Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • For authors
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • ERS author centre
    • COVID-19 submission information
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • For authors
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • ERS author centre
    • COVID-19 submission information
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and non-asthma lung disease

R. S. Morehead
European Respiratory Review 2009 18: 233-243; DOI: 10.1183/09059180.00002509
R. S. Morehead
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common disorder in Western countries, and its relationship to airways disorders (e.g. asthma) has been well established. Lung diseases other than asthma have also been associated with GERD, but the nature and scope of this relationship has not been fully defined. Diseases that have been associated with GERD include bronchiolitis syndromes, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, scleroderma and nontubercular mycobacterial infection.

Diagnostic evaluation centres upon proving both reflux and pulmonary aspiration, which may be accomplished in some cases by lung biopsy. However, in many cases a compatible clinical and radiographic picture coupled with proof of proximal reflux by combined oesophageal probe testing may suffice for a provisional diagnosis and allow institution of anti-reflux measures.

Proton-pump inhibitors are the medications of choice for GERD; other interventions shown to reduce reflux are weight loss, elevation of the head of the bed and avoidance of recumbency after meals. However, acid suppression therapy does not address non-acid reflux that may be important in disease pathogenesis in select patients, and lifestyle modifications often fail.

Laparoscopic fundoplication is the procedure of choice for medically refractory GERD with excellent short-term results with respect to respiratory symptoms associated with GERD; however, long-term studies document a significant percentage of patients requiring ongoing acid suppression therapy.

  • Aspiration
  • bronchiolitis
  • fundoplication
  • gastro-oesophageal reflux disease
  • idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

Chest physicians generally acknowledge a link between oesophageal disorders and respiratory disease; however, this relationship is complex and may manifest in a variety of clinical entities. A comprehensive, recent article has documented a causal link between gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and asthma, chronic cough and posterior laryngitis [1], but in contrast the nature and scope of the relationship between other lung diseases and GERD has not been fully evaluated. This article will review the current knowledge of these disorders.

DEFINITION AND EPIDEMIOLOGY

GERD is defined as “a condition which develops when the reflux of stomach contents causes troublesome symptoms and/or complications” [2]. This definition serves to differentiate normal individuals with occasional symptomatic reflux from patients with either life-altering symptoms (including extra-oesophageal complaints) or asymptomatic reflux that produces mucosal injury and risk for neoplasia. GERD is a common disorder affecting up to 20% of individuals in Western countries [3]. Risk factors for GERD include hiatus hernia, obesity, older age, alcohol and tobacco use, and male sex [4]; in addition, obstructive sleep apnoea may also confer a risk independent of that due to obesity [5]. Given the obesity epidemic and the aging of the population [6] this prevalence figure is likely to increase.

The high prevalence of GERD contrasts with the rarity of non-asthmatic lung diseases, such as idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), which as a group have a poorly defined epidemiology. A recent study [7] using a US healthcare claims database reported the prevalence of IPF as 16.3 and 42.7 per 100,000 persons, using narrow and broad diagnostic criteria, respectively. Despite studies showing a strong association between GERD and respiratory complaints [2, 8, 9], the development of parenchymal lung disease appears to be an exceptional event. One reason for this disparity is that occult microaspiration, the pathological link between GERD and lung disease, occurs in only a minority patients with GERD. Moreover, this appears true even in select patients with extra-oesophageal complications, as shown by two nuclear scintigraphy studies that demonstrated microaspiration in only 5–15% of patients with documented GERD-related cough [10, 11]. In contrast, patients with severe lung disease often have unrecognised pathological reflux. In one study of 65 consecutive IPF patients, 87% had pathological gastro-oesophageal reflux (GER) [12], another study reported GERD in 48–76% of patients following lung transplantation [13–15]. Microaspiration is more likely in the setting of impaired swallowing mechanism and depressed alertness, conditions more prevalent in the elderly, as suggested by one study [16] which showed an association of bilateral chest radiography scarring with pH probe-proven GERD in elderly patients referred for evaluation of gastrointestinal symptoms.

There are also no long-term longitudinal studies of patients with GERD assessing whether parenchymal lung disease develops over time. The few studies attempting to document lung function abnormalities in patients with GERD have been inconclusive. Spechler et al. [17] randomised 207 patients with complicated GERD to different treatment groups and assessed lung function after 1 yr; there were no important differences. Schachter et al. [18] studied 147 obese patients undergoing weight reduction surgery, identifying a reduced diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DL,CO) in those with severe GERD compared to those without GERD. However, the GERD patients were sleepier and older, suggesting that pulmonary vascular disease due to sleep apnoea could have accounted for the difference in DL,CO.

MECHANISMS OF RESPIRATORY DISEASE IN GERD

The lung and oesophagus share a common embryological derivation and innervation by the vagus nerve. The upper oesophageal sphincter lies immediately posterior to the larynx, and the oesophagus runs adjacent to the trachea in the thorax, forming the posterior wall of this structure. GER is a well-documented event in normal individuals, resulting from transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxation (TLESR). Physiological TLESRs tend to occur after meals, result in brief oesophageal acid contact times and produce no mucosal injury [19, 20]. In contrast, patients with GERD have more frequent TLESR, longer oesophageal acid time and lower oesophageal sphincter (LES) incompetence (prolonged low LES pressure), with the latter phenomenon correlating with endoscopically graded severity of mucosal injury [21]. GER is more likely to be present in several clinical settings (table 1⇓).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table. 1—

Conditions associated with gastro-oesophageal reflux (GERD)

The first clinical setting is primary lung disease, where the thoracic cavity pressure is negative in relation to the abdominal cavity and varies during the respiratory cycle. As such, pre-existing LES incompetence may be worsened by factors producing an increased trans-diaphragmatic pressure gradient, as may occur with lung disease (e.g. increased negative intra-thoracic pressure during inspiration). Moreover, studies of asthmatics undergoing methacholine challenge reveal that bronchospasm increases both TLESR frequency and GER [22, 23].

The second clinical setting is increased intra-abdominal pressure. Conditions that increase intra-abdominal pressure (e.g. obesity, pregnancy and massive ascites) have the potential to increase GER.

The final clinical setting is conditions affecting the intrinsic oesophageal musculature, such as primary myopathic disease, scleroderma, and certain drugs which may adversely affect LES function, thus producing or exacerbating GER.

There are two mechanisms by which GER produces lung disease: 1) reflex neural mechanisms occurring during reflux events limited to the lower oesophagus (distal GER); and 2) direct effect from gastric contents refluxed above the upper oesophageal sphincter (proximal GER) producing upper airway injury and, if aspirated into the tracheobronchial tree, lung disease. A large body of research has examined the relationship between GERD and asthma, and while laryngeal irritation due to proximal GER produces cough and laryngospasm, distal GER alone may also produce functional changes in the respiratory tract. Animal [24] and human studies [25] confirm that distal GER may increase airways resistance and promote airway inflammation by releasing pro-inflammatory mediators [25]. Field et al. [26] also showed that oesophageal acid increases minute ventilation, suggesting another mechanism for respiratory symptoms in GERD patients. Notwithstanding these functional changes, without aspiration parenchymal pathology does not occur.

Normal individuals aspirate small volumes of oral secretions during sleep [27] without sequelae, and this occult aspiration occurs more often in the setting of depressed consciousness [28]. Proximal GER creates the potential for aspiration, the outcome of which varies with the chronicity of the events and the volume and nature of the aspirate. Acute pneumonitis results from aspiration of a large volume of acidic fluid [29], and animal studies have shown this to be a biphasic process [30, 31]: initial chemical injury followed by an inflammatory phase [32–34]. Food particles and low pH act synergistically to produce a more severe injury with a different cytokine profile from that generated by acid alone [35, 36]. In contrast, repeated instillation of small amounts of partially digested vegetable matter with a neutral pH produces a foreign body reaction involving cell-mediated immunity. This latter response results in a pathological pattern of nodular granulomas, giant cells and bronchiolitis with alveolar organisation [37, 38]. Lung disease resulting from GER-related recurrent microaspiration may differ pathologically from the nodular granulomatous pattern if foreign material is absent from the aspirate and, thus, definitive diagnosis by lung biopsy may be difficult. Additionally, the relative importance of non-acid reflux in the development of GERD-related lung disease is currently unresolved, as constituents of gastric juice such as bile acids and pepsin may cause epithelial damage. Bile acids have been identified in the sputum of patients with GERD [39] and have been shown to induce in vitro production of transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1 by human epithelial cells. As TGF-β is important in the fibroproliferative process of IPF [40], this mechanism may factor into the fibroblast proliferation of this disease. Clarifying the pathogenesis of non-acid reflux is important given that proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs), the commonest treatment for GERD, have no effect on non-acid reflux.

