Table 6. Quantitative analyses of included clinical trials: health-related quality of life data#
NEJ002 [12, 23, 30]IPASS [8, 14, 31]OPTIMAL [10, 32]LUX-Lung 3 [15, 33]LUX-Lung 6 [16, 26]
QuestionnaireCare notebookFACT-L (incl. LCS/TOI)FACT-L (incl. LCS/TOI)EORTC-QLQ C30 and LC13EORTC-QLQ C30 and LC13
Assessment until disease progressionBaseline, weeklyBaseline, weeks 1 and 3 Every 3 weeks until week 18, then every 6 weeksBaseline, every 6 weeksBaseline, every 3 weeksBaseline, every 3 weeks
Compliance with completing questionnaires+Gefitinib: 63% chemotherapy: 69% (at least two time-points)Gefitinib: 95% chemotherapy: 90% (time-point NR)Erlotinib: 96%/91% cycle 2/cycle 6 chemotherapy: 100%/50% cycle 2/cycle 6Afatinib: 97%/98% cycle 2/cycle 6 chemotherapy: 97%/83% cycle 2/cycle 6Afatinib: 96%/85% cycle 2/cycle 6 chemotherapy: 98%/90% cycle 2/cycle 6
Significant and clinically relevant# symptom improvement¶,§Loss of appetite (p = 0.014) Constipation (p<0.0001) Pain and shortness of breath (p<0.0001)Maintaining at least 21 days FACT-L (70% versus 45%), TOI (70% versus 38%), LCS (76% versus 54%)FACT-L, TOI, LCSDyspnoea (64% versus 50%) Pain (59% versus 48%; only significant for individual pain items)Cough (76% versus 55%) Dyspnoea (71% versus 48%) Pain (64% versus 47%) Global health status (63% versus 33%) Physical (54% versus 29%) Role (50% versus 35%) Social (55% versus 35%)
Significant and clinically relevant differences in time to worsening/deteriorationPain and shortness of breath (0.2 versus 2.1 months) Daily functioning (0.4 versus 3.0 months)FACT-L (15.6 versus 3.0 months) TOI (16.6 versus 2.9 months) LCS (11.3 versus 2.9 months)NACough (NE versus 8.0 months) Dyspnoea (10.3 versus 2.9 months)Cough (NE versus 10.3 months) Dyspnoea (7.7 versus 1.7 months) Pain (6.4 versus 3.4 months)
Significant and clinically relevant changes in longitudinal analysesNANANACough DyspnoeaCough Dyspnoea Pain
  • NEJ002: North East Japan 002; IPASS: First Line IRESSA versus Carboplatin/Paclitaxel in Asia; FACT-L: Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Lung; LCS: lung cancer subscale; TOI: trial outcome index; EORTC-QLQ C30: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30; LC13: lung cancer-specific module; NR: not reported; NA: not available; NE: not evaluable. #: different definitions of “clinically meaningful” were used in the different evaluations; : to date, no quality of life data have been published from the ENSURE trial; +: baseline, cycle 6; §: data are presented as % patients, tyrosine kinase inhibitor versus chemotherapy.