Doppler evaluation of bioprosthetic and mechanical aortic valves: Data from four models in 107 stable, ambulatory patients
Reference (23)
- et al.
Subcostal window: a new portal for the recording of continuous wave Doppler aortic flow velocities
Am J Cardiol
(1985) - et al.
Reproducibility of stand-alone continuous wave Doppler recordings of aortic flow velocity across bioprosthetic valves
Am J Cardiol
(1985) - et al.
Systematic correlation of continuous-wave Doppler and hemodynamic measurements in patients with aortic stenosis
Am Heart J
(1986) - et al.
Correlation of continous wave Doppler velocities with cardiac catheterization gradients: an experimental model of aortic stenosis
J Am Coll Cardiol
(1985) - et al.
Doppler hemodynamic evaluation of prosthetic (Starr-Edwards and Bjo¨rk-Shiley) and bioprosthetic (Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards) cardiac valves
Am J Cardiol
(1985) - et al.
Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of Hancock and Bjo¨rk-Shiley prosthetic valves
J Am Coll Cardiol
(1986) - et al.
Normal and abnormal prosthetic valve function as assessed by Doppler echocardiography
J Am Coll Cardiol
(1986) - et al.
Degeneration in porcine bioprosthetic cardiac valves: incidence of primary tissue failures among 938 bioprostheses at risk
Am J Cardiol
(1984) - et al.
Flow characteristics of four commonly used mechanical valves
Am J Cardiol
(1986) - et al.
Pulsed Doppler regurgitant flow patterns of normal valves
Am J Cardiol
(1986)
Regurgitation of normal Bjo¨rk-Shiley prosthetic valves in the aortic position
Am J Cardiol
(1985)
Cited by (38)
Normal Values for Doppler Echocardiographic Assessment of Heart Valve Prostheses
2003, Journal of the American Society of EchocardiographyMP3 compression of Doppler ultrasound signals
2003, Ultrasound in Medicine and BiologyDoppler hemodynamics of 51 clinically and echocardiographically normal pulmonary valve prostheses
2001, Mayo Clinic ProceedingsCitation Excerpt :However, comparisons of the findings in these studies are flawed because of differences in right ventricular function and follow-up imaging intervals. Several previous studies on aortic prostheses reported an inverse correlation between valve size and flow velocities.5,6,8–10 In contrast, we found no significant inverse correlation when comparing increasing PVP size to peak velocities.
Doppler echocardiographic assessment of prosthetic aortic valve area: Estimation with the continuity equation compared to the Gorlin formula
1996, International Journal of CardiologyThe Omnicarbon tilting-disc heart valve prosthesis: A clinical and Doppler echocardiographic follow-up
1993, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Supported in part by Veterans Administration Medical Research Funds and by an Investigative Group Award from the American Heart Association, Greater Los Angeles Affiliate, Los Angeles, California.
Copyright © 1988 Published by Mosby, Inc.