Original Article
Prediction of asthma in young adults using childhood characteristics: Development of a prediction rule

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.02.011Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

To develop an easily applicable prediction rule for asthma in young adulthood using childhood characteristics.

Methods

A total of 1,055 out of 1,328 members of a Dutch birth cohort were followed from 2 to 21 years of age. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate the predictive value of childhood characteristics on asthma at 21 years of age. A prognostic function was developed, and the area under the receiving operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to estimate the predictive ability of the prognostic models.

Results

Of the 693 responding subjects, 86 (12%) were diagnosed with asthma. Independent prognostic factors at ages 2 and 4 years were female gender (odds ratios (OR) 1.9 and 2.1; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.2–3.2 and 1.3–2.5), smoking mother (OR 1.6 and 1.6; CI 1.0–2.7 and 1.0–2.6), lower respiratory tract illness (OR 1.9 and 2.4; CI 1.0–3.6 and 1.4–4.0), and atopic parents (OR 2.1 and 1.9; CI 1.3–3.4 and 1.2–3.1). The predictive power of both models was poor; area under ROC curve was 0.66 and 0.68, respectively.

Conclusion

Asthma in young adulthood could not be predicted satisfactorily based on childhood characteristics. Nevertheless, we propose that this method is further tested as a tool to predict development of asthma.

Introduction

Asthma is an increasing health problem in Western societies [1]. Its pressure on health care facilities and budget is considerable. It is a challenge for primary health care to find ways to prevent and treat asthma, particularly in high-risk patients, who will benefit most from interventions. Early treatment of asthmatic symptoms might for instance prevent airway remodeling [2]. Adequate risk assessment, preferably by using easily obtainable information, is however, still difficult to achieve. Once it is possible to assess the individual risk of young children in the general population, both preventive and therapeutic intervention strategies as well as proper prognostic information to parents can be targeted at this group.

Prediction models, which estimate the probability of occurrence of a relevant outcome as a combined function of the levels of various predictors, are a helpful tool in the assessment of individual prognosis [3], [4]. Such clinical prediction models would be useful to distinguish individual children at high risk of developing asthma during adulthood from those at low risk.

So far, previous studies on this topic have focused on single childhood risk factors associated with persistence or recurrence of asthma in adulthood, such as severe asthma in childhood, other atopic disease, parental asthma, female gender, active cigarette smoking, positive skin prick test, decreased lung function, and bronchial hyperresponsiveness [5], [6], [7], [8]. Although these studies show that the presence of such factors will increase the relative risk for developing asthma in adulthood, they do not enable us to quantify an absolute risk score for an individual subject. Only very few studies attempted to provide an individual risk assessment of asthma or persistence of wheezing in childhood [9], [10].

So far, only Toelle et al. [11] have reported on a risk score to assess individual prognoses in adulthood based on data from the Belmont cohort study. The authors described a diagnostic algorithm of independent likelihood ratios. However, they did not develop a clinical prediction rule. The aim of the present study is to define prognostic factors and to develop an easily applicable prediction model that can be used in a primary health care setting to identify children at risk for asthma in young adulthood.

Section snippets

Study population and follow-up

All children born in the city of Nijmegen between September 1982 and September 1983, were invited to participate in a study on otitis media at their second birthday (N = 1,439). Of this birth cohort, subjects have been followed up prospectively from 2 to 4 years (N = 1,328) [12], [13].

At age 2 years a thorough history was taken of both upper respiratory tract infections (URTI) and lower respiratory tract illness (LRTI) during the first 2 years of life. Baseline parameters such as duration of

Results

At the age of 21 years, addresses of 1,055 subjects (79%) of the 1,328 original cohort members could be traced; 693 (66%) of these 1,055 subjects returned the questionnaire.

The 693 study members evaluated at age 21 years and the original cohort of 1,328 members did not differ significantly regarding gender distribution, history of breast feeding, family size, day care attendance, parental smoking habits, maternal educational level, recurrent URTI, LRTI, and antibiotic treatment at age 2 years (

Discussion

Independent predictors of asthma in young adulthood in children aged 2 to 4 years were female gender, smoking mother, LRTI, and parental atopic disease. The performance of a prognostic model including these parameters in terms of the occurrence of asthma in young adulthood was poor. It was not possible to find a cut-off point in the risk score that classified the children satisfactorily. In both models too many children were misclassified for each arbitrary threshold to be of any clinical use.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Sonja van Oosterhout and Miriam Olling for secretarial work and Eline van Hattum for developing the database.

References (23)

  • A. Laupacis et al.

    Clinical prediction rules: a review and suggested modifications of methodological standards

    JAMA

    (1997)
  • Cited by (33)

    • Asthma transition from childhood into adulthood

      2017, The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Many studies have followed up patients who have matured from the care of their paediatrician and the transition into adulthood either in a clinical35–37 or population-based setting. These population-based studies that cross the gap between childhood and adulthood address: persistence,3,20,24,34,38–63 remission,20,34,38–50,54–57 relapse,20,34,38,39,51–57,64 and new-onset of symptoms in adulthood (table).20,54–57,65–70 In contrast to paediatrics, adult asthma care has a definitive absence of longitudinal studies that start tracking the course of the disease at early adulthood and follow patients up for an adequate length of time.

    • A simple asthma prediction tool for preschool children with wheeze or cough

      2014, Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
      Citation Excerpt :

      It showed good internal validity and is distinguished by ease of use in primary care and epidemiologic studies. Several prediction models have been proposed for estimating the risk of persistent asthma in preschool children.8-16 Table III8,9,13,36 summarizes inclusion criteria, outcome, methods used to derive the tool, predictors, and performance for 3 tools that used a similar prediction interval as ours and had a sample size of greater than 300.

    • Predicting asthma in preschool children with asthma-like symptoms: Validating and updating the PIAMA risk score

      2013, Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
      Citation Excerpt :

      For example, when follow-up actions are invasive or costly, false-positive results should be kept as low as possible. Compared with the predictive performance of previously reported models to predict asthma at age 6 to 7 years,1,3-9 the predictive probability of the updated PIAMA risk score at a cutoff point of 8 showed a high sensitivity (64% vs 9% to 57%1) but a low PPV (12% vs 24% to 75%1). Compared with the LR+ range of previously reported models to predict asthma at age 6 to 7 years (LR+ range, 1-121), the LR+ range of the updated PIAMA risk score was similar (1-10, depending on the selected cutoff).

    • The evolution of the wheezy allergic infant

      2010, Revue Francaise d'Allergologie
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text