Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Specific inhalation challenge tests for occupational asthma in Europe: a survey

Hille Suojalehto, Paul Cullinan on behalf of the European Respiratory Society Task Force on Specific Inhalation Challenges with Occupational Agents
European Respiratory Review 2014 23: 266-270; DOI: 10.1183/09059180.00000414
Hille Suojalehto
1Occupational Medicine Team, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland. 2Dept of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Imperial College, National Heart and Lung Institute, London, UK. 3A full list of the members of the European Respiratory Society Task Force on Specific Inhalation Challenges with Occupational Agents and their affiliations can be found in the Acknowledgements section.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: hille.suojalehto@ttl.fi
Paul Cullinan
1Occupational Medicine Team, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland. 2Dept of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Imperial College, National Heart and Lung Institute, London, UK. 3A full list of the members of the European Respiratory Society Task Force on Specific Inhalation Challenges with Occupational Agents and their affiliations can be found in the Acknowledgements section.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

To the Editor:

Asthma is described as “occupational” if it has been induced by an agent encountered in the workplace. The avoidance of further exposure to the causative agent often results in resolution of the asthma, especially if it can be achieved soon after the onset of symptoms [1]. Consequently, occupational asthma is one of the very few types of asthma that are potentially curable.

The implications of this include the importance of early recognition of occupational asthma and of accurate identification of the causative agent. A variety of methods are available to make a diagnosis [2], among which specific inhalation challenge (SIC) testing is generally considered to be the reference standard [3–5]. In this context, SIC testing is the controlled exposure of a patient, under laboratory conditions, to an agent encountered in their workplace. The technique is complex, specialised and practised only in a limited number of centres. If performed carefully it is an effective, efficient and low-risk strategy for making (or in some cases refuting) a diagnosis of occupational asthma and for identifying a specific causal exposure.

In 2011, we established a Task Force on occupational SIC testing, comprising 15 specialist physicians from 10 European countries; funding was granted by the European Respiratory Society (ERS). Our principle aim was to issue guidance on the indications, methodology and interpretation of SIC tests for those who already provide the service and for those who wish to do so in the future. The work programme included a survey of European centres where SIC testing is currently offered; here we present a summary of the responses to this survey.

Members of the Task Force devised a 40-item questionnaire designed to enquire about the experience and practice of occupational SIC over the previous 3 years. This was sent, by e-mail, to every European member of the Occupational and Environmental Group (6.2) of the ERS. We received and collated responses from 24 separate centres that conduct occupational SIC tests in 12 countries.

Figure 1 maps the separate European centres where SIC is practised. The international distribution across the continent is uneven: while some countries (notably Finland, Belgium, Italy, Germany and the UK) have several centres, many have none. There is greater variation still in the rates of SIC, depicted by the size of the circles in figure 1, which bear no clear relationship with population numbers.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

European centres where specific inhalation challenges are used in the diagnosis of occupational asthma. The size of each circle is proportional to the number of patients challenged each year. The biggest circle (Helsinki) represents 136 patients per year and the smallest circle (Aarhus) represents one patient per year. Information was derived from an online survey of members of the European Respiratory Society Occupational and Environmental group in 2012. The following centres are shown: Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland; Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, Łodz, Poland; Hospital Vall d’Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, Madrid, Spain; Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Mont-Godinne, Yvoir, Belgium; General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic; Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, Birmingham, UK; The Institute for Prevention and Occupational Medicine of the German Social Accident Insurance, Bochum, Germany; Seinäjoki Central Hospital, Seinäjoki, Finland; Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland; Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK; Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland; Universitair Ziekenhuis, Brussels, Belgium; University of Padova, Padova, Italy; Institute for Occupational and Maritime Medicine, Hamburg, Germany; University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri, Pavia, Italy; University of Munich, Munich, Germany; North Manchester General Hospital, Manchester, UK; University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Republican Klaipeda Hospital, Klaipeda, Lithuania; Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway; Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

In the 3 years prior to the survey, the centres had collectively performed 1612 SIC tests, half of them with low molecular weight agents. table 1 summarises their facilities, practise and experiences over this period after categorisation into two groups of “high” and “low” activity based on the median number of tests (n=12) undertaken annually. In 38% of centres, SIC is routinely used in the diagnosis of occupational asthma; the remainder employ it when alternative diagnostic tests have failed to provide an adequate diagnosis. All but three centres have an enclosed and ventilated chamber dedicated to occupational SIC testing. In all centres, the tests are overseen by a physician; in two-thirds a nurse performs the test, advised by a technician, occupational hygienist or chemist in 54% of centres. These proportions did not differ markedly by the level of activity.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1. Responses to questionnaire items for all centres and after categorisation by median level of annual activity

Half of the centres routinely admitted patients to hospital for the duration of the SIC, the remainder carried out the test on an outpatient basis; almost all centres preferred to perform the test after asking patients to stop all treatments for asthma. Simulating work tasks is the most common method of delivering exposure; in almost all centres this was carried out with exposure to an inactive control agent on a separate day to provide a basis for comparison of responses to active exposures. It was rare for more than one active agent to be tested on any one day, although different doses of the same active agent were used in about half of the centres. For almost all centres, the exceptions being two centres in Germany where airway conductance was measured, serial measurements of forced expiratory volume in 1 s were the primary outcome. In addition, assessment of bronchial reactivity was commonly used and, in many centres, the newer techniques of exhaled nitric oxide fraction measurement and sputum cytology were routinely included.

We asked each centre to report the number of excessive asthmatic reactions requiring treatment with oral corticosteroids provoked by SIC over the previous 3 years. Half of the centres reported none; in the remainder (with one exception where an incidence of 18% was reported), the incidence was between 2% and 8%. These proportions were not related to the level of activity in the centre.

