Chest
Volume 131, Issue 2, February 2007, Pages 539-548
Journal home page for Chest

Original Research: Interventional Pulmonology
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Staging: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis

https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.06-1437Get rights and content

Abstract

Background:Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is a minimally invasive alternative technique for mediastinal staging of non-small cell lung cancer. A metaanalysis was performed to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA for staging mediastinal lymph nodes (N2/N3 disease) in patients with lung cancer.

Methods:Relevant studies were identified using Medline (1966 to November 2005), CINAHL, and citation indexing. Included studies used histology or adequate clinical follow-up (> 6 months) as the “gold standard,” and provided sufficient data for calculating sensitivity and specificity. Summary receiver operating characteristic curves metaanalysis was performed to estimate the pooled sensitivity and specificity.

Results:In 18 eligible studies, EUS-FNA identified 83% of patients (95% confidence interval [CI], 78 to 87%) with positive mediastinal lymph nodes (pooled sensitivity) and 97% of patients (95% CI, 96 to 98%) with negative mediastinal lymph nodes (pooled specificity). In eight studies that were limited to patients who had abnormal mediastinal lymph nodes seen on CT scans, the sensitivity was 90% (95% CI, 84 to 94%) and the specificity was 97% (95% CI, 95 to 98%). In patients without abnormal mediastinal lymph nodes seen on CT scans (four studies), the pooled sensitivity was 58% (95% CI, 39 to 75%). Minor complications were reported in 10 cases (0.8%). There were no major complications.

Conclusions:EUS-FNA is a safe modality for the invasive staging of lung cancer that is highly sensitive when used to confirm metastasis to mediastinal lymph nodes seen on CT scans. In addition, among lung cancer patients with normal mediastinal adenopathy seen on CT scans, despite lower sensitivity, it has the potential to prevent unnecessary surgery in a large proportion of cases missed by CT scanning.

Section snippets

Study Selection and Data Abstraction

A literature search was performed using PubMed and CINAHL from January 1966 to November 2005. The following search terms were used: endoscopic ultrasound OR endosonography; and biopsy, fine-needle OR fine-needle aspiration. Titles and abstracts were reviewed by two independent investigators (CGM and DAP). Full articles of appropriate studies were retrieved for detailed evaluation. We included studies in any language that included the following; (1) used EUS-FNA in adult patients (> 18 years

Results

Combining the search terms resulted in a total of 101 articles (Fig 1). Seventy-seven articles were excluded after reviewing the title and abstract. Eight articles were excluded after reviewing the full article.7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14Two additional studies15, 16were identified from the references of articles obtained from this literature search and review articles.

A total of 18 studies15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32were included in the metaanalysis (

Discussion

In this metaanalysis, we found that EUS-FNA is an accurate method for the invasive staging of NSCLC. Its sensitivity is higher when used to confirm metastasis to lymph nodes in patients with suspected N2 or N3 disease seen on CT scans. Patients without enlarged mediastinal adenopathy seen on CT scans had a 35% prevalence of malignant mediastinal lymph nodes. The performance of EUS-FNA in this group is useful given the ability of this technique to sample nodes as small as 3 mm and to identify

References (38)

Cited by (305)

  • Bilan d'extension du cancer bronchique et classification TNM des CBNPC

    2023, Revue des Maladies Respiratoires Actualites
View all citing articles on Scopus

The authors have reported to the ACCP that no significant conflicts of interest exist with any companies/organizations whose products or services may be discussed in this article.

Reproduction of this article is prohibited without written permission from the American College of Chest Physicians (www.chestjournal.org/misc/reprints.shtml).

View full text