=27)51±13Decrease in mPAP (p=0.001) and TPR (p<0.0001) at 3 months, maintained over 20 months; NYHA-FC improved for 48% of patients (p<0.0001) at 3 months and for 50% at 20 months; sustained improvement in 6MWD (p=0.03) at 20 months
    Iloprost (inhaled)Olschewski [56]2002RCT versus placebo12 weeksPAH and CTEPH (101 iloprost, 102 placebo)51±13 (iloprost) 53±12 (placebo)Increase in 6MWD (p=0.004); no difference in haemodynamics between iloprost and placebo; NYHA-FC improvement (p=0.03)
    Beraprost (oral)Ono [57]2003Retrospective, beraprost+CT versus CT aloneMean 36 monthsInoperable CTEPH (20 beraprost+CT, 23 CT)56±10 (beraprost) 52±14 (CT)Decrease in TPR (p<0.05) at 2 months with beraprost; NYHA-FC improved for 50% of patients at 2 months with beraprost; improved 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates with beraprost (100%, 85% and 76%, respectively) versus CT alone (87%, 60% and 46%, respectively)
    Treprostinil (subcutaneous)Lang [58]2006Retrospective36 monthsPAH (n=99) and CTEPH (n=23)49 (12–81)#Increase in 6MWD (p=0.0001); NYHA-FC improvement (p=0.0001); results consistent across all types of PH
    Skoro-Sajer [59]2007Open-label versus historical controlMean 24 monthsInoperable CTEPH (n=25)59±13 (treprostinil) 62±15 (control)Increase in 6MWD (p=0.01); decrease in PVR (p=0.01) and NT-proBNP (p=0.02); WHO-FC improvement (p=0.001)
    Sildenafil (oral)Ghofrani [60]2003Open-label6 monthsInoperable CTEPH (n=12)NAIncrease in 6MWD (p=0.02); decrease in PVR (p=0.004)
    Reichenberger [61]2007Open-label12 monthsInoperable CTEPH (n=104)62±11Increase in 6MWD at 3 months (p=0.0001) and 12 months (p=0.0005); decrease in PVR at 3 months (p=0.0002); WHO-FC improvement at 3 months (p=0.01) and 12 months (p=0.001)
    Suntharalingam [62]2008RCT versus placebo12 weeksInoperable CTEPH (9 sildenafil, 10 placebo)50±13 (sildenafil) 60±14 (placebo)No difference in 6MWD between two groups; decrease in PVR (p=0.044); WHO-FC improvement (p=0.025)
    Open-label extension12 monthsInoperable CTEPH (n=17)NAIncrease in 6MWD (p=0.014); decrease in PVR (p=0.001) and NT-proBNP (p=0.004)
    Riociguat (oral)Ghofrani [26]2013RCT versus placebo16 weeksInoperable and persistent CTEPH (173 riociguat, 88 placebo)59±14 (riociguat) 59±13 (placebo)Increase in 6MWD (p<0.001); decrease in PVR (p<0.001) and NT-proBNP (p<0.001); WHO-FC improvement (p=0.003)
    “Modern  treatment”: bosentan, sildenafil, clinical trial drugsNishimura [63]2013Retrospective, single-centre cohort; group 1 diagnosed 1986–1998, group 2 diagnosed 1999–2004, group 3 diagnosed 2005–2010Inoperable CTEPH (n=95)55±14Significantly improved survival in group 3 compared with groups 1 and 2
    • 6MWD: 6-min walking distance; PVR: pulmonary vascular resistance; WHO-FC: World Health Organization functional class; NT-proBNP: N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide; NYHA-FC: New York Heart Association functional class; mPAP: mean pulmonary artery pressure; TPR: total pulmonary resistance; RCT: randomised controlled trial; PAH: pulmonary arterial hypertension; CT: conventional therapy; PH: pulmonary hypertension; NA: not available. #: data presented as mean (range).

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Disclosures

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • M.M. Hoeper
PreviousNext
Back to top
View this article with LENS
Vol 24 Issue 136 Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Pharmacological therapy for patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
Pharmacological therapy for patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension
Marius M. Hoeper
European Respiratory Review Jun 2015, 24 (136) 272-282; DOI: 10.1183/16000617.00001015

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Pharmacological therapy for patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension
Marius M. Hoeper
European Respiratory Review Jun 2015, 24 (136) 272-282; DOI: 10.1183/16000617.00001015
Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Rationale for targeted medical therapy in CTEPH
    • Clinical evidence for pharmacological therapy in CTEPH
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Subjects

  • Pulmonary pharmacology and therapeutics
  • Pulmonary vascular disease
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • PROMs for paediatric acute lower respiratory infection studies
  • Forbearance with endobronchial stenting: cognisance before conviction
  • Prevalence, imaging patterns, and risk factors of ILD in CTD
Show more Reviews

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERR

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising
  • Sponsorship

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN: 0905-9180
Online ISSN: 1600-0617

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society