Skip to main content
Log in

Economic Burden of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Impact of New Treatment Options

  • Review Article
  • Published:
PharmacoEconomics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The incidence, morbidity and mortality of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is rising throughout the world. The total economic cost of COPD in the US in 1993 was estimated to be over $US15.5 billion, with $US6.1 billion for hospitalisation, $US4.4 billion for physician and other fees, $US2.5 billion for drugs, $US1.5 billion for nursing home care and $US1.0 billion for home care. Office visits, hospital outpatient visits and emergency department visits accounted for 17.3% of the direct costs for COPD in the US. When stratified by severity, COPD treatment costs strongly correlate with disease severity. The American Thoracic Society, the European Respiratory Society and the British Thoracic Society have developed guidelines for the pharmacological treatment of COPD. However, the guidelines establish inhaled bronchodilators (anticholinergic agents and β2-adrenergic agonists) as the mainstay of therapy for patients with COPD. The guidelines were not based on cost analyses and thus are not a priori cost-effective guidelines.

Since the publication of these guidelines, several new pharmacological products have been approved for use in patients with COPD including a combination of an anticholinergic and selective β2-adrenergic agonist [ipratropium/salbutamol (albuterol)] and a long-acting β2-adrenergic agonist (salmeterol). Both products are effective bronchodilators in COPD. The purpose of this report is to place these new agents in an updated pharmacological guideline scheme, utilising recently published data on clinical efficacy as well as pharmacoeconomics. The annualised healthcare costs were computed to be $US788/patient/year for the combination ipratropium/salbutamol inhaler and $US1059/patient/year for salmeterol (1999 values). Based upon an improved understanding of the complexity of COPD, the response of patients to newer bronchodilators (given individually or in combination), and recent pharmacoeconomic data for COPD treatment, a new treatment algorithm with associated costs is proposed. The use of an algorithm, based on medical and pharmacoeconomic data, will improve lung function in patients with COPD, improve patient satisfaction (e.g. quality of life, dyspnoea) and outcomes (e.g. exacerbations). It will also result in a positive effect on healthcare costs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Singh GK, Matthews TJ, Clarke SC, et al. Annual summary of births, marriages, divorces and deaths: United States, 1994; monthly vital statistics report. Vol. 43. No. 13. Hyattsville (MD): National Center for Health Statistics, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hilleman DE, Dewan N, Malesker M, et al. Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of COPD. Chest 2000; 118 (5): 1278–85

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Morbidity & mortality: 1998 chartbook on cardiovascular, lung, and blood diseases. Hyattsville (MD): US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, 1998 Oct

    Google Scholar 

  4. Center for Disease Control and Prevention/National Center for Health Statistics. Discharge summary annual survey 1998. Hyattsville (MD): Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  5. Benson V, Marano MA. Current estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, 1995. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat 1998; 10 (199): 1–428

    Google Scholar 

  6. American Thoracic Society. Standards for the diagnosis and care of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995; 152: S78–S121

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gross NJ. COPD: a disease of reversible airflow obstruction. Am Rev Respir Dis 1986; 133: 725–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Anthonisen NR, Connett JE, Kiley JP, et al. Effects of smoking intervention and the use of an inhaled anti-cholinergic bronchodilator on the rate of decline of FEV1. The Lung Health Study. JAMA 1994; 272: 1497–505

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Siafakis NM, Vermeire P, Pride NB, et al. Optimal assessment and management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Eur Respir J 1995; 8: 1398–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. COPD Guideline Group of the Standards of Care of the British Thoracic Society. Thorax 1997; 52 Suppl. 5: S1–S28

    Google Scholar 

  11. Braun S. A comparison of the effect of ipratropium and albuterol in the treatment of chronic obstructive airway disease. Arch Intern Med 1989; 149: 544–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mahler DA, Donohue JF, Barbee RA, et al. Efficacy of salmeterol xinafoate in the treatment of COPD. Chest 1999; 115: 957–65

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Friedman M, Witek Jr TJ, Serby CW, et al. Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of a combination of ipratropium plus albuterol compared to ipratropium alone and albuterol alone in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Chest 1999; 115: 635–41

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Combivent Inhalation Aerosol Study Group. In chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, a combination of ipratropium and albuterol is more effective than either agent alone: an 85-day multicenter trial. Chest 1994; 105: 1411–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jones PW, Bosh TK. Quality of life changes in COPD patients treated with salmeterol. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997; 155: 1283–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mahler DA, Jones PW. Measurement of dyspnea and quality of life in advanced lung disease. Clin Chest Med 1997; 18 (3): 457–69

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Anthonisen NR, Manfreda J, Warren C, et al. Antibiotic therapy in exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Ann Intern Med 1987; 106: 196–204

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Price-Check PC: version 2.16 [CD-ROM]. St Louis (MO): Medi-Span, 1998

  19. Price-Check PC: version 2.16 [CD-ROM]. St Louis (MO): Medi-Span, 1999

  20. Gross NJ, Skorodin MS. Anticholinergic, antimuscarinic bronchodilators. Am Rev Respir Dis 1984; 129: 856–70

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Rennard SI, Serby CW, Ghafouri M, et al. Extended therapy with ipratropium is associated with improved lung function in COPD: a retrospective analysis of data from seven clinical trials. Chest 1996; 110: 62–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Campbell SC, Auerbach D, Boyars M, et al. For COPD, a combination of ipratropium bromide and albuterol sulfate is more effective than albuterol base. Arch Intern Med 1999; 159: 156–60

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Gross NJ, Petty TL, Friedman M, et al. Dose-response to ipratropium as a nebulized solution in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a three-center study. Am Rev Respir Dis 1989; 139: 1188–91

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Niser NM, Walshaw JE, Earis MG, et al. Assessment of reversibility of airway obstruction in patients with chronic airways obstruction. Thorax 1990;: 190–4

  25. Calverley PMA. Inhaled corticosteroids are beneficial in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 161: 341–2

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Barnes PJ. Inhaled corticosteroids are not beneficial in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 161: 342–4

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Burge PS, Calverley PMA, Jones PW, et al. Randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled study of fluticasone propianate in patients with moderate to severe chronic obstructive disease: the ISOLDE trial. BMJ 2000; 320: 1297–303

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mitchell Friedman MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Friedman, M., Hilleman, D.E. Economic Burden of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Pharmacoeconomics 19, 245–254 (2001). https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200119030-00003

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200119030-00003

Keywords

Navigation