ERR open access journal advertisement
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY REVIEW, 2005;14: 83. doi:10.1183/09059180.05.00009600
© 2005 the European Respiratory Society

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bateman, E. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bateman, E. D.

INTRODUCTION

E. D. Bateman

CORRESPONDENCE: cE. D. Bateman, UCT Lung Institute, PO Box 34560, 7937 Groote Schuur, Cape Town, South Africa. Fax: 27 214066902. E-mail: ebateman{at}uctgsh1.uct.ac.za

In the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), achieving sustained bronchodilation through the regular use of long-acting bronchodilators is currently the best treatment option for symptomatic patients. Delivery of these drugs via inhalation therefore needs to be adequate and reliable to maximise the benefits of such treatment. However, current treatment guidelines contain little advice on the key elements of inhalation therapy; namely, delivery devices and their performance in COPD, approaching inhaler selection, methods for improving compliance and the impact of patient preference on drug delivery and treatment outcomes.

To explore this topic in more detail, a Round Table meeting, sponsored by Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH, was held in Zürich, Switzerland, on 3–4 June 2005. The papers in this Review arise from the proceedings of that meeting. Our purpose was to consider the subject of inhaler use and selection in COPD, and how compliance and treatment outcomes might be improved by taking patient preference into account. Our discussion was broken down into the following categories: patient needs and medication styles [1]; communication between patient and doctor [2]; adherence to therapy [3]; advantages and disadvantages of the main types of inhaler devices and how they affect technique [4]; assessment of device preference and satisfaction [5]; and the role of the caregiver in choosing the inhaler device [6]. A summary of the points from each paper is provided below.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Osman LM, Hyland ME. Patient needs and medication styles in COPD. Eur Respir Rev 2005; 14: 89–92.
  2. Booker R. Effective communication with the patient. Eur Respir Rev 2005; 14: 93–96.
  3. Rand CS. Patient adherence with COPD therapy. Eur Respir Rev 2005; 14: 97–101.
  4. Newman SP. Inhaler treatment options in COPD. Eur Respir Rev 2005; 14: 102–108.
  5. Anderson P. Patient preference for and satisfaction with inhaler devices. Eur Respir Rev 2005; 14: 109–116.
  6. Chapman KR, Voshaar TH, Virchow JC. Inhaler choice in primary practice. Eur Respir Rev 2005; 14: 117–122.




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bateman, E. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bateman, E. D.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS