Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
    • WoS Reviewer Recognition Service
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Institutional open access agreements
    • Peer reviewer login
    • WoS Reviewer Recognition Service
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

The challenge of breathlessness in the detection of pulmonary hypertension

F. Blasi
European Respiratory Review 2012 21: 1-3; DOI: 10.1183/09059180.00008511
F. Blasi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: francesco.blasi@unimi.it
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Acute or chronic shortness of breath (dyspnoea) is a common reason for patients to consult their primary care physicians. However, appropriate diagnosis and deciding whether or when to refer the patient to specialist care can be a challenge. Dyspnoea has been defined as “a subjective experience of breathing discomfort that consists of qualitatively distinct sensations that vary in intensity” [1]; however, patients may use a variety of descriptions for their symptoms, such as “my chest feels tight” or “I cannot get enough air” [2]. A patient's perception of their symptoms will also vary depending on their context, such as whether they occur on physical exertion or at rest, and on whether symptoms have come on acutely or developed gradually over time. Individuals with chronic dyspnoea are often limited in their activities, with resulting impairment in physical functioning and quality of life [1].

Dyspnoea can be a symptom of a variety of underlying conditions. These include cardiac conditions (such as myocardial infarction, arrhythmias or valvular disease), pulmonary conditions (such as asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), pneumonia, pulmonary embolism or lung malignancy), or a range of other causes (such as panic attacks, thyroid disease, anaemia or obesity) [1–3]. In many cases, dyspnoea may be due to multifactorial causes [4]. For some patients, the probable cause of dyspnoea may be obvious, such as exacerbation of known asthma, COPD or heart failure, but for others, particularly younger previously healthy individuals, a thorough diagnostic evaluation to establish the underlying cause is required.

A full clinical history and physical examination provide the first clues to the diagnosis of dyspnoea. For example, intermittent breathlessness with triggering factors may suggest asthma, while a history of heavy tobacco smoking and a productive cough may suggest COPD [2, 3]. Features such as persistent inspiratory crackles and clubbing of the fingers provide evidence towards idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis [5], while chest pain during dyspnoea may be caused by coronary or pleural disease [3]. Standard lung function tests may be useful in the assessment of dyspnoea, helping to distinguish restrictive lung diseases from obstructive airway disease [1]. Blood tests can reveal anaemia or show erythrocytosis in patients with advanced COPD [2]. If history and basic examination do not provide an obvious diagnosis, or if the patient is suffering from severe symptoms, referral for specialist respiratory or cardiac assessment will be necessary.

A number of tests may be conducted in the diagnosis of dyspnoea. Chest radiography may reveal lung parenchymal disease characteristic of COPD, chest wall abnormalities, malignancy or congestive heart failure. An ECG may reveal a disturbance of heart rate or rhythm, cardiac ischaemia, ventricular hypertrophy or pericardial disease [6]. Normal ECG findings, while not excluding a diagnosis of heart failure, may make this diagnosis less probable. Pulse oximetry and arterial blood gas analysis can confirm gas exchange abnormalities, which are commonly found in patients with interstitial lung disease or emphysema [1]. Specialist spirometry tests include measurement of the diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide, which is reduced in patients with diseases affecting the lung parenchyma or vascular abnormalities and may be elevated in conditions where there is an increased effective pulmonary blood volume, such as asthma or left-to-right cardiac shunts. In addition, methacholine bronchoprovocation challenge can identify airway hyperreactivity. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing aims to quantify pulmonary gas exchange, ventilation and cardiac function, and is useful in cases where there is no apparent cause for dyspnoea or in patients who have multiple potential causes for their breathlessness [7]. High-resolution computed tomography (CT) scanning may also be useful for patients in whom the cause of dyspnoea is unclear, as it can help to diagnose interstitial lung disease or bronchiectasis [2, 8] and CT pulmonary angiography is increasingly used for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism [9]. Echocardiography is the most useful test for diagnosing most cardiac causes of chronic dyspnoea, such as left ventricular dysfunction, valvular dysfunction or pericardial disease. An echocardiogram can also be used to estimate pulmonary artery systolic pressure and, more specifically, right ventricular size and function. If pulmonary vascular disease is suspected, echocardiography with Doppler flow studies can demonstrate elevated pulmonary artery pressures and resultant tricuspid regurgitation [10, 11]. As in all areas of medicine, there is a risk of misdiagnosis of the underlying cause of dyspnoea, and so regular reassessment and consideration of alternative diagnoses is crucial [12].

While most cases of chronic breathlessness can be attributed to conditions such as asthma, congestive heart failure, COPD, pneumonia, cardiac ischaemia, interstitial lung disease and psychogenic conditions [4, 13], it is important to remain vigilant for less common causes of breathlessness. Of these, one of the most serious is pulmonary hypertension (PH). Defined by an elevated resting mean pulmonary artery pressure >25 mmHg, PH is a complex, multifactorial group of disorders that leads to progressive right ventricular failure [14–16]. As well as breathlessness, presenting symptoms include fatigue, weakness, angina pectoris, syncope and abdominal distension [17]. While very few patients with dyspnoea consulting their general practitioner or referred to the pulmonology outpatient clinic will be diagnosed with PH, early diagnosis is so important that it must be always considered in the differential diagnosis. PH is not a single disease, but can be classified into five main categories depending on the mechanisms and underlying cardiovascular or respiratory condition: 1) pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH); 2) PH due to left ventricular dysfunction (PH-LVD); 3) PH due to interstitial lung diseases and/or hypoxia (PH-ILD); 4) chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH); and 5) PH with unclear and/or multifactorial mechanisms [14]. Of the categories of PH, PAH has received the most research attention. All forms of PH are progressive and ultimately fatal; for example, untreated patients with PAH have an average survival of <3 yrs after diagnosis [18]. While the advent of pharmacological treatment for PAH has undoubtedly improved patients' symptoms and physical functioning, there are no approved treatments for the other types of PH, and even for PAH current treatment strategies remain inadequate and the mortality rate continues to be high [14, 19, 20]. For example, in recently reported data from a French registry of PAH patients, 1-, 2- and 3-yr survival rates were 87, 76 and 67%, respectively [21].

Diagnosis of all forms of PH at an early stage is important so that treatment may be started in order to delay disease progression before right heart failure develops. However, the rarity of the disease and the lack of symptoms specific to PH over other causes of breathlessness often thwart prompt diagnosis. Although PH is rare, it can strike relatively young patients who are otherwise healthy and in whom a serious disease would not normally be suspected. Delayed diagnosis is also attributable to clinical failure to recognise the combination of breathlessness and other symptoms as possibly related to PH and failure to fully evaluate symptoms. Consequently, misdiagnosis of PH as asthma is fairly common. In addition, patients may interpret an insidious onset of breathlessness and fatigue as being due to their lifestyle, being unfit or ageing, and so delay seeking medical attention until their daily activities are severely impaired [17]. Thus, diagnosis is often delayed by at least 2 yrs after the onset of symptoms [21, 22].

Once PAH is suspected from the patient's symptoms and results from an echocardiogram are available, definitive diagnosis of PAH requires accurate measurement of pulmonary artery pressure, pulmonary vascular resistance and cardiac output via right heart catheterisation [14]. While some clinicians rely on an echocardiogram to make a diagnosis of PAH because it is less invasive, it is necessary to demonstrate that the elevation in pulmonary artery pressure is due to increased pulmonary venous resistance, which can only be achieved by catheterisation [17]. It is also important to be aware that the resting physiological range of pulmonary artery pressure observed by echocardiography is dependent on age, sex and body mass index, with higher pressures often observed in older or obese individuals [10].

Underlying conditions that may be the cause of other types of PH, such as thromboembolism, left ventricular dysfunction or pulmonary fibrosis, should be identified and treated. In particular, ventilation–perfusion scanning or spiral CT scanning of the chest may be used to confirm a diagnosis of CTEPH [2].

Despite the development of nine different drugs representing three classes of medication for the treatment of PAH over the past two decades, prognosis remains poor. In addition, no treatment has been approved for PH-LVD and PH-ILD and the only curative treatment for CTEPH is surgery, which is not suitable for many patients with the condition.

Ideally, therapy should slow down or reverse pulmonary vascular remodelling and preserve right ventricular function. It is generally understood that PH is a disorder of the pulmonary vasculature resulting in pathological vasoconstriction and proliferation of the vascular smooth muscle and endothelium. Current therapies for PAH target various signalling pathways known to be involved in vasoconstriction and proliferation, but these pathways are not yet fully elucidated. In addition, the associated conditions that result in the various types of PH are heterogeneous and sometimes do not seem to be related to one another, complicating comprehensive diagnosis and targeted treatment.

Another challenge is the accurate definition of PH phenotypes. Such definition may provide insights about the causes of disease, help to predict prognosis and ultimately identify which phenotypes are more likely to respond to a particular treatment or management strategy [23]. For example, one such phenotype is scleroderma-related PAH, which carries a poorer prognosis compared with most other forms of PAH [24]. PAH appears to occur early in the course of scleroderma, and so not only are regular screening and prompt diagnosis required, but treatment strategies to target the relevant disease processes are urgently required [25]. Another more recently recognised PH phenotype is that of PH in association with combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema. This phenotype appears to have a particularly poor prognosis, with a recently reported 1-yr survival rate of only 60% [26].

PH is a rare but serious group of conditions with no real cure. Despite the symptomatic improvement provided by current treatment strategies, there is much room for improvement in outcomes and many questions remain about the optimal management of PH.

In this issue of the European Respiratory Review, several leading experts summarise the latest research on the pathophysiology of PH and discuss current management practices. Wilkins [27] discusses the science behind the disease spectrum of PH, the understanding of which may one day provide targets for therapeutic intervention. Vachiéry et al. [28] describe current practices for detecting and monitoring disease progression in the clinic. The focus then shifts to CTEPH, with Kim and Lang [29] reviewing the risk factors behind the development of CTEPH, while Jenkins et al. [30] present the latest techniques for diagnosing CTEPH.

I hope that you find this issue interesting and informative, and gain an understanding of the exciting new developments and ongoing research that provide hope in the future for improved outcomes for our patients with all types of PH.

Acknowledgments

I received editorial assistance from Adelphi Communications (Bollington, UK), funded by Bayer Pharma AG (Berlin, Germany).

Footnotes

  • Provenance

    Publication of this peer-reviewed article was supported by Bayer Pharma AG, Germany (article sponsor, European Respiratory Review issue 123).

  • Statement of Interest

    F. Blasi has received reimbursement for attending symposium, and fees for speaking, organising education and consultancy from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer, Chiesi, Diasorin, GSK, Nycomed, Pfizer and Zambon.

  • ©ERS 2012

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    Dyspnea. Mechanisms, assessment, and management: a consensus statement. American Thoracic Society. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999; 159: 321–340.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Karnani NG,
    2. Reisfield GM,
    3. Wilson GR
    . Evaluation of chronic dyspnea. Am Fam Physician 2005; 71: 1529–1537.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Zoorob RJ,
    2. Campbell JS
    . Acute dyspnea in the office. Am Fam Physician 2003; 68: 1803–1810.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Michelson E,
    2. Hollrah S
    . Evaluation of the patient with shortness of breath: an evidence based approach. Emerg Med Clin North Am 1999; 17: 221–237.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    American Thoracic Society. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: diagnosis and treatment. International consensus statement. American Thoracic Society (ATS), and the European Respiratory Society (ERS). Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 161: 646–664.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Davie AP,
    2. Francis CM,
    3. Caruana L,
    4. et al
    . Assessing diagnosis in heart failure: which features are any use? QJM 1997; 90: 335–339.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    American Thoracic Society, American College of Chest Physicians. ATS/ACCP statement on cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003; 167: 211–277.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Hunninghake GW,
    2. Lynch DA,
    3. Galvin JR,
    4. et al
    . Radiologic findings are strongly associated with a pathologic diagnosis of usual interstitial pneumonia. Chest 2003; 124: 1215–1223.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Burns SK,
    2. Haramati LB
    . Diagnostic imaging and risk stratification of patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Cardiol Rev 2012; 20: 15–24.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Bossone E,
    2. Citro R,
    3. Blasi F,
    4. et al
    . Echocardiography in pulmonary arterial hypertension: an essential tool. Chest 2007; 131: 339–341.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Schiller NB
    . Pulmonary artery pressure estimation by Doppler and two-dimensional echocardiography. Cardiol Clin 1990; 8: 277–287.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Wills CP,
    2. Young M,
    3. White DW
    . Pitfalls in the evaluation of shortness of breath. Emerg Med Clin North Am 2010; 28: 163–181.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. DePaso WJ,
    2. Winterbauer RH,
    3. Lusk JA,
    4. et al
    . Chronic dyspnea unexplained by history, physical examination, chest roentgenogram, and spirometry. Analysis of a seven-year experience. Chest 1991; 100: 1293–1299.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Galiè N,
    2. Hoeper MM,
    3. Humbert M,
    4. et al
    . Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension: the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS), endorsed by the International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT). Eur Heart J 2009; 30: 2493–2537.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    1. Rosenblum WD
    . Pulmonary arterial hypertension: pathobiology, diagnosis, treatment, and emerging therapies. Cardiol Rev 2010; 18: 58–63.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Rosenkranz S
    . Pulmonary hypertension: current diagnosis and treatment. Clin Res Cardiol 2007; 96: 527–541.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Houtchens J,
    2. Martin D,
    3. Klinger JR
    . Diagnosis and management of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Pulm Med 2011; 2011: 845864.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. D'Alonzo GE,
    2. Barst RJ,
    3. Ayres SM,
    4. et al
    . Survival in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension. Results from a national prospective registry. Ann Intern Med 1991; 115: 343–349.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Benza RL,
    2. Miller DP,
    3. Gomberg-Maitland M,
    4. et al
    . Predicting survival in pulmonary arterial hypertension: insights from the Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-Term Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Disease Management (REVEAL). Circulation 2010; 122: 164–172.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Thenappan T,
    2. Shah SJ,
    3. Rich S,
    4. et al
    . Survival in pulmonary arterial hypertension: a reappraisal of the NIH risk stratification equation. Eur Respir J 2010; 35: 1079–1087.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Humbert M,
    2. Sitbon O,
    3. Chaouat A,
    4. et al
    . Survival in patients with idiopathic, familial, and anorexigen-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension in the modern management era. Circulation 2010; 122: 156–163.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Badesch DB,
    2. Raskob GE,
    3. Elliott CG,
    4. et al
    . Pulmonary arterial hypertension: baseline characteristics from the REVEAL Registry. Chest 2010; 137: 376–387.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Dweik RA,
    2. Erzurum SC
    . Update on pulmonary vascular diseases 2010. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011; 184: 26–31.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Chung L,
    2. Liu J,
    3. Parsons L,
    4. et al
    . Characterization of connective tissue disease-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension from REVEAL: identifying systemic sclerosis as a unique phenotype. Chest 2010; 138: 1383–1394.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Hachulla E,
    2. Launay D,
    3. Mouthon L,
    4. et al
    . Is pulmonary arterial hypertension really a late complication of systemic sclerosis? Chest 2009; 136: 1211–1219.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Cottin V,
    2. Le Pavec J,
    3. Prevot G,
    4. et al
    . Pulmonary hypertension in patients with combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema syndrome. Eur Respir J 2010; 35: 105–111.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Wilkins MR
    . Pulmonary hypertension: the science behind the disease spectrum. Eur Respir Rev 2012; 21: 19–26.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Vachiéry J-L,
    2. Yerly P,
    3. Huez S
    . How to detect disease progression in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur Respir Rev 2012; 21: 40–47.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Kim NH,
    2. Lang IM
    . Risk factors for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Eur Respir Rev 2012; 21: 27–31.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Jenkins D,
    2. Mayer E,
    3. Screaton N,
    4. et al
    . State-of-the-art chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension diagnosis. Eur Respir Rev 2012; 21: 32–39.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
View this article with LENS
Vol 21 Issue 123 Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The challenge of breathlessness in the detection of pulmonary hypertension
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
The challenge of breathlessness in the detection of pulmonary hypertension
F. Blasi
European Respiratory Review Mar 2012, 21 (123) 1-3; DOI: 10.1183/09059180.00008511

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
The challenge of breathlessness in the detection of pulmonary hypertension
F. Blasi
European Respiratory Review Mar 2012, 21 (123) 1-3; DOI: 10.1183/09059180.00008511
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Subjects

  • Pulmonary vascular disease
  • Respiratory clinical practice
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Clinical and prognostic value of ventilatory efficiency in cardiorespiratory disorders
  • Guidance production before evidence generation for critical issues: COVID-19
  • Modulator treatment for people with cystic fibrosis
Show more Editorial

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERR

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising
  • Sponsorship

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN: 0905-9180
Online ISSN: 1600-0617

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society