Abstract
In the European Union, omalizumab is indicated as add-on therapy to improve asthma control in adult and adolescent patients (≥12 yrs of age) with severe persistent allergic asthma who have a positive skin test or in vitro reactivity to a perennial aeroallergen, and who, despite receiving daily high-dose inhaled corticosteroids and a long-acting β2-agonist, have the following characteristics: reduced lung function (forced expiratory volume in one second <80%); frequent daytime symptoms or night-time awakenings; and multiple documented severe asthma exacerbations. Omalizumab is indicated for patients with baseline total immunoglobulin E levels of 30–700 IU·mL−1. Patients who receive omalizumab should be assessed by their physician after 16 weeks and treatment continued only if there has been a marked improvement in asthma control. Omalizumab is administered by subcutaneous injection every 2 or 4 weeks at a dosage determined using a dosing table based on the patient's pre-treatment serum total immunoglobulin E levels and body weight.
Omalizumab has shown significant benefits in patients with severe persistent allergic asthma who remain symptomatic despite treatment with high-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in combination with a long-acting β2-agonist (LABA) [1]. However, careful selection of patients for omalizumab treatment is required to maximise its cost effectiveness. In general, patients will have a high individual burden of disease and clear unmet clinical need, and will include those who are identified as high-risk for asthma-related mortality [2], have ≥2 severe exacerbations per year [1, 2], require multiple courses of oral corticosteroids per year [3], have regular disruptive nocturnal or daytime symptoms [4] or have impaired quality of life as a consequence of asthma symptoms and exacerbations [4].
In patients with severe persistent asthma, the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) 2005 guidelines recommend the use of high-dose ICS and a LABA, with one or more add-on controller medications if required (step 4 therapy), to maintain control of asthma symptoms. The GINA 2005 guidelines include omalizumab as a treatment step 4 add-on therapy [4], and it is the only step 4 add-on therapy with Category A evidence (rich body of evidence from randomised controlled trials).1</note>
EUROPEAN UNION INDICATION
Omalizumab is indicated in the European Union (EU) as add-on therapy to improve asthma control in adult and adolescent patients (≥12 yrs of age) with severe persistent allergic asthma who have: a positive skin test or in vitro reactivity to a perennial aeroallergen; reduced lung function (forced expiratory volume in one second <80%); frequent daytime symptoms or night-time awakenings; and multiple documented severe asthma exacerbations despite daily high-dose ICS and LABA. It is stated that omalizumab treatment should only be considered for patients with convincing immunoglobulin (Ig)E-mediated asthma (table 1⇓). Omalizumab is indicated for patients with baseline total IgE levels of 30–700 IU·mL−1. Patients who receive omalizumab should be assessed by their physician after 16 weeks and treatment continued only if there has been a marked improvement in asthma control (table 1⇓).
In order to maximise clinical benefit and cost effectiveness of omalizumab therapy and to minimise inappropriate prescribing, physicians should ensure that patients who are selected for treatment fall within the EU indication [5]. Correct diagnosis is essential and current therapy should be optimised. Patient history, which includes symptoms and spirometry data, should be examined.
DOSING AND ADMINISTRATION
Omalizumab is administered by subcutaneous injection in the deltoid region of the arm or the thigh every 2 or 4 weeks. Accurate determination of IgE levels, as set out in the dosing table (fig. 1⇓), is a key component of patient selection and correct dosing. Dosage is determined by total serum IgE levels measured before treatment initiation and the patient's body weight. Individual patient dosing requirements are determined using the dosing table.
Omalizumab is indicated for patients with baseline total IgE 30–700 IU·mL−1. Once baseline serum IgE levels are obtained, there is no need to re-test IgE levels during omalizumab treatment, because total IgE levels are elevated during treatment and remain elevated. This phenomenon may appear paradoxical at first glance, but it simply reflects the fact that commercially available IgE assays also measure complexed IgE, i.e. IgE bound to omalizumab. Since these complexes have a longer half-life than free IgE, quantification of IgE after initiation of omalizumab therapy with conventional assays will result in the detection of higher IgE levels. However, it should be noted that free IgE decreases rapidly and dramatically during omalizumab treatment.
Significant change in a patient's body weight may necessitate dosing adjustment. Physicians should use the patient's pre-treatment serum IgE levels, the new body weight and the dosing table to determine the new dosing regimen. As there is limited experience with self-administration, omalizumab is intended to be administered by a healthcare provider.
CASE STUDY
Patient history
The patient was a 32-yr-old female with childhood-onset asthma, and comorbid allergic rhinitis and atopic dermatitis. She suffered from multiple allergies, including pollen, dust mites, moulds, dog, cat and horse, as confirmed by skin-prick tests and radioallergosorbent test classes ≥2 for respective allergens. In the 6 months prior to omalizumab initiation, the patient had suffered six exacerbations requiring systemic steroid bursts and had regular night-time symptoms, despite maximal asthma treatment. She had kept a domestic cat until 2001, which was re-homed on physician's advice after a severe exacerbation requiring hospitalisation. However, the patient remained symptomatic at home, due to cat allergen persisting in the environment (fig. 2⇓).
Medication
Prior to treatment with omalizumab, the patient had been prescribed inhaled fixed combination budesonide/formoterol 320/9 μg, two puffs b.i.d., inhaled fenoterol 100 μg p.r.n. (≤10 puffs·day−1), oral montelukast 10 mg q.d. and an oral β2-agonist (bambuterol) 20 mg q.d.. She also took a liquid formulation of theophylline on an as-needed basis.
Omalizumab treatment
Despite high-dose ICS in combination with a LABA, and additional medications, the patient’s symptoms remained uncontrolled, and due to frequent exacerbations requiring steroid bursts, it was decided to commence treatment with omalizumab (pre-license era). Based on her body weight of 60 kg and a total serum IgE level of 564 IU·mL−1, her dosage of omalizumab was determined to be 300 mg subcutaneously every 2 weeks.
The patient first noticed an improvement in symptoms ∼4 weeks later when collecting her daughter from horse riding. Previous advice from her physician had been to send someone else to collect her daughter in order to avoid asthma exacerbations due to horse allergen, but now she found she “could enter the stables”. While she still has severe asthma requiring a high level of medication, she had no severe exacerbations in the following year, demonstrating a clear clinical benefit.
CONCLUSIONS
Add-on omalizumab is suitable for patients with severe persistent inadequately controlled allergic asthma despite optimised therapy with inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting β2-agonist, with a history of exacerbations, impaired quality of life and immunoglobulin E levels suitable for dosing. Real-life clinical experience supports the findings of the omalizumab clinical trial programme (see Case study), and shows that add-on omalizumab is clinically effective in reducing symptoms and improving quality of life.
Statement of interest
K-M. Beeh has received compensation for serving on an advisory board and speaking at a conference symposium sponsored by Novartis Pharma AG, has participated as a speaker at scientific meetings or courses financed by various companies (Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis Pharma AG, Pfizer, Fujisawa and Merck, Sharp and Dohme). The institution where K-M. Beeh is currently employed has received compensation for participating in multicentre clinical trials from several companies (AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis Pharma AG, GlaxoSmithKline, Revotar Biopharmaceuticals, EpiGenesis, Pfizer, Corus Pharma, Alimrall Prodesfarma, Merck, Sharp and Dohme and Fujisawa). K-M. Beeh has received travel expenses from Novartis Pharma AG, Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck, Sharp and Dohme and Pfizer for attending several conferences, and has also received funds for research and a fee for organising education. This issue of the European Respiratory Review contains proceedings of a satellite symposium held at the 16th ERS Annual Congress, 2006, which was sponsored by Novartis Pharma AG. The authors were assisted in the preparation of the text by professional medical writers at ACUMED®; this support was funded by Novartis Pharma AG.
Footnotes
-
1 See Post-meeting note on page 88.
-
This is an updated version of the article owing to an error in Figure 1 in the previous version.
- © ERSJ Ltd