ERR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY REVIEW, 2008;17: 93-95. doi:10.1183/09059180.00010813
© 2008 the European Respiratory Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrow Request Permissions
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vanaudenaerde, B.
Right arrow Articles by Verleden, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Vanaudenaerde, B.
Right arrow Articles by Verleden, G.

The Leuven experience with a dichotomy in Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome (BOS) after lung transplantation revealed by azithromycin

Bart Vanaudenaerde*, Robin Vos*, Nele Geudens#, Dirk Van Raemdonck#, Lieven Dupont* and Geert Verleden*

* Laboratory of Pneumology, KULeuven, Leuven, Belgium, # Laboratory of Experimental Thoracic Surgery, KULeuven, Leuven, Belgium

CORRESPONDENCE: Bart Vanaudenaerde, Laboratory of Pneumology and Lung Transplant Unit, Leuven, Belgium

BOS is the most important cause of late mortality after LTx. Until 5 years ago, the prevalence was around 30% and 50%, 3 and 5 years after LTx. Introduction of azithromycin (AZI) improved the FEV1 in 40% of BOS patients. AZI treatment may explain why in our center, the BOS prevalence at 3 years has decreased from 30% to 15% compared to the ISHLT registry. Opposed to the current belief about BOS, we hypothesize a dichotomy within BOS: Neutrophilic Reversible Allograft Dysfunction (NRAD) and fibropoliferative BOS (fBOS; table 1). This dichotomy is based on the discrepancy in AZI response and observations within our center consisting of clinical, biochemical and cellular (BAL) analysis.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 1— A hyphothesised dichotomy

 
NRAD makes a re-evaluation of the BOS definition (irreversible FEV1 decline, neutrophilic inflammation, fibroproliferation) indispensable. As it is reversible, NRAD should be excluded from BOS and accepted as innate (non-specific) inflammation and as an important risk factor for the development of BOS. So after exclusion of other complications such as acute rejection, infection, gastro-oesophageal reflux and after a trial with AZI, BOS will remain what it is now (the fBOS). This implements a re-evaluation of the neutrophilic inflammation, as it is a prerequisite for AZI responsiveness. BOS can then histologically be characterized as pure inactive OB, which is hardly responsive to any treatment.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the European Respiratory Society.