CLINICAL SYNDROMES

Lung diseases that have been associated with GERD include nodular granulomatous bronchiolar disease, bronchiolitis obliterans with organising pneumonia (BOOP), IPF and scleroderma, bronchiolitis obliterans following lung transplantation, and nontubercular mycobacterial (NTM) lung infection. Acute lung injury resulting from large volume aspiration of gastric contents (aspiration pneumonitis) is a distinct clinical syndrome [29] which should be differentiated from the more insidious microaspiration-related diseases discussed below.

Nodular granulomatous bronchiolar disease

Patients with neurological disorders (e.g. stroke and Parkinson's disease) and oesophageal diseases (e.g. achalasia) commonly have repeated occult aspiration. Previous autopsy studies [38, 41–43] document a nodular granulomatous process with foreign body reaction in patients with neurological impairment and/or oesophageal disease who aspirated gastric contents containing partially digested vegetable matter, a condition termed lentil pneumonitis [44, 45]. In the study by Knoblich [38] >1,500 autopsies were reviewed and 41 cases of this lesion were found, noting that the diagnostic finding of vegetable matter was often initially missed. More recently, Matsuse et al. [46] analysed >3,000 autopsies from two hospitals in Tokyo, Japan and revealed 31 cases with a similar pathological lesion, which they termed diffuse aspiration bronchiolitis. Medical records in these patients documented a high incidence of cough, sputum production and dyspnoea, in addition to underlying neurological disorders, dementia and oropharyngeal dysphagia. Only half of these patients had documented emesis or gross aspiration.

Foreign material aspiration is required for the development of this lesion, and while most patients with this disorder have obvious neurological compromise or derangement of the swallowing mechanism, some patients apparently only have GERD as the predisposing factor. Barnes et al. [47] reported four patients aged 41–59 yrs with pathologically proven diffuse aspiration bronchiolitis. None of the patients had a disorder associated with altered sensorium and two patients had video fluoroscopy showing no evidence of aspiration; three of these patients had GERD. Mukhopadhyay and Katzenstein [48] reported 59 cases referred for pathological consultation ultimately diagnosed as aspiration-related lung disease. Of these, 10 patients had illicit and/or prescription narcotic drug use as the predisposing factor to aspiration, and 11 had a variety of oesophageal disorders, including three with hiatal hernia. Case reports also describe this disorder in ambulatory patients with dementia who were not suspected of chronic aspiration [49, 50], and in one patient who was found to irrigate her nasal cavity with green tea [51].

BOOP

BOOP has been sporadically reported secondary to occult aspiration related to GER [49, 52], but is rarely mentioned as a condition associated with GERD [53–55]. Sadoun et al. [56] reported a series of five patients with biopsy-proven refractory BOOP who had sustained resolution with therapy solely for GERD. In contrast to patients with nodular granulomatosis, pathognomonic findings of aspiration are absent as there is no identifiable foreign matter in the pathology sections, making the differentiation from other causes of BOOP difficult [57]. Findings suggestive of this condition include multicentric and migratory infiltrates, but an anatomic preference for dependent lung segments has not been evident in the few cases reported. Along these lines, Marumo et al. [58] studied 16 patients with recurrent respiratory symptoms identified from a large group of patients having total gastrectomy. These patients had prominent nocturnal reflux symptoms with productive cough, often followed by morning fever, and many had been evaluated for fever of unknown origin. Although no lung biopsies were performed, these patients are similar to others with BOOP in association with GERD, as they had clinical and laboratory findings of inflammation and chest radiography showing small and multifocal airspace infiltrates without regional preference. The recognition of GERD as a possible aetiological factor in BOOP has important implications, as the usual therapy, corticosteroids, may increase reflux [59].

Fibrosing lung diseases

The classic fibrosing lung disease, IPF, is strikingly similar to the lung involvement occurring in scleroderma. Patients with both disorders present with dyspnoea, inspiratory rales, finger clubbing, exercise-induced hypoxaemia, interstitial and fibrotic radiographic changes, and nonuniform collagen deposition, fibroblastic foci and honeycomb changes on lung pathology [60]. Lung fibrosis in these diseases progresses to death within 3–5 yrs in most patients. Recurrent microaspiration has been identified as a potential risk factor for IPF [61] and is postulated as important in the pathogenesis of scleroderma pulmonary fibrosis and IPF based on the observation of frequent oesophageal dysfunction in both diseases [62, 63]. Oesophageal dysfunction occurring in interstitial lung diseases other than IPF and scleroderma is less well studied, but has been reported [64, 65], suggesting that GERD in fibrotic diseases results from nondisease specific changes in pulmonary mechanics and trans-diaphragmatic pressure gradient.

Scleroderma lung fibrosis

Studies evaluating the role of oesophageal reflux in the development of scleroderma pulmonary fibrosis are limited to small case series employing a variety of indices of oesophageal function. Johnson et al. [66] studied 13 patients with scleroderma, all of whom had abnormal LES function and biopsy evidence of GERD. 10 of these patients had a reduced DL,CO, which was inversely correlated with GERD severity as judged by reflux score, and two had proven aspiration by scintigraphic study. Denis et al. [67] studied 24 scleroderma patients revealing reduced lung compliance in those with impaired oesophageal peristalsis and LES function. Another series of 43 patients [68] demonstrated a correlation between abnormal oesophageal motility and poorer lung function. Kinuya et al. [69] evaluated 47 scleroderma patients showing that higher oesophageal retention of a nuclear tracer (a marker of impaired peristalsis) was correlated with impairment in both DL,CO and forced vital capacity. Marie et al. [70] studied 43 scleroderma patients with oesophageal manometry showing that, although the patients did not differ with respect to disease duration, systemic disease manifestations or inflammatory markers, more severe oesophageal dysfunction was correlated with interstitial changes as shown by high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) and reduced DL,CO, with a trend toward lower lung volumes. Savarino et al. [71] studied 40 consecutive scleroderma patients with combined oesophageal pH and impedance testing. HRCT evidence of pulmonary fibrosis was found in 18 out of 40 patients, and this group had significantly lower LES pressure, more oesophageal acid exposure, more total and proximal reflux events (both acid and non-acid), and a higher percentage of proximal reflux episodes as compared to those without fibrosis. In contrast, one study of 47 patients found that the presence of proximal reflux was not correlated with lung function, although DL,CO was reduced in patients both with and without reflux [72]. These studies, limited as they are, support the premise that recurrent aspiration plays a role in the progression of scleroderma lung fibrosis, although the association of pulmonary and oesophageal dysfunction could simply reflect a more advanced stage of disease.

IPF

Similar to scleroderma, patients with IPF have a high prevalence of GERD [12, 65, 73–75], leading to the hypothesis that recurrent occult microaspiration may drive the ongoing inflammation characteristic of this disease. This should not be confused with acute exacerbation of IPF (progression of symptoms over weeks with radiographic airspace disease), as biopsies may also reveal organising pneumonia with underlying UIP in this syndrome [76, 77]. Mays et al. [73] reported 131 patients with radiographic pulmonary fibrosis, of which six had recurrent aspiration as their primary diagnosis. 63 were ultimately diagnosed as “idiopathic” fibrosis, and 79% of this group had symptoms of GERD. Additionally, eight patients in this group had surgical lung biopsy showing diffuse fibrosis with areas of bronchiolar damage. Savici and Katzenstein [78] reported surgical lung biopsy findings in six patients with recurrent acute respiratory distress syndrome of unclear aetiology. In addition to the expected finding of alveolar damage, focal acute inflammation and organising pneumonia were also seen. Five of these patients had GERD and four out of the five patients had a history of chronic narcotic use, suggesting a combination of reflux and aspiration; one patient developed chronic lung disease requiring home oxygen therapy.

Recognition of GERD as a potential aetiological factor has important treatment implications, especially since corticosteroids may worsen GERD and continue to be widely used for therapy of IPF despite a lack of definitive clinical trials [61]. Trials of therapy for GERD in patients with established IPF are limited to one retrospective case series [79] of four patients with IPF and documented GERD who were only treated with PPI, these patients stabilised or improved over a 2–3-yr period. Current evidence linking GERD and IPF in a causal relationship is lacking, the hypothesis infers microaspiration from the finding of proximal reflux. However, scintigraphic studies in patients with upper airway complaints [10, 11] suggest that this may be a false assumption as only a minority of patients with proximal reflux aspirate. As such, the question of whether GERD initiates the fibrotic process, participates in driving already established fibrosis or is an innocent bystander remains unresolved.

Bronchiolitis obliterans in lung transplant recipients

Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) is a disease of small airways reflecting chronic allograft rejection and ultimately occurs in about two-thirds of lung transplant patients surviving past the initial post-operative period. BOS manifests clinically as progressive dyspnoea, cough and recurrent infection, with the characteristic finding of progressive airflow limitation on pulmonary function testing. It has been increasingly recognised that GERD, present in 48–76% of patients post-transplantation [13–15], may be a key factor in the development and progression of BOS [80]. Factors predisposing to GERD-related lung disease in this population include gastroparesis [81], vagus nerve dysfunction, a high incidence of post-operative oropharyngeal dysphagia [82], and depressed cough reflex due to the lack of innervation of the allograft [83]. Most lung transplant patients with GERD lack classic symptoms [14], and although acid suppression therapy is frequently given to this patient group, non-acid reflux is present in up to 50% as documented by the finding of bile acids in lung lavage samples [13], a finding associated with BOS in one study [84]. Supporting the aetiological role of GERD in a subset of BOS patients, Davis et al. [85] reported their experience with 43 BOS patients undergoing oesophageal fundoplication, showing lung function improvement (and BOS stage) in 16 cases. In another article, Cantu e al. [15] compared early fundoplication in 14 patients (within 3 months of transplant) with 62 patients undergoing a later operation (mean almost 2 yrs after transplant), suggesting that early surgery may prevent BOS.

NTM infection

NTM infection of the lung may produce a clinical picture of nodular bronchiectasis in nonsmokers [86], and this disease has been associated with oesophageal disorders [87–89]. A recent paper from Korea described 58 HIV-negative patients (86% female) with nodular bronchiectasis due to NTM who had 24-hr oesophageal pH probe evaluation [90]. Pathological acid reflux was identified in 15 (26%) patients, a figure substantially higher than the <5% prevalence reported in Eastern Asia. Moreover, only four (27%) out of the 15 patients had symptoms of GERD. Thomson et al. [91] conducted a case–control study of a cohort of 58 HIV-negative patients with NTM in Australia showing that compared to controls, NTM patients used more acid-suppressing medications and were more likely to have clinically diagnosed GERD and aspiration.

The nature of the linkage between NTM lung infection and GERD is speculative, it is unclear whether acid-suppressing medications predispose to NTM infection or if medication use is simply a marker of severe GERD. There is data that Mycobacterium avium is naturally resistant to acidic pH [92] and in vitro growth is not affected by PPI [93], suggesting that medical therapy of GERD may not be the key factor in pathogenesis.

EVALUATION

Key elements to making the diagnosis of GERD-related lung disease are documenting proximal reflux and aspiration, otherwise there is little established dogma regarding the preferred diagnostic algorithm. As previously discussed, reflux and aspiration warrant consideration in the work up of various lung diseases; however, it must be recalled that GERD is a common condition that may coexist with lung disease by chance alone. Features suggesting a linkage between lung disease and GERD include a suggestive medical history, a compatible radiological picture and certain lung pathological features.

Complaints suggesting the possibility of GERD-related lung disease are nonspecific, including recurrent cough and fever, migratory pulmonary opacities, recurrent pneumonia, and/or exertional dyspnoea with cough. Particular attention should be paid to complaints associated with GERD (e.g. heartburn, waterbrash, change in voice quality and globus sensation) and aspiration (e.g. reported aspiration, dysphagia, cough occurring with oral ingestion, neurological disease and use of sensorium-altering substances). Patients with the latter symptoms should undergo a formal evaluation by a multidisciplinary dysphagia team, which should include a modified barium swallow test [94]. Identifying the origin of the aspiration (e.g. oropharyngeal versus gastro-oesophageal) is crucial for formulating management plans, a previously unrecognised swallowing disorder should be addressed prior to more invasive testing.

Clinical impression should dictate the pace of evaluation but, generally speaking, chest HRCT scanning is a reasonable starting point in patients with suggestive symptoms. Well-recognised disease-HRCT patterns (e.g. sarcoidosis) should result in evaluation according to published guidelines [95], but certain patterns may be indicative of recurrent aspiration, including multifocal ground-glass opacities, tree-in-bud changes, and ill-defined centrilobular nodules (fig. 1⇓) [50, 96]. In addition, abnormal oesophageal imaging, such as the finding of a dilated oesophagus with an air–fluid level or a large hiatus hernia, support a higher likelihood of proximal reflux. If clinical suspicion remains after assessing the history and HRCT, the clinician must decide whether to proceed directly to lung biopsy based on the likely yield and morbidity of the procedure.

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

Computed tomography scan from a male with aspiration revealing nodular airspace infiltration (#), focal ground-glass opacification (arrow) and centrilobular nodules with tree-in-bud changes (arrowheads).

Bronchoscopy with transbronchial biopsy can potentially prove recurrent aspiration if vegetable matter with foreign body reaction is discovered, and can also diagnose other GERD-related conditions, such as NTM infection. Biopsies obtained via bronchoscopy are limited in size and sampling errors are not infrequent, select patients should be considered for surgical lung biopsy with multiple lobe sampling. Nonetheless, even surgical biopsies may not yield diagnostic pathology as in reported cases of GERD-related idiopathic BOOP [49, 52, 56, 57], where microaspiration is presumably devoid of particulate matter. Moreover, elderly and debilitated patients who are at highest risk for foreign material aspiration are often poor candidates for lung biopsy.

Clinical scenarios where biopsy is not the first option and/or the pathology is not definitive should lead to evaluation of GERD (table 2⇓) [97–108]. Combined multi-channel oesophageal impedance and pH-metry probe is the test of choice, detecting both acid and non-acid reflux with high sensitivity and specificity [99], as well as identifying proximal reflux with the potential for aspiration. Other testing modalities have variable utility. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy can detect mucosal changes diagnostic of GERD (high specificity), and it is important in the evaluation of potentially pre-cancerous lesions associated with chronic reflux, but endoscopy is only ∼50% sensitive for the diagnosis of GERD [97, 109]. Barium oesophagram is a modality limited by poor sensitivity and is not recommended for routine diagnosis [97]. Oesophageal manometry provides information on LES pressure and motility, but as most patients with GERD have normal resting LES tone, this is not recommended during initial evaluation [97]. Nuclear gastro-oesophageal scintigraphy is the only noninvasive test that can provide definitive evidence of GER and pulmonary aspiration. Patients ingest a radiolabelled liquid in the evening with immediate gamma camera scanning to exclude oropharyngeal aspiration, followed by repeat scanning the following morning [66, 110–113]. Identification of tracer in the lungs proves reflux and aspiration with high specificity; however, the sensitivity of this method has not been formally established, being limited by the intermittency of aspiration events and the possibility of tracer clearance (e.g. coughed out) prior to the morning scan.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table. 2—

Tests for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and pulmonary aspiration

Visualisation of the respiratory mucosa may support the diagnosis of oesophageal reflux if posterior laryngeal inflammation and/or contact granulomas of the vocal cords are seen [114]; however, findings are often nonspecific as shown by one laryngoscopic study of normal volunteers where 86% had at least one sign associated with reflux [100]. Bronchoscopy has the advantage of allowing lung biopsy and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL); the latter technique is useful in excluding infectious agents such as NTM. Lipid-laden macrophages in BAL fluid have been associated with chronic aspiration. This has been formalised as the lipid-laden macrophage index (LLMI) based on the semi-quantitative grading of 100 consecutive BAL-obtained macrophages stained for fat [101]. Most reports describing the LLMI are small case series involving children, with reported sensitivity of 57–100% and specificity of 57–89% [101–107]. Rosen et al. [108] recently reported a series of 50 children undergoing bronchoscopy and combined oesophageal pH and impedance monitoring, and found no correlation between the LLMI and reflux events, endoscopic oesophagitis or response to fundoplication. Other BAL markers of aspiration, bile acids and pepsin, have been identified in patients with GERD and lung disease [115–118], but currently these markers have not been adequately studied as routine diagnostic tests.

Patients with IPF and BOS following lung transplantation have a high prevalence of asymptomatic GERD, and the issue of when to test is unclear. Practice guidelines recommend treating IPF patients for symptomatic GERD [95], but as the role of GERD in driving the disease progression is unresolved [61], it seems reasonable to consider oesophageal probe testing in patients with these diagnoses, especially with features pointing to the possibility of GERD and microaspiration.

MANAGEMENT

There are no large, well-performed trials of the treatment of GERD-related lung disease. Evidence-based practice dictates using best available information for clinical decision-making [119], which in GERD-related lung disease comes from small trials, expert opinion, case reports and extrapolation of data from larger trials addressing other GERD-related complications (e.g. chronic cough). Moreover, as proving microaspiration can be difficult, empirical medical treatment may be warranted in some patients. GERD-related lung disease should improve and/or resolve if reflux and microaspiration is corrected, provided the disease has not advanced to the point of irreversible fibrosis. As such, it is imperative that patients be closely followed to ensure therapeutic effectiveness in addition to standard evaluation of lung disease progression.

General therapeutic goals for patients with GERD-related lung disease include minimising gastric acidity, decreasing oesophageal reflux, enhancing gastric motility and, where relevant, improving swallowing function. PPIs are the agents of choice for treatment of GERD, and anti-reflux medical therapy improves GERD-related chronic cough in 70–100% of patients [120]. Two recent meta-analyses concluded that although PPIs improved cough scores in patients with GERD, there was insufficient evidence to universally recommend PPIs for treatment of either cough [121] or laryngitis/hoarseness due to proximal reflux [122]. The Oporto consensus [99] stated that “reflux is best detected by impedance and its acidity characterized by pH-metry”; thus, one reason for failure of PPI therapy is that these drugs do not address non-acid reflux, which may be important in extra-oesophageal symptom production and lung disease pathogenesis. Moreover, the optimal PPI dose and schedule is uncertain, repeat oesophageal probe testing while receiving treatment should be strongly considered as standard acid suppression therapy was shown to be inadequate in 63% of IPF patients by pH-metry [65]. PPIs are generally safe medications, theoretical concerns regarding the development of gastrointestinal malignancy and predisposition to community-acquired pneumonia with long-term use have not been validated [123, 124].

The approach to patients with persistent symptoms related to GERD despite adequate oesophageal acid control is unclear. Considerations in this group should include pro-kinetic therapy, lifestyle intervention and, ultimately, surgical treatment. Pro-kinetic agents have the conceptual advantage of decreasing both acid and non-acid reflux and may be helpful in patients with proven motility disorders. Nevertheless, they have been relegated to a role secondary to PPIs in GERD management [109, 120], and there has been little formal study in patients with extra-oesophageal symptoms. Older pro-kinetic drugs, metoclopropamide and bethanechol, have frequent side-effects, and cisapride has been withdrawn or restricted in most countries. Domperidone (unavailable in the USA) has been used in the treatment of gastroparesis [125] and as part of a treatment regimen in two small studies of asthmatics with GERD [126, 127], but it may prolong the QTc interval [128]. Finally, baclofen reduces the frequency of TLESR in GERD patients [129, 130] but, to date, has not been well studied in clinical trials.

Lifestyle modifications are attractive to the clinician as they are low cost, relatively risk free, specifically address GERD risk factors, and have been recommended by practice guidelines for treatment of GERD-related cough [120]. However, in practical terms, many patients find these unacceptable or unattainable, and none of these modifications have been specifically evaluated in patients with GERD-related lung disease. Interventions advocated to reduce total reflux time and GERD symptoms include elevating the head of the bed during sleep, avoidance of the right lateral decubitus position and recumbency 3 hr after meals, smoking and alcohol cessation, dietary restrictions and weight loss [109]. A systematic review [131] revealed that elevation of the head of the bed, sleeping in the left lateral decubitus position and weight loss were effective for patients with GERD with moderate strength of evidence; none of the other interventions had significant support from well-performed clinical trials. Weight loss is universally advocated, but the few studies that have evaluated medical weight loss and GERD have yielded conflicting results [132]. However, two well-performed studies did show reduced acid reflux as assessed by pH probe in patients who lost weight [133, 134], and the lack of benefit in other investigations may have been due to the presence of hiatus hernia (unlikely to be effected by weight loss) in study patients [132]. Although seemingly obvious, smoking cessation should be strongly recommended to patients due to its association with both lung disease and GERD. In addition, avoidance of high-fat and high-calorie meals, caffeine, chocolate, mints, citrus, alcohol and tomatoes have been advocated without substantial supporting evidence. Drugs that can lower LES pressure include calcium-channel blockers [135], anticholinergic medications [136], benzodiazepines [137] and theophylline [138], and corticosteroids may worsen GERD [59]; as for dietary recommendations, avoidance of these agents may be helpful. Obstructive sleep apnoea may be an independent risk for GERD [5], and screening for sleep apnoea should be performed as the application of positive airway pressure with sleep decreases nocturnal reflux [136]. Finally, patients with disordered swallowing should be managed in consultation with a dysphagia specialist [137].

Surgical treatment of GERD should be reserved for medically refractory patients, but it must be noted that there are no controlled trials demonstrating efficacy in patients with GERD-related lung disease. As such, the decision to recommend surgery must take into account local expertise and the likelihood of operative morbidity in patients with substantial lung function impairment. Laparoscopic fundoplication is the preferred surgical approach for most patients as it reliably decreases oesophageal acid contact time, increases LES pressure, improves oesophageal symptoms, and decreases proximal reflux [138–142]. Available evidence suggests that fundoplication improves respiratory symptoms in most patients in the short term and has the potential to improve lung function in those with parenchymal lung disease. However, the response of respiratory complaints is less predictable than oesophageal symptoms [143]. The failure of acid suppressant medication to relieve respiratory complaints in patients with proven GERD may be due to non-acid reflux. In this context surgery is an attractive option as it corrects both acid and non-acid reflux [144, 145]. Reports of carefully selected patients undergoing laparoscopic fundoplication document that cough and other respiratory symptoms improve in >80% of patients and completely resolve in >60% [138, 146–148]. There are few studies on the response of parenchymal lung disease to surgical therapy of GERD. Linden et al. [149] performed laparoscopic fundoplication in 19 patients with end-stage lung disease and GERD awaiting lung transplantation; there was a modest improvement in supplementary oxygen requirement but no difference in pulmonary function or six-min walk distance. However, the advanced stage of disease may have precluded a better outcome. Fundoplication in lung transplantation patients with GERD has the potential to improve pulmonary function and delay or prevent BOS. Davis et al. [85] reported 43 patients having laparoscopic fundoplication showing a 24% improvement in forced expiratory volume in 1 s after surgery (1.87 L versus 2.19 L; p = 0.00002). The benefit was greatest in patients with earlier stage BOS and relatively preserved lung function. A subsequent paper from this group [15] compared early fundoplication in 14 patients (within 3 months of transplant) to 62 patients having the operation later (almost 2 yrs after transplant), showing that 100% of the early surgery group remained free from BOS, suggesting that early surgery may prevent BOS in patients with GERD.

Morbidly obese patients with GERD and lung disease may be candidates for bariatric surgery if medical weight loss attempts fail. In this setting, laparoscopic Roux-en-Y bypass appears to be the favoured procedure, resulting in sustained weight loss, improved GERD symptoms, and it has been reported to benefit GERD patients <100 lbs overweight [150]. In contrast, the commonly performed adjustable gastric band procedure may increase GERD [151, 152]. In a series of 152 obese patients (mean body mass index 48 kg·m−2) with chronic GERD undergoing laparoscopic Roux-en-Y bypass, >80% had GERD symptom resolution 6 months after surgery, and there was a significant decrease in patient-reported laryngitis, wheezing and aspiration [153].

Lastly, enthusiasm for surgical treatment of GERD should be tempered by long-term follow-up data showing persistent GERD symptoms and medication use in many patients [154]. Spechler et al. [155] reported 10-yr outcomes in patients randomised to surgical or medical management of GERD as part of the VA Cooperative study, showing that while 92% of medically managed patients continued to use anti-reflux medications, 62% in the surgery arm also required medical therapy.

CONCLUSION

GER and aspiration should be strongly considered as possible aetiological factors in a variety of lung diseases including bronchiolitis syndromes, pulmonary fibrosis and NTM infection. In addition to clinical suspicion, HRCT is important in suggesting these diagnoses. Evaluation strategies should focus on proving proximal reflux and pulmonary aspiration. Lung biopsy, oesophageal probe, direct airway visualisation, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and nuclear scintigraphic studies are all potentially useful modalities, but all have significant limitations, and the diagnostic approach should be tailored to the individual patient. Treatment consists of acid suppression and lifestyle modifications; refractory cases should be considered for laparoscopic fundoplication, understanding that a significant percentage will nonetheless require long-term acid suppression therapy.

Statement of interest

None declared.

Provenance

Submitted article, peer reviewed.

  • Received April 17, 2009.
  • Accepted May 3, 2009.
  • © ERSJ Ltd

References

  1. ↵
    Napierkowski J, Wong RKH. Extraesophageal manifestations of GERD. Am J Med Sci 2003; 326: 285–299.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Vakil N, van Zanten SV, Kahrilas P, et al. The Montreal definition and classification of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 1900–1920.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Locke GR, Talley NJ, Fett SL, et al. Prevalence and clinical spectrum of gastroesophageal reflux: a population-based study in Olmstead County, Minnesota. Gastroenterology 1997; 112: 1448–1456.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    Shaheen N, Provenzale D. The epidemiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Med Sci 2003; 326: 264–273.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Sabate JM, Jouet P, Merrouche M, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux in patients with morbid obesity: a role of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome? Obes Surg 2008; 18: 1479–1484.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Greenwald DA. Aging, the gastrointestinal tract, and risk of acid-related disease. Am J Med 2004; 117: Suppl. 5A 8S–13S.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. ↵
    Raghu G, Weycker D, Edelsberg J, et al. Incidence and prevalence of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006; 174: 810–816.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    Nordenstedt H, Nilsson M, Johansson S, et al. The relation between gastroesophageal reflux and respiratory symptoms in a population-based study. Chest 2006; 129: 1051–1056.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    Theodoropoulos DS, Ledford DK, Lockey RF, et al. Prevalence of upper respiratory symptoms in patients with symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001; 164: 72–76.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. ↵
    Songur N, Songur Y, Cerci SS, et al. Gastroesophageal scintigraphy in the evaluation of adult patients with chronic cough due to gastroesophageal reflux disease. Nucl Med Commun 2008; 29: 1066–1072.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    Bestetti A, Carola F, Carnevali-Ricci P, et al. 99mTc-sulfur colloid gastroesophageal scintigraphy with late lung imaging to evaluate patients with posterior laryngitis. J Nucl Med 2000; 41: 1597–1602.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    Raghu G, Freudenberger TD, Yang S, et al. High prevalence of abnormal acid gastro-esophageal reflux in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Eur Respir J 2006; 27: 136–142.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    Blondeau K, Mertens V, Vanaudenaerde BA, et al. Gastro-oesophageal reflux and gastric aspiration in lung transplant patients with or without chronic rejection. Eur Respir J 2008; 31: 707–713.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    Young LR, Hadjiliadis D, Davis D, et al. Lung transplant exacerbates gastroesophageal reflux disease. Chest 2003; 124: 1689–1693.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    Cantu E, Appel JZ, Hartwig MG, et al. Early fundoplication prevents allograft dysfunction in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 78: 1142–1151.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    Raiha I, Manner R, Hietanen E, et al. Radiographic pulmonary changes of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in elderly patients. Age Ageing 1992; 21: 250–255.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    Spechler SJ, Gordon DW, Cohen J, et al. The effects of antireflux therapy on pulmonary function in patients with severe Gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol 1995; 90: 915–918.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. ↵
    Schachter LM, Dixon J, Pierce RJ, et al. Severe gastroesophageal reflux is associated with reduced carbon monoxide diffusing capacity. Chest 2003; 123: 1932–1938.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    Dent J, Dodds WJ, Friedman RH, et al. Mechanisms of gastroesophageal reflux in recumbent asymptomatic human subjects. J Clin Invest 1980; 65: 256–267.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    Schoeman MN, Tippett MD, Akkermans LM, et al. Mechanisms of gastroesophageal reflux in ambulant healthy human subjects. Gastroenterology 1995; 108: 83–91.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    Dent J, Holloway RH, Toouli J, et al. Mechanisms of lower esophageal sphincter incompetence in patients with symptomatic gastrooesophageal reflux. Gut 1988; 29: 1020–1028.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    Moote DW, Lloyd DA, McCourtie DR, et al. Increase in gastroesophageal reflux during methacholine-induced bronchospasm. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1986; 78: 619–623.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    Zerbib F, Guisset O, Lamouliatte H, et al. Effects of bronchial obstruction on lower esophageal sphincter motility and gastroesophageal reflux in patients with asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002; 166: 1206–1211.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    Tuchman DN, Boyle JT, Pack AI, et al. Comparison of airway responses following tracheal or esophageal acidification in the cat. Gastroenterology 1984; 87: 872–881.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  25. ↵
    Stein MR. Possible mechanisms of influence of esophageal acid on airway hyperresponsiveness. Am J Med 2003; 115: Suppl. 3A 55S–59S.
    OpenUrl
  26. ↵
    Field SK, Evans JA, Price LM. The effects of acid perfusion of the esophagus on ventilation and respiratory sensation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998; 157: 1058–1062.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  27. ↵
    Gleeson K, Eggli DF, Maxwell LM. Quantitative aspiration during sleep in normal subjects. Chest 1997; 111: 1266–1272.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    Huxley EJ, Viroslav J, Gray WR, et al. Pharyngeal aspiration in normal adults and patients with depressed consciousness. Am J Med 1978; 64: 564–568.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    Marik PE. Aspiration pneumonitis and aspiration pneumonia. N Engl J Med 2001; 344: 665–671.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    Kennedy TP, Johnson KJ, Kunkel RG, et al. Acute acid aspiration lung injury in the rat: biphasic pathogenesis. Anesth Analg 1989; 69: 87–92.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  31. ↵
    Knight PR, Rutter T, Tait AR, et al. Pathogenesis of gastric particulate lung injury: a comparison and interaction with acidic pneumonitis. Anesth Analg 1993; 77: 754–760.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  32. ↵
    Folkesson HG, Matthay MA, Hebert CA, et al. Acid aspiration-induced lung injury in rabbits is mediated by interleukin-8-dependent mechanisms. J Clin Invest 1995; 96: 107–116.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. Knight PR, Druskovich G, Tait AR, et al. The role of neutrophils, oxidants, and proteases in the pathogenesis of acid pulmonary injury. Anesthesiology 1992; 77: 772–778.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    Weiser MR, Pechet TT, Williams JP, et al. Experimental murine acid aspiration injury is mediated by neutrophils and the alternative complement pathway. J Appl Physiol 1997; 83: 1090–1095.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    Hutson AD, Davidson BA, Raghavendran K, et al. Statistical prediction of the type of gastric aspiration lung injury based on early cytokine/chemokine profiles. Anesthesiology 2006; 104: 73–79.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    Knight PR, Davidson BA, Nader ND, et al. Progressive, severe lung injury secondary to the interaction of insults in gastric aspiration. Exper Lung Res 2004; 30: 535–557.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    Moran TJ. Experimental aspiration pneumonia. IV. Inflammatory and reparative changes produced by intratracheal injections of autologous gastric juice and hydrochloric acid. Arch Pathol 1955; 60: 122–129.
    OpenUrl
  38. ↵
    Knoblich R. Pulmonary granulomatosis caused by vegetable particles. So-called lentil pulse pneumonia. Am Rev Respir Dis 1969; 99: 380–389.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  39. ↵
    Perng D, Chang K, Su K, et al. Exposure of airway epithelium to bile acids associated with gastroesophageal reflux symptoms. Chest 2007; 132: 1548–1556.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    Krein PM, Winston BW. Roles for insulin-like growth factor I and transforming growth factor-β in fibrotic lung disease. Chest 2002; 122: Suppl. 6 289S–293S.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    Head MA. Foreign body reaction to inhalation of lentil soup: giant cell pneumonia. J Clin Path 1956; 9: 295–299.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  42. Crome L, Valentine JC. Pulmonary nodular granulomatosis caused by inhaled vegetable particles. J Clin Path 1962; 15: 21–25.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. ↵
    Vidyarthi SC. Diffuse miliary granulomatosis of the lungs due to aspirated vegetable cells. Arch Pathol 1967; 83: 215–218.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  44. ↵
    Emery JL. Two cases of lentil pneumonitis. Proc R Soc Med 1960; 53: 952–953.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  45. ↵
    Gill DG, Ritchie GJ. Lentil pulmonary granulomatosis. Med J Aust 1974; 1: 836–838.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  46. ↵
    Matsuse T, Oka T, Kida K, et al. Importance of diffuse aspiration bronchiolitis caused by occult aspiration in the elderly. Chest 1996; 110: 1289–1293.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    Barnes TW, Vassello R, Tazelaar HD, et al. Diffuse bronchiolar disease due to chronic occult aspiration. Mayo Clin Proc 2006; 81: 172–176.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    Mukhopadhyay S, Katzenstein AA. Pulmonary disease due to aspiration of food and particulate matter: a clinicopathologic study of 59 cases diagnosed on biopsy or resection specimens. Am J Surg Path 2007; 31: 752–759.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    Friedlander AL, Fessler MB. A 70-year-old man with migratory pulmonary infiltrates. Chest 2006; 130: 1269–1274.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    Marom EM, McAdams HP, Thomas A, et al. Lentil aspiration pneumonia: radiographic and CT findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1998; 22: 598–600.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. ↵
    Sakamoto O, Saita N, Yamasuki H, et al. Pulmonary granulomatosis caused by aspirated green tea. Chest 1994; 106: 308–309.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. ↵
    Fleming CM, Shepard JO, Mark EJ. Case records of the Massachusetts General Hospital. Weekly clinicopathological exercises. Case 15-2003. A 47-year-old man with waxing and waning pulmonary nodules five years after treatment for testicular seminoma. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 2019–2027.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. ↵
    Epler GR. Bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia. Arch Intern Med 2001; 161: 158–164.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. Lazor R, Vandevenne A, Pelletier A, et al. Cryptogenic organizing pneumonia. Characteristics of relapses in a series of 48 patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 162: 571–577.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. ↵
    Drakopanagiotakis F, Polychronopoulos V, Judson MA. Organizing pneumonia. Am J Med Sci 2008; 335: 34–39.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. ↵
    Sadoun D, Valeyre D, Cargill J, et al. Apparently cryptogenic bronchiolitis obliterans with organizing pneumonia. Demonstration of a gastro-oesophageal reflux in 5 cases. Presse Med 1988; 17: 2383–2385.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  57. ↵
    Miyagawa-Hayashino A, Wain JC, Mark EJ. Lung transplant biopsy specimens with bronchiolitis obliterans and bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia due to aspiration. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2005; 129: 223–226.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  58. ↵
    Marumo K, Homma S, Fukuchi Y. Postgastrectomy aspiration pneumonia. Chest 1995; 107: 453–456.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  59. ↵
    Lazenby JP, Guzzo MR, Harding SM, et al. Oral corticosteroids increase esophageal acid contact times in patients with stable asthma. Chest 2002; 121: 625–634.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  60. ↵
    Leslie KO. Pulmonary pathology for the clinician. Clin Chest Med 2006; 27: Suppl. 1 S1–S10.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  61. ↵
    American Thoracic Society. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: diagnosis and treatment. International consensus statement. American Thoracic Society (ATS), and the European Respiratory Society (ERS). Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 161: 646–664.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  62. ↵
    Pearson JE, Wilson RS. Diffuse pulmonary fibrosis and hiatus hernia. Thorax 1971; 26: 300–305.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  63. ↵
    Ebert EC. Esophageal disease in scleroderma. J Clin Gastroenterol 2006; 40: 769–775.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  64. ↵
    Salvioli B, Belmonte G, Strangellini V, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux and interstitial lung disease. Dig Liver Dis 2006; 38: 879–884.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  65. ↵
    Tobin RW, Pope CE, Pellegrini CA, et al. Increased prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Resp Crit Care Med 1998; 158: 1804–1808.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  66. ↵
    Johnson DA, Drane WE, Curran J, et al. Pulmonary disease in progressive systemic sclerosis. A complication of gastroesophageal reflux and occult aspiration? Arch Intern Med 1989; 149: 589–593.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  67. ↵
    Denis P, Ducrotte P, Pasquis P, et al. Esophageal motility and pulmonary function in progressive systemic sclerosis. Respiration 1981; 42: 21–24.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  68. ↵
    Lock G, Pfeifer M, Straub RH, et al. Association of esophageal dysfunction and pulmonary function in systemic sclerosis. Am J Gastroenterol 1998; 93: 341–345.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  69. ↵
    Kinuya K, Nakajima K, Kinuya S, et al. Esophageal hypomotility in systemic sclerosis: close relationship with pulmonary involvement. Ann Nucl Med 2001; 15: 97–101.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  70. ↵
    Marie I, Dominique S, Levesque H, et al. Esophageal involvement and pulmonary manifestations in systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Rheum 2001; 45: 346–354.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  71. ↵
    Savarino E, Bazzica M, Zentilin P, et al. Gastro-esophageal reflux and pulmonary fibrosis in scleroderma: a study using pH-impedance monitoring. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2009; 179: 408–413.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  72. ↵
    Troshinski MB, Kane GC, Varga J, et al. Pulmonary function and gastroesophageal reflux in systemic sclerosis. Ann Intern Med 1994; 121: 6–10.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  73. ↵
    Mays EE, Dubois JJ, Hamilton JB. Pulmonary fibrosis associated with tracheobronchial aspiration. Chest 1976; 69: 512–515.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  74. Sweet MP, Patti MG, Leard LE, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis referred for lung transplantation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007; 133: 1078–1084.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  75. ↵
    Patti MG, Tedesco P, Golden J, et al. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: how often is it really idiopathic? J Gastrointest Surg 2005; 9: 1053–1056.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  76. ↵
    Hyzy H, Huang S, Myers J, et al. Acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Chest 2007; 132: 1652–1658.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  77. ↵
    Park I-N, Kim DS, Shim TS, et al. Acute exacerbation of interstitial pneumonia other than idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Chest 2007; 132: 214–220.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  78. ↵
    Savici D, Katzenstein AA. Diffuse alveolar damage and recurrent respiratory failure: report of six cases. Hum Pathol 2001; 32: 1398–1402.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  79. ↵
    Raghu G, Yang ST, Spada C, et al. Sole treatment of acid gastroesophageal reflux in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Chest 2006; 129: 794–800.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  80. ↵
    D'Ovidio F, Keshavjee S. Gastroesophageal reflux and lung transplantation. Dis Esophagus 2006; 19: 315–320.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  81. ↵
    Berkowitz N, Schulman LL, McGregor C, et al. Gastroparesis after lung transplantation. Potential role in postoperative respiratory complications. Chest 1995; 108: 1602–1607.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  82. ↵
    Atkins BZ, Trachtenberg MS, Prince-Petersen R, et al. Assessing oropharyngeal dysphagia after lung transplantation: altered swallowing mechanisms and increased morbidity. J Heart Lung Transplant 2007; 26: 1144–1148.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  83. ↵
    Higenbottam T, Jackson M, Woolman P, et al. The cough response to ultrasonically nebulized distilled water in heart-lung transplant patients. Am Rev Respir Dis 1989; 140: 58–61.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  84. ↵
    D'Ovidio F, Mura M, Tsang M, et al. Bile acid aspiration and the development of bronchiolitis obliterans after lung transplantation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005; 129: 1144–1152.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  85. ↵
    Davis RD, Lau CL, Eubanks S, et al. Improved lung allograft function after fundoplication in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease undergoing lung transplantation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003; 125: 533–542.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  86. ↵
    Reich JM, Johnson RE. Mycobacterium avium complex pulmonary disease presenting as an isolated lingular or middle lobe pattern. The Lady Windermere syndrome. Chest 1992; 101: 1605–1609.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  87. ↵
    Varghese G, Shepherd R, Watt P, et al. Fatal infection with Mycobacterium fortuitum associated with oesophageal achalasia. Thorax 1988; 43: 151–152.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  88. Hadjiliadis D, Adlakha A, Prakash UB. Rapidly growing mycobacterial lung infection in association with esophageal disorders. Mayo Clin Proc 1999; 74: 45–51.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  89. ↵
    Griffith DE, Girard WM, Wallace RJ. Clinical features of pulmonary disease caused by rapidly growing mycobacteria. An analysis of 154 patients. Am Rev Respir Dis 1993; 147: 1271–1278.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  90. ↵
    Koh WJ, Lee JH, Kwon YS, et al. Prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux in patients with nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease. Chest 2007; 131: 1825–1830.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  91. ↵
    Thomson RM, Armstrong JG, Looke D. Gastroesophageal reflux disease, acid suppression, and Mycobacterium avium complex disease. Chest 2007; 131: 1166–1172.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  92. ↵
    Bodmer T, Miltner E, Bermudez LE. Mycobacterium avium resists exposure to acidic conditions of the stomach. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2000; 182: 45–49.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  93. ↵
    Suzuki K, Tsuyuguchi K, Matsumoto H, et al. Effect of proton pump inhibitor alone or in combination with clarithromycin on mycobacterial growth in human alveolar macrophages. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2000; 182: 69–72.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  94. ↵
    Cook IJ. Diagnostic evaluation of dysphagia. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 5: 393–403.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  95. ↵
    Bradley B, Branley HM, Egan JJ, et al. Interstitial lung disease guideline: the British Thoracic Society in collaboration with the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand and the Irish Thoracic Society. Thorax 2008; 63: Suppl. 5 v1–v58.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  96. ↵
    Franquet T, Gimenez A, Roson N, et al. Aspiration diseases: findings, pitfalls, and differential diagnosis. Radiographics 2000; 20: 673–685.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  97. ↵
    Richter JE. The many manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease: presentation, evaluation, and treatment. Gastroenterol Clin N Am 2007; 36: 577–599.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  98. ↵
    Dhiman RK, Saraswat VA, Naik SR. Ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring: technique, interpretations, and clinical indications. Dig Dis Sci 2002; 47: 241–250.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  99. ↵
    Sifrim D, Castell D, Dent J, et al. Gastro-oesophageal reflux monitoring: review and consensus report on detection and definitions of acid, non-acid, and gas reflux. Gut 2004; 53: 1024–1031.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  100. ↵
    Hicks DM, Ours TM, Abelson TI, et al. The prevalence of hypopharynx findings associated with gastroesophageal reflux in normal volunteers. J Voice 2002; 16: 564–579.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  101. ↵
    Corwin RW, Irwin RS. The lipid-lade alveolar macrophage as a marker of aspiration in parenchymal lung disease. Am Rev Respir Dis 1985; 132: 576–581.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  102. Ding Y, Simpson PM, Schellhase DE, et al. Limited reliability of lipid-laden macrophage index restricts its use as a test for pulmonary aspiration: comparison with a simple semiquantitative assay. Pediatr Dev Pathol 2002; 5: 551–558.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  103. Adams R, Ruffin R, Campbell D. The value of the lipid-laden macrophage index in the assessment of aspiration pneumonia. Aust N Z J Med 1997; 27: 550–553.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  104. Bauer ML, Lyrene RK. Chronic aspiration in children: evaluation of the lipid-laden macrophage index. Pediatr Pulmonol 1999; 28: 94–100.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  105. Koksal D, Ozkan B, Simsek C, et al. Lipid-laden macrophage index in sputum is mot useful in the differential diagnosis of pulmonary symptoms secondary to gastroesophageal reflux. Arch Med Res 2005; 36: 485–489.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  106. Ahrens P, Noll C, Kitz R, et al. Lipid-laden alveolar macrophages (LLAM): a useful marker of silent aspiration in children. Pediatr Pulmonol 1999; 28: 83–88.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  107. ↵
    Kazachkov MY, Muhlebach MS, Livasy CA, et al. Lipid-laden macrophage index and inflammation in bronchoalveolar lavage in children. Eur Respir J 2001; 18: 790–795.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  108. ↵
    Rosen R, Fritz J, Nurko A, et al. Lipid-laden macrophage index is not an indicator of gastroesophageal reflux-related respiratory disease in children. Pediatrics 2008; 121: 879–884.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  109. ↵
    DeVault KR, Castell DO. Updated guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2005; 100: 190–200.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  110. ↵
    Fisher RS, Malmud LS, Roberts GS, et al. Gastroesophageal (GE) scintiscanning to detect and quantitate GE reflux. Gastroenterology 1976; 70: 301–308.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  111. Reich SB, Earley WC, Ravin TH, et al. Evaluation of gastro-pulmonary aspiration by a radioactive technique: concise communication. J Nucl Med 1977; 18: 1079–1081.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  112. Chernow B, Johnson LF, Janowitz WR, et al. Pulmonary aspiration as a consequence of gastroesophageal reflux. A diagnostic approach. Dig Dis Sci 1979; 24: 839–844.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  113. ↵
    Balan KK, Vinjamuri S, Maltby P, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux in patients fed by percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG): detection by a simple scintigraphic method. Am J Gastroenterol 1998; 93: 946–949.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  114. ↵
    Ford CN. Evaluation and management of laryngopharyngeal reflux. JAMA 2005; 294: 1534–1540.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  115. ↵
    D'Ovidio F, Singer LG, Hadjiliadis D, et al. Prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux in end-stage lung disease candidates for lung transplant. Ann Thorac Surg 2005; 80: 1254–1261.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  116. Ward C, Forrest IA, Brownlee IA, et al. Pepsin like activity in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid is suggestive of gastric aspiration in lung allografts. Thorax 2005; 60: 872–874.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  117. Starosta V, Kitz R, Hartl D, et al. Bronchoalveolar pepsin, bile acids, oxidation, and inflammation in children with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Chest 2007; 132: 1557–1564.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  118. ↵
    Sacco O, Sivestri M, Sabatini F, et al. IL-8 and airway neutrophilia in children with gastroesophageal reflux and asthma-like symptoms. Resp Med 2006; 100: 307–315.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  119. ↵
    Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, et al. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ 1996; 312: 71–72.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  120. ↵
    Irwin RS. Chronic cough due to gastroesophageal reflux disease. ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 2006; 129: Suppl. 1 80S–94S.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  121. ↵
    Chang AB, Lasserson TJ, Gaffney J, et al. Gastro-oesophageal reflux treatment for prolonged non-specific cough in children and adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; CD004823
  122. ↵
    Hopkins C, Yousaf U, Pedersen M. Acid reflux treatment for hoarseness. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; CD005054
  123. ↵
    Nealis TB, Howden CW. Is there a dark side to long-term proton pump inhibitor therapy? Am J Ther 2008; 15: 526–542.
    OpenUrl
  124. ↵
    Sarkar M, Hennessy S, Yang Y-X. Proton-pump inhibitor use and the risk for community-acquired pneumonia. Ann Intern Med 2008; 149: 391–398.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  125. ↵
    Sugumar A, Singh A, Pasricha PJ. A systematic review of the efficacy of domperidone for the treatment of diabetic gastroparesis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 6: 726–733.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  126. ↵
    Sharma B, Sharma M, Daga MK, et al. Effect of omeprazole and domperidone on adult asthmatics with gastroesophageal reflux. World J Gastroenterol 2007; 13: 1706–1710.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  127. ↵
    Jiang S-P, Liang R-Y, Zeng Z-Y, et al. Effects of antireflux treatment on bronchial hyper-responsiveness and lung function in asthmatic patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. World J Gastroenterol 2003; 9: 1123–1125.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  128. ↵
    Djeddi D, Kongolo G, Lefaix C, et al. Effect of domperidone on QT interval in neonates. J Pediatr 2008; 153: 663–666.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  129. ↵
    Cange L, Johnsson E, Rydholm H, et al. Baclofen-mediated gastro-esophageal acid reflux control in patients with established reflux disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2002; 16: 869–873.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  130. ↵
    Zhang Q, Lehmann A, Rigda R, et al. Control of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations and reflux by the GABAB agonist baclofen in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Gut 2002; 50: 19–24.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  131. ↵
    Kaltenbach T, Crockett S, Gerson LB. Are lifestyle measures effective in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease? Arch Intern Med 2006; 166: 965–971.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  132. ↵
    Sise A, Friedenberg FK. A comprehensive review of gastroesophageal reflux disease and obesity. Obes Rev 2008; 9: 194–203.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  133. ↵
    Mathus-Vliegen EM, Tygat GN. Gastro-oesophageal reflux in obese subjects: influence of overweight, weight loss and chronic gastric balloon distention. Scand J Gastroenterol 2002; 37: 1246–1252.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  134. ↵
    Mathus-Vliegen EM, van Weeren M, van Eerten PV. LOS function and obesity: the impact of untreated obesity, weight loss, and chronic gastric balloon distention. Digestion 2003; 68: 161–168.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  135. ↵
    Konrad-Dalhoff I, Baunack AR, Ramsch KD, et al. Effect of the calcium antagonist nifedipine, nitrendipine, nimodipine and nisoldipine on oesophageal motility in man. Eur J Clin Pharm 1991; 41: 313–316.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  136. ↵
    Aggestrup S, Jensen SL. Effects of pirenzepine and atropine on basal lower esophageal pressure and gastric acid secretion in man: a placebo-controlled randomized study. Dig Dis 1991; 9: 360–364.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  137. ↵
    Rushnak MJ, Leevy CM. Effect of diazepam on the lower esophageal sphincter. A double-blind controlled study. Am J Gastroenterol 1980; 73: 127–130.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  138. ↵
    Stein MR, Towner TG, Weber RW, et al. The effect of theophylline on the lower esophageal sphincter pressure. Ann Allergy 1980; 45: 238–241.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  139. Pizza F, Rosetti G, Del Genio G, et al. Influence of esophageal motility on the outcome of laparoscopic total fundoplication. Dis Esophagus 2008; 21: 78–85.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  140. Papasavas PK, Keenan RJ, Yeaney WW, et al. Effectiveness of laparoscopic fundoplication in relieving the symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and eliminating medical therapy. Surg Endosc 2003; 17: 1200–1205.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  141. Frantizides CT, Richards C. A study of 362 consecutive laparoscopic Nissen fundoplications. Surgery 1998; 124: 651–655.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  142. ↵
    Oelschlager BK, Eubanks TR, Oleynikov D, et al. Symptomatic and physiologic outcomes after operative treatment for esophageal reflux. Surg Endosc 2002; 16: 1032–1036.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  143. ↵
    DeMeester TR, Bonavina L, Iascone C, et al. Chronic respiratory symptoms and occult gastroesophageal reflux. A prospective clinical study and results of surgical therapy. Ann Surg 1990; 211: 337–345.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  144. ↵
    Irwin RS, Zawacki JK, Wilson MM, et al. Chronic cough due to gastroesophageal reflux disease. Failure to resolve despite total/near-total elimination of esophageal acid. Chest 2002; 121: 1132–1140.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  145. ↵
    Mainie I, Tutuian R, Agrawal A, et al. Fundoplication eliminates chronic cough due to non-acid reflux identified by impedance pH monitoring. Thorax 2005; 60: 521–523.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  146. ↵
    Novitsky YV, Zawacki JK, Irwin RS, et al. Chronic cough due to gastroesophageal reflux disease: efficacy of antireflux surgery. Surg Endosc 2002; 16: 567–571.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  147. Wetscher GJ, Glaser K, Hinder RA, et al. Respiratory symptoms in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease following medical therapy and following antireflux surgery. Am J Surg 1997; 174: 639–643.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  148. ↵
    Fernando HC, El-Sherif A, Landreneau RJ, et al. Efficacy of laparoscopic fundoplication in controlling pulmonary symptoms associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Surgery 2005; 138: 612–617.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  149. ↵
    Linden PA, Gilbert RJ, Yeap BY, et al. Laparoscopic fundoplication in patients with end-stage lung disease awaiting transplantation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006; 131: 438–446.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  150. ↵
    Jones KB Jr. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: an effective procedure in the less than morbidly obese. Obes Surg 1998; 8: 35–38.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  151. ↵
    Ikramuddin S. Surgical management of gastroesophageal reflux disease in obesity. Dig Dis Sci 2008; 53: 2318–2329.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  152. ↵
    Friedenberg FK, Xanthopoulos M, Foster GD, et al. The association between gastroesophageal reflux disease and obesity. Am J Gastroenterol 2008; 103: 2111–2122.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  153. ↵
    Frezza EE, Ikramuddin S, Gourash W, et al. Symptomatic improvement in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc 2002; 16: 1027–1031.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  154. ↵
    Klapow JC, Wilcox CM, Mallinger AP, et al. Characterization of long-term outcomes after Toupet fundoplication. J Clin Gastroenterol 2002; 34: 509–515.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  155. ↵
    Spechler SJ, Lee E, Ahnen D, et al. Long-term outcome of medical and surgical therapies for gastroesophageal reflux disease: follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2001; 285: 2331–2338.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
View this article with LENS
Vol 18 Issue 114 Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and non-asthma lung disease
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and non-asthma lung disease
R. S. Morehead
European Respiratory Review Dec 2009, 18 (114) 233-243; DOI: 10.1183/09059180.00002509

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and non-asthma lung disease
R. S. Morehead
European Respiratory Review Dec 2009, 18 (114) 233-243; DOI: 10.1183/09059180.00002509
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • DEFINITION AND EPIDEMIOLOGY
    • MECHANISMS OF RESPIRATORY DISEASE IN GERD
    • CLINICAL SYNDROMES
    • EVALUATION
    • MANAGEMENT
    • CONCLUSION
    • Statement of interest
    • Provenance
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Asthma-COPD overlap: current understanding and experimental models
  • CF-related diabetes and lung disease
  • Corticosteroids for CAP, influenza and COVID-19
Show more Reviews

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERR

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Reviewers
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising
  • Sponsorship

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Submit a manuscript
  • ERS author centre

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN: 0905-9180
Online ISSN: 1600-0617

Copyright © 2021 by the European Respiratory Society