We doubt that we have captured the full picture, but in any case, a large number of occupational SIC tests are performed in Europe. However, the distribution of centres that offer tests and the numbers undertaken in each centre are uneven and reflect neither the populations they serve nor the likely regional incidence of occupational asthma. This variation has probably arisen through the interests and customs of local specialists as, as far as we are aware, no jurisdiction in Europe absolutely requires the use of SIC in the diagnosis of occupational asthma for reasons of compensation. Over half of European countries appear to offer no SIC service. Structurally, there seems to be a high degree of consistency between centres, with few differences between those where relatively high or low numbers of challenge tests are carried out. There is more variation in procedure, especially in the practice of admitting patients to hospital, in the use of devices that deliver precise doses of challenge agent and in the measurement of (secondary) outcome indicators. These variations have been collated and are presented in the full Task Force report, which also includes a practical “handbook” of methods for SIC with the wide variety of occupational agents [6].

SIC is an important tool in the diagnosis of occupational asthma. While other tools are available, only SIC testing has the potential, in every case, to identify with precision the causative agent(s) and so provide the information necessary for appropriate management. Approximately a third of the surveyed centres used SIC routinely, that is in every, or almost every, case of suspected disease; the remainder reserved it for cases where other methods have failed or are impractical. As above the variation is likely to be driven by local custom, but it will also reflect structural arrangements (e.g. the ease of timely access to hospital beds), whereby SIC is or is not a more efficient method than the alternatives.

The provision of services for SIC tests is far higher in Europe than in other parts of the world where, with the notable exception of some provinces in Canada, it is rarely, if at all, available. Nonetheless, we suggest that access to occupational SIC testing in Europe should be broader and provided at least on a national level in each country. We hope that these findings and those in the full Task Force report [6] will provide the necessary impetus for this development.

Acknowledgments

The Task Force members’ affiliations are as follows. P. Cullinan (co-chair): Dept of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Imperial College, National Heart and Lung Institute, London, UK; H. Suojalehto (co-chair): Occupational Medicine Team, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland; T.B. Aasen: Dept of Occupational Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway; X. Baur: Institute for Occupational Medicine, Charité University, Berlin, Germany; P.S. Burge: Dept of Respiratory Medicine, Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK; F. de Blay: Division of Asthma and Allergy, Dept of Chest Diseases, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Fédération de Médecine Translationnelle, Strasbourg University, Strasbourg, France; D. Fishwick: Dept of Respiratory Medicine, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK; J. Hoyle: Dept of Respiratory Medicine, North Manchester General Hospital, Manchester, UK; P. Maestrelli: Dept of Cardiologic, Thoracic, and Vascular Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy; X. Muñoz: Pulmonology Dept, Hospital Vall d’Hebron, Barcelona, CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain; G. Moscato: Department of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine of the University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy; J. Sastre: Allergy Dept, Fundacion Jimenez Diaz-Capio, CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain; T. Sigsgaard: Dept of Public Health, Section of Environment, Occupation and Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; K. Suuronen: Occupational Medicine Team, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland; O. Vandenplas: Dept of Chest Medicine, Mont-Godinne Hospital, Université Catholique de Louvain, Yvoir, Belgium; J. Walusiak-Skorupa: Dept of Occupational Diseases, Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, Łodz, Poland.

Footnotes

  • Conflict of interest: None declared.

  • Provenance: Submitted article, peer reviewed

  • Received January 17, 2014.
  • Accepted January 19, 2014.
  • ©ERS 2014

ERR articles are open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Vandenplas O,
    2. Dressel H,
    3. Nowak D,
    4. et al
    . What is the optimal management option for occupational asthma? Eur Respir Rev 2012; 21: 97–104.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Baur X,
    2. Sigsgaard T,
    3. Aasen TB,
    4. et al
    . Guidelines for the management of work-related asthma. Eur Respir J 2012; 39: 529–545.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Nicholson PJ,
    2. Cullinan P,
    3. Burge PS,
    4. et al
    . Occupational asthma: prevention, identification and management: systematic review and recommendations. London, British Occupational Health Research Foundation, 2010.
    1. Beach J,
    2. Russell K,
    3. Blitz S,
    4. et al
    . A systematic review of the diagnosis of occupational asthma. Chest 2007; 131: 569–578.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Tarlo SM,
    2. Balmes J,
    3. Balkissoon R,
    4. et al
    . Diagnosis and management of work-related asthma: American College Of Chest Physicians Consensus Statement. Chest 2008; 134: 1S–41S.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Vandenplas O,
    2. Suojalehto H,
    3. Aasen TB,
    4. et al
    . Specific inhalation challenge in the diagnosis of occupational asthma: consensus statement. Eur Respir J 2014; 43: 1573–1587.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
View this article with LENS
Vol 23 Issue 132 Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Specific inhalation challenge tests for occupational asthma in Europe: a survey
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
Specific inhalation challenge tests for occupational asthma in Europe: a survey
Hille Suojalehto, Paul Cullinan
European Respiratory Review Jun 2014, 23 (132) 266-270; DOI: 10.1183/09059180.00000414

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Specific inhalation challenge tests for occupational asthma in Europe: a survey
Hille Suojalehto, Paul Cullinan
European Respiratory Review Jun 2014, 23 (132) 266-270; DOI: 10.1183/09059180.00000414
Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Subjects

  • Asthma and allergy
  • Epidemiology, occupational and environmental lung disease
  • Lung structure and function
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Hypoxaemia during pregnancy
  • Pulmonary hypertension and Whipple disease
  • Germ-line exon 21 EGFR mutations in nonsmall cell lung cancer
Show more Letters

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERR

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising
  • Sponsorship

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN: 0905-9180
Online ISSN: 1600-0617

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society