Elsevier

Mayo Clinic Proceedings

Volume 87, Issue 9, September 2012, Pages 825-834
Mayo Clinic Proceedings

Original article
Bloodstream Infections in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Treated With Intravenous Prostanoids: Insights From the REVEAL REGISTRY®

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2012.05.014Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the rate of and potential risk factors for bloodstream infections (BSIs) using data from the REVEAL (Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-term Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension [PAH] Disease Management) REGISTRY®, which provides current information about patients with PAH.

Patients and Methods

Patients were enrolled from March 30, 2006, through December 8, 2009, and data on reported BSIs were collected through the third quarter of 2010. Bloodstream infection rates were calculated per 1000 patient-days of risk.

Results

Of 3518 patients enrolled, 1146 patients received intravenous (IV) prostanoid therapy for more than 1 day (no BSI, n=1023; ≥1 BSI, n=123; total BSI episodes, n=166). Bloodstream infections rates were significantly increased in patients receiving IV treprostinil vs IV epoprostenol (0.36 vs 0.12 per 1000 treatment days; P<.001), primarily due to gram-negative organisms (0.20 vs 0.03 per 1000 treatment days; P<.001). Multivariate analysis adjusting for age, causes of PAH, and year of BSI found that treatment with IV treprostinil was associated with a 3.08-fold increase (95% confidence interval, 2.05-4.62; P<.001) in BSIs of any type and a 6.86-fold increase (95% confidence interval, 3.60-13.07; P<.001) in gram-negative BSIs compared with treatment with IV epoprostenol.

Conclusion

Compared with IV epoprostenol therapy, treatment with IV treprostinil is associated with a significantly higher rate of gram-negative BSIs; observed differences in BSI rate did not seem to be due to any other analyzed factors.

Trial Registration

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00370214

Section snippets

Study Design

REVEAL is a 55-center, observational, US-based, longitudinal registry designed to provide current information on the demographic characteristics, course, and management of patients with PAH confirmed via RHC.12, 13 Between March 30, 2006, and December 8, 2009, 3518 consecutive patients with PAH meeting enrollment criteria were enrolled in REVEAL. All patients were followed up for at least 5 years from enrollment. The enrollment date was the date of obtaining informed consent, and time of

Enrollment Characteristics

Of the 1146 patients who had 1 or more patient-days at risk and were included in the analysis, 1023 did not have a BSI, and 123 patients had 1 or more BSIs during follow-up (Figure 1). Ninety-four of 123 patients with a BSI (76.4%) had only 1 BSI after enrollment in REVEAL, and 29 of 123 patients (23.6%) had 2 or more BSIs during follow-up. In total, 166 BSI episodes were reported. Coinfections with both gram-negative and gram-positive organisms were reported in 6 patients; these patients were

Discussion

In the present study, the overall BSI rate was 3.08-fold higher in patients with PAH receiving IV treprostinil compared with those receiving IV epoprostenol. The rates of gram-positive and gram-negative BSIs were also higher in patients receiving IV treprostinil when compared with IV epoprostenol (1.84-fold and 6.86-fold, respectively).

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention conducted a retrospective pooled data analysis from 2003 to 2006 of patients with PAH treated with either IV

Conclusion

Overall BSI rates have decreased from previous reports. However, the present data suggest that the risk of a gram-negative BSI is greater with IV treprostinil therapy than with IV epoprostenol therapy. In addition, the data suggest that initial antibiotic therapy in a patient receiving IV treprostinil suspected of having a BSI should be initiated with a broad-spectrum antibiotic(s) with coverage for both gram-negative and gram-positive organisms, at least until speciation and sensitivities of

Acknowledgments

Manuscript preparation and editing support were provided by Mary Hines, BSc (Hons), Scarlett Geunes-Boyer, PhD, Latoya M. Mitchell, PhD, and Jennifer M. Kulak, PhD, of in Science Communications, Springer Healthcare. SAS programming support was provided by Ginny Lai, MPH, of ICON Late Phase & Outcomes Research.

Ms Kitterman thanks Dr Lynette Brown for her guidance and support of this project.

Participating Investigators: We thank the Principal Investigators and their Study Coordinators for their

References (18)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (51)

  • Complications associated with peripherally inserted central catheters and Hickman™ in patients with advanced pulmonary hypertension treated with intravenous prostanoids

    2021, Respiratory Medicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    However, its short half-life makes necessary a continuous intravenous infusion through a central venous catheter connected to a perfusion pump. Complications associated with the infusion system are frequent, increasing the morbidity and mortality in this group of patients [5,6]. Choosing the right catheter depends on a wide range of elements, such as the treatment duration and the individual center's experience [7,8].

  • Infections and systemic sclerosis: an emerging challenge

    2020, Revista Colombiana de Reumatologia
  • Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Palliative Medicine Review of the Disease, Its Therapies, and Drug Interactions

    2020, Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
    Citation Excerpt :

    Epoprostenol is supplied as a sterile powder, must be reconstituted in diluent every one or two days by the patient, and loaded into the pump, all while maintaining sterility. Severe adverse effects are associated with the drug delivery system, including thrombosis, infection, pump malfunction, and interruption of the infusion.57,58 Treprostinil is an analogue of epoprostenol with the advantage of a longer half-life of 4.5 hours, allowing subcutaneous or intravenous administration.

  • Long-term safety and outcome of intravenous treprostinil via an implanted pump in pulmonary hypertension

    2018, Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
    Citation Excerpt :

    In all comparisons, p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Rates of SAEs and complications related to the pump, catheter, pump pocket, and infection were calculated by dividing the number of events by the total number of exposure days and expressed per 1,000 treatment-days.19 In a sub-set of patients with hemodynamic data collected ≤ 3 months before pump implantation, Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to identify predictors of transplant-free survival.

View all citing articles on Scopus

Grant Support: This work and the REVEAL REGISTRY® were supported by Actelion Pharmaceutical US, Inc.

Potential Competing Interests: Ms Kitterman has served on the advisory boards of Actelion, United Therapeutics, and Gilead; has participated in the Simply Speaking PAH program through Rush University; and has received honoraria for speaker's bureau participation from Actelion, Gilead, and United Therapeutics.

Ms Poms serves as a consultant for clinical research studies and advisory boards for Actelion, Gilead, United Therapeutics, and GlaxoSmithKline; has received honoraria for speaker's bureau participation from Actelion, Gilead, and United Therapeutics; and has received grants from United Therapeutics and GlaxoSmithKline.

Mr Miller is employed by ICON Late Phase & Outcomes Research, a company that receives support from Actelion and other pharmaceutical companies.

Ms Lombardi has served on the advisory boards of Actelion, United Therapeutics, and Gilead, and has received honoraria for speaker's bureau participation from Actelion, United Therapeutics, and Gilead.

Dr Farber serves as a consultant for Actelion, Gilead, Novartis, Bayer, and United Therapeutics; is on the speaker's bureau for Actelion and Gilead; has received a research grant from United Therapeutics; and has received honoraria for his service on the REVEAL Steering Committee, which is supported by Actelion.

Dr Barst serves as a consultant for and has received honoraria from Actelion, Bayer, Corridor Pharmaceuticals, Eli Lilly & Company, GlaxoSmithKline, Gilead, Ikaria, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, and VentriPoint; has provided expert testimony on diet pill litigation for the plaintiffs; has received grants from Actelion, Eli Lilly, Gilead, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (National Institutes of Health), Novartis, Pfizer, and United Therapeutics; and has received honoraria for her service on the REVEAL Steering Committee, which is supported by Actelion.

View full text