Chest
Volume 123, Issue 5, May 2003, Pages 1583-1588
Journal home page for Chest

Clinical Investigations
PULMONARY HYPERTENSION
Effect of Orally Active Prostacyclin Analogue on Survival in Patients With Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension Without Major Vessel Obstruction

https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.123.5.1583Get rights and content

Objectives:

This study investigated whether treatment with beraprost sodium (BPS), an orally active prostacyclin analog, improves hemodynamics and survival in patients with peripheral-vessel chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), for which there is no surgical option.

Background:

Oral administration of BPS has been shown to improve the hemodynamics and prognosis in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension; however, whether BPS has beneficial effects in CTEPH remains unknown.

Methods:

Forty-three patients with peripheral-vessel CTEPH were classified into two groups: patients treated with BPS (BPS group, n = 20) and those without BPS (conventional group, n = 23). Baseline demographic and hemodynamic data did not significantly differ between the two groups.

Results:

BPS therapy improved New York Heart Association functional class in 10 patients (50%) and significantly decreased total pulmonary resistance from 18 ± 6 to 15 ± 8 Wood units (p < 0.05) [mean ± SD]. Sixteen patients died of cardiopulmonary causes in the conventional group during a mean follow-up period of 58 ± 45 months. In contrast, only three patients died of cardiopulmonary causes in the BPS group during a mean follow-up period of 44 ± 30 months. The absence of BPS therapy, elevated total pulmonary resistance, heart rate, and age were independently related to the mortality by Cox proportional hazard analysis. The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival rates for the BPS group were 100%, 85%, and 76%, respectively, compared to 87%, 60%, and 46% in the conventional group.

Conclusions:

This preliminary study suggests that oral administration of BPS may improve hemodynamics and survival in patients with peripheral-vessel CTEPH, for which there is no surgical option.

Section snippets

Study Subjects

We studied 43 patients (16 men and 27 women; mean ± SD age, 54 ± 13 years) with peripheral-vessel CTEPH that was not suitable for surgical pulmonary thromboendarterectomy. The diagnosis of CTEPH was made on the basis of the previously reported procedure.14 In brief, patients with clinical symptoms suggesting CTEPH underwent ventilation/perfusion lung scanning to detect pulmonary perfusion defects. The diagnosis was confirmed by pulmonary angiography.15 When characteristic angiographic findings

Results

During a follow-up period of 2 ± 1 month, NYHA functional class significantly improved in 10 patients (50%), worsened in 1 patient (5%), and was unchanged in 9 patients (45%) in the BPS group (Fig 1). However, no significant change in NYHA functional class was observed in the conventional group.

BPS significantly lowered mean pulmonary arterial pressure by 11% (55 ± 15 to 49 ± 16 mm Hg, p < 0.05; Fig 2) and total pulmonary resistance by 18% (18 ± 6 to 15 ± 8 Wood units, p < 0.05) during a

Discussion

In the present study, we demonstrated the following: (1) oral administration of BPS improved NYHA functional class and decreased total pulmonary resistance in patients with peripheral-vessel CTEPH, for which no surgical option exists; (2) the absence of BPS therapy was significantly related to mortality in such patients; and (3) the Kaplan-Meier survival curves demonstrated that the BPS group had a significantly higher survival rate than the conventional group.

IV infusion of epoprostenol

Conclusions

This study suggest that oral administration of BPS may improve NYHA functional class, hemodynamics, and long-term prognosis in patients with peripheral-vessel CTEPH, for which no surgical option exists. Thus, BPS may be a new therapeutic approach to the treatment of inoperable CTEPH.

References (20)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (85)

  • Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

    2018, Heart Failure Clinics
    Citation Excerpt :

    Data regarding the use of prostacyclin therapies to treat CTEPH are more limited. In a small retrospective study of 43 patients with peripheral vessel CTEPH, improvements in PVR and in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class were seen in 20 patients treated with oral beraprost but not in 23 patients give conventional therapy including anticoagulants and diuretics alone.73 In the conventional therapy group 16 out of 23 patients died during a mean follow-up period of 58 ± 45 months, whereas only 3 out of 20 patients in the beraprost group died during a mean follow-up of 44 ± 30 months.

  • Medical Therapy Versus Balloon Angioplasty for CTEPH: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    2018, Heart Lung and Circulation
    Citation Excerpt :

    Only one RCT which evaluated riociguat required independent adjudication of inoperability of disease as an eligibility criteria. Regarding uncontrolled observational studies of medical therapy, a total of 333 patients from 12 studies evaluated the effects of bosentan (n = 5) [24–28], sildenafil (n = 2) [29,30], beraprost (n = 1) [31], riociguat (n = 1) [32], intravenous epoprostenol (n = 2) [33,34], and subcutaneous treprostenil (n = 1) [35]. NYHA functional class III represented the majority of patients and prior PEA ranged from 0 to 32% of patients.

  • Pulmonary Thromboembolism

    2015, Murray and Nadel's Textbook of Respiratory Medicine: Volume 1,2, Sixth Edition
  • Long-term advanced therapy with bosentan improves symptoms and prevents deterioration of inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

    2014, Life Sciences
    Citation Excerpt :

    Interestingly, histological changes in the non-occluded pulmonary arteries are similar to those seen in pulmonary artery hypertension (PAH), such as medial hypertrophy and the intimal proliferative and fibrotic changes that include plexiform lesions (Galiè and Kim, 2006). As the pathological changes in the pulmonary vasculature appear similar, new pulmonary vasodilating drugs used to treat PAH have also been used in CTEPH: prostanoids (Ono et al., 2003; Cabrol et al., 2007; Skoro-Sajer et al., 2007), endothelin-receptor antagonists (ERAs) (Becattini et al., 2010), and phosphodiesterase type-5 (PDE5) inhibitors (Suntharalingam et al., 2008) are reported to have hemodynamic and clinical benefits, although these have not been established in randomized, placebo-controlled trials. Nonetheless, the prognosis of Japanese patients with CTEPH is improving: it has recently been reported that the 5-year survival rate has risen to 87.3% as a result of the use of PAH-specific therapies by almost two-thirds of patients (Nishimura et al., 2013).

  • Recent progress in the diagnosis and management of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

    2013, Respiratory Investigation
    Citation Excerpt :

    In an uncontrolled study in Japan, Ono et al. reported that oral beraprost improved New York Heart Association class in 10 patients (50%) and significantly decreased total pulmonary resistance from 18±6 to 15±8 Wood units (p<0.05). Sixteen patients died of cardiopulmonary causes in the group receiving conventional therapy, while only 3 patients died of cardiopulmonary causes in the group receiving beraprost [61]. The clinical efficacy of modern PAH therapy in CTEPH remains to be demonstrated by an RCT.

View all citing articles on Scopus

This work was supported by a Research Grant for Cardiovascular Disease (12C-2) from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, the Uehara Memorial Foundation, and a grant from the Japan Cardiovascular Research Foundation.

View full text