Chest
Volume 123, Issue 2, February 2003, Pages 338-343
Journal home page for Chest

Clinical Investigations
PULMONARY CIRCULATION
Prostacyclin Therapy Before Pulmonary Thromboendarterectomy in Patients With Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension*

https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.123.2.338Get rights and content

Objectives:

The continuous IV administration of prostacyclin improves pulmonary hemodynamics and prognosis in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension. We investigated whether the administration of prostacyclin therapy to patients before they undergo pulmonary thromboendarterectomy ameliorates pulmonary hypertension in patients with the most severe form of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH).

Methods:

Of the 33 patients with CTEPH who were candidates for pulmonary thromboendarterectomy, 12 patients with severe pulmonary hypertension (pulmonary vascular resistance, > 1,200 dyne · s · cm−5) received IV prostacyclin prior to undergoing pulmonary thromboendarterectomy. Right heart catheterization and plasma brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) measurements were repeated at baseline, immediately before surgery, and 1 month after surgery.

Results:

During a mean (± SEM) follow-up period of 46 ± 12 days, the IV administration of prostacyclin resulted in a 28% decrease in pulmonary vascular resistance (1,510 ± 53 to 1,088 ± 58 dyne · s · cm−5; p < 0.001) before surgery. Prostacyclin therapy markedly decreased plasma BNP level (547 ± 112 to 188 ± 30 pg/mL; p < 0.01), suggesting improvement in right heart failure. Pulmonary thromboendarterectomy caused a further reduction of pulmonary vascular resistance (302 ± 47 dyne · s · cm−5) and plasma BNP levels (60 ± 11 pg/mL) compared to each preoperative value (p < 0.05). Operative mortality rates were relatively low (8.3%) in patients with the most severe form of CTEPH.

Conclusion:

The IV administration of prostacyclin caused beneficial hemodynamic effects in patients with severe CTEPH and may serve as pretreatment for patients undergoing pulmonary thromboendarterectomy.

Section snippets

Study Patients

This study included 33 consecutive patients with CTEPH (11 men and 22 women; mean age, 54 years; age range, 22 to 76 years) who had undergone pulmonary thromboendarterectomy from December 1998 to October 2001. The preoperative condition was New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class III or IV. Twelve patients who had a pulmonary vascular resistance of > 1,200 dyne · s · cm−5 at diagnostic catheterization received IV prostacyclin before undergoing pulmonary thromboendarterectomy

Characteristics of Patients With and Without Prostacyclin Therapy

There was no significant difference in age or sex between the prostacyclin group and the conventional group (Table 1). NYHA functional class was significantly higher in the prostacyclin group than in the conventional group. Baseline heart rate, mean pulmonary arterial pressure, pulmonary vascular resistance, and mean right atrial pressure were significantly higher in the prostacyclin group than in the conventional group. Cardiac output, arterial oxygen saturation, and mixed venous oxygen

Discussion

In the present study, prostacyclin therapy was performed as pretreatment before pulmonary thromboendarterectomy for patients with the most severe form of CTEPH. We demonstrated the following: (1) that IV administration of prostacyclin markedly decreased pulmonary vascular resistance in patients with CTEPH; (2) that IV prostacyclin also decreased plasma BNP levels before surgery; and (3) that the surgical mortality rate of patients with severe CTEPH who had received prostacyclin were relatively

Conclusion

These preliminary results suggest that the IV administration of prostacyclin may have beneficial hemodynamic effects in patients with severe CTEPH and may serve as pretreatment before they undergo pulmonary thromboendarterectomy.

Cited by (177)

  • Interventional and pharmacological management of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

    2021, Respiratory Medicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    Clinical trial evidence supporting the efficacy of these therapies in CTEPH is, however, scarce. Several small retrospective and open-label trials of bosentan [59–61], treprostinil [62], epoprostenol [63–65] and sildenafil [66] (reviewed by Hoeper [67]) were limited by small patient cohorts, lack of randomization and blinding, or absence of a control arm [57,67]. Evidence from randomized controlled trials of medical therapies in patients with CTEPH is summarized in Table 2.

  • An Update on the Management of Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

    2017, Current Problems in Cardiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    There is some evidence that medical therapy can be used in patients with severe life-threatening CTEPH as a therapeutic bridge to definitive PTE. In a case series of 12 patients with severe CTEPH as defined as PVR > 1200 dyn/s/cm−5, a continuous IV infusion of epoprostenol was administered for a mean of 46 days before surgery.108 A 28% decrease from baseline was seen in PVR preoperatively; however, no postoperative benefits were observed.

View all citing articles on Scopus

This work was supported by Grant From Japan Cardiovascular Research Foundation and the Uehara Memorial Foundation.

View full text