Chest
Volume 130, Issue 4, October 2006, Pages 934-936
Journal home page for Chest

Editorials
Pulmonary Hypertension Trials: Current End Points Are Flawed, But What Are the Alternatives?

https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.130.4.934Get rights and content

References (13)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (16)

  • Prognostic factors associated with increased survival in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension treated with subcutaneous treprostinil in randomized, placebo-controlled trials

    2011, Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
    Citation Excerpt :

    In addition, threshold values in our study were determined based on the distribution of the data, not by ROC curves. Due to inherent limitations in the 6MWD27,28 and differences in patient etiologies and their ability to perform timed tests, the lack of exercise improvement is more important than a precise inflection point by which distance walked correlates with survival. It appears that patients who walk <380 m have a poor likelihood of long-term survival, and our study implies that clinicians possibly should use an inflection point closer to 300 m in clinical practice.

  • Epidemiology of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

    2007, Clinics in Chest Medicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    They may also lead to improvements in the care of patients who have other forms of PH. Expanding therapeutic options might also allow consideration of end points beyond physical function and survival, such as health-related quality of life, when planning care [182–187]. Indeed, the continued suitability of measurements currently used to assess improvement is debated, as is the appropriate duration of these studies [188,189]. Together, these advances in therapy and the end points used to study them will continue to change our assessment of the epidemiology of PAH.

View all citing articles on Scopus

Dr. Roberts has no conflicts of interest. Drs. Preston and Hill have received honoraria from and Dr. Hill has served as a consultant for Actelion, Inc, Encysive, Cotherix, and Pfizer, Inc. Dr. Hill has received research grants from Actelion, Encysive, Cotherix, ICOS, Myogen, United Therapeutics, and Pfizer, Inc.

Reproduction of this article is prohibited without written permission from the American College of Chest Physicians (www.chestjournal.org/misc/reprints.shtml).

View